Element contents
Philosophy of Mathematics from Descartes to Kant
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 June 2026
Summary
The mathematical method and the nature of mathematical knowledge were subjects of intense philosophical discussion in the 17th and 18th centuries. In particular, there was a debate over whether metaphysical truths admit of distinct proof as geometrical truths do, and whether they may be known with the same degree of certainty. This comparison between geometry and philosophy required a proper understanding of how Euclidean demonstration secured certainty. This element examines attempts by Descartes, Locke, Leibniz, Wolff, Lambert, Mendelssohn and Kant to address this question. The emphasis is on metaphysical and epistemological questions about geometrical demonstration in the 17th- and 18th-centuries.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108982405Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 31 July 2026
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Géométrie: Descartes, René (1969). OEuvres de Descartes, Tome VI. Adam, Charles Ernest & Paul Tannery. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Meditations: Descartes, René (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume II. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (eds.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rules: Descartes, René (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume 1. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (eds.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ACV: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1915). Abhandlung vom Criterium Veritatis. Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte 36. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
NO: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1764). Neues Organon, oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung vom Irrthum und Schein. Leipzig.Google Scholar
PE: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1918). “Über die Methode, die Metaphysik, Theologie und Moral richtiger zu beweisen,” Kant-Studien, 42.Google Scholar
AG: Ariew, Roger & Garber, Daniel (eds.) (1989). G. W. Leibniz Philosophical Essays. Hackett.Google Scholar
NE: Remnant, Peter, & Bennett, Jonathan (eds.) (1996). Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm & Loemker, Leroy E. (ed., tr.) (1976). Philosophical Papers and Letters. Holland, Boston, D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
A: Locke, John (1990). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings: In Three Volumes, Vol. 1: Drafts A and B. Nidditch, Peter H. & Rogers, G. A. John. (eds.), Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B: Locke, John (1990). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings: In Three Volumes, Vol. 1: Drafts A and B. Nidditch, Peter H. & Rogers, G. A. John. (eds.), Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essay: Locke, John (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, Peter (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evidence: Mendelssohn, Moses (1786). Abhandlung über die Evidenz in metaphysischen Wissenschaften, Haude und Spener.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1997). Philosophical Writings, Dahlstrom, Daniel (trans. and ed.), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1743). Elementa Matheseos Universae. Reprinted in Wolff, (1973), Gesammelte Werke, II.29. Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1750). Kurzer Unterricht von der mathematischen Lehrart. Reprinted in Wolff (1973), Gesammelte Werke, I.12. Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1754). Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und Ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkänntnis der Wahrheit [German Logic]. Reprinted in Wolff (1973), Gesammelte Werke, I.1 Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Géométrie: Descartes, René (1969). OEuvres de Descartes, Tome VI. Adam, Charles Ernest & Paul Tannery. J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Meditations: Descartes, René (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume II. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (eds.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rules: Descartes, René (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume 1. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (eds.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ACV: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1915). Abhandlung vom Criterium Veritatis. Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte 36. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
NO: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1764). Neues Organon, oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung vom Irrthum und Schein. Leipzig.Google Scholar
PE: Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1918). “Über die Methode, die Metaphysik, Theologie und Moral richtiger zu beweisen,” Kant-Studien, 42.Google Scholar
AG: Ariew, Roger & Garber, Daniel (eds.) (1989). G. W. Leibniz Philosophical Essays. Hackett.Google Scholar
NE: Remnant, Peter, & Bennett, Jonathan (eds.) (1996). Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm & Loemker, Leroy E. (ed., tr.) (1976). Philosophical Papers and Letters. Holland, Boston, D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
A: Locke, John (1990). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings: In Three Volumes, Vol. 1: Drafts A and B. Nidditch, Peter H. & Rogers, G. A. John. (eds.), Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B: Locke, John (1990). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings: In Three Volumes, Vol. 1: Drafts A and B. Nidditch, Peter H. & Rogers, G. A. John. (eds.), Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essay: Locke, John (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, Peter (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evidence: Mendelssohn, Moses (1786). Abhandlung über die Evidenz in metaphysischen Wissenschaften, Haude und Spener.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1997). Philosophical Writings, Dahlstrom, Daniel (trans. and ed.), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1743). Elementa Matheseos Universae. Reprinted in Wolff, (1973), Gesammelte Werke, II.29. Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1750). Kurzer Unterricht von der mathematischen Lehrart. Reprinted in Wolff (1973), Gesammelte Werke, I.12. Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1754). Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und Ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkänntnis der Wahrheit [German Logic]. Reprinted in Wolff (1973), Gesammelte Werke, I.1 Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Arana, Andrew (2016). “Imagination in Mathematics.” In Kind, Amy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination. New York: Routledge. pp. 463–477.Google Scholar
Basso, Paola (2011). “Mendelssohn on Lambert’s Neues Organon.” In Munk, Reinier (ed.), Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics, 65 Studies in German Idealism 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94–007–2451–8_4, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011.Google Scholar
Bos, Henk (1993). “The Concept of Construction and the Representation of Curves in Seventeenth-century Mathematics.” Lectures in the History of Mathematics, Volume 7: Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risi, De, Vincenzo, (2016). Leibniz on the Parallel Postulate and the Foundations of Geometry: The Unpublished Manuscripts. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dika, Tarek (2020). “Descartes’ Method,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/descartes-method.Google Scholar
Domski, Mary (2006). “Construction without Spatial Constraints: A Reply to Emily Carson.” Locke Studies, 6: 85–99.Google Scholar
Dunlop, Katherine (2009). “Why Euclid’s Geometry Brooked No Doubt: J. H. Lambert on Certainty and the Existence of Models.” Synthese, 167(1) (March): 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, Katherine (2013). “Mathematical Method and Newtonian Science in the Philosophy of Christian Wolff.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3): 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, Katherine (2014). “Arbitrary Combination and the Use of Signs in Mathematics: Kant’s 1763 Prize Essay and its Wolffian Background.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44: 658–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, Katherine (2020). “Kant and Mendelssohn on the Use of Signs in Mathematics.” In Posy, Carl and Rechter, Ofra (eds.). Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey W. (2014). Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2021). “Before and Beyond Leibniz: Tschirnhaus and Wolff on Experience and Method” In DeBoer, Karin and Prunea-Bretonnet, Tinca (eds.). The Experiential Turn in 18th Century German Philosophy. Routledge, pp. 17–36. London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gava, Gabriele (2018). “Kant, Wolff, and the Method of Philosophy.” In Garber, Daniel and Rutherford, Donald (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 271–304.Google Scholar
Hatfield, (1986). “The Senses and the Fleshless Eye.” In Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp. 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heis, Jeremy (2014). “Kant on Real Definitions in Geometry.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (5–6): 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heis, Jeremy (2020). Kant on Parallel Lines, Axioms, Postulates and Definitions” In Posy, Carl and Rechter, Ofra (eds.). Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Laywine, Alison (2010). “Kant and Lambert on Geometrical Postulates in the Reform of Metaphysics.” In Friedman, Michael, Domski, Mary, & Dickson, Michael (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 113–133.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo (ed.) (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manders, Kenneth (2008). The Euclidean Diagram. In Mancosu, Paolo (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. (ed.) (1970). Proclus: A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, Amy (2000). “Mind and Sign: Method and the Interpretation of Mathematics in Descartes’s Early Work.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 30 (3): 371–412.Google Scholar
Posy, Carl and Rechter, Ofra (eds.) (2020) Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (1998). “Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29 (4): 589–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2003). Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2004). “Kant’s ‘Argument from Geometry.’” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42 (2): 195–215.Google Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2005). “Apriority and Application: Philosophy of Mathematics in the Modern Period.” In Shapiro, Stewart (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2021). “Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel (2021). Kant’s Mathematical World: Mathematics, Cognition, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael (1984). “Construction, Schematism, and Imagination.” Topoi, 3 (2): 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Arnulf (tr.) (1986). Philosophical Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.