Automaticity and Implicit Measures

doi:10.1017/9781009170123.018

17 - Automaticity and Implicit Measures

from Part III - Deep Dives on Methods and Tools for Testing Your Question of Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2024

Edited by

Tessa West and

Harry T. Reis: Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Tessa West: Affiliation:
New York University
Charles M. Judd: Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Various areas in psychology are interested in whether specific processes underlying judgments and behavior operate in an automatic or nonautomatic fashion. In social psychology, valuable insights can be gained from evidence on whether and how judgments and behavior under suboptimal processing conditions differ from judgments and behavior under optimal processing conditions. In personality psychology, valuable insights can be gained from individual differences in behavioral tendencies under optimal and suboptimal processing conditions. The current chapter provides a method-focused overview of different features of automaticity (e.g., unintentionality, efficiency, uncontrollability, unconsciousness), how these features can be studied empirically, and pragmatic issues in research on automaticity. Expanding on this overview, the chapter describes the procedures of extant implicit measures and the value of implicit measures for studying automatic processes in judgments and behavior. The chapter concludes with a discussion of pragmatic issues in research using implicit measures.

Keywords

automaticity cognitive control cognitive resources consciousness implicit measures intentionality measurement

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology , pp. 404 - 426

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009170123.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., and Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between explicit and implicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393.10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Banaji, M. R., and Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Banse, R., Gawronski, B., Rebetez, C., Gutt, H., and Morton, J. B. (2010). The development of spontaneous gender stereotyping in childhood: Relations to stereotype knowledge and stereotype flexibility. Developmental Science, 13, 298–306.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00880.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bar-Anan, Y., and Nosek, B. A. (2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1194–1208.10.1177/0146167212446835CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bar-Anan, Y., Nosek, B. A., and Vianello, M. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343.10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.329CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., and Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 104–128.Google Scholar

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., and Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blair, I. V., Ma, J., and Lenton, A. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–841.10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bluemke, M., and Friese, M. (2006). Do irrelevant features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 163–176.10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.004CrossRef Google Scholar

Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., and Messner, C. (2005). Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 346–368.10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.006CrossRef Google Scholar

Calanchini, J. (2020). How multinomial processing trees have advanced, and can continue to advance, research using implicit measures. Social Cognition, 38, s165–s186.10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s165CrossRef Google Scholar

Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J., and Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behaviors and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350.10.1177/1088868312440047CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chen, M., and Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.10.1177/0146167299025002007CrossRef Google Scholar

Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., and Groom, C. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487.10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Corneille, O., and Hütter, M. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 212–232.10.1177/1088868320911325CrossRef Google Scholar

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., and Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

De Houwer, J. (2003a). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

De Houwer, J. (2003b). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In Musch, J. and Klauer, K. C. (eds.) The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

De Houwer, J., and De Bruycker, E. (2007). The identification-EAST as a valid measure of implicit attitudes toward alcohol-related stimuli. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 133–143.10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.004CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

De Houwer, J., Heider, N., Spruyt, A., Roets, A., and Hughes, S. (2015). The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 319, Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319.CrossRef Google Scholar

De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., and Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.10.1037/a0014211CrossRef Google Scholar

Deutsch, R., and Gawronski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101–114.10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001CrossRef Google Scholar

Dhar, R., and Gorlin, M. (2013). A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 528–542.10.1016/j.jcps.2013.02.002CrossRef Google Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eder, A. B., and Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281.10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637.10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., and Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B. (2013). What should we expect from a dual-process theory of preference construction in choice? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 556–560.10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.007CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B. (2019). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 574–595.10.1177/1745691619826015CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gawronski, B., Balas, R., and Creighton, L. A. (2014). Can the formation of conditioned attitudes be intentionally controlled? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 419–432.10.1177/0146167213513907CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gawronski, B., and Bodenhausen, G. V. (2005). Accessibility effects on implicit social cognition: The role of knowledge activation versus retrieval experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 672–685.10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.672CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., and Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Self-insight from a dual-process perspective. In Vazire, S. and Wilson, T. D. (eds.) Handbook of Self-Knowledge. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., and Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In Carlston, D. E. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., De Houwer, J., and Sherman, J. W. (2020). Twenty-five years of research using implicit measures. Social Cognition, 38, s1–s25.10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s1CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., and Banse, R. (2011). Response interference tasks as indirect measures of automatic associations. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., and Stahl, C. (eds.) Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., LeBel, E. P., and Peters, K. R. (2008). Response interference as a mechanism underlying implicit measures: Some traps and gaps in the assessment of mental associations with experimental paradigms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 218–225.10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.218CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Geschke, D., and Banse, R. (2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 573–589.10.1002/ejsp.166CrossRef Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Luke, D. M., and Creighton, L. A. (in press). Dual-process theories. In Carlston, D. E., Johnson, K., and Hugenberg, K. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., Morrison, M., Phills, C. E., and Galdi, S. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 300–312.10.1177/0146167216684131CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., and Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740.10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A G., and Lai, C. K. (2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 419–445.10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., and Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.10.1037/a0015575CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., and Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369–1392.10.1037/a0035028CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., and Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 143–165.10.1080/02699930125768CrossRef Google Scholar

Hofmann, W., Friese, M., and Roefs, A. (2009). Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 431–435.10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.013CrossRef Google Scholar

Högden, F., Hütter, M., and Unkelbach, C. (2018). Does evaluative conditioning depend on awareness? Evidence from a continuous flash suppression paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1641–1657.Google Scholar PubMed

Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., and De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorising in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. Psychological Record, 61, 465–498.10.1007/BF03395772CrossRef Google Scholar

Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Bernhardt., J., Dierksmeier, A., and Banse, R. (2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 676–690.10.1080/02699931.2010.508260CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., and Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133.10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process-dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541.10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-FCrossRef Google Scholar

Karpinski, A., and Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32.10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Klauer, K. C., and Becker, M. (in press). Latent state–trait analyses for process models of implicit measures. In Krosnick, J. A., Stark, T. H., and Scott, A. L. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klauer, K. C., and Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Controllability and resource dependence in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 648–655.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Koppehele-Gossel, J., Hoffmann, L., Banse, R., and Gawronski, B. (2020). Evaluative priming as an implicit measure of evaluation: An examination of outlier-treatments for evaluative priming scores. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 103905.10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103905CrossRef Google Scholar

Krieglmeyer, R., and Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behavior: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828.10.1080/02699930903047298CrossRef Google Scholar

Krieglmeyer, R. and Sherman, J. W. (2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the stereotype misperception task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205–224.10.1037/a0028764CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kurdi, B., Seitchik, A. E., Axt, J. R., Carroll, T. J., Karapetyan, A., Kaushik, N., Tomezsko, D., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (2019). Relationship between the implicit association test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.10.1037/amp0000364CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moors, A., and De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297CrossRef Google Scholar

Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886CrossRef Google Scholar

Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.10.1177/0146167204271418CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., and Tetlock, P. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192.10.1037/a0032734CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J., Burkley, M., Arbuckle, N. L., Cooley, E., Cameron, C. D., and Lundberg, K .B. (2013). Intention invention and the affect misattribution procedure: Reply to Bar-Anan and Nosek (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 375–386.10.1177/0146167212475225CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Payne, B. K., Burkley, M., and Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31.10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Payne, B. K., Cheng, S. M., Govorun, O., and Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Payne, B. K., and Correll, J. (2020). Race, weapons, and the perception of threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 1–50.Google Scholar

Penke, L., Eichstaedt, J., and Asendorpf, J. B. (2006). Single attribute implicit association tests (SA-IAT) for the assessment of unipolar constructs: The case of sociosexuality. Experimental Psychology, 53, 283–291.10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.283CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peters, K. R., and Gawronski, B. (2011). Mutual influences between the implicit and explicit self-concepts: The role of memory activation and motivated reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 436–442.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.015CrossRef Google Scholar

Röhner, J., Schröder-Abé, M., and Schütz, A. (2013). What do fakers actually do to fake the IAT? An investigation of faking strategies under different faking conditions. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 330–338.10.1016/j.jrp.2013.02.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., and Wentura, D. (2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the IAT: The recoding-free implicit association test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84–98.10.1080/17470210701822975CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sava, F. A., Maricutoiu, L. P., Rusu, S., Macsinga, I., Virga, D., Cheng, C. M., and Payne, B. K. (2012). An inkblot for the implicit assessment of personality: The semantic misattribution procedure. European Journal of Personality, 26, 613–628.10.1002/per.1861CrossRef Google Scholar

Scherer, L. D., and Lambert, A. J. (2009). Contrast effects in priming paradigms: Implications for theory and research on implicit attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 383–403.10.1037/a0015844CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schnabel, K., Banse, R., and Asendorpf, J. B. (2006). Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP). Experimental Psychology, 53, 69–76.10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.69CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shanks, D. R., and St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.10.1017/S0140525X00035032CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherman, J. W., Klauer, K. C., and Allen, T. J. (2010). Mathematical modeling of implicit social cognition: The machine in the ghost. In Gawronski, B. and Payne, B. K. (eds.) Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.10.1037/h0047274CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., Vandekerckhove, J., and Eelen, P. (2007). On the predictive validity of indirect attitude measures: Prediction of consumer choice behavior on the basis of affective priming in the picture–picture naming task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 599–610.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.009CrossRef Google Scholar

Sriram, N., and Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283–294.10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stahl, C., Haaf, J., and Corneille, O. (2016). Subliminal evaluative conditioning? Above-chance CS identification may be necessary and insufficient for attitude learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1107–1131.10.1037/xge0000191CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Teige, S., Schnabel, K., Banse, R., and Asendorpf, J. B. (2004). Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the extrinsic affective Simon task. European Journal of Personality, 18, 495–520.10.1002/per.531CrossRef Google Scholar

Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., and Rothermund, K. (2008). Minimizing method-specific variance in the IAT: The single block IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 237–245.10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.237CrossRef Google Scholar

Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., and Sherman, J. W. (2010). A practical guide to the implicit association test and related tasks. In Gawronski, B. and Payne, B. K. (eds.) Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Teige-Mocigemba, S., Penzl, B., Becker, M., Henn, L., and Klauer, K. C. (2016). Controlling the “uncontrollable”: Faking effects on the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1470–1484.10.1080/02699931.2015.1070793CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Uleman, J. S., and Moskowitz, G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 490–501.10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.490CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wegener, D. T., and Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141–208.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60017-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, T. D., and Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., and Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationships with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wolsiefer, K., Westfall, J., and Judd, C. M. (2017). Modeling stimulus variation in three common implicit attitude tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1193–1209.10.3758/s13428-016-0779-0CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ye, Y., and Gawronski, B. (2018). Validating the semantic misattribution procedure as an implicit measure of gender stereotyping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 348–364.10.1002/ejsp.2337CrossRef Google Scholar

Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A., and Rocher, S. J. (1999). Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 449–462.10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.449CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.