Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T03:49:28.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

F. Debruyne ,
P. Delaere ,
J. Wouters  and
P. Uwents
F. Debruyne*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Leuven, Belgium.
P. Delaere
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Leuven, Belgium.
J. Wouters
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Leuven, Belgium.
P. Uwents
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Leuven, Belgium.
*
F. Debruyne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, U.Z. St. Rafaël, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to evaluate the vocal quality of tracheo-oesophageal and oesophageal speech, several objective acoustic parameters were measured in the acoustic waveform (fundamental frequency, waveform perturbation) and in the frequency spectrum (harmonic prominence, spectral slope). Twelve patients using tracheo-oesophageal speech (with the Provox® valve) and 12 patients using oesophageal speech for at least two months, participated.

The main results were that tracheo-oesophageal voices more often showed a detectable fundamental frequency, and that this fundamental frequency was fairly stable; there was also a tendency to more clearly defined harmonics in tracheo-oesophageal speech. This suggests a more regular vibratory pattern in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment, due to the more efficient respiratory drive in tracheo-oesophageal speech. So, a better quality of the voice can be expected, in addition to the longer phonation time and higher maximal intensity.

Keywords

SpeechalaryngealSpeech acoustics

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 4 , April 1994 , pp. 325 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainsworth, W. A., Singh, W. (1992) Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech. Folia Phoniatrica 44: 297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baken, R. J. (1987) Clinical Measurements of Speech and Voice, College-Hill Press, Boston, pp 154–155.Google Scholar
Dejonckere, Ph., Lebacq, J. (1987) Harmonic emergence in formant zone of a sustained <a> as a parameter for evaluating hoarseness. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Belgica 41: 988–996.Google Scholar
Hirano, M., Hibi, S., Yoshida, T. (1988) Acoustic analysis of pathological voice. Acta Otolaryngologica 105: 432–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, Y. (1973) Application of some acoustic measures for the evaluation of laryngeal dysfunction. Studia phonologica 7: 17–24.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, M., Morris, M., Gallagher, R. (1993) A comparative study of speech after total laryngectomy and total laryngopharyngectomy. Archives ofOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 119: 508–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pindzola, R., Cain, B. (1988) Acceptability ratings of tracheooesophageal speech. Laryngoscope 98: 394–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, J. (1984) Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheo-oesophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27: 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, J., Fisher, H., Blom, E., Singer, M. (1984) A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 202–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, R. J., Anderson, S. J., Denholm, S., Kerr, A. I. G. (1993) The assessment of alaryngeal speech. Clinical Otolaryngology 18: 181–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasserath, M., Remade, M., Ryckaert, M., Trigaux, I. (1992) Vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy by phonatory prosthesis. Estimation by high resolution frequency analysis. Folia Phoniatrica 44: 70.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B., Horii, Y., Blom, E., Singer, M. (1982) Airway resistance during esophageal phonation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47: 194–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, S., Watson, B. (1987) Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope 97: 737–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J., Leeper, H. (1992) Changes in laryngeal airway resistance in young adult men and women as a function of vocal sound pressure level and syllable context. Journal of Voice 6: 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar