Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-l8mnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-20T18:05:05.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Amerind Personal Pronouns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Johanna Nichols  and
David A. Peterson
Johanna Nichols*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David A. Peterson*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
Johanna Nichols, Department of Slavic Languages, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2979 [johanna@uclink.berkeley.edu]
David A. Peterson, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 [daveap@garnet.berkeley.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Personal pronouns with first person n and second person m have been claimed to be frequent in the native languages of the Americas, widespread there, and rare elsewhere, and thus to indicate genetic unity of Amerind. A controlled cross-linguistic survey shows that these pronouns have an extensive yet restricted geographical range limited to the western Americas, and that they recur (though not frequently) elsewhere around the Pacific rim. This distribution removes the strongest (and perhaps the only) evidence for genetic relatedness of Amerind. In addition, on statistical grounds the n:m paradigm fails as a diagnostic of genetic relatedness, though equally clearly it cannot be due to universals or random chance. Certain other linguistic features and one mitochondrial DNA lineage have much the same geographical and statistical distribution. Though the language families in which these features appear cannot be shown to be genetically related, the families have clearly had some shared history (the type and degree not precisely specifiable) in the distant past. The n:m pronouns reflect a single, datable, noninitial and nonterminal phase in the settlement of the Americas and are probably the best linguistic marker of that phase.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 336 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Campbell, Lyle. 1994. Putting pronouns in proper perspective in proposals of remote relationships among native American languages. Proceedings of the meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, July 2–4, 1993, and the Hokan-Penutian workshop, July 3, 1993, ed. by Langdon, Margaret and Hinton, Leanne (Survey of California and other Indian languages, report 8.) Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cann, Rebecca, and Lum, Koji J. 1994. Reconstructing colonization of remote Oceania with mitochondrial DNA. Paper presented at AAA 93rd Annual Meeting, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1995. Regarding Native American pronouns. Mother Tongue 24. 62–64.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives, and Campbell, Lyle. 1994. The history and classification of American Indian languages: What are the implications for the peopling of the Americas? Method and theory for investigating the peopling of the Americas, ed. by Bonnichsen, Robson and Steele, D. G., 189–207. Corvallis, OR: Center for the Study of the First Americans.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 1995. The phonological composition of personal pronouns: Implications for genetic hypotheses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 21. 117–28.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1991. Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. Paradigms: The economy of inflection, ed. by Plank, Frans, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Joseph G., and Smith, David G. 1994. Distribution of the 9-bp mitochondrial DNA Region V deletion among North American Indians. Human Biology 66: 5. 777–88.Google Scholar
Merriwether, D. A., Rothhammer, F.; and Ferrell, R. E. 1994. Genetic variation in the New World: Ancient teeth, bone, and tissue as sources of DNA. Experientia 50. 592–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1995. The spread of language around the Pacific Rim. Evolutionary Anthropology 3:6.206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1996a. The comparative method as heuristic. The comparative method reviewed, ed. by Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm, 39–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1996b. Sprung from two common sources: Sahul as a linguistic area. Archeology and linguistics: Understanding Ancient Australia, ed. by McConvell, Patrick et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1996c. Shaped by some common contingency: Genetic and historical markers. Mathematical methods in comparative linguistics, ed. by Ringe, D. and Warnow, T., to appear.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1994. First and second person pronouns in the world's languages. On the origin of languages: Studies in linguistic taxonomy, 252–60. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1995. A note on Amerind pronouns. Mother Tongue 25. 60–61.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1983. The Mesoamerican Indian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torroni, A., Schurr, T. G., Cabell, M. F., Brown, M. D., Neel, J. V., Larsen, M., Smith, D. G., Vullo, C.M.; and Wallace, D. C. 1993. Asian affinities and continental radiation of the four founding Native American mitochondrial DNAs. American Journal of Human Genetics 53. 563–90.Google Scholar
Willerman, Raquel. 1994. The phonetics of pronouns: Articulatory bases of markedness. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Corrections