Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T06:19:13.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Event-related potentials reveal anomalous morphosyntactic processing in developmental dyslexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2012

CHIARA CANTIANI ,
MARIA LUISA LORUSSO ,
PAOLO PEREGO ,
MASSIMO MOLTENI  and
MARIA TERESA GUASTI
CHIARA CANTIANI*
Affiliation:
University of Milan–Bicoccaand Scientific Institute E. Medea, Bosisio Parini
MARIA LUISA LORUSSO
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute E. Medea, Bosisio Parini
PAOLO PEREGO
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute E. Medea, Bosisio Parini
MASSIMO MOLTENI
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute E. Medea, Bosisio Parini
MARIA TERESA GUASTI
Affiliation:
University of Milan–Bicocca
*
Chiara Cantiani, Unit of Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology, Scientific Institute E. Medea, Via Don Luigi Monza 20, 23842, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy. E-mail: chiara.cantiani@bp.lnf.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the light of the literature describing oral language difficulties in developmental dyslexia (DD), event-related potentials were used in order to compare morphosyntactic processing in 16 adults with DD (aged 20–28 years) and unimpaired controls. Sentences including subject–verb agreement violations were presented auditorily, with grammaticality and subject number as main factors. Electrophysiological data revealed differences between groups concerning both the latency of the P600 component and the additional presence in the DD group of a negativity broadly diffused all over the scalp. Moreover, these electrophysiological anomalies increased when plural sentences were processed. On the whole, the results support the hypothesis of a linguistic deficit and of different language processing modalities in DD participants.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 1135 - 1162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Balconi, C., & Pozzoli, U. (2005). Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian: N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barshalom, E. G., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1993). A comparison of comprehension and production abilities of good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., & Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., & Leonard, L. B. (1997). Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 809–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breznitz, Z., & Leikin, M. (2000). Syntactic processing of Hebrew sentences in normal and dyslexic readers: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161, 359–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caprin, C., & Guasti, M. T. (2009). The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1979). Culture Free, Scale 2—Forma A e B. Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signature of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1995). Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola media inferiore. Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Di Matteo, R., Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Ciccarelli, L., et al. (2003). Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and Language, 85, 280–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., & Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 970–987.Google ScholarPubMed
Facoetti, A., Lorusso, M. L., Paganoni, P., Cattaneo, C., Galli, R., Umilta, C., et al. (2003). Auditory and visual automatic attention deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flax, J. F., Realpe-Bonilla, T., Hirsch, L. S., Brzustowicz, L. M., Bartlett, C. W., & Tallal, P. (2003). Specific language impairment in families: Evidence for co-occurrence with reading impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 530–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonteneau, E., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2008). Electrical brain responses in language-impaired children revealed grammar specific deficits. Public Library of Science ONE, 3, e1832.Google ScholarPubMed
Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (2006). Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition, 101, 173–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garraffa, M. (2009). Minimal structures in aphasia: A study on agreement and movement in a nonfluent aphasic speaker. Lingua, 119, 1444–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M., Dalalakis, J., Fukuda, S., & Fukuda, S. E. (1997). The biological basis of language: Familial language impairment. In Gopnik, M. (Ed.), The inheritance and innateness of grammars (pp. 111–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neural architecture of syntactic processing. In Hagoort, C. B. P. (Ed.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 273–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. (2003). Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 4340–4345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42, 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helenius, P., Salmelin, R., Service, E., & Connolly, J. F. (1999). Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helenius, P., Salmelin, R., Service, E., Connolly, J. F., Leinonen, S., & Lyytinen, H. (2002). Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in non-reading-impaired and dyslexic adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2936–2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Jakobson, R. (Ed.), Selected writings (Vol. 2, pp. 130–147). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judica, A., & De Luca, M. (2005). Prova di velocità di lettura di brani per la Scuola Media Superiore. Rome: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia.Google Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicoeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences—Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1982). The lateral distribution of event-related potentials during sentence processing. Neuropsychologia, 20, 579–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leikin, M. (2002). Processing syntactic functions of words in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liederman, J., Kantrowitz, L., & Flannery, K. (2005). Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth. Journal of Learning Disability, 38, 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 1077, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marconi, L., Ott, M., Pesenti, E., Ratti, D., & Tavella, M. (1993). Lessico Elementare. Dati statistici sull'italiano letto e scritto dai bambini delle elementari. Bologna, Italy: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
McArthur, G. M., Hogben, J. H., Edwards, V. T., Heath, S. M., & Mengler, E. D. (2000). On the “specifics” of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 869–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mody, M., Wehner, D. T., & Ahlfors, S. P. (2008). Auditory word perception in sentence context in reading-disabled children. NeuroReport, 19, 1567–1571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60, 154–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related brain potentials and language comprehension. In Rugg, M. D. & Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 171–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., Poliakov, A., Inoue, K., McLaughlin, J., Valentine, G., Pitkanen, I., et al. (2008). Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, M. (1987). The assessment of bilingual aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Brunswick, N., & Paganelli, F. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in normal and dyslexic reading: Behavioural and functional anatomical observations in adult readers of regular and irregular alphabetic orthographies. In Brunswick, N., McDougall, S. & Davies, P. d. M. (Eds.), Learning to read and spell in different orthographies (pp. 249–272). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., & Caselli, M. C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology—Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C. (1998). Advanced progressive matrices (APM). Frankfurt: Swets.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Redmond, S. M. (1999). Grammaticality judgements of an extended optional infinitive grammar: Evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 943–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispens, J. (2004). Syntactic and phonological processing in developmental dyslexia. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Rispens, J. E., Been, P. H., & Zwarts, F. (2006). Brain responses to subject–verb agreement violations in spoken language in developmental dyslexia: An ERP study. Dyslexia, 12, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispens, J. E., Roeleven, S., & Koster, C. (2004). Sensitivity to subject–verb agreement in spoken language in children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, E. K., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). Spoken sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia and language impairment: The role of syntax and working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 384, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rüsseler, J., Hennighausen, E., Münte, T. F., & Rösler, F. (2003). Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabisch, B., Hahne, A., Glass, E., von Suchodoletz, W., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Auditory language comprehension in children with developmental dyslexia: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1676–1695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, G., Job, R., & Tressoldi, P. E. (1995). Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e della disortografia evolutiva. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarPubMed
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., White, E., Cornell, S., Genesee, F., & White, L. (2006). The neural dynamics of second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 99 (Suppl. 1).Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25, 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallal, P., Allard, L., Miller, S., & Curtiss, S. (1997). Academic outcomes of language-impaired children. In Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. J. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition, and intervention (pp. 167–181). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Torkildsen, J. V., Syversen, G., Simonsen, H. G., Moen, I., & Lindgren, M. (2007). Brain responses to lexical–semantic priming in children at risk for dyslexia. Brain and Language, 102, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., & Gopnik, M. (1999). Inflectional morphology in a family with inherited specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 51–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Alphen, P., de Bree, E., Gerrits, E., de Jong, J., Wilsenach, C., & Wijnen, F. (2004). Early language development in children with a genetic risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 10, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Lely, H. K. J. (2005). Grammatical-specific language impairment (G-SLI): Identifying and characterising the G-SLI subgroup. Fréquences, 17, 13–20.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 177–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltzman, D. E., & Cairns, H. S. (2000). Grammatical knowledge of third grade good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45, 920–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1994). WISC-R Scala di intelligenza Wechsler per bambini (riveduta). Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar