Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T04:15:29.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced spillover transmission of Mycobacterium bovis to feral pigs (Sus scofa) following population control of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

G. NUGENT*
Affiliation:
Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln, New Zealand
J. WHITFORD
Affiliation:
Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln, New Zealand
I. J. YOCKNEY
Affiliation:
Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln, New Zealand
M. L. CROSS
Affiliation:
Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln, New Zealand
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr G. Nugent, Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. (Email: nugentg@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In New Zealand, bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is present in domestic cattle and deer herds primarily as the result of on-going disease transmission from the primary wildlife host, the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). However, bTB is also present in other introduced free-ranging mammalian species. Between 1996 and 2007, we conducted a series of studies to determine whether poison control of possum populations would have any effect on the prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in sympatric feral pigs (Sus scrofa). We compared trends in the prevalence of bTB infection in feral pigs in six study areas: possum numbers were reduced in three areas, but not in the other three, effectively providing a thrice-replicated before-after-control-intervention design. Before possum control, the overall prevalence of culture-confirmed M. bovis infection in feral pigs was 16·7–94·4%, depending on area. Infection prevalence varied little between genders but did vary with age, increasing during the first 2–3 years of life but then declining in older pigs. In the areas in which possum control was applied, M. bovis prevalence in feral pigs fell to near zero within 2–3 years, provided control was applied successfully at the whole-landscape scale. In contrast, prevalence changed much less or not at all in the areas with no possum control. We conclude that feral pigs in New Zealand acquire M. bovis infection mainly by inter-species transmission from possums, but then rarely pass the disease on to other pigs and are end hosts. This is in contrast to the purported role of pigs as bTB maintenance hosts in other countries, and we suggest the difference in host status may reflect differences in the relative importance of the oral route of infection in different environments. Despite harbouring M. bovis infection for a number of years, pigs in New Zealand do not sustain bTB independently, but are good sentinels for disease prevalence in possum populations.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. Prevalence of culture-confirmed M. bovis infection cases (%) and sample sizes (in parentheses) of pigs from six main areas, by year of survey. In addition, pigs were obtained in 2004 from an area immediately south of WG (WGS; 3·4% prevalence, n=29) and for the Lake McRae area immediately east of DC (2004/2005, 94·5% prevalence, n=56; 2006; 76·0% prevalence, n=25) and these additional 110 cases were included in the overall prevalence analysis. The shaded cells indicate the years in which possum control was applied within study areas

Figure 1

Fig. 1. bTB prevalence in pigs in relation to birth year. Simple trend lines are fitted to the observed prevalence for each cohort in each area, with each point treated equally regardless of the differences in sample size between cohorts. The last three cohorts in each sequence have age structures that are increasingly biased towards the young age groups [e.g. the 2004 cohort for panels (bd), and the 2005 cohort for panel (a) contain only the youngest (0–1 year) pigs]. Possum control was applied to areas in panels (ac) but not in areas in panels (df). The dark arrows indicate when possums within the area were controlled and the lighter arrows indicate when possum control was applied to adjacent areas.

Figure 2

Table 2. Statistical significance of fixed-effect terms in the minimum adequate generalized mixed-effects model of factors affecting the bTB infection status of feral pigs in the six main study areas. Only data from 2000 onwards were included, and relative year of birth represents the year of birth expressed in relation to the year in which full possum control was first achieved in those areas that received control, and in relation to the midpoint of the study for those area where possums were not controlled

Figure 3

Fig. 2. West–East gradient in the prevalence of bTB in pigs in the East Hauhungaroa region during the 2001–2005 period, for each age group, and for all pigs aged >1 year combined. Distances were measured from the kill site to the nearest point on the western boundary of the study area. The lines are based on the predicted values for each pig based on the binomial regression models. The simplest linear model (i.e. based on just two age groups: <1 year or ⩾1 year) was: bTB prevalence=−0·31×distance+1·47×age group−0·16.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Trends in age-specific prevalence in pigs from (a) all areas combined but excluding pigs collected after 2004/2005 possum control operations; and (b) from the three high prevalence areas on Molesworth Station (BH, DC, LM), again excluding post-possum control pigs.