Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6pvrj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T08:44:14.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body image as a global mental health concern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Rachel F. Rodgers*
Affiliation:
APPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Psychiatric Emergency & Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Katherine Laveway
Affiliation:
APPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Priscila Campos
Affiliation:
NICTA, Body Image and Eating Disorders Research Group, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Pedro Henrique Berbert de Carvalho
Affiliation:
NICTA, Body Image and Eating Disorders Research Group, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil AMBULIM, Eating Disorders Program, Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Rachel F. Rodgers, Email: r.rodgers@northeastern.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Body image concerns related to weight or other dimensions of appearance are now prevalent on a global scale. This paper reviews the theoretical frameworks that account for the global similarities and regional differences in rates and presentation of body image concerns, as well as reviewing the extant data. Given the harmful consequences of body image concerns in terms of mental and physical health, their global burden is high. Interventions to mitigate these concerns at the individual and systemic level are warranted.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Author comment: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR1

Comments

8th August 2022

Dear Sir,

My coauthors and I would like to submit our manuscript titled “Body image as a global mental health concern” to Global Mental Health. Our review highlights the prevalence of body image concerns across the globe as well as associated risk factors, and the need for universal and targeted prevention.

Many thanks in advance for your time and consideration. We look forward to hearing from you,

Yours sincerely,

Rachel Rodgers, Ph.D.. FAED

Associate Professor

Review: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR2

Comments

Comments to Author: Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting manuscript. It is well-written, well-organized, and takes a much-needed global perspective on the widespread body image concerns across continents. It describes different theoretical frameworks for understanding body image concerns globally and it also summarizes what is known from research in different regions. I very much enjoyed reading this paper. Theories and results are clearly described. I especially liked the idea of interpreting the different rates in body image concerns in the light of the different theoretical frameworks and I think the paper could be improved by adding even more discussion/links between these. Below are my more specific comments:

Page 2: Body image is defined as “thoughts, feelings and behaviors of an individual related to their own appearance”, but body image may also comprise thoughts, feelings and behaviors related to other aspects of the body (health, functionality). Does this study focus more on the appearance domain? Please specify.

Page 2: “the early literature” – what time period does this refer to?

Page 2: it says “individuals whose identities afford them lower power and privilege” – could you please give examples?

Page 4: “toned yet curvy ideal” seems to describe a female ideal although this is not made explicit. Is there a global male ideal too?

Page 4: Critical feminist theories are salient in current body image research. Should this perspective be more emphasized in the theoretical part?

Page 2-5: It strikes me after reading the results that the research described seems to be investigating body image concerns mostly from sociocultural theory. It could be a good idea to think about the order of presentation of the theories, for example by starting with the most explored theory.

Page 6: it is stated that effective interventions have been developed – could you add some information regarding the focus of these interventions? This could be helpful for the other regions too.

Page 6: “In contrast, Latin countries…”. The previous sentence describes findings from Portugal which could be defined as a European Latin country. Should “in contrast” be removed from the sentence? Findings seem not to be in contrast. Should it be “Latin countries such as Portugal and X..”?

On page 14: “with higher levels of risk among already vulnerable groups.” – which are these groups? For example, one of the findings is that body image concerns are more salient in high-income English-speaking countries. This may not be considered a vulnerable group.

Some overall comments:

As mentioned above, I would like to see more connections between the results and the theories described. This is only briefly discussed on page 12 and I find this part very interesting. I think extending this discussion (for example in a section of its own) could really improve the paper. How can we understand the results in relation to the theories described? Is there support for all theories? How should future intervention/prevention look like considering these findings/theoretical frameworks?

Finally, there are a few grammatical errors/ typos in the MS, for example page 2 “privilege than underpin”, and page 4 “the role (of) appearance comparisons”.

Review: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

I have personal relationships with some authors. But I do not believe that this have influenced my review.

Comments

Comments to Author: Manuscript ID: GMH-22-0225

The authors proposed an important review of the theoretical frameworks about body image concerns through the different regions of the globe. This is a relevant topic to be discussed, given its implications in our society, especially in mental health field. That said, I have some questions, concerns and comments.

1. I understand the limitation of the words count to give an in-depth discussion about the theoretical concepts elected. However, I think that the presentation of the theories (Body Capital, Sociocultural and Minority stress) is excessively superficial.

P.3 – when talking about Body Capital, the authors cite Edmonds (2007) and Hunter (2011) that are secondary references, i.e., they cite the original authors. It would be better if the authors cited original theorists such as Pierre Bourdieu.

P. 3 – the topic’s number is 2.2 instead of 2.3.

P. 4 – I think it is important add some references to the following phrase: “These theories also highlight how […] existing systems of power and privilege”.

P. 5 – I suggest better explain the integrative model by Convertino et al. (2021).

2. The topic about the empirical evidence across countries is very diverse. They lack unity and cohesion. The information about some regions is more complete and more detailed than others. Also, the authors cite some old studies (from 2010, for example) to sustain the argumentation. About prevention programs, I suggest that the authors standardize the inclusion of eating disorders prevention programs that contain body image concerns in its scripts (such as the Body Project versions cited in the Latin America topic), making this information clear in the text. For example, when talking about prevention programs target specifically on body image concerns, this should be highlighted as well as when the programs that are being cited are ED prevention interventions.

P. 7 – The authors cited Diedrichs et al. (2015) as a study among non-English speaking countries. However, this research was carried out in UK.

P. 7 – The study from Barbosa (2021) is not cited in the references.

3. In order to better establish the relevance and innovation of the proposed review, the authors should add a topic summarizing how the found results across globe confirm or refute the theoretical concepts elected and presented (Body Capital, Sociocultural and Minority stress). Moreover, a better discussion about the implication of these information to the global mental health ins recommended.

Specific questions from the editor:

Question 1:

For global reviews, how well does the review cover global content in the inclusion of research, presentation of results, and/or in the discussion and implications? And how could this be improved/expanded?

The manuscript gives an overall framework about body image concerns around different regions of the globe. Besides that, it would be important to better discuss the implications of these information to the global mental health field.

Recommendation: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Body image as a global mental health concern — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.