Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T12:39:45.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continued Decrease of Ice-Flow Velocity at Lewis Glacier, Mount Kenya, East Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stefan Hastenrath*
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our earlier monitoring program on Lewis Glacier, Mount Kenya, indicated a slow-down of the ice flow to January 1982, while based on the numerical modeling of the ice dynamics a further drastic decrease of the ice flow was predicted from the 1978 to the 1985 datum. This paper presents velocity measurements over the years 1982–83, 1984, and 1985. Changes of ice-flow conditions from 1978 to the mid 1980s are characterized by a velocity decrease by nearly half; a decrease of the maximum mass flux by more than half; a flattening and up-glacier shift of the velocity and mass-flux maxima; an up-glacier displacement of the transition between prevailingly longitudinal crevasses in the lower glacier and transverse crevasses in the upper glacier; and a terminus retreat by about 50 m. In consequence of the very weak ice flow remaining in Lewis Glacier, thinning and terminus retreat of the glacier are now primarily controlled by the in-situ net balance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1987
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Approximate flow-line pattern constructed from surface topography in February 1974. Dotted line represents a central longitudinal line, and broken and solid lines indicate the 1974 ice extents, respectively.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Approximate flow-line pattern constructed from surface topography in February 1986. Dotted line represents a central longitudinal line.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Surface ice-flow pattern 1982–83 (25–26 January 1982 to 21–23 December 1983). Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of horizontal velocity. Velocity scale in m a− 1 is ten times the horizontal map scale (i.e. a velocity of 10 m a− 1 would be represented as a 100 m arrow). The dotted line defines a central longitudinal line (see Figs 1–6) with tick marks at 50 m intervals indicating longitudinal distance from the highest point of glacier.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Surface ice-flow pattern 1984 (21–23 December 1983 to 5–6 January 1985), solid arrows, and 1982–84 (25–26 January 1982 to 5–6 January 1985) broken line arrows. Other symbols and scale as for Figures 3–5

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Surface ice-flow pattern 1985 (5–6 January 1985 to 1–2 January 1986). Symbols and scale as for Figures 3–5.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Secular variation of horizontal surface velocity (m a− 1) along central longitudinal line (see Figs 1–6). “Raw” observations are averaged over 100 m intervals to yield the “filtered” values. Time intervals given are as follows: 1978–79 (25–29 January 1978 to 26–27 December 1979) heavy solid line; 1980–81 (26–27 December 1979 to 25–26 January 1982) dotted; 1982–83 (25–26 January 1982 to 21–23 December 1983) broken; 1984 (21–23 December 1983 (5–6 January 1985) dash–dotted; 1985 (5–6 January 1985 to 1–2 January 1986) thin solid line.

Figure 6

Table 1. Longitudinal Mean Filtered Velocity and Maximum Mass Flux During 1978–85.