Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T05:22:00.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of horizontal divergence on estimates of firn-air content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2020

Annika N. Horlings*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Knut Christianson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Nicholas Holschuh
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA
C. Max Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Edwin D. Waddington
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Annika N. Horlings, E-mail: annikah2@uw.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ice-sheet mass-balance estimates derived from repeat satellite-altimetry observations require accurate calculation of spatiotemporal variability in firn-air content (FAC). However, firn-compaction models remain a large source of uncertainty within mass-balance estimates. In this study, we investigate one process that is neglected in FAC estimates derived from firn-compaction models: enhanced layer thinning due to horizontal divergence. We incorporate a layer-thinning scheme into the Community Firn Model. At every time step, firn layers first densify according to a firn-compaction model and then thin further due to an imposed horizontal divergence rate without additional density changes. We find that horizontal divergence on Thwaites (THW) and Pine Island Glaciers can reduce local FAC by up to 41% and 18%, respectively. We also assess the impact of temporal variability of horizontal divergence on FAC. We find a 15% decrease in FAC between 2007 and 2016 due to horizontal divergence at a location that is characteristic of lower THW. This decrease accounts for 16% of the observed surface lowering, whereas climate variability alone causes negligible changes in FAC at this location. Omitting transient horizontal divergence in estimates of FAC leads to an overestimation of ice loss via satellite-altimetry methods in regions of dynamic ice flow.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Our layer-thinning scheme that accounts for horizontal divergence in the CFM. At each time step, the firn first compresses vertically and densifies (Eqn (4)) following the equations of the user-specified firn-compaction model (part one). Then the firn stretches horizontally without further density change, as determined by the prescribed horizontal divergence rate $\dot {\epsilon }_{{\rm h}}$ in Eqn (6) (part two).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Model response of FAC (b) to a step change in the horizontal divergence rate (a) from 0 to 1×10−4 a−1 (solid light gray line), to 0 to 1×10−2 a−1 (dotted black line), using the LIG firn-compaction model. The model was forced with an accumulation rate of 0.30 m ice eq. a−1, surface temperature of -20$^\circ$C and surface-snow density of 400 kg m−3. Evolution of the depth-density profile for a step-change in horizontal divergence rate of 5 × 10−3 a-1 is shown in (c) as an example. Black line indicates the BCO depth. Contour interval is 50 kg m−3.

Figure 2

Table 1. Steps in horizontal divergence rates used in the layer-thinning scheme.These encompass the range of horizontal divergence rates commonly observed on the ice sheets. The model was forced with an accumulation rate of 0.30 m ice eq. a−1, surface temperature of $-20^\circ$C and surface-snow density of 400 kg m−3. Percent decrease values are shown using LIG; values from HL are shown in parentheses.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Estimated firn-air content (FAC) using the layer-thinning scheme to account for horizontal divergence with the HL and LIG firn-compaction models. The greater the step-change in horizontal divergence rate, the greater the decrease in the FAC after the step change.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Location of Experiment 2 (THW) and Experiment 3 (PIG) on a map of mean thinning rate for 1978–2018 (Schröder and others, 2019). The black star represents the location on lower Thwaites used in Experiment 4. Map is superimposed on Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA) ice-sheet surface elevation (Howat and others, 2019). Inset shows location of figure domain in Antarctica. The projection is polar stereographic (EPSG: 3031).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Results from the layer-thinning scheme for the flowline on Thwaites Glacier using the LIG firn-compaction model (Experiment 2). (a) Horizontal divergence rates for the flowline. Horizontal divergence rates were derived from Mouginot and others (2019) following the approach of Alley and others (2018), and exclude compression. (b) The firn depth-density profile along the flowline for the model that accounts for horizontal divergence. Black line indicates the BCO depth. Contour interval is 50 kg m−3. (c) FAC results from model runs including the horizontal divergence rates shown in (a) (dotted line) and from a model without the horizontal divergence rates (dashed line).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Results from the layer-thinning scheme for a flowline on Pine Island Glacier using the Ligtenberg and others (2011) firn-compaction model (Experiment 3). (a) Horizontal divergence rates for the flowline. Horizontal divergence rates were derived from Mouginot and others (2019) following the approach of Alley and others (2018), and exclude compression. (b) The firn depth-density profile along the flowline for the model that accounts for horizontal divergence. Black line indicates the BCO depth. Contour interval is 50 kg m−3. (c) FAC results from model runs with the horizontal divergence rates shown in (a) (dotted line) and from a model without horizontal divergence rates (dashed line).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Surface boundary conditions, horizontal divergence rates and estimated FAC using the layer-thinning scheme with the LIG firn-compaction model for a location on lower Thwaites Glacier (Experiment 4). The model spin up from 1980 to 2007 is shown. Run 1 represents a conventional firn-compaction model run with no horizontal divergence. A constant horizontal divergence rate of 0.015 a−1 is used in run 2. For runs 3 and 4, after spin up with a constant divergence rate of 0.015 a−1, the model is run from 2007 to 2016 with temporally variable horizontal divergence rates derived from the Mouginot and others (2017) velocity time series. Run 4 also includes a linear ramp between horizontal divergence rates from the 1997 to 2007 values.

Figure 8

Table 2. Summary of results from temporally varying the horizontal divergence rate for the location on Thwaites Glacier from 2007 to 2016. Results using the LIG firn-compaction model in the layer-thinning scheme are shown, with results using the HL firn-compaction model in parentheses.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Ratio of the vertical and horizontal divergence rates (R) across the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Higher values of R show where horizontal divergence rates are significant in calculations of firn-air content.

Supplementary material: PDF

Horlings et al. Supplementary Materials

Horlings et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Horlings et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 690.4 KB