Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T22:10:54.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 2024 U.S. Elections: Global Health Policy at a Crossroads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2024

Benjamin Mason Meier Open the ORCID record for Benjamin Mason Meier [Opens in a new window] ,
Aunchalee E.L. Palmquist ,
Meredith Dockery ,
Neha Saggi ,
Kiara Ekeigwe ,
Isabela Latorre  and
Gavin Yamey
Benjamin Mason Meier
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
Aunchalee E.L. Palmquist
Affiliation:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA.
Meredith Dockery
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
Neha Saggi
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
Kiara Ekeigwe
Affiliation:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA.
Isabela Latorre
Affiliation:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA.
Gavin Yamey
Affiliation:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2024 U.S. election will shape the future of global health policy, with crucial implications for continuing U.S. leadership in global health. The United States has long played a critical role in global health governance, through multilateral institutions under the United Nations (UN) and bilateral assistance to advance U.S. priorities. However, political shifts have challenged U.S. engagement in global health, with the politicization of global health policy threatening global governance under the World Health Organization (WHO) and dividing global health support across political parties. This political polarization in global health proved catastrophic in the COVID-19 pandemic response and influential in the 2020 Presidential Elections. With the United States again seeking to advance global health policy, the 2024 Elections present a clear contrast in global health visions across U.S. political parties – with sweeping impacts on global governance, health funding, sexual and reproductive health, corporate regulations, tax equity, humanitarian challenges, and climate change. The future of U.S. leadership in global health hangs in the balance of this election, raising an imperative for candidates to highlight their global health positions and for voters to consider the global health implications.

Keywords

United StatesGlobal Health PolicyUnited Nations (UN)World Health Organization (WHO)Elections

Information

Type
Columns: Global Health Law
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 52 , Issue 2: Defining Health Law for the Future: A Tribute to Professor Charity Scott , Summer 2024 , pp. 498 - 505
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

About This Column

Lawrence O. Gostin and Benjamin Mason Meier serve as the section editors for Global Health Law. Professor Gostin is University Professor at Georgetown University and the Founding Linda D. & Timothy J. O’Neill Professor of Global Health Law at Georgetown University Law Center and Director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. Professor Meier is a Professor of Global Health Policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Senior Scholar at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. This column features timely analyses and perspectives on law, policy, and justice in global health.

References

Cueto, M., The Value of Health: A History of the Pan American Health Organization (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hilleboe, H.E., “What WHO Means to Us,” Public Health Reports 70, no. 11 (1955):1069–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quimby, F., The Politics of Global Health: Prepared for the Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Developments of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov’t Printing Office; 1971).Google Scholar
Jacobson, H.K., “WHO: Medicine, Regionalism, and Managed Politics,” in: Cox, R., Jacobson, H., eds., The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974): 172–215.; H. Morefield, “Visions of the Future,” in Developing to Scale: Technology and the Making of Global Health (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Allen, C.E., “World Health and World Politics,” International Organization 4, no. 1 (1950): 27–43: 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osakwe, C., Participation of the Soviet Union in Universal International Organizations: A Political and Legal Analysis of Soviet Strategies and Aspirations inside ILO, UNESCO and WHO (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1972): 115.Google Scholar
Kickbusch, I., “Influence and Opportunity: Reflections on the US Role in Global Public Health,” Health Affairs 21, no. 6 (2002): 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nossal, G., “The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization — A Millennial Challenge,” Nature Immunology 1 (2000): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fidler, D.P., “Constitutional Outlines of Public Health’s ‘New World Order’,” Temple Law Review 77 (2005): 247–290.Google Scholar
Brown, T.M., Cueto, M., and Fee, E., “The World Health Organization and the Transition from “International” to “Global” Public Health,” American Journal of Public Health 96, no. 1 (2006): 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, T.J., “How U.S. Decision-Makers Assessed their Control of Multilateral Organizations, 1957–1982.” Review of International Organization, 4 (2009): 269–291; H.V. Milner and D. Tingley, “The Choice for Multilateralism: Foreign Aid and American Foreign Policy,” Review of International Organizations 8, no. 3 (2013): 313-341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Global Health and the Future of the United States, Global Health and the Future Role of the United States (Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2017).Google Scholar
Russell, P.F., “International Preventive Medicine,” Scientific Monthly (1950): 393–400, at 397.Google Scholar
van Zile Hyde, H., “International health: Bilateral international health programs of the United States,” American Journal of Public Health 41, no. 12 (1951):1473–1476, at 1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorp, W.L., “New International Programs in Public Health,” American Journal of Public Health,” 40, no. 12 (1950):1479-1485: 1479.Google ScholarPubMed
Bristol, N., “USAID Outlines Initial Reform Plans,” Lancet 375, no. 9728 (2010):1767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. Morefield, H., “More with Less: Commerce, Technology, and International Health at USAID, 1961-1981,” Diplomatic History 43, no. 4 (2019): 618–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, P., New Directions in International Health Cooperation: A Report to the President (Washington: U.S. Gov’t Printing Office; 1978).Google Scholar
Mingst, K.A., “The United States and the World Health Organization,” in Karns, M.P and Mingst, K.A., eds., The United States and Multilateral Institutions: Patterns of Changing Instrumentality and Influence (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990): 205–230.Google Scholar
Starrels, J.M., The World Health Organization: Resisting Third World Ideological Pressures (Washington: Heritage Foundation, 1985).Google Scholar
Vaughan, J.P., Mogedal, S., Kruse, S., Lee, K., Walt, G., and de Wilde, K., “Financing the World Health Organization: Global Importance of Extrabudgetary Funds,” Health Policy, 35, no. 3 (1996):229–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walt, G., “WHO Under Stress: Implications for Health Policy,” Health Policy 24, no. 2 (1993):125–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cueto, M., Brown, T., and Fee, E., The World Health Organization: A History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019): 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Assessed Contributions, available at <https://www.who.int/about/funding/assessed-contributions#:~:text=Assessed%20contributions%20(AC)%20are%20the,is%20adjusted%20for%20WHO’s%20membership> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar
See Cueto, Brown, and Fee, supra note 25.Google Scholar
Richert, L., “Reagan, Regulation, and the FDA: The US Food and Drug Administration’s Response to HIV/AIDS, 1980-90,” Canadian Journal of History 44, no. 3 (2009): 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The White House Office of Policy Development. “US Policy Statement for the International Conference on Population,” Population and Development Review 10, no. 3 (1984): 574–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, S., Desai, S., Ferguson, L., Stöckl, H., and Heidari, S., “Not Without a Fight: Standing Up against the Global Gag Rule,” Reproductive Health Matters 25 (2017): 14–16. Ironically, the Global Gag Rule has been associated with an increase in abortions. N. Brooks, E. Bendavid, and G. Miller, “USA Aid Policy and Induced Abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Analysis of the Mexico City Policy,” Lancet Global Health 7, no. 8 (2019): 1046-1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Board on International Health, Institute of Medicine, America’s Vital Interest in Global Health: Protecting Our People, Enhancing our Economy, and Advancing our International Interests (Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Fidler, D.P., International Law and Infectious Diseases (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchesky, R.P., Global Prescriptions: Gendering Health and Human Rights (London: Zed Books, 2003).Google Scholar
Khan, A.S., “Public Health Preparedness and Response in the USA since 9/11: A National Health Security Imperative,” Lancet 378, no. 9794 (2011): 1460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brower, J. and Chalk, P., The Global Threat of New and Reemerging Infectious Disease: Reconciling U.S. National Security and Public Health Policy (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003).Google Scholar
Sekalala, S., Williams, C.R., Meier, B.M., “Global Health Governance through the UN Security Council: Health Security vs. Human Rights?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 76, no. 1 (2022): 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, E.J., “PEPFAR and Maximizing the Effects of Global Health Assistance,” JAMA 307, no. 19 (2012): 2097–2100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchal, B., Cavalli, A., Kegels, G., “Global Health Actors Claim to Support Health System Strengthening — Is This Reality or Rhetoric?” PLoS Medicine 6, no. 4 (2009): e1000059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gostin, L.O., “President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief: Health Development at the Crossroads,” JAMA 300, no. 17 (2008): 2046–2048.Google ScholarPubMed
Garrett, L.A., The Future of Foreign Assistance amid Global Economic and Financial Crisis: Advancing Global Health in the U.S. Development Agenda (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Morison, J.S., Global Health Policy in the Second Obama Term (Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, B.M., “Global Health Takes a Normative Turn: The Expanding Purview of International Health Law and Global Health Policy to Meet the Public Health Challenges of the 21st Century,” Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 1 (2011): 69–108.Google Scholar
Kolker, J., “HHS and Global Health in the Second Obama Administration,” Global Health Policy Center, Center for Strategic and International Studies (2017): 3–5.Google Scholar
Katz, R., Sorrell, E., Kornblet, S.A., and Fischer, J.E., “Global Health Security Agenda and the International Health Regulations: Moving Forward,” Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 12, no. 5 (2014): 231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, J.A. and Karim, S.S. Abdool, “Trump’s “Global Gag Rule”: Implications for Human Rights and Global Health,” Lancet Global Health 5, no. 4 (2017): 387–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyer, O., “US Stops Funding United Nations Population Fund,” BMJ 357 (2017).Google ScholarPubMed
Jotzo, F., Depledge, J., and Winkler, H., “US and International Climate Policy Under President Trump,” Climate Policy 18, no. 7 (2018): 813–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L.O., Constantin, A., and Meier, B.M., “Global Health and Human Rights in the Age of Populism” in Gostin, L.O. and Meier, B.M., eds., Foundations of Global Health & Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micah, A.E., Zlavog, B., Friedman, S., Reynolds, A., Chapin, A.L., Schneider, M.T. and Dieleman, J.L., “The U.S. Provided $13 Billion in Development Assistance for Health in 2016, Less per Person Than Many Peer Nations,” Health Affairs 36, no. 12 (2017).Google ScholarPubMed
Oberlander, J., “Polarization, Partisanship, and Health in the United States,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy Law 49, no. 3 (2024): 329–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B.M. et al., “Travel Restrictions and Variants of Concern: Global Health Laws Need to Reflect Evidence,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 100, no. 3 (2022): 178–178A.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, C.R., Kestenbaum, J. Getgen, and Meier, B.M., “Populist Nationalism Threatens Health and Human Rights in the COVID-19 Response,” American Journal of Public Health 110 (2020): 1766–68.Google ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D., McDade, K.K., Ogbuoji, O., Johnson, M., Dixit, S., and Yamey, G., “Incentivizing Wealthy Nations to Participate in the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility (COVAX): A Game Theory Perspective,” BMJ Global Health 5 (2020): 3627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L.O., Moon, S., and Meier, B.M., “Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19,” American Journal of Public Health 110, no. 11 (2020): 1615–1619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanne, J.H., “COVID-19: US Will Not Join WHO in Developing Vaccine,” BMJ 370 (2020); Lancet Commission on COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics Task Force Members, Operation Warp Speed: Implications for global vaccine security. 2021.Google ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, S., “US election 2020: Public Health,” Lancet, 396, no. 10256 (2020): 946–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, H., Stewart, M.C., and Ho, K., “Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election,” Social Science Quarterly 102, no. 5 (2021): 2194–2209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, A., “System Failure: America Needs a Global Health Policy for the Pandemic Age,” Foreign Affairs (2021).Google Scholar
Puyvallée, A.d.B. and Storeng, K.T., “COVAX, Vaccine Donations and the Politics of Global Vaccine Inequity,” Globalization and Health 18, no. 26 (2022).Google Scholar
“Global VAX: A New ‘Initiative for Global Vaccine Access’ to Accelerate U.S. Vaccine Delivery Assistance Around the World,” USAID (2022), available at <https://www.usaid.gov/coronavirus/fact-sheets/global-vax> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar
Morrison, J.S. and Simoneau, M., “The Worst is Over—Now What?” CSIS, 2023, available at <https://www.csis.org/analysis/worst-over-now-what> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar
Meier, B.M., Habibi, R., and Gostin, L.O., “A Global Health Law Trilogy: Transformational Reforms to Strengthen Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no. 3 (2022):625–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slipowitz, A. and Repucci, S., “The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule,” Freedom House. n.d., available at <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2022/global-expansion-authoritarian-rule> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar
Drain, P.K. et al., “Eliminating the Fogarty International Center Would Be Bad for the Health of Americans,” New England Journal of Medicine 377, no. 1 (2017): 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Oberlander, supra note 48.Google Scholar
Palley, M.L. and Palley, H.A., The Politics of Women’s Healthcare in the United States (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Collins, V.E. and Rothe, D.L., “A Legacy of Harm: Violence Against Women and the Trump Administration,” in Akande, A. ed., U.S. Democracy in Danger: Springer Studies on Populism, Identity Politics and Social Justice (Cham: Springer, 2023).Google Scholar
Zucman, G., “Taxing the Super-Rich: at the G20, Gabriel Zucman Advocates for International Standards for Tax Justice,” G20 Brazil 2024, (2024), available at <https://www.g20.org/en/news/taxing-the-super-rich-at-the-g20-gabriel-zucman-advocates-for-international-standards-for-tax-justice> (last visited July 4, 2024).Google Scholar
Agénor, P.-R., “Global Health Challenges and the World Economy: Assessing the Benefits of Fiscal Policy Cooperation,” FERDI Policy Brief, No. B253 (2023)Google Scholar
Kim, W., “Biden’s Plan to Tax the Rich, Explained,” Vox (2023), available at <https://www.vox.com/money/23634085/biden-2024-budget-billionaire-tax-capital-gains> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar
Gostin, L.O. and Goodwin, M.B., “Wars in Gaza and Beyond: Why Protecting the Sacredness of Health Matters,” JAMA 331, no. 3 (2024):191–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, N., et al., “Health and Climate Change: Policy Responses to Protect Public Health,” Lancet 386, no. 10006 (2015): 1861–1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tollefson, J., Gilbert, N., Kozlov, M., and Lenharo, M., “Trump versus Biden: What the Rematch Could Mean for Three Key Science Issues,” Nature (March 6, 2024), available at <https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00657-w> (last visited July 4, 2024).+(last+visited+July+4,+2024).>Google Scholar