Introduction

Research on the second generation of postwar immigrants is a relatively new phenomenon. Only in the past decade has it become a central focus in the study of immigrant integration. The postwar second generation in Europe came of age at roughly the same time as the American one – and that was when researchers began exploring it more systematically. Examples of early studies in various European countries are Seifert (1992), Crul (1994), Tribalat (1995), Veenman (1996), and Lesthaeghe (1997). International comparative research on the second generation is still scant. In fact, only one such venture has been undertaken – the EFFNATIS project, conducted from 1998 to 2000 by researchers in eight European countries (EFFNATIS, 2001). Because EFFNATIS focused on different ethnic groups in different countries, no comparisons could be made of how the same ethnic group had fared in different settings. Cross-national comparisons were, therefore, awkward to make (Crul and Vermeulen 2003).

The primary focus of this chapter is the comparison of integration processes in different countries. This is an aspect that has received far more attention in European than in American research. More specifically, we compare the integration of second-generation Turkish immigrants in five European countries: Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Austria. This focus on immigrants from a single source country offers a complementary contrast to chapter 8 by Schnepf, as does a focus on educational attainment rather than achievement.