The lifetime population prevalence of panic disorder has been reported to be between 2.5 and 4.7%. Reference Kingsbury, Sucha, Horton, Sampasa-Kanyinga, Murphy and Gilman1,Reference Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas and Walters2 Panic disorder and panic attacks are distressing and reduce life expectancy, due to heightened suicidal risk and medical comorbidities – for example, through elevated cardiovascular risk. Reference Batelaan, Smit, de Graaf, van Balkom, Vollebergh and Beekman3 Panic disorder causes a significant burden, with annual societal costs exceeding €226 million per million inhabitants, comparable to the combined costs of depression and dysthymia. Reference Chang, Pan, Chen, Chen, Su and Tsai4 Panic disorder is characterised by recurrent, unexpected panic attacks, which are abrupt surges of intense fear that reach a peak with minutes and encompass physical symptoms such as dyspnoea/choking sensations, palpitations, chest pain and dizziness, and/or emotional symptoms such as fear of losing control or even of dying. 5 To meet a panic disorder diagnosis according to DSM-5 criteria, panic attacks must be followed by persistent concern or worry about additional attacks or their consequences, or by maladaptive behavioural changes related to the attacks. Furthermore, there must be no substance-related cause, medical condition or alternative mental disorder that better explains the attacks. 5
For many years the main pharmacological treatments of panic disorder have been dominated by two drug groups, namely antidepressants Reference Klein6–Reference Guaiana, Meader, Barbui, Davies, Furukawa and Imai8 and benzodiazepines. Reference Guaiana and Davies7,Reference Guaiana, Meader, Barbui, Davies, Furukawa and Imai8 Anxiety marked by recurrent panic attacks was first reported to be responsive to a tricyclic antidepressant, i.e. imipramine, more than six decades ago. Reference Klein6 This ‘pharmacological dissection’ of an anxiety condition that responded to antidepressants paved the way to defining the category of panic disorder as we know it today. Subsequent studies extended the evidence base from the tricyclics to the specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (e.g. fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and citalopram), which primarily target serotonin transporters and are regarded unanimously by current national and international guidelines as first-line drug treatments. Reference Guaiana and Davies7,Reference Guaiana, Meader, Barbui, Davies, Furukawa and Imai8 The serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) drug venlafaxine is considered a first-line treatment in some guidelines and second-line in others, whereas other antidepressants such as mirtazapine, reboxetine and the SNRIs duloxetine and milnacipran, as well as various monoamine oxidase inhibitors (e.g. phenelzine and moclobemide), have weaker evidence of efficacy and are usually ranked as second-line or lower. Reference Guaiana and Davies7 Although antidepressants may be effective in reducing panic attack frequency and intensity over a period of 3–6 weeks, the onset of action is slow and some individuals may experience symptom worsening before improvement, increasing the potential for dropping out of treatment before the beneficial effects are realised.
By contrast, benzodiazepines when taken orally can exert their therapeutic effects far more rapidly than antidepressants, sometimes within 15 min of ingestion, and can therefore reduce the ongoing impact of a panic attack while its symptoms are still present, albeit normally after the ‘peak’, which DSM-5 defines as occurring within ‘minutes’ of the initial awareness of symptoms. 5 However, benzodiazepines, while performing well for efficacy and tolerability in the short term, Reference Guaiana, Meader, Barbui, Davies, Furukawa and Imai8 are associated with several issues that render them less attractive as ongoing treatments beyond the few weeks’ duration examined in the majority of trials. These issues include risks of tolerance, dose escalation and addiction. Reference Guaiana and Davies7 In older adults, continuous use (>2/3 of days for at least 6 months) is associated with a greater risk of hip fractures, emergency department visits or hospitalisations (both specifically for falls and for all reasons), as well as with increased risks of long-term care admission and mortality compared with short-term or intermittent use, Reference Davies, Rudoler, De Oliveira, Huang, Kurdyak and Iaboni9 even after adjustment for cumulative dose. Therefore, current national and international guidelines Reference Guaiana and Davies7 do not recommend benzodiazepines as first-line drug treatments in panic disorder, and are divided as to whether they consider these to be second-line options (usually with caveats about treatment duration) or should be reserved for use in more limited circumstances.
Beyond antidepressants and benzodiazepines, the few other drugs that have any evidence of efficacy in panic disorder include gabapentin, valproate, levetiracetam, risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine, but in each case their evidence is limited and only a minority of current guidelines recommend them, Reference Guaiana and Davies7 usually as options following two or more treatment failures. Alternatively, psychotherapy-based approaches remain a widely used option, either as stand-alone treatments or in combination with medications. Cognitive–behavioural therapy is the preferred modality, Reference Papola, Ostuzzi, Tedeschi, Gastaldon, Purgato and Del Giovane10 and in most guidelines is ranked as an alternative first-line treatment.
Many individuals receiving existing treatments for panic disorder and panic attacks, whether medications or psychotherapy, do not achieve remission whereas among those who improve, a substantial number will relapse over time. Reference Nay, Brown and Roberson-Nay11 Therefore, there is clearly a need for new drug treatments to be identified and developed. Ideally, the aspiration must be to identify compounds that could be efficacious not only in preventing panic attacks in the longer term (as existing treatments are able to do), but also to head off panic attacks as soon as the first warning signs of their impending onset are detected, allowing the user to ‘nip panic attacks in the bud’. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 Crucially, no currently available panic disorder treatment Reference Guaiana and Davies7 has the ability to disrupt the genesis of a panic attack in the interval, usually a matter of minutes, between initial awareness that an attack may be about to occur and the peak of symptoms.
One compound that fulfils these aspirations, on the basis of strong preclinical data and a favourable pharmacokinetic profile suggesting rapid distribution to the brain, is amiloride nasal spray. Amiloride is familiar as an orally administered, potassium-sparing diuretic that has been used for many years as part of drug combinations targeting heart failure or hypertension, due to its actions in blocking renal epithelial sodium channels and the Na+/H+ antiporter. Amiloride’s potential for repurposing for use in panic disorder rests on an entirely different pharmacological mechanism, namely its affinity for acid-sensitive ion channels (ASICs), where it acts as a reversible antagonist (Fig. 1). These channels are found across several body systems including the central nervous system, where they subserve the detection of extracellular pH changes and learning in response to adversities. Reference Wemmie, Taugher and Kreple13 A nasal spray formulation is required to target brain ASIC channels directly, because amiloride’s ability to cross the blood–brain barrier is limited. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 Formulation of amiloride as a nasal spray, which allows circumvention of the blood–brain barrier, offers a further potential benefit in terms of a rapid onset of action, and therefore the potential to disrupt panic attacks before they reach their peak.

Fig. 1 Schematic drawing of the acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) and the potential site of action of amiloride (indicated by black dots). ASIC is activated by an extracellular decrease in pH (H+), leading to a transient inflow of calcium (Ca2+) and sodium (Na+) ions, which then initiate various downstream effects. Amiloride is an ASIC antagonist and can be used to block downstream effects such as CO2-induced panic attacks.
Why ASIC antagonism might suppress panic
Preclinical, clinical and pharmacological data support a pathophysiological role for ASICs, and hence a therapeutic role for the ASIC antagonist amiloride.
People with panic disorder undergo measurable respiratory and autonomic instability such as changes in tidal volume and CO2 partial pressure, which often begin up to 50 min before the consciously detectable onset of a panic attack. Reference Meuret, Rosenfield, Wilhelm, Zhou, Conrad and Ritz14 Although these respiratory fluctuations (most prominently hyperventilation) are driven by extracellular pH changes, they probably reflect hypersensitive pH-detecting functions that feed into the generation of full-blown panic attacks. Reference Meuret, Rosenfield, Wilhelm, Zhou, Conrad and Ritz14–Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Esquivel, De Cort, Goossens and Strackx16 Conscious awareness of bodily signals develops only later in the genesis of a panic attack, after which the subjective experience of emotional and cognitive symptoms may begin. Once this point is reached, a targeted, fast-acting therapeutic intervention could limit panic attacks before they reach the peak of symptom intensity Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 within the timespan of ‘minutes’ that DSM-5 defines as the maximum interval between awareness of panic attack onset and its peak. 5
The possibility that panic attacks might be ‘intercepted’ before they can cause maximal clinically significant distress is plausible once one identifies (a) a pathophysiological mechanistic target, (b) a molecule that acts on this target and (c) an administration route allowing this molecule to reach the brain quickly and exert its effect once the initial panic attack signs are evident. The blood-acidifying signals that occur as panic attacks develop can be reproduced in the laboratory using paradigms such as CO2 stimulation via respiratory challenges (inducing hypercapnia, and hence relative acidosis in the extracellular compartment) Reference Klein15 and transient brain acidification. Reference Maddock, Buonocore, Miller, Yoon, Soosman and Unruh17 Under these provocations, abnormal respiratory responses are demonstrable in people with panic disorder Reference Battaglia, Ogliari, D’Amato and Kinkead18 as well as in preclinical Reference D’Amato, Zanettini, Lampis, Coccurello, Pascucci and Ventura19 studies of panic pathophysiology. Specifically, it has been shown that hypercapnia induced comparable physiological changes in murine and human models of experimental panic. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Viechtbauer, Buchanan, Goossens and Lange20
Carbon dioxide is an end-product of carbohydrate metabolism and is continuously produced within the body. The majority of bodily CO2 is readily processed by the bicarbonate buffering system to maintain a physiological acid–base balance. CO2 reacts with water to form carbonic acid, which in turn dissociates into hydrogen ions and bicarbonate (CO2 + H2O ↔ H2CO3 ↔ H+ + HCO3 −). Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Esquivel, De Cort, Goossens and Strackx16 Bicarbonate buffers the hydrogen ions as otherwise these would accumulate, resulting in a decrease in pH. When CO2 concentration increases markedly, the partial pressure of CO2 increases rapidly, which is associated with a decrease in pH. This is followed by adaptive bodily responses such as an increase in respiratory rate to expirate excess CO2. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Esquivel, De Cort, Goossens and Strackx16 Importantly, also in the brain, CO2 has been shown to reduce pH. This has been demonstrated directly in rodents whereas in humans the evidence is indirect, i.e. coming from observations such as decrease in pH following intravenous bicarbonate infusion. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Esquivel, De Cort, Goossens and Strackx16
Inhalation of air mixtures enriched with CO2 has been developed as an experimental model to study panic attacks in the laboratory. A series of studies have demonstrated relative hyper-reactivity in panic disorder patients, good test–retest reliability, robustness against contextual manipulations and sensitivity to anti-panic medications. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Esquivel, De Cort, Goossens and Strackx16,Reference de Vos, Haj Yahya, Viechtbauer, Linden, Schruers and Leibold21 Notably, it was demonstrated that the physiological responses to excess CO2 are similar in mice and humans, and between healthy volunteers and panic disorder patients. This allows for translation of findings in animal studies to the human situation and, ultimately, to the clinic. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Viechtbauer, Buchanan, Goossens and Lange20
Human CO2 hypersensitivity (i.e. acute fear and hyperventilation in response to respiratory CO2 challenges) is substantially heritable, Reference Battaglia, Ogliari, Harris, Spatola, Pesenti-Gritti and Reichborn-Kjennerud22 with 90% of genetic background shared with panic disorder and separation anxiety disorder. Reference Battaglia, Pesenti-Gritti, Medland, Ogliari, Tambs and Spatola23,Reference Battaglia, Pesenti-Gritti, Spatola, Ogliari and Tambs24 Early life adversities induce gene–environment interactions that further enhance CO2 sensitivity, Reference Spatola, Scaini, Pesenti-Gritti, Medland, Moruzzi and Ogliari25 and childhood parental loss contributes to heightened human CO2 sensitivity. Reference Battaglia, Pesenti-Gritti, Medland, Ogliari, Tambs and Spatola23 Due to these features, and the reproducibility of CO2 responses in the laboratory, the trait of CO2 sensitivity provides a powerful preclinical context with which to study the pathophysiology underpinning panic disorder and panic attacks. Reference Battaglia, Ogliari, D’Amato and Kinkead18 With many similarities to the situation of humans who experienced prolonged parental separation/loss in childhood, the repeated cross-fostering (RCF) procedure, which involves separating mice early in life from their biological mothers in favour of a rotating series of unrelated, adoptive, lactating females, induces stable, lifelong respiratory CO2 hypersensitivity and heightened separation anxiety. Reference D’Amato, Zanettini, Lampis, Coccurello, Pascucci and Ventura19,Reference Battaglia, Pesenti-Gritti, Medland, Ogliari, Tambs and Spatola23 These associations are best explained by gene–environment interaction mechanisms, Reference D’Amato, Zanettini, Lampis, Coccurello, Pascucci and Ventura19 implying altered expression of certain regulatory genes. Investigation of the genetic enrichments associated with CO2 hypersensitivity in humans and animals genome-wide yielded evidence of (a) brain-stem H3Ac/H3K4me3 histonic enrichments and upregulated messenger RNA expression of the Asic1 gene Reference Cittaro, Lampis, Luchetti, Coccurello, Guffanti and Felsani26 ; (b) altered DNA methylation of the Asic2 gene concurrently in mice (brain) and humans (white blood cells) hypersensitive to CO2 stimulation; Reference Giannese, Luchetti, Barbiera, Lampis, Zanettini and Knudsen27 (c) hyperventilation in response to hypercapnia among the first generation of RCF-exposed animals, as well as among two successive generations of their normally reared offspring, through matrilineal transmission; Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Lorenzo, Deguire and Godin28 and (d) genetic variants in the ACCN2 gene, the human orthologue of the Asic1 gene, are associated with differential sensitivity to CO2 in panic disorder patients, as well as in healthy volunteers. Reference Leibold, van den Hove, Viechtbauer, Kenis, Goossens and Lange29 Parallel enhancements of ASIC1, ASIC2 and ASIC3 messenger RNA transcripts have been detected transgenerationally in the medulla oblongata and periaqueductal grey matter of RCF-lineage animals. Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Lorenzo, Deguire and Godin28 Crucially, a single, nebulised dose of the ASIC antagonist amiloride renormalised respiratory responses to CO2 across the entire RCF lineage. Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Lorenzo, Deguire and Godin28,Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Bachand, D’Amato and Koninck30 A single-dose pretreatment with amiloride, nebulised to reach the brain swiftly, normalised respiratory CO2 hypersensitivity among RCF animals, thereby restoring responses to the range observed in controls, whereas RCF animals pretreated with only nebulised saline had significantly greater tidal volumes in response to CO2. By contrast, amiloride dispensed intraperitoneally to RCF animals was not associated with efficacy in normalising the CO2 response. A lack of efficacy similar to that seen with intraperitoneally administered amiloride was observed with saline given intraperitoneally, and with no treatment.
Because ASIC2 and ASIC1 multimerise to affect pH sensing, fear and learning, Reference Wemmie, Taugher and Kreple13 these findings regarding Asic genes’ enrichment and CO2 responses are consistent with (a) ASICs’ role in detecting brain pH changes and in evoking fear; Reference Wemmie, Taugher and Kreple13 (b) functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of brain pH changes in human panic disorder; Reference Maddock, Buonocore, Miller, Yoon, Soosman and Unruh17 and (c) the associations of specific Asic1 gene single-nucleotide proteins with human panic disorder and CO2 hypersensitivity. Reference Savage, McMichael, Gorlin, Beadel, Teachman and Vladimirov31,Reference Smoller, Gallagher, Duncan, McGrath, Haddad and Holmes32 The data thus show that (a) ASICs are key pathophysiological elements of panic, as mediated by hypersensitivity to CO2; and (b) nebulised, single-dose amiloride modulates these responses.
In summary, both genes and environment influence liability to panic attacks and panic disorder. Emotional and respiratory CO2 hypersensitivity, a valid psychobiological marker of panic disorder/panic attacks, can be used in humans Reference Battaglia, Ogliari, Harris, Spatola, Pesenti-Gritti and Reichborn-Kjennerud22 and preclinically Reference Battaglia, Ogliari, D’Amato and Kinkead18,Reference D’Amato, Zanettini, Lampis, Coccurello, Pascucci and Ventura19 to translationally identify key pathophysiological mechanisms, including gene enrichment in response to environmental triggers. ASICs become overexpressed in response to environmental adversities and are integral to panic disorder/attack pathophysiology and related respiratory reactivity to hypercapnia. Reference Cittaro, Lampis, Luchetti, Coccurello, Guffanti and Felsani26–Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Lorenzo, Deguire and Godin28,Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Bachand, D’Amato and Koninck30 The ASIC antagonist amiloride, nebulised to reach the brain, blocks hyperventilatory panic-like responses in preclinical models. Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Lorenzo, Deguire and Godin28,Reference Battaglia, Rossignol, Bachand, D’Amato and Koninck30 As research into amiloride nasal spray develops, it is anticipated that future studies will assess the impact of its administration on CO2 challenge paradigms in humans who have experienced panic disorder or recurrent panic attacks.
Other pharmacological properties of amiloride nasal spray
Amiloride nasal spray is safe and chemically and bacteriologically stable, with models indicating rapid distribution into the human brain. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12,Reference Azzeh, Davies, Strauss, Battaglia, Dogra and Yellepeddi33,Reference Renninger, Sayre, Battaglia, Davies, Sayre and Yellepeddi34 Extensive safety, distribution and pharmacokinetic studies of amiloride nasal spray have been completed. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12,Reference Azzeh, Davies, Strauss, Battaglia, Dogra and Yellepeddi33 A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model Reference Azzeh, Davies, Strauss, Battaglia, Dogra and Yellepeddi33 showed excellent, rapid brain concentration with maximal ASIC inhibition. Human pharmacokinetic data in 15 healthy individuals (mean age 28 years (range 21–40 years); 71% female, 65% White; 18% Hispanic/Latino, 18% Asian) Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 demonstrated rapid absorption from the nasal mucosa, followed by a brisk plasmatic peak (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04181008). Tolerability was excellent, with no grade 2+ adverse events, and the comprehensive metabolic panel (of 14 different proteins, enzymes, electrolytes, minerals and other substances), kidney profile, complete blood count with platelet count and auto-differential, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and cardiovascular parameters before and after amiloride nasal spray administration, revealed no adverse events. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 Amiloride nasal spray’s excellent physical, chemical and microbiological stability, extending to 90 days from preparation at room temperature and under refrigeration, have been confirmed. Reference Renninger, Sayre, Battaglia, Davies, Sayre and Yellepeddi34
Amiloride nasal spray has the potential to become a portable, rapid-acting Reference Azzeh, Davies, Strauss, Battaglia, Dogra and Yellepeddi33 treatment for panic disorder, for use on an ‘as-needed’ basis only at the specific moment when a panic attack is thought to be starting. Reference Yellepeddi, Battaglia, Davies, Alt, Ashby and Shipman12 Unlike some other treatments for panic attacks, Reference Guaiana and Davies7 there is no evidence to suggest that amiloride has the potential to be addictive. Existing data have demonstrated that it is well tolerated and has been used safely. The body of work described herein has led to the hypothesis that, in people with panic disorder, amiloride nasal spray will block or reduce panic attack intensity, with the suggestion that it might have the capability to stop or disrupt impending panic attacks before they become full-blown attacks. The putative biological mechanisms of action described relate to channels (i.e. ASICs) that have a known physiological function (detection of extracellular pH changes) and have been characterised as existing in locations implicated in the development of panic attacks. To this extent, amiloride nasal spray can be considered a highly specific intervention moderating well-characterised targets that are directly implicated in panic attacks. This contrasts with many of the drug classes that currently have evidence of efficacy in panic attacks. In most of these, our understanding of their pharmacological action is limited to impacts on the availability of a certain neurotransmitter, without a knowledge base causally linking these changes to specific receptors or channels demonstrated to be implicated in the genesis of panic attacks. Further support for the utility of amiloride comes from animal studies illustrating its ability to normalise hypersensitive CO2 responses in mice that experienced early life adversity.
For all of the above reasons, there is a need for clinical trials to be undertaken to test the efficacy of this preparation in individuals with panic disorder and/or recurrent panic attacks. This might include an initial comparison of the acute effects of amiloride nasal spray with a placebo, administered at the onset of panic attacks, and subsequent research into its ability to control panic attacks in comparison with existing medications and psychotherapies.
Data availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article because no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author contributions
The manuscript was conceived and designed by all four authors. S.J.C.D. wrote the first draft, which was then edited and extended by M.B., N.K.L. and K.R.J.S. All authors participated in critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version and are accountable for the contents.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of interest
S.J.C.D. and K.R.J.S. are members of the Anxiety Disorders Research Network of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. S.J.C.D. is part of the guest editorial team for Br J Psychiatry but did not take part in the review or decision-making process of this paper.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.