Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T01:23:30.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling the impact of circumbinary disk accretion on post-AGB binary evolution and surface chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2025

Kayla Martin*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Orsola De Marco
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Devika Kamath
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Astrophysics and Space Technologies Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Glenn-Michael Oomen
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Hans Van Winckel
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Kayla Martin, Email: kayla.martin@hdr.mq.edu.au.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Post-asymptotic giant branch (post-AGB) binaries are surrounded by dusty circumbinary disks and exhibit unexpected orbital properties resulting from poorly understood binary interaction processes. Re-accreted gas from the circumbinary disk alters the photospheric chemistry of the post-AGB star, producing a characteristic underabundance of refractory elements that correlates with condensation temperature – a phenomenon known as chemical depletion. This work investigates how re-accretion from a disk drives chemical depletion, and the impact accreted matter has on post-AGB evolution. We used the MESA code to evolve 0.55 and 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ post-AGB stars with the accretion of refractory element-depleted gas from a circumbinary disk. Our study adopts observationally-constrained initial accretion rates and disk masses to reproduce the chemical depletion patterns of six well-studied post-AGB binary stars: EP Lyr, HP Lyr, IRAS 17038-4815, IRAS 09144-4933, HD 131356, and SX Cen. We find high accretion rates ($\gt 10^{-7}$ M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$) and large disk masses ($\gtrsim10^{-2}$ M$_{\odot}$) necessary to reproduce observed depletion, particularly in higher-mass, hotter post-AGB stars ($T_{\textrm{eff}}\gtrsim$ 6 000 K). A slower evolution (lower core mass) is required to reproduce cooler ($T_{\textrm{eff}}\lesssim$ 5 000 K) depleted post-AGB stars. Rapid accretion significantly impacts post-AGB evolution, stalling stars at cooler effective temperatures and extending post-AGB lifetimes by factors of around 3 to 10. Despite this, extended post-AGB timescales remain within or below the planetary nebula visibility timescale, suggesting accretion cannot account for the observed lack of ionised PNe in post-AGB binaries. Our findings constrain accretion-flow parameters and advance our understanding of disk-binary interactions in post-AGB systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Table 1. Important stellar and binary properties for our post-AGB sample. Included are the post-AGB star’s effective temperature ($T_{\textrm{eff}}$) and SED-derived photospheric luminosity (from Oomen et al., 2019), as well as estimated current mass and approximate stellar radius. Orbital periods, eccentricities, and projected semi-major axes ($a_{\textrm{b}}\sin i$), are from Oomen et al. (2018, 2020). The upper-limit Roche-lobe radii at periastron ($R_{\textrm{L,peri}}$) is additionally given, computed using minimum companion masses from Oomen et al. (2018). Further provided are key chemical abundance ratios (in dex, relative to solar), depletion pattern turn-off temperature ($T_{\textrm{turn-off}}$), and circumbinary disk type (from Kluska et al., 2022). Reference papers are provided below the table.

Figure 1

Table 2. Best-fitting initial accretion rates, $\dot{M}(0)$ (in M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), and disk masses, $M_{\textrm{d}}$ (in M$_{\odot}$), per core mass ($M_{\textrm{c}}$), determined from the position of each post-AGB star in $[\textrm{Zn}/\textrm{Ti}]-T_{\textrm{eff}}$ space (see Figure 1).

Figure 2

Figure 1. Post-AGB MESA models of mass 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ (top) and 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ (bottom), with maximum depletion strength $[\textrm{Zn}/\textrm{Ti}]=$ 4 dex. Models begin at 4 000 K, and increase in effective temperature over time. Different initial accretion rates, $\dot{M}(0)$ (in M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), are represented by different coloured curves, while different linestyles corresponds to different disk masses, $M_{\textrm{d}}$ (in M$_{\odot}$). Observed stars are over-plotted as points: EP Lyr (yellow square), HP Lyr (purple diamond), IRAS 17038-4815 (blue cross), IRAS 09144-4933 (green triangle), HD 131356 (pink pentagon), and SX Cen (red star).

Figure 3

Figure 2. Comparison between observed abundances, and the abundances predicted by the best-fitting 0.55 and 0.60 M$_{\odot}$MESA models from Figure 1, for chemically-depleted post-AGB stars EP Lyr ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 6 200 K), HP Lyr ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 6 300 K), IRAS 17038-4815 ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 4 750 K), IRAS 09144-4933 ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 5 750 K), HD 131356 ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 6 000 K), and SX Cen ($T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 6 250 K). Abundances are given relative to solar (values from Asplund et al., 2009), and are presented against condensation temperature, $T_{\textrm{cond}}$ (values from Lodders, 2003). Predicted model abundances are further normalised to the observed abundances of Zn, or S where Zn is unavailable (i.e. IRAS 09144-4933), as these elements are assumed to be non-depleted and hence representative of the star’s initial metallicity.

Figure 4

Table 3. Evolution timescales and extension factors (in square brackets) for the post-AGB phase of the accreting 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ models, for each initial accretion rate, $\dot{M}(0)$, and disk mass, $M_{\textrm{d}}$, combination. The post-AGB evolution timescale (${{\tau}}_{\textrm{pAGB}}$) corresponds to the time taken for the model to evolve from $T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 4 000 K (the start of the post-AGB) to $T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 25 000 K (the minimum PN ionisation temperature). The post-AGB phase extension factor was computed as ${{\tau}}_{\textrm{pAGB}}/{{\tau}}_{\textrm{{norm}}}$, where ${{\tau}}_{\textrm{{norm}}}$ is the post-AGB evolution timescale of the non-accreting model (noted below the table for reference).

Figure 5

Figure 3. Evolution of effective temperature, stellar radius, and envelope mass ($M_{\textrm{env}}$, relative to the start of the post-AGB where $M_{\textrm{env},0}\approx 0.02\ \textrm{M}_{\odot}$), over the post-AGB phase of the 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ models. Accreting models (orange) with different initial accretion rates, $\dot{M}(0)$ (in M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), are indicated by linestyle. A disk mass of $3\times10^{-2}$ M$_{\odot}$ was used in all accreting cases. The non-accreting 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ model (blue) is shown for reference.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Post-AGB effective temperature evolution for the non-accreting 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ model and most rapidly accreting ($\dot{M}(0)=10^{-6}$ M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$) 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ models of different disk mass (as indicated). Effective temperature increases from the start of the post-AGB to the points marked at 25 000 K (the minimum PN ionisation temperature, indicated by a dashed horizontal line) and 50 000 K. The shaded region between 20 000 and 50 000 years corresponds to the range of PN visibility timescales; post-AGB stars that reach $T_{\textrm{eff}}\sim$ 25 000 K after this time are unlikely to form a visible PN.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from Oomen et al. (2018) for the chemically-depleted post-AGB binary stars used in this work. The observed spectrum (red curve) and dereddened photospheric model (black curve, scaled to the object) are shown. Photospheric observations were obtained at different pulsation phases by various surveys (indicated by different coloured symbols); for expansion on acronyms used different photometric surveys, we refer the reader to the relevant instrument papers. All objects (except EP Lyr) present a distinct near-infrared (near-IR) excess, indicative of hot dust in a stable circumbinary disk. The lack of IR excess in the SED of EP Lyr is characteristic to a transition-type disk, which have large dust-free inner-disk cavities.

Figure 8

Table 4. Updated observed and derived properties for EP Lyr and HP Lyr, based on Gaia DR3 distances. Effective temperatures ($T_{\textrm{eff}}$) are taken from Mohorian et al. (2025) for EP Lyr and Oomen et al. (2019) for HP Lyr, while photospheric luminosities, derived via the PLC-relation, are from Menon et al. (2024). Further provided are the estimated current (post-AGB) mass and stellar radius, along with values for orbital period, eccentricity, and projected semi-major axis ($a_{\textrm{b}}\sin i$) from Oomen et al. (2018, 2020). The upper-limit Roche-lobe radius at periastron ($R_{\textrm{L,peri}}$) is additionally given.

Figure 9

Table 5. Post-AGB evolution timescales, expressed in years, and extension factors (enclosed by square brackets) for the accreting 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ models, given different initial accretion rates, $\dot{M}(0)$, and disk masses, $M_{\textrm{d}}$. Values are computed similarly to those presented in Section 5.1 (Table 3) for the 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ models, though come with a caveat – see text. The post-AGB evolution timescale (${{\tau}}_{\textrm{pAGB}}$) corresponds to the model evolution time between $T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 4 000 K and $T_{\textrm{eff}}=$ 25 000 K. The post-AGB phase extension factor is computed as ${{\tau}}_{\textrm{pAGB}}/{{\tau}}_{\textrm{{norm}}}$, where ${{\tau}}_{\textrm{{norm}}}$ is the post-AGB evolution timescale of the non-accreting model (noted below the table).

Figure 10

Figure 6. Hertzsprung-Russel diagram showing the MESA evolutionary tracks of the non-accreting 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ (red solid) and 0.60 M$_{\odot}$ (blue solid) post-AGB models, and the most rapidly accreting ($\dot{M}(0)=10^{-6}$ M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$) 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ post-AGB model with disk mass $3\times10^{-2}$ M$_{\odot}$ (red dotted). The stellar models presented were evolved from the main sequence, with an initial mass of 2.5 M$_{\odot}$, and initial solar metallicity. A late thermal pulse (LTP) is shown to occur in both the non-accreting and accreting 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ post-AGB models, which temporarily brings the star back to the post-AGB phase. A black star marks the peak of the LTP in both the non-accreting and accreting 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ models, around 8 000 years into the post-AGB phase.

Figure 11

Figure 7. Evolution of effective temperature ($T_{\textrm{eff}}$), envelope mass ($M_{\textrm{env}}$), and nuclear burning power (from hydrogen and helium) during the late thermal pulse in the 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ models. Solid lines represent the non-accreting 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ model, while dotted lines correspond to the most rapidly accreting ($\dot{M}(0)=10^{-6}$ M$_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$) 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ model with disk mass $3\times10^{-2}$ M$_{\odot}$.

Figure 12

Figure 8. Envelope mass fraction as a function of radial coordinate, from the base of the convective envelope to the surface of the star, showing the depth to which accreted material was mixed (dashed line). Envelope mass ($M_{\textrm{env}}$) was computed by subtracting the core mass ($M_{\textrm{c}}$, initially $\sim$ 0.53 M$_{\odot}$) from the total stellar mass at each mass coordinate m, and has been further normalised to the mass at the convective envelope base. The radial coordinate was computed as the difference between the radial coordinate for the star, r, and the helium core radius ($R_{\textrm{c}}$, initially $\sim$ 0.03 R$_{\odot}$).