Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T01:09:10.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Depression and gender differences among younger immigrant patients on sick leave due to chronic back pain: a primary care study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2013

Marina Taloyan*
Affiliation:
Center for Family and Community Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Caring Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Monica Löfvander
Affiliation:
Center for Family and Community Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Caring Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Center for Clinical Research – Västmanland, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine Unit, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
*
Correspondence to: Marina Taloyan, Department of Neurobiology, Center for Family and Community Medicine, Caring Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Alfred Nobels allé 12, 14152 Huddinge, Sweden. Email: marina.taloyan@sll.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Mental ill-health and pain are major causes for disability compensation in female adults in Sweden.

Aims

The aims of this study were to (1) analyse gender differences in the prevalence of depression among immigrant patients with chronic back pain and (2) explore whether factors such as age, marital status, educational level, religious faith, number of children and number of diagnosed pain sites could explain these differences.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 245 sick-listed primary care patients in consecutive order aged 18 through 45 years with a median duration of sick leave of 10 months for back pain and participating in a rehabilitation programme. Explanatory variables included physicians’ diagnosed pain sites, age, marital status, education, number of children and religious affiliation. Predictive factors for depression were analysed using logistic regression.

Findings

The women differed significantly from the men in three aspects: they were less educated, had more children and had more multiple pain sites, that is, 68% versus 45%. In the age-adjusted model, women were twice as likely to have depression (odds ratio (OR) 2.1). Regardless the gender, those with intermediate education of 9–11 years had the lowest odds of outcome compared with those with <0–8 years and ⩾12 years education. Finally, after adjusting for all explanatory variables, the ORs of depression for women decreased to a non-significant level (OR 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–3.43). Furthermore, regardless of the gender, those with multiple pain sites had twice higher odds (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.11–3.74) of depression than those with fewer pain sites.

Conclusion

Gender differences in odds of depression in our study could be explained by a higher prevalence of diagnosed multiple pain sites in women. This calls for tailor-made treatments that focus on the pain relief needs of immigrant women with low education and chronic back pain.

Information

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Distribution (%) of explanatory variables by gender in the study population of immigrant patients 18–45 years in primary care

Figure 1

Table 2 Prevalence (%) of depression across explanatory variables and gender in the study population of immigrant patients 18–45 years in primary care

Figure 2

Table 3 ORs and 95% CIs of depression in women with chronic back pain (reference group = men) in the study population of 245 immigrant patients 18–45 years in primary care