Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T09:29:51.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The formation of planetary systems with SPICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

I. Kamp*
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
M. Honda
Affiliation:
Department of Biosphere-Geosphere Science, Okayama University of Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama 700-0005, Japan
H. Nomura
Affiliation:
Division of Science, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
M. Audard
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Geneva, Ch. d’Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
D. Fedele
Affiliation:
INAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, L.go Fermi 5, 50126 Firenze, Italy
L. B. F. M. Waters
Affiliation:
Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics & Particle Physics, Department of Astrophysics, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, NL-3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Y. Aikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan
A. Banzatti
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas State University, 749 N Comanche Street, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
J.E. Bowey
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
M. Bradford
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
C. Dominik
Affiliation:
Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
K. Furuya
Affiliation:
Division of Science, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
E. Habart
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, 91405, Orsay, France
D. Ishihara
Affiliation:
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, 252-5210 Kanagawa, Japan
D. Johnstone
Affiliation:
NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Rd, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7, Canada
G. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
M. Kim
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Kiel, Leibnizstraße 15, 24118 Kiel, Germany Space Research Institute of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, 8042 Graz, Austria
Q. Kral
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
S.-P. Lai
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, 11F of Astronomy-Mathematics Building, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
B. Larsson
Affiliation:
Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, Department of Astronomy, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
M. McClure
Affiliation:
Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
A. Miotello
Affiliation:
ESO, Garching, Germany
M. Momose
Affiliation:
College of Science, Ibaraki University, Bunkyo 2-1-1, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512, Japan
T. Nakagawa
Affiliation:
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, 252-5210 Kanagawa, Japan
D. Naylor
Affiliation:
Institute for Space Imaging Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4, Canada
B. Nisini
Affiliation:
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via di Frascati 33, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM)
S. Notsu
Affiliation:
Star and Planet Formation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
T. Onaka
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Meisei University, 2-1-1 Hodokubo, Hino, Tokyo 191-8506, Japan
E. Pantin
Affiliation:
CEA, Centre d'Etudes de Saclay, France
L. Podio
Affiliation:
INAF Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, L.go Fermi 5, 50126 Firenze, Italy
P. Riviere Marichalar
Affiliation:
Observatorio Astronóomico Nacional (OAN,IGN), Calle Alfonso XII, 3, 28014 Madrid, Spain
W. R. M. Rocha
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr Institute & Centre for Star and Planet Formation, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K., Denmark
P. Roelfsema
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
T. Shimonishi
Affiliation:
Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Niigata University, Ikarashi-ninocho 8050, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan; Environmental Science Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Ikarashi-ninocho 8050, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan
Y.-W. Tang
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, 11F of Astronomy-Mathematics Building, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
M. Takami
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, 11F of Astronomy-Mathematics Building, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
R. Tazaki
Affiliation:
Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
S. Wolf
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Kiel, Leibnizstraße 15, 24118 Kiel, Germany
M. Wyatt
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
N. Ysard
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, 91405, Orsay, France
*
*Author for correspondence: Inga Kamp, E-mail: kamp@astro.rug.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this era of spatially resolved observations of planet-forming disks with Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) and large ground-based telescopes such as the Very Large Telescope (VLT), Keck, and Subaru, we still lack statistically relevant information on the quantity and composition of the material that is building the planets, such as the total disk gas mass, the ice content of dust, and the state of water in planetesimals. SPace Infrared telescope for Cosmology and Astrophysics (SPICA) is an infrared space mission concept developed jointly by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and European Space Agency (ESA) to address these questions. The key unique capabilities of SPICA that enable this research are (1) the wide spectral coverage $10{-}220\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, (2) the high line detection sensitivity of $(1{-}2) \times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{W\,m}^{-2}$ with $R \sim 2\,000{-}5\,000$ in the far-IR (SAFARI), and $10^{-20}\,\mathrm{W\,m}^{-2}$ with $R \sim 29\,000$ in the mid-IR (SPICA Mid-infrared Instrument (SMI), spectrally resolving line profiles), (3) the high far-IR continuum sensitivity of 0.45 mJy (SAFARI), and (4) the observing efficiency for point source surveys. This paper details how mid- to far-IR infrared spectra will be unique in measuring the gas masses and water/ice content of disks and how these quantities evolve during the planet-forming period. These observations will clarify the crucial transition when disks exhaust their primordial gas and further planet formation requires secondary gas produced from planetesimals. The high spectral resolution mid-IR is also unique for determining the location of the snowline dividing the rocky and icy mass reservoirs within the disk and how the divide evolves during the build-up of planetary systems. Infrared spectroscopy (mid- to far-IR) of key solid-state bands is crucial for assessing whether extensive radial mixing, which is part of our Solar System history, is a general process occurring in most planetary systems and whether extrasolar planetesimals are similar to our Solar System comets/asteroids. We demonstrate that the SPICA mission concept would allow us to achieve the above ambitious science goals through large surveys of several hundred disks within $\sim\!2.5$ months of observing time.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Figure 1. Sketch summarising where SPICA provides unique insight into how planetary systems form.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Distribution of disk masses as a function of the stellar mass for nearby star-forming regions, based on recent millimetre dust continuum observations with the SMA and ALMA (Andrews et al. 2013; Ansdell et al. 2016; Barenfeld et al. 2016; Pascucci et al. 2016; Cieza et al. 2019; Cazzoletti et al. 2019) and assuming a global gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100. The two horizontal lines indicate the detection limits that will be achieved with SAFARI observations of the HD $J=1{-}0$ line fluxes in the case of the shallow (1 h on-source, dashed line) and deep (10 h on-source, dotted) surveys, following the HD line flux predictions from Trapman et al. (2017).

Figure 2

Figure 3. HD diagnostic diagram: Disk gas masses can be derived from a combination of the two HD lines, based on a grid of T Tauri disk models from Trapman et al. (2017). Open symbols denote disk model predictions for a distance of 140 pc (e.g., the Taurus star-forming region), where SPICA will not be able to detect both HD lines in a SAFARI/HR 1 h integration $(\!<\!5\,\sigma$) due to the lower sensitivity at $56\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ (the higher continuum lowers the line sensitivity). The black dot with error bars shows the only object, TW Hya ($60.1\,\mathrm{pc}$, put here at a distance of 140 pc), for which both HD lines have been measured with Herschel/PACS. The vertical dotted line indicates the 1 h sensitivity limit ($5\,\sigma$) for the HD $J=1{-}0$ line.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Herschel/PACS spectrum of TW Hya showing the detection of the lowest two HD rotational lines at $56\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ and $112\,\mu\mathrm{m}$(spectra re-reduced by D. Fedele).

Figure 4

Table 1. Wavelengths and upper level energies ($E_{\rm up}$) of CO lines to be observed with SAFARI to constrain the 2D gas temperature structure.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Predicted line flux of high-J CO rotational transitions in protoplanetary disks to be measured with SAFARI. The two models refer to the case of a flat disk with low scale height around a Herbig Ae star (spectral type A0, $20\,L_{\odot}$) and to a cold T Tauri disk (K5, $1.5\,L_{\odot}$), both located at a distance of 140 pc from the Sun (DALI models,Bruderer et al. 2012; Bruderer 2013). The two horizontal lines indicate the limiting line flux ($5\,\sigma$ detection limit) for a shallow and deep survey, respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Line intensity ratio of CO(18-17)/CO(12-11) versus $\mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}\, 78\,\mu\mathrm{m}/179\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ line ratios predicted by the DENT grid of disk models compared with the predictions of J- and C-type shock models of Flower & Pineau des Forets (2015) for different pre-shock densities and pre-shock velocities.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Expected profiles of the [Ne II]$12.8\mu\mathrm{m}$ (red), [Ne III] $15.5\mu\mathrm{m}$ (blue), and [Fe II]$17.9\mu\mathrm{m}$ (green) lines excited in a X-ray-induced photoevaporative wind, based on the models of Picogna et al. (2019) and the calculations of Weber et al. (2020). Histograms show how the lines are seen by the SMI instrument. An iron abundance 10 times smaller than solar has been assumed, taking into account the expected Fe depletion onto dust grains.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Sketch of gas distribution in a debris disk based on a detailed dissociation/ionisation model including an interstellar radiation field (IRF). This illustrates the complementarity of ALMA and SPICA gas observations in debris disks. Figure modified from Kral et al. (2019).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Predicted [C II] (left) and [O I] (right) masses for the sample of 192 debris disks in Kral et al. (2017). Approximate detection thresholds for surveys with Herschel/PACS (red, 1 h, $5\,\sigma$) and with SAFARI/HR (yellow, 1 h, $5\,\sigma$) are shown; the sensitivity of Herschel was only sufficient to detect (green dots) the most extreme disks in the population in deep integrations (longer than 1 h), whereas with SPICA we can build statistically representative samples of debris disk gas detections. The mass estimates for the few objects that have detections from Herschel are indicated by green dots. Green arrows indicate lower limits of carbon masses related to the large uncertainty on the excitation temperature.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Left: The water vapour line spectra after subtracting the dust continuum, at SMI and SAFARI wavelengths, colour-coded by the energy of the upper levels of the line. Right: The line-emitting regions of various water vapour transitions in a disk around a $1\,M_{\odot}$ T Tauri star for the model in Kamp et al. (2017). The white dashed line is the water snowline indicating where water vapor starts to freeze out.

Figure 11

Figure 11. The 179.5-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ water vapour line fluxes as a function of the dust continuum fluxes for the DENT grid of disk models with a variety of parameters (Woitke et al. 2010; Kamp et al. 2011). The sensitivity levels of SAFARI for a 1 h (shallow) and 10 h (deep) survey and the histogram of observed Herschel dust continuum fluxes (red) from selected star-forming regions are also shown.

Figure 12

Figure 12. (Left:) Water profiles of the 17.75-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ line convolved with $R=29,000$ ($\Delta v \sim 10\,\mathrm{km\ s}^{-1}$) and (centre) the 37.98-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ line convolved with $R=10,000$ ($\Delta v \sim 30\,\mathrm{km\ s}^{-1}$), emitted from a Herbig Ae disk with inclination angle of $45^\circ$ at a distance of 140 pc. An integration time of $\sim\!10\ \mathrm{min}$ is assumed. (Right:) The $\textbf{water vapour abundance distribution}$ ($n_{\rm H_2O}/n_{\rm H}$) in a disk around a $2.5\ \mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ Herbig Ae star (Notsu et al. 2017)

Figure 13

Figure 13. Simulated water ice spectra at $45\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ with different thermal histories. Using a 10-min integration (SAFARI noise level) and spectral resolution of $R=250$, these are distinguishable. The ‘Reference’ case is for using constant temperature crystalline ice opacities (140 K).

Figure 14

Figure 14. The effect of radial mixing of forsterite (crystalline silicate) grains in the disk on the infrared spectra. When fosterite resides only within 5 au, the $69\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ forsterite feature is very weak. On the other hand, when forsterite appears within the 0–50 au radius of the disk, astrong $69\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ feature appears (Maaskant et al. 2015).

Figure 15

Figure 15. (Top) The 69-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ resonance of $\mathrm{Mg}_2\mathrm{SiO}_4$ for a range of temperatures. The band position broadens and shifts redwards with increasing temperature. Note that the band also shifts redwards with increasing Fe content. Optical constants from Suto et al. 2006, using a distribution of hollow spheres (DHS) grain model (Min et al. 2005) with $f=0.7$ and a grain size of $1\,\mu\mathrm{m}$. (Bottom) Forsterite 69-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ feature peak and Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) dependence on Fe content in olivine ($\mathrm{Mg}_{2x}\mathrm{Fe}_{(2-2x)}\mathrm{SiO}_4$) and temperature. Only 1% inclusion results in $\sim\!0.3\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ shift to longer wavelengths (this figure has been modified from de Vries et al. 2012, Springer Nature).

Figure 16

Figure 16. Opacities of forsterite, enstatite, calcite, and the hydrosilicates montmorillonite and serpentine, showing the potential of SPICA to detect these dust species over the full SMI and SAFARI wavelength range. Optical constants from Suto et al. (2006), Zeidler, Mutschke, and Posch (2015), and Koike & Shibai (1990) using a ‘distribution of hollow spheres’ grain model (Min et al. 2005) with a vacuum fraction of $f=0.7$ and a grain size of $0.1\,\mu\mathrm{m}$.

Figure 17

Figure 17. Sensitivity to Kuiper belt analogues at 5 pc. The blackbody radius is the stellocentric radius obtained from the dust temperature by assuming the dust behaves as a blackbody. Grey dots are known disks around nearby stars. Disks that lie above a given instrument’s line are detectable. The SPICA sensitivity at 50–$70\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ is very similar, so only one line is shown. Thus, only SPICA can detect debris disks at Kuiper belt (and fainter) levels.

Figure 18

Figure 18. Kuiper Belt sample selection. The top row shows the 34-$\mu\mathrm{m}$ SMI survey, and the bottom row shows the 70$\mu\mathrm{m}$ B-BOP survey. (Left panels:) Volume-limited sample of nearby stars (Phillips et al. 2010). The KBs of targets falling below the solid line would be resolvable by SPICA. (Right panels:) The surface brightness of resolvable KB analogues is used to determine a further selection based on a 3 $\sigma$ detection in a 2-h observation assuming the sensitivity (dashed lines) and confusion limits (dot-dashed lines), and disk to star contrast assuming the PSF is known at 1% accuracy near the first Airy ring (dotted lines). Stars with detectable KBs lie above and right of all lines. Here disks have been assumed to be face-on; inclined disks would move up and to the right on this plot. Detection for the top left target in the upper right panel, $\alpha$ Cen, should still be possible as the angular size of a KB for this target is well beyond 1.2 $\lambda/D$. KBs around M-type stars cannot be detected at 34 $\mu\mathrm{m}$ unless the contrast is better than $1.7 \times 10^{-4}$, or at 70 $\mu\mathrm{m}$ because their surface brightness is below the confusion limit (unless stellar proper motion is used to subtract the background).

Figure 19

Table 2. Summary of the reference mission. Surveys in brackets use the data acquired by the main survey and do not require a different sample and/or longer exposure times. Exposure time estimates are derived using SAFARI simulator version 1.2 issue 6.2 and SMI simulator version 4.