Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T08:32:35.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential use of Kebilian clay reserves (southern Tunisia) for the production of geopolymer materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2020

Chedlia Ounissi*
Affiliation:
Research Unity of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (UR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6072, Zrig, Gabes, Tunisia
Salah Mahmoudi
Affiliation:
Research Unity of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (UR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6072, Zrig, Gabes, Tunisia
Luca Valentini
Affiliation:
Departement of Geosciences – Center CIRCe, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, Padua, Italy
Ali Bennour
Affiliation:
Institute of Arid Regions (IRA), Medenine 4100, Tunisia
Enrico Garbin
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, 35131, Padua, Italy
Gilberto Artioli
Affiliation:
Departement of Geosciences – Center CIRCe, University of Padua, via Gradenigo 6, Padua, Italy
Mabrouk Montacer
Affiliation:
Research Unity of Geo-systems, Geo-resources and Geo-environments (UR3G), Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes, University of Gabes, 6072, Zrig, Gabes, Tunisia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to help drive the Tunisian construction industry towards a more sustainable approach given the existence of abundant local raw material deposits that could be exploited for the production of low-CO2 binders. Various clay sediments from the Kebili region (southern Tunisia) were characterized by chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis and geotechnical tests to determine their suitability for the preparation of geopolymer binders. The clays consist of illite and kaolinite with other accessory minerals. To test the possibility of using these materials as precursors for the production of low-CO2 and low-cost geopolymers, the raw samples were calcined and activated by addition of solid sodium silicate. Compressive strength tests performed on four alkali-activated clays show that promising mechanical performance may be achieved, with mechanical strength values as high as 25 MPa after 7 days, depending on the clay composition. The mechanical strength is related to the SiO2:Al2O3 and Al2O3:(NaO2 + K2O) ratios. Careful selection of the raw materials is, therefore, an essential step in the exploitation of clay deposits to be used for the production of ecological materials such as geopolymers.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of the studied area (triangle symbol: sampling points), (b) Panoramic view of the area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photograph of red–yellow–green superposed clays from the Kebili region (Lower Cretaceous).

Figure 2

Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of the raw materials.

Figure 3

Table 2. Mineralogical composition (wt.%) of the raw materials.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Micro-granulometric analysis of the C2 sample.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Plasticity of the studied samples Dj1, C2, BM2 and Cr1. Projection of the samples in the Casagrande diagram (Casagrande, 1947). The A line separates clays from silts. The U line defines the upper limit of the correlation between PI and LL. LL = liquid limit; PI = plasticity index.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. FTIR spectra of the studied raw materials.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. TGA/DSC curves and weight loss (%) for the C2 sample. DSC is shown by the continuous line and TGA is shown by the dotted line.

Figure 8

Table 3. Mix design elemental ratios and the equivalent Na2O values of the geopolymers.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Specimens of prepared geopolymers of each sample.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. XRD traces for the four clay samples before calcination (raw), after calcination (calc.) and after reaction (react.). Phase identification was based on International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) and Crystallography Open Database (COD) databases. I = illite; K = kaolinite; Q = quartz; C = calcite; A = anatase; F = feldspar; D = dolomite; H = hematite; G = gypsum; An = anhydrite; S = sodium carbonates (trona, thermonatrite); B = burkeite.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. SEM back-scatter detector images of reacted samples C2 (a) and Dj1 (b). (c,d) Example compositions of the sample matrices obtained using EDS analysis.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Semi-adiabatic calorimetry heat release curve (differential curve over the first 10 min displayed in the inset).

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Kaolinite percentage in the clay fraction vs compressive strength (red circles) and vs magnitude of the peak in the differential heat release curve (blue squares).

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Correlation between the SiO2:Al2O3 and Al2O3:(N2O + K2O) ratios and compressive strength.