Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-xcx4r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T10:59:35.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralogy and mineral chemistry of quartz: A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2021

Jens Götze*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineralogy, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Brennhausgasse 14, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
Yuanming Pan
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada
Axel Müller
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Jens Götze, Email: jens.goetze@mineral.tu-freiberg.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quartz (trigonal, low-temperature α-quartz) is the most important polymorph of the silica (SiO2) group and one of the purest minerals in the Earth crust. The mineralogy and mineral chemistry of quartz are determined mainly by its defect structure. Certain point defects, dislocations and micro-inclusions can be incorporated into quartz during crystallisation under various thermodynamic conditions and by secondary processes such as alteration, irradiation, diagenesis or metamorphism. The resulting real structure is a fingerprint of the specific physicochemical environment of quartz formation and also determines the quality and applications of SiO2 raw materials. Point defects in quartz can be related to imperfections associated with silicon or oxygen vacancies (intrinsic defects), to different types of displaced atoms, and/or to the incorporation of foreign ions in lattice sites and interstitial positions (extrinsic defects). Due to mismatch in charges and ionic radii only a limited number of ions can substitute for Si4+ in the crystal lattice or can be incorporated in interstitial positions. Therefore, most impurity elements in quartz are present at concentrations below 1 ppm. The structural incorporation in a regular Si4+ lattice site has been proven for Al3+, Ga3+, Fe3+, B3+, Ge4+, Ti4+, P5+ and H+, of which Al3+ is by far the most common and typically the most abundant. Unambiguous detection and characterisation of defect structures in quartz are a technical challenge and can only be successfully realised by a combination of advanced analytical methods such as electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, cathodoluminescence (CL) microscopy and spectroscopy as well as spatially resolved trace-element analysis such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The present paper presents a review of the state-of-the-art knowledge concerning the mineralogy and mineral-chemistry of quartz and illustrates important geological implications of the properties of quartz.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Projection of morphologically right-handed α-quartz atomic positions onto the (0001) plane perpendicular to the c-axis, showing the EPR coordinate system (xyz), crystallographic axes a1, a2 and a3, and z∥c; the central c-axis large channel is seen to be surrounded by six c-axis small channels; LS denotes left-handed helices.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Representative powder EPR spectrum of a high-purity quartz from Kyshtym (Russia) containing 4.2 ppm Al (Götze et al., 2017) measured at a microwave frequency (ν) of ~9.39 GHz and temperature of 85 K, showing the [AlO4]0 centre. Also shown for comparison is the simulated spectrum of this centre using spin Hamiltonian parameters from Walsby et al. (2003). Insert is a room-temperature spectrum of the same sample containing <0.41 ppm Fe (i.e. the detection limit of LA-ICP-MS), showing a rhombic Fe3+ centre at the effective g = ~4.28.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Representative single-crystal EPR spectrum of a natural amethyst measured with B∥y and at 294 K. Letters S and I mark lines belonging to the S1 ([FeO4/Li]0; Han and Choh, 1989; Halliburton et al., 1989) and I centres, respectively. Note that the so-called interstitial (I) centre is actually [FeO4] with substitutional Fe ions at the Si sites (Mombouquette et al., 1986). Also present are the broad signal at g = 4.28 and the E1 centre (modified from SivaRamaiah et al., 2011).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Representative single-crystal EPR spectrum of an electron-irradiated, 17O-enriched quartz (JC324) measured, after annealing at 573 K, with B‖c, room temperature and X-band frequency (~9.3 GHz; modified from Mahskovtsev et al., 2013), showing three 17O hyperfine sextets and one 73Ge hyperfine line of the Ge E1 centre. Insert shows the 3D spin density of the Ge E1 centre calculated from the tri-vacancy with an Al impurity model.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Representative single-crystal EPR spectrum of an electron-irradiated quartz measured at W-band frequency (~94 GHz), B^c = ~140°, T = 110 K and a microwave power of 0.2 mW, illustrating three silicon-vacancy hole centres (H1, H4(I) and H5) (modified from Nilges et al., 2009). Note that the H1 (alias #1) centre has six main lines corresponding to six magnetically inequivalent sites and that 29Si hyperfine satellites are marked on four main lines. Also note that the two remaining main lines at ~3330 mT have irregular line shapes due to an incompletely resolved 27Al superhyperfine structure (Nilges et al., 2009). The H4(I) centre is characterised by a well-resolved 27Al superhyperfine structure.

Figure 5

Table 1. Main emission bands in CL spectra of quartz and suggested activators (modified after Götze, 2012a).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Photomicrographs of quartz in transmitted light (crossed polars – a) and CL (b) in a rhyolite from Kemmlitz (Saxony, Germany); different quartz generations are distinguishable by different CL colours: (1) primary quartz phenocryst with blue CL, (2) reddish volcanic quartz of a second generation, (3) secondary microcrystalline quartz of hydrothermal origin with yellow CL. (c) The volcanic quartz exhibits two main emission bands at 450 and 620 nm with varying intensity ratios, whereas the hydrothermal quartz has a main emission at 570 nm and a subordinate shoulder at 620 nm; the circles in (b) mark the positions of spectral CL analyses.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Photomicrographs in transmitted light (crossed polars, a) and CL (b) of drusy quartz from the Arrow U-deposit, Athabasca basin (Saskatchewan, Canada); the CL image reveals a continuous yellow orange radiation rim around the crystal as well as radiation halos around radioactive inclusions (arrow). (c) The CL spectra display strong development of the 650 nm emission band (NBOHC) due to radiation induced lattice damage; the circles in (b) mark the positions of spectral CL analyses.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Photomicrographs in transmitted light (crossed polars, a) and CL (b) of an Al-doped, synthetic hydrothermal quartz; CL reveals growth zones not visible in transmitted light. (c) The CL image after 60 s of electron irradiation reveals the transient character of the CL, which turns from initial blue (b) to reddish-brown (c). The related CL spectra (d) show a strong decrease of the blue emission band, whereas the red band increases due to the conversion of precursor centres (e.g. silanol groups :Si–OH) into the NBOHC.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Photomicrographs in transmitted light (crossed polars, a) and CL (b) of a pegmatite quartz from Heftetjern, Tørdal region (Norway); the sample exhibits the characteristic transient blue-green CL; fluid trails are visible due to dark CL. (c) The CL spectra show a drastic drop of the CL intensity of the 500 nm emission band during electron irradiation; the circle in (b) marks the position of spectral CL measurements.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Photomicrographs in transmitted light (crossed polars, a) and CL (b) of a chalcedony sample from Kardzali, Bulgaria; microcrystalline quartz exhibits a bright green CL. (c) The CL spectra reveal that uranyl (UO22+) is responsible for the emission peak at ~500 nm accompanied by several equidistant lines; there is an additional CL emission band at 650 nm due to the non-bridging oxygen hole centre (NBOHC). The circle in (b) marks the position of spectral CL analyses.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Element correlation for Al vs. Li (ppma = atoms per 106 atoms Si) in quartz of different origin: (a) pegmatite quartz from Norway; (b) pegmatite quartz from different deposits in Norway and Namibia; (c) hydrothermal quartz from the Ural region, Russia. The pegmatite quartz shows almost 1:1 ratios of Al to Li, whereas the hydrothermal quartz is Li deficient (data from Götze et al., 2004, 2017; Sittner, 2019).

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Plot of Ti content in quartz measured by ICP-MS vs. concentration of structural Ti ([TiO4/Li+]0 centres) determined by EPR spectroscopy (concentrations were determined as peak to base intensity under constant analytical settings according to Moiseev, 1985). Pegmatite quartz samples from the Rubicon Mine, Namibia (red circles) exhibit a linear correlation with zero intercept indicating a complete presence of Ti as structural substituent for Si; quartz samples from Norway (blue squares) are mostly far away from the correlation and show higher Ti contents; in these samples micro-inclusions of rutile were detected (data from Götze et al., 2004).

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Aluminium vs. Ga in pegmatite quartz of different origin (data from Müller et al., 2021; NYZ = Nb/Y/F-pegmatite, LCT = Li/Cs/Ta-pegmatite according to Černỳ and Ercit, 2005).

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Contents of alkali elements in quartz: (a) K vs. Na; (b) Rb vs. Na (red symbols) and Rb vs. K (blue symbols); (c) Rb vs. Cs. All log plots show positive trends and similar absolute concentrations of K and Na with nearly 1:1 ratio (circles = hydrothermal quartz, rhombs = pegmatite quartz; data from Götze et al.2004, 2017).

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Contents of alkali and alkali earth elements in quartz: (a) Na vs. Mg; (b) Rb vs. Sr; (c) Ba vs. Mg (red symbols) and Ba vs. Sr (blue symbols). All log plots show similar trends with varying absolute concentrations (Mg > Sr); note that pegmatite quartz mostly contains < 0.1 ppm Sr and hydrothermal quartz > 0.1 ppm Sr (circles = hydrothermal quartz, rhombs = pegmatite quartz; data from Götze et al.2004, 2017).

Figure 16

Fig. 16 Bulk REE content in pegmatite quartz plotted vs. absolute amount of inclusion fluid in the quartz samples; the correlation trend indicates the preferred accumulation of REE in fluid inclusions; the scatter can be explained by variations of their absolute concentrations in the fluid (data from Götze et al., 2004).

Figure 17

Fig. 17 (a) Th vs. U concentrations in quartz samples from different parent rocks and localities (data from Götze et al., 2004, 2017; circles = hydrothermal quartz, rhombs = pegmatite quartz); (b) model of the uranyl–silicate complex in microcrystalline SiO2 with neighbouring SiO4 tetrahedra and uranyl polyhedra (modified after Pan et al., 2021).

Figure 18

Fig. 18. Triangle for discrimination of S-type granites, A-type granites and pegmatites (modified after Breiter et al., 2020); the arrows indicate evolution trends during magma fractionation.

Figure 19

Fig. 19. Log plot of Ti vs. Al contents in quartz for the discrimination of hydrothermal quartz originating from epithermal, orogenic Au and porphyry type deposits (modified after Rusk, 2012).

Figure 20

Fig. 20. Chondrite-normalised REE distribution patterns of quartz from different geological environments: (a) hydrothermal quartz from the TAG mound (Mid-Atlantic Ridge), high-purity quartz (HPQ) from Vjazovka (Ural region, Russia) and from the gold deposit Muruntau/Myutenbai (Uzbekistan); (b) pegmatite quartz from Hittero (Norway) and macrocrystalline (agateqtz) as well as chalcedony (agatechal) of an agate from Hohenstein-Ernstthal (Saxony, Germany) both showing positive Ce-anomalies, negative Eu-anomalies and tetrad effects; (c) metamorphic quartz from the Middle Erzgebirge (Germany) and overprinted counterpart from the area of tin mineralisation; (data from Monecke et al., 2000, 2002; Götze et al., 2004, 2016, 2017).

Figure 21

Fig. 21 Photomicrographs of intensely zoned hydrothermal quartz from Chemnitz (Saxony, Germany) in panchromatic CL (a) and true colour optical microscopy–cathodluminescence image (b); the dark luminescent zones in panchromatic CL (blue CL zones in b) have elevated Al concentrations up to 300 ppm, whereas the bright zones in panchromatic CL (yellow in b) have mostly low (< 50 ppm) or no detectable Al contents; Ti concentrations are generally < 10 ppm. (c) The spectra reveal that the blue CL (1) is caused by the incorporation of structural Al ([AlO4/M+] centre), the yellow CL (2) is related mainly to structural defects (e.g. STE) and not to trace elements; the circles in (a) mark the positions of spectral CL analyses.

Figure 22

Fig. 22. CL emission spectra of (a) a quartz phenocryst in the Leisnig porphyry (Saxony, Germany) and (b) high-purity quartz from Kuznechikhinsk (Ural, Russia). Both quartz samples exhibit a blue CL (see insets) with a dominant emission band at 450 nm. The blue CL emission band of the Ti-rich quartz phenocryst (up to 80 ppm Ti and paramagnetic [TiO4/M+] centres) is stable during electron irradiation and can probably be related to the activation by substitutional Ti. In contrast, the intensity of the STE-activated 450 nm emission band of the HPQ quartz (4.52 ppm Ti, no detectable Ti-centres) shows a strong decrease due to electron bombardment.

Supplementary material: PDF

Götze et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Götze et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 223.4 KB