Nomenclature

• A projected or wetted area (m²)

• C _D form drag coefficient (dimensionless)

• C _f skin-friction coefficient (dimensionless)

• C _L lift coefficient (dimensionless)

• E specific towing effort (N s kg^-1)

• F external force on iceberg (N)

• f Coriolis parameter Ω sin φ (s^-1)

• H height of iceberg (m)

• k _c Coriolis coefficient (dimensionless)

• k _i added mass coefficient (dimensionless)

• L length dimension of iceberg (m)

• M mass of iceberg (kg)

• S factor sensitivity (dimensionless)

• V velocity of wind (m s^-1)

• x x coordinate (m)

• y y coordinate (m)

• Z height above sea surface (m)

• α angle between iceberg y-axis and direction of motion of iceberg

• β angle between direction of iceberg motion and north

• ψ angle between towing pull and iceberg y-axis

• Ω angular velocity of earth (7.29 × 10^-5 rad s^-1)

• Φ latitude angle

• ρ fluid density (kg m^-3)

• θ angle between wind direction and north

Subscripts

• a refers to air

• w refers 10 wetted area

• wi refers to wind

• x denotes forces or velocities in the x-direction, lengths or areas projected on the x-direction and coefficients relevant to x-direction motion

• y denotes forces or velocities in the y-direction, lengths or areas projected on the y-direction and coefficients relevant to y-direction motion

Introduction

Considerable interest in the possibility of utilizing Antarctic icebergs for water supply to coastal regions has been generated by the work of Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell (1973) and also by Reference Hult and OstranderHult and Ostrander (1973). The latter authors studied a hypothetical tow of large, insulated iceberg trains from the Antarctic to southern California. Their assumption of effective insulation of the icebergs essentially eliminated deterioration through melting and calving from their analysis, so that hydrodynamic considerations were dominant in their simulation. However, the technology of insulation is arguably the most problematic aspect of the whole operation, so that the alternative approach of towing unprotected icebergs needs to be fully evaluated. On the other hand, Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell (1973) did model such an operation, where unprotected icebergs were towed to destinations in the southern hemisphere, but a number of important factors in iceberg deterioration were not included in their model. Since the viability of a towing operation would be dramatically affected by the total rate of ablation of the iceberg, it is important to estimate this rate with reasonable accuracy.

The work reported here includes the important melting mechanisms of bubble-assisted natural convection and wave attack, and accounts for the effects of non-uniform melting. In addition, wave radiation stresses and Coriolis forces were explicitly included in the force balance which determines the velocity of the iceberg. The inclusion of such factors makes very significant differences to the resultant calculated ice delivery and energy consumption.

The general towing trajectory studied is approximately equivalent to that studied by Weeks and Campbell, but a simplified environmental regime has been specified which gives rise to a quasi-one-dimensional trajectory. This makes it possible to isolate the sensitivity of the ice delivery results from each of the important environmental factors, and from the assumptions concerning the fluid dynamics of the motion of the iceberg and the heat transfer to it.

General Dynamic Model

The motion of the iceberg is modelled by the following force balance written in component form:

x direction:

y direction:

The terms on the right-hand side are, in order, the sum of all external forces (wind, wave, and towing force) independent of the motion of the iceberg, the Coriolis force, form drag, skin friction drag, and normal (lift) forces.

A number of assumptions are implicit in the writing of such a dynamic model. The most important ones are:

• (i) The motion can be described by a Coriolis-induced perturbation to a conventional high-Rossby-number dynamic model.

• (ii) The motion is translational but without rotation, where the velocity of the iceberg with respect to the water can be represented by a single translation vector.

• (iii) The Coriolis force can be written unambiguously in terms of the relative velocity of the iceberg with respect to water, and is modified by an empirical coefficient k _c.

• (iv) The whole of the attitude-dependent effects on hydrodynamic drag can be absorbed by considering the drag components to arise from the corresponding velocity component and a constant drag coefficient.

Specification of environmental forces

The direct wind force was specified as follows:

where V _z = V ₁₀(Z/10)^1/7, α = tan^-1 (x/y), and the various angles are positive as shown in figure 1.

Fig. 1.

The iceberg in its frame of reference for the dynamic model.

The wave force was calculated as that arising from the reflection of the waves of a fully risen sea from the vertical face of an iceberg, including the effect of a wavelength spread (personal communication from K. T. Spillane). This was modified by an arbitrary latitude-dependent factor to allow for the effects of sea ice and the inconstancy of wind direction:

It is interesting to note that on the above estimates, the wave radiation force becomes comparable with the direct wind force at wind velocities over 10 m s^-1. The mean wind used in the towing simulations was obtained by taking a zonal average of wind data from all sources between 70° E. and 150° E. longitude, as reported by Reference EyreEyre (1972).

Although the general circumpolar current has a marked easterly transport there are probably significant circulatory motions with a time scale of weeks or months, and an actual towing operation may well be able to pick significant favourable currents to provide a natural northerly component to the motion. Nevertheless, it was assumed in this simulation that there was in fact no meridional component, so that transport was neither helped nor hindered by the general ocean circulation.

The specification of drag coefficients and other important shape-related factors is not straightforward, since the available information is sparse and somewhat equivocal. Reference Job and HusseinyJob ([^c1978]) has discussed this topic in its application to the present simulation. The form drag coefficients C _D assumed are in the range 0.35 to 0.9 depending on shape, the friction drag coefficients C _f in the range 0.002 to 0.006, and the Coriolis coefficients k _c in the range 0.6 to 1.3.

When the appropriate coefficients, environmental forces, and towing force are inserted into the dynamic model, the resulting equations can generally be solved by an iterative process for the velocity components with respect to the mean current, and . This solution requires the arbitrary specification of either the orientation of the iceberg or the direction of the resultant velocity of the iceberg, in order to fix the system in a geographical frame of reference.

The pseudo-one-dimensional trajectory allows the convenient specification of the direction of motion with respect to the current, i.e. due north. On occasion, where the winds were unfavourable and the towing force small, a simple northward motion was not possible, and a search had to be made for other possible directions which had a significant northerly component of motion.

Iceberg Melting and Deterioration

In towing an unprotected iceberg, the rates of ablation and calving are critical in the determination of whether significant quantities of ice will be delivered. Previous authors have confined their attentions to an ablation mechanism of turbulent, forced-convective heat transfer to a homogeneous plane surface, a mechanism which is fairly well understood.

The important mechanisms of deterioration which can be foreseen are:

• (i) Turbulent, forced-convection ablation of the bottom and immersed portions of the sides due to the net motion of the iceberg through still water, enhanced by surface macro-roughness or waviness.

• (ii) Buoyancy-induced natural convection along the sides, enhanced by the buoyancy of air bubbles released along with the melting ice.

• (iii) Undercutting of the sides by wave action, followed by top calving.

• (iv) Subsurface calving due to the upthrust on large underwater shelves formed by other ablation mechanisms.

• (v) Differential melting along cracks or low-density planes in the iceberg, leading to further calving.

• (iv) Convection caused by wallowing and possible overturning following a large calving event.

• (vii) Top melting by interception of solar radiation and convection with the atmosphere.

• (viii) Possible break-up of the iceberg due to thermal stresses induced following calving in warm waters.

The influence of the several melting mechanisms is also further complicated by two important factors. These are the markedly lower density of the ice in the upper portion of the berg (Reference Crary, Clary., Robinson, Bennett and BoydCrary and others, 1962, p. 115), and the uncertainty regarding the likely salinity profile in the water close to the ice surface. This last factor affects both the effective temperature difference which drives the heal transfer, and the magnitude of the buoyancy forces which drive the strong natural convection.

Turbulent forced convection was modelled using the well-known Eckert and Drake flat plate correlation (Reference Eckert and DrakeEckert and Drake, 1959, p. 215), after modification for surface waviness, Reference Ashton, Landis and HordemannAshton, 1972), initial ice temperature, and finite interfacial velocity (Reference Vanier and TienVanier and Tien, 1968). Natural convection was modelled using a well-establishcd correlation (Reference McAdamsMcAdams, 1954, p. 172) where the effective buoyancy contribution was modified by the presence of air bubbles (Reference KonsetovKonsetov, 1966). The influence of these bubbles on the Prandtl number of the sea-water was also included (Reference BatchelorBatchelor. 1967, p. 253). Wave action was modelled crudely by considering the melting action as approximated by forced convection corresponding to the induced swash velocities which can be estimated to prevail. Top calving was assumed to take place concurrently with this undercutting at the water line. The other five deterioration mechanisms listed above were not included in this simulation.

It is clear that the effects of low ice density in the upper parts of the berg, of buoyancy induced by the released air bubbles, of wave action, and of the vertical temperature gradient in the surrounding water, combine to produce a concentrated attack along the sides of the upper parts of the iceberg. It was therefore essential to model iceberg ablation as a function of depth. The development of a wave-cut platform introduces further complications, since the direction of ablation, being normal to the ice surface, is no longer horizontal on the sides. The effectiveness of natural convection is also influenced by surface inclination (Reference Lloyd, Lloyd, Sparrow and Eckert.Lloyd and others, 1972).

The recession of the profile of an iceberg resulting from these combined influences is presented for a typical simulation run in Figure 2. The corresponding yield and northward-tow velocities are shown in Figure 3. It is noteworthy that the rate of mass loss calculated here is many times greater than that obtained by considering forced convection alone, and is roughly comparable with that observed by Reference KollmeyerKollmeyer (1966).

Fig. 2.

Recession of the side face of an iceberg for a typical simulated low. (4 km² equi-dimensional iceberg at 5 × 10^-5 m s^-2 nominal towing acceleration.) Profiles are plotted at time intervals of 5 × 10⁵ s.

Fig. 3.

Velocity trajectory find yield for a typical simulated tow. (4 km² equi-dimensional iceberg at 5 × 10^-5 m s^-2 nominal towing acceleration.) Transit time was 63 d.

Towing Simulation

The formulation of the equations of motion in terms of the iceberg velocity with respect to the current suggests an important simplification for the towing route. A constant bearing can be taken for this velocity with respect to the current, and any current component in this direction added. This allows environmental conditions (wind and current speed and direction, and sea temperature) to be specified simply as functions of latitude, and the sensitivity of the total ice delivery to variations from the standard condition to be easily isolated. This is one way of handling the large number of variables which need to be included.

The simulation has been performed for transport from 66° S. to 38° S. latitude, corresponding to a possible destination on the southern coast of Australia. The results may therefore be directly compared with those of Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell (1973).

The towing operation was assumed to be performed at constant power, which is slightly different from the constant thrust assumption of previous workers. For a certain combination of assumptions regarding initial iceberg size and shape, towing power, and environmental and other factors, the height out of water and the shape coefficients were calculated, and the velocity of the iceberg was computed (assumed constant for the standard time interval of 5 × 10⁴ s (13.9 h)). After each time interval, melting decrements over the vertical profile and the undersurface were calculated, and the iceberg mass, flotation level, and all shape coefficients were recalculated. When the destination latitude was reached, the ice yield and energy consumption parameters were calculated.

Ice Delivery

The result of most importance is the volume of ice delivered as a function of iceberg size and towing force. Four sizes of iceberg were selected for examination: 1.5, 4, 7, and 10 km² of initial plan area, and two different shapes were used: equi-dimensional (circular plan) and a 3 : 1 elliptical plan. This is the lower part of the range studied by Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell (1973) who considered icebergs up to 100 km² initial plan area.

A number of values of tug power were used, generally in the range 50 to 1 000 MW, corresponding approximately to the range 5 to 100 MN (500 to 10 000 tons) of towing pull. This compares with the range 2 to 20 MN which was considered by Weeks and Campbell. It was found necessary to use such large towing forces because lesser forces gave rise to several problems. These included poor performance under unfavourable winds at high latitudes and iceberg instability arising from excessive melting during the later part of the journey.

A useful measure of towing effect is the "nominal towing acceleration", defined here as the ratio of the time mean of the towing force divided by the initial mass of the iceberg. Values of towing acceleration less than about 2.5 × 10^-5 m s^-2 were not useful for the journey from 66° S. Consideration of the likely wind and wave forces under gale conditions and the possibility that an adverse current may have to be headed at times, suggests that this acceleration would be a minimum requirement. This corresponds to the suggestion by Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell (1973) that a desirable minimum towing force would be that capable of maintaining a towing velocity of 0.25 m s^-1.

The bold central lines in Figure 4 indicate the gross quantities of ice that could be delivered under the central assumptions of the model for three of the iceberg sizes. The simulation predicts that the proportion of the original iceberg which is delivered is a strong function of the towing force. This result is in contradiction to the results of Weeks and Campbell, who found that the percentage yield was almost independent of the towing force. The difference arises from the fact that the principal ablation mechanisms modelled here are essentially independent of the iceberg velocity. On the other hand, the conclusion that the percentage yield is not a strong function of the initial size and shape is in general agreement with Weeks and Campbell, at least over the range of size studied here.

Fig. 4.

Quantity of ice delivered from three initial sizes of iceberg 10 km², 4 km², and 1.5 km² plan area, corresponding to 1.96 km³, 0.78 km³, and 0.29 km³ water equivalent respectively, and two shapes, as a function of mean towing force. The effect on ice delivery of a ±30% variation in total melting rate is shown.

Figure 4 also shows the effect on ice delivery of varying the assumptions which determine the overall melting rate, by +30% and —30% respectively. This variation makes a drastic difference to the ice delivery, which emphasizes the need for a realistic prediction of deterioration rates. In a similar manner, the ice delivery under varying assumptions of form drag coefficients, Coriolis coefficients, towing distance, and meridional current component were computed, and the results are analysed in terms of a "sensitivity factor" in a later section.

Towing Effort and Energy Consumption

The assessment of a scheme of this nature depends essentially upon the estimation of technical feasibility and economic viability. The predictions of ice delivery volumes for different towing forces as presented in the previous section are relevant to the assessment of the technical feasibility. From the point of view of economics, the most important single factor is the unit cost of water delivery, including conversion and shore facilities. The towing costs are clearly an important part of this unit cost, and they have been estimated in previous work (Reference Weeks and CampbellWeeks and Campbell, 1973; Reference Hult and OstranderHult and Ostrander, 1973). A complete economic analysis of the towing stage is however hardly justified at this stage, given the approximate stale of our knowledge. It is also markedly affected by assumptions regarding interest rates, fuel costs, and the like, which are external to the study.

On the other hand, consideration of the cost components involved indicate that the energy consumed per unit of ice delivered is of central importance, since many costs are directly proportional to the specific energy consumption. The energy consumption is however, markedly affected by the efficiency of the towing method employed. The essential difficulty of the particular iceberg towing operation can be isolated by calculating a "specific towing effort" E, defined here as the time-mean product of towing force and time, divided by the mass of ice delivered, in units of N s kg^-1. Having estimated the value of E for a particular towing job, this can be simply converted to a specific energy consumption by multipying by the power-to-thrust ratio appropriate to the type of towing apparatus employed. This ratio has values of around 10W N^-1 for conventional tugs. If desired, an all-up unit-energy cost can be applied to this specific energy consumption to obtain an estimate of the unit delivery cost of ice. Some results are presented in this way in Figure 5, and this makes clear several important points:

• (i) For the trip from 66° S., there is a well-defined optimal towing force for each size and shape, which minimizes the total towing effort per unit mass of ice delivered. This optimal towing acceleration is in the region of 10^-4 m s^-2.

• (ii) The elongated iceberg shape is considerably more efficient than the equi-dimensional shape, but the difference is less significant for the larger sizes.

• (iii) Very much less effort is required to tow icebergs from 50° S., and the specific towing effort drops off continuously as the towing acceleration is reduced. The results for very low towing accelerations are only of academic interest because of the requirement for effective control under adverse conditions.

Fig. 5.

Specific towing effort required for the delivery of ice to 38° S. from 66° S. and 50° S. for two initial iceberg sizes and two shapes as a function of the nominal towing acceleration.

Over-All Sensitivity Factors

A variance analysis could be used to separate out the important variables and their interactions, but a highly simplified approach is presented here. A sensitivity factor S is defined for a set of standard conditions of all parameters (except parameter P) by the following:

,

where E ₁ and E ₂ are the lower and higher values of the specific towing effort, and P ₁ and P₂ are the lower and higher values of the parameter P respectively. Sensitivity factors have been calculated for the standard condition of an equi-dimensional iceberg with a nominal towing acceleration of 5 × 10^-5 m s^-2 (Table I).

TABLE I.

CALCULATED SENSITIVITY FACTORS FOR VARIOUS PARAMETER AND ICEBERG AREA CHANGES

Some important conclusions follow from such an analysis. Current, towing distance, and melting rate each have a disproportionately great effect on the towing effort. It is clear from this that it would be very worthwhile to expend considerable effort in locating icebergs well north of the Antarctic continent when a tow to 38° S. is under consideration. A greater knowledge of actual currents at the time of the tow could be of great assistance if it is possible to avoid unfavourable regions and to take advantage of favourable northward currents. It is also vital to obtain better information on the behaviour and deterioration of icebergs in warm seas.