Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T14:14:05.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Violent Origins of Authoritarian Variation: Rebellion Type and Regime Type in Cold War Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

Dan Slater*
Affiliation:
Dan Slater is Professor in the Department of Political Science and incoming Director of the Weiser Centre for Emerging Democracies (WCED) at the University of Michigan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: dnsltr@umich.edu

Abstract

Dictatorships are every bit as institutionally diverse as democracies, but where does this variation come from? This article argues that different types of internal rebellion influence the emergence of different types of authoritarian regimes. The critical question is whether rebel forces primarily seek to seize state power or to escape it. Regional rebellions seeking to escape the state raise the probability of a military-dominated authoritarian regime, since they are especially likely to unify the military while heightening friction between civilian and military elites. Leftist rebellions seeking to seize the state are more likely to give rise to civilian-dominated dictatorships by inspiring ‘joint projects’ in which military elites willingly support party-led authoritarian rule. Historical case studies of Burma, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam illustrate the theory, elaborating how different types of violent conflict helped produce different types of dictatorships across the breadth of mainland and island Southeast Asia during the Cold War era.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2018. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable