Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T02:21:36.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unifying the Study of Asymmetric Hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2017

Andrew S. Rosenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. Email: rosenberg.1108@osu.edu
Austin J. Knuppe
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. Email: rosenberg.1108@osu.edu
Bear F. Braumoeller
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. Email: rosenberg.1108@osu.edu

Abstract

This article presents a conceptual clarification of asymmetric hypotheses and a discussion of methodologies available to test them. Despite the existence of a litany of theories that posit asymmetric hypotheses, most empirical studies fail to capture their core insight: boundaries separating zones of data from areas that lack data are substantively interesting. We discuss existing set-theoretic and large-N approaches to the study of asymmetric hypotheses, introduce new ones from the literatures on stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis, evaluate their relative merits, and give three examples of how asymmetric hypotheses can be studied with this suite of tools.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable