Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T09:41:46.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

F. FERDOUS
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) Department of Clinical Trial and Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
S. AHMED
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
F. D. FARZANA
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
J. DAS
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
M. A. MALEK
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
S. K. DAS*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
M. A. SALAM
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
A. S. G. FARUQUE
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
*
* Author for correspondence: Dr S. K. Das, Assistant Scientist, Centre for Nutrition and Food Security (CNFS), icddr,b, 68 Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh. (Email: sumon@icddrb.org)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objective of our analysis was to describe the aetiology, clinical features, and socio-demographic background of adults with diarrhoea attending different urban and rural diarrhoeal disease hospitals in Bangladesh. Between January 2010 and December 2011, a total of 5054 adult diarrhoeal patients aged ⩾20 years were enrolled into the Diarrhoeal Disease Surveillance Systems at four different hospitals (two rural and two urban) of Bangladesh. Middle-aged [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·23–0·35, P < 0·001] and elderly (aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·11–0·20, P < 0·001) patients were more likely to present to rural diarrhoeal disease facilities than urban ones. Vibrio cholerae was the most commonly isolated pathogen (16%) of the four pathogens tested followed by rotavirus (5%), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (4%), and Shigella (4%). Of these pathogens, V. cholerae (19% vs. 11%, P < 0·001), ETEC (9% vs. 4%, P < 0·001), and rotavirus (5% vs. 3%, P = 0·013) were more commonly detected from patients presenting to urban hospitals than rural hospitals, but Shigella was more frequently isolated from patients presenting to rural hospitals than urban hospitals (7% vs. 2%, P < 0·001). The isolation rate of Shigella was higher in the elderly than in younger adults (8% vs. 3%, P < 0·001). Some or severe dehydration was higher in urban adults than rural adults (P < 0·001). Our findings indicate that despite economic and other progress made, conditions facilitating transmission of V. cholerae and Shigella prevail in adults with diarrhoea in Bangladesh and further efforts are needed to control these infections.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sampling frame.

Figure 1

Table 1. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of young adults, adults and elderly patients in urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

Figure 2

Table 2. Isolation of pathogens in adult diarrhoeal patients in urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

Figure 3

Table 3. Characteristics of patients between urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

Figure 4

Table 4. Susceptibility pattern of Shigella and Vibrio cholerae isolated in different healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011 (aged ⩾20 years)