1. Introduction
The Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Tempelfjorden Group) of Svalbard comprises a superbly exposed succession of biogenic cherts and carbonates with minor siliciclastic deposits (sandstones, siltstones and shales). The strata provide a window into the Permian Chert Event, an unprecedented 30 Ma long interval of biogenic chert deposition that extended across the northern margin of Pangaea and is recorded in Arctic Canada (Sverdrup Basin), eastern North Greenland (Wandel Sea Basin), Russia (Timan–Pechora Basin), the Barents Sea (the Finnmark Platform and Stappen High offshore) and onshore Svalbard (the latter is shown in Fig. 1) (Murchey & Jones, Reference Murchey and Jones1992; Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik, James and Clarke1997; Beauchamp & Baud, Reference Beauchamp and Baud2002; Larssen et al. Reference Larssen, Elvebakk, Henriksen, Kristensen, Nilsson, Samuelsberg, Tore, Stemmerik and Worsley2005). The Barents Sea has been the subject of exploration-motivated research for several decades (Ronnevik & Motland, Reference Ronnevik, Motland, Illing and Hobson1981; Stemmerik & Worsley, Reference Stemmerik and Worsley2005), resulting in a number of seismic-based sequence stratigraphic studies and correlations between offshore strata and the age-equivalent Kapp Starostin Formation on Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet in the Svalbard archipelago (e.g. Cecchi, Reference Cecchi, Vorren, Bergsager, Dahl-Stamnes, Holter, Johansen, Lie and Lund1993; Cecchi, Markello & Waite, Reference Cecchi, Markello, Waite, Steel, Felt, Johannessen and Mathieu1995; Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Nielsen, Svana and Stemmerik1998; Colpaert et al. Reference Colpaert, Pickard, Mienert, Henriksen, Rafaelsen and Andreassen2007).
Geological map of the Svalbard archipelago (excluding Bjørnøya), showing the section locations within NE Svalbard (E, H, S) and central Spitsbergen (F, FN, KF, TRN). The transect used for the section correlation (Figs 4, 5) and the interpreted cross-section (Fig. 7) is marked by a red line.
Onshore extensive outcrops of the Kapp Starostin Formation provide opportunity for a detailed sequence stratigraphic study and analyses of the geological setting and basin morphology. The Svalbard sequences reveal substantial lateral and vertical thickness and facies changes, varying geometry and stratigraphic relationships of sedimentary deposits, large-scale sedimentary patterns including the record of the Middle Permian mass extinction, and post-depositional deformation.
Previous sequence stratigraphic studies of the Kapp Starostin Formation have largely focused on correlation with contemporaneous offshore (Barents Sea) strata and were based on a limited number of sections (e.g. Stemmerik & Worsley, Reference Stemmerik, Worsley and Collinson1989; Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik, James and Clarke1997; Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Nielsen, Svana and Stemmerik1998, Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Svånå, Nilsson and Davydov2000, Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001). Here we present a more comprehensive sequence stratigraphic model for the Kapp Starostin Formation, based on seven onshore sections spanning the greater portion of the Svalbard archipelago. This is intended to facilitate correlation of the onshore and offshore strata of the Barents Sea and its counterparts across northern Pangaea. Detailed facies analysis provides the main tool for correlating the study sections, resulting in the interpretation of lateral facies relationships and the basin morphology, and a reconstruction of the sea-level history for the Artinskian to Changhsingian depositional period of the Kapp Starostin Formation.
2. Regional setting
Permian bedrocks are exposed at a multitude of localities across Svalbard (Fig. 1). In most areas, excluding Bjørnøya, the strata are arranged into two fundamentally contrasting lithostratigraphic units: the Early Carboniferous to Early Permian Gipsdalen Group and the Early to Late Permian Tempelfjorden Group (Fig. 2). The Gipsdalen Group (Serpukhovian–Artinskian) comprises mainly carbonates (limestones and dolostones) and evaporites (gypsum and anhydrite), characterised by fully photozoan (Wordiekammen Formation) to reduced photozoan/heterozoan biotic assemblages (Gipshuken Formation; Cutbill & Challinor, Reference Cutbill and Challinor1965; Lauritzen Reference Lauritzen1981a, Reference Lauritzen1981b; Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011). Sediments and fossils reflect open- to restricted-marine carbonate platform environments and coastal settings (intertidal to supratidal lagoons, mudflats and sabkhas) under a warm, dry climate. The boundary between the Gipsdalen Group (Gipshuken Formation) and Tempelfjorden Group (Kapp Starostin Formation) is marked by a major hiatus of Artinskian age. This manifests as a disconformity resulting from subaerial exposure of extended platform areas and the subsequent erosion of the uppermost Gipsdalen Group strata prior to, or during transgression, and the onset of Kapp Starostin Formation sedimentation (Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999; Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001; Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011; Fig. 2).
Permian chronostratigraphy (based on the International Chronostratigraphic Chart 2015/01), sea-level history (modified from Haq & Schutter, Reference Haq and Schutter2008) and lithostratigraphic system of Svalbard (modified from Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999). Fm = Formation; mb = member (informal); SG = Sassendalen Group.
In contrast to the Gipsdalen Group, the sedimentary facies of the Tempelfjorden Group (Artinskian to Changhsingian stages; Fig. 2) consist predominantly of light and dark spiculitic cherts interbedded with locally occurring siliceous shales and siltstones, glauconitic sandstones and silicified, fossiliferous limestones (Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999) with a fully heterozoan faunal assemblage. During the deposition of the Tempelfjorden Group, Svalbard formed part of a broad, epicontinental shelf at the northern margin of Pangaea, which experienced a period of prolonged biogenic chert deposition due to persistent cool-water conditions (Murchey & Jones, Reference Murchey and Jones1992; Beauchamp & Baud, Reference Beauchamp and Baud2002; Beauchamp & Grasby, Reference Beauchamp and Grasby2012; Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall, Talavera, Galloway, Piepjohn, Reinhardt and Blomeier2015, Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall and Sanei2016). The strata record open-marine nearshore to deeper offshore environments.
Synsedimentary tectonic activity in the Svalbard region during the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) created a series of local rift basins across the archipelago. By the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), rift movements ceased and the entire region experienced a more uniform subsidence during the Permian, although higher subsidence rates and local downwarping may have continued to some extent near previous graben structures, affecting sedimentation, palaeobathymetry and topography during deposition of the Tempelfjorden Group (Steel & Worsley, Reference Steel, Worsley and Spencer1984; Stemmerik & Worsley, Reference Stemmerik, Worsley and Collinson1989). Accordingly, the thickness of the Tempelfjorden Group varies substantially, from a maximum of 460 m in western Svalbard (>400 m on Akseløya, and 380 m at the Kapp Starostin Formation type section at Festningen, outer Isfjorden) at the deepest points in the depositional basin, to only a few metres thickness at Hornsund in southern Spitsbergen. Further south still, at Sørkapp Land, the Kapp Starostin Formation completely wedges out against the margins of the Sørkapp–Hornsund High (Fig. 1; Siedlecka, Reference Siedlecka1970; Hellem & Worsley, Reference Hellem and Worsley1978; Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999).
The Tempelfjorden Group is divided into the Kapp Starostin Formation, the most widespread and predominant formation across Svalbard, and the contemporaneous Tokrossøya Formation (in Hornsund) and Miseryfjellet Formation (on Bjørnøya; Fig. 2). The latter two formations formed in contemporaneous depositional basins marked by distinct but similar sedimentological and palaeogeographic developments (Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999). The Kapp Starostin Formation is further subdivided into several members, of which only the Vøringen Member at the base of the formation is formally defined. Above the Vøringen Member, the strata of the Kapp Starostin Formation are arranged into a number of informal, local members, not referred to in this study. The upper boundary of the Kapp Starostin Formation to the Vardebukta and Vikinghøgda Formations of the latest Permian to Middle Triassic Sassendalen Group is sharp, condensed and conformable, and marked by the onset of marine shales and siltstones and the termination of biogenic deposits such as cherts (Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001; Dustira et al. Reference Dustira, Wignall, Joachimski, Blomeier, Hartkopf-Froder and Bond2013; Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall, Talavera, Galloway, Piepjohn, Reinhardt and Blomeier2015, Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall and Sanei2016). Carbonate producers disappeared c. 40 m below this boundary at the type section; skeletal limestones are not seen in the topmost metres of the Kapp Starostin Formation. This level is considered to be immediately below the Middle Permian mass extinction that saw the disappearance of >80% of brachiopod taxa (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015).
Biostratigraphic control is poor but there have been studies based on bryozoan, brachiopod, coral, conodont and palynomorph assemblages that provide approximate age control for the Kapp Starostin Formation (Szaniawski & Malkowski, Reference Szaniawski and Malkowski1979; Biernat & Birkenmajer, Reference Biernat and Birkenmajer1981; Nakamura, Kimura & Winsnes, Reference Nakamura, Kimura and Winsnes1987; Nakrem, Reference Nakrem1988, Reference Nakrem1991; Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik1988; Nakrem, Nilsson & Mangerud, Reference Nakrem, Nilsson and Mangerud1992; Mangerud & Konieczny, Reference Mangerud and Konieczny1993; Buggisch et al. Reference Buggisch, Joachimski, Lützner, Thiedig and Hüneke2001; Chwieduk, Reference Chwieduk2007). More recently, Bond et al. (Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015) attempted to date the upper part of the formation using chemostratigraphy (δ13Corg and 87Sr/86Sr ratios). Conodonts and foraminifera indicate a late Artinskian to Kungurian depositional period for the Vøringen Member, while palynomorphs, brachiopods, bryozoans and conodonts indicate Capitanian ages for the upper part of the formation (Nakrem, Nilsson & Mangerud, Reference Nakrem, Nilsson and Mangerud1992). The lack of reliable age-diagnostic taxa in the uppermost metres of the Kapp Starostin Formation has led to considerable disagreement on age assignment for its youngest sediments and a level of uncertainty regarding the positioning of the Permian–Triassic boundary (Wignall, Morante & Newton, Reference Wignall, Morante and Newton1998). However, δ13Corg chemostratigraphic studies on bulk samples from central Spitsbergen indicate that the top of the Kapp Starostin Formation is of latest Permian (Changhsingian) age, and that the Permian–Triassic boundary lies within the lowermost metres of the overlying Sassendalen Group (Wignall, Morante & Newton, Reference Wignall, Morante and Newton1998; Dustira et al. Reference Dustira, Wignall, Joachimski, Blomeier, Hartkopf-Froder and Bond2013; Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015; Wignall et al. Reference Wignall, Bond, Sun, Grasby, Beauchamp, Joachimski and Blomeier2016).
3. Methods
We measured seven sections across Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet (from southwest to northeast: Forkastningsdalen; Festningen; Tålmodryggen; Kapp Fleur de Lys; Eremitten; Hódbreen; and Selanderneset; Fig. 1), varying in thickness from 100 to 380 m, between the years 2005 and 2012. Bed thicknesses (terminology after Tucker, Reference Tucker2003), colours, lithologies, textures, sedimentary structures, macrofossils and the stacking pattern of the strata were recorded in the field, and more than 400 samples were collected and thin-sectioned for subsequent detailed microfacies analysis (Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011, Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013). This data provides the basis for the correlation of these seven vertical sections and the sequence stratigraphic arrangement introduced here. The petrography of the Festningen section (section FN) in western Spitsbergen has been examined in detail using a petrographic microscope and scanning electron microscope in backscatter mode. Carbonates are described according to the classification scheme of Dunham (Reference Dunham and Ham1962), whilst mixed siliciclastic–carbonate deposits are classified after Mount (Reference Mount1985) and siliciclastic sediments are classified after Wentworth (Reference Wentworth1922).
4. Facies and depositional setting of the Kapp Starostin Formation
Depositional sequences within the Kapp Starostin Formation strata are identified based on their large-scale stacking patterns, as well as facies and microfacies development, which generally reflect palaeowater depth and thus provide a reliable indicator of accommodation space. We use sedimentary facies in association with sedimentation patterns to infer relative sea-level changes within the studied sections. Detailed facies analyses of the Kapp Starostin Formation were performed by Blomeier et al. (Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011, Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013) and our depositional model (Fig. 3) is based on the three main depth-dependent facies associations established in those publications. These serve as the basis for the sequence stratigraphic model developed here, which derives from the interpretation of facies changes in all seven sections within this study (Figs 4, 5). A total of 11 facies types are recognized within the Kapp Starostin Formation strata (Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011, Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013), and are grouped into three facies associations (limestones, spiculitic cherts, and siliciclastics) that record a range of inner, middle and outer shelf depositional environments (Table 1; Fig. 3).
Schematic depositional model for the Kapp Starostin Formation, showing main facies associations and fossil assemblages of the inner, middle and outer shelf zones (modified from Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013). FWWB = fair weather wave base; SWWB = storm weather wave base. Facies descriptions are provided in Table 1.
Correlation of the vertical sections located in western and central Spitsbergen: Forkastningsdalen (F), Festningen (FN), Tålmodryggen (TRN), Kapp Fleur de Lys (KF; see Fig. 1 for section locations), showing section and bed thickness, main lithologies and fossils, depositional environments (inner, middle, outer shelf), and presumed third-order depositional sequences (grey cones). Abbreviations used for lithological descriptions follow the Dunham (Reference Dunham and Ham1962) scheme: m = mudstone; w = wackestone; p = packstone; g = grainstone; f/r = floatstones and rudstones. Abbreviations used for shelf position: I = inner shelf; M = middle shelf; O = outer shelf.
Correlation of the vertical sections located in NE Svalbard: Eremitten (E), Hódbreen (H) and Selanderneset (S; see Fig. 1 for section locations), showing section and bed thickness, main lithologies and fossils, depositional environments (inner, middle, outer shelf), and presumed third-order depositional sequences. Symbols and abbreviations as in Figure 4.
Facies and facies associations of the Kapp Starostin Formation
4.a. Inner-shelf facies association
The inner shelf refers to the zone stretching from the lower shoreface (and fair weather wave base, FWWB) to the middle-shelf transitional zone (Fig. 3). The inner-shelf facies association includes coarse-grained, brachiopod-dominated rudstones with minor grainstones and packstones (facies 1a, e.g. Fig. 6a; Table 1), fine-grained, sandy, bioclastic, peloidal grainstones with minor wackestones and packstones (facies 1b), mixed-bioclastic wackestones, grainstones, floatstones and rudstones (facies 1c, which is also present in some middle shelf settings). Some sections expose thin- to thick-bedded, massive sandstones (facies 3a) that are also interpreted as inner shelf deposits because they are extremely well-sorted and winnowed as a result of prolonged exposure to high-energy currents that perhaps occurred during storms (e.g. Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011, Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013).
Photographs of the dominant lithologies and facies types of the Kapp Starostin Formation. (a) At Kapp Fleur de Lys (section KF), the Vøringen Member (1), which mainly consists of coarse-grained, brachiopod-dominated skeletal floatstones and rudstones is overlain by a thick succession (2) of dark cherts interbedding with black shales and silicified mudstones. Person for scale = 1.8 m tall. (b) Close-up of the dark chert succession overlying the Vøringen Member at Festningen (section FN). The bedding of the medium- to thin-bedded cherts is due to black shale partings and intercalations of thin shale horizons. Hammer for scale = 33 cm long. (c) A monotonous, several metres thick, horizontally bedded succession of siltstones and paper shales forming a part of sequence TR4 at Tålmodryggen (section TRN). Field of view c. 8 m high. (d) An intercalation of glauconitic sandstones (1) and coarse-grained, brachiopod-dominated floatstones and rudstones (2) within sequence TR4 at Selanderneset (section S). Hammer for scale. (e) An association of light-coloured, massive cherts (1), overlain by a bed-set of thick- to thin-bedded bryozoan grainstones (2) in sequence TR3 at Festningen (section FN). Hammer (centre of photograph) for scale.
4.b. Middle-shelf facies association
The middle shelf area extends from the middle shelf transitional zone near fair weather wave base (FWWB) to the storm weather wave base (SWWB). Coarse-grained, echinoderm- (facies 1d) and bryozoan-dominated (facies 1e) wackestones and floatstones and minor packstones, grainstones and rudstones are prevalent on the middle shelf, where they form prominent, thick- to medium-bedded bed-sets mainly comprising allochthonous debris and, more rarely, local autochthonous build-ups. With increasing water depth, the brachiopod constituents that dominate the inner-shelf facies associations gradually decrease in abundance. The echinoderm- and bryozoan-dominated limestones pass distally into thick- to medium-bedded, nodular to massive, light cherts (facies 2a), resulting from the accumulation of siliceous sponge spicules on extended submarine flats. Ehrenberg et al. (Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001) report localized bryozoan bioherms embedded in the light cherts, suggesting that in some middle shelf settings the two lithologies coexisted, perhaps on a structural high within the middle shelf. We do not see clear evidence of reef fabrics in our facies 1d and 1e, however.
4.c. Outer-shelf facies association
The outer shelf extends from around SWWB towards the deepest areas of the basin. The facies association is characterized mainly by thick successions of thin- to medium-bedded, massive, dark spiculitic cherts (facies 2b, e.g. Fig. 6b), locally interbedded with silicified mudstones (facies 3b) and black shales (facies 3c), forming partings and thin-bedded horizons, (Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013). In addition, intercalations of homogeneous, dark siltstones (facies 3d, e.g. Fig. 6c) occur in central and western Spitsbergen (sections F, FN, TRN). Abundant burrows and bioturbation within the dark cherts and fine horizontal lamination within some of the shales are indicative of varying bottom water oxygen levels on the outer shelf. Occasionally intercalated, thin- to medium-bedded limestones (wackestones to grainstones) marked by coarse-grained skeletal debris from the middle and inner shelf zones are interpreted as distal tempestites, reflecting the storm-related import of shallow-marine material into the most distal and deepest shelf zones (Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013).
5. Sequence stratigraphic arrangement
Due to the absence of subaerial unconformities, which might otherwise be used as sequence boundaries, we have adopted the transgressive–regressive (T-R) sequence approach introduced by Embry & Johannessen (Reference Embry, Johannessen, Vorren, Bergsager, Dahl-Stamnes, Holter, Johansen, Lie and Lund1992). This approach uses the subaerial unconformity as the unconformable portion of the boundary (not recorded in our sequences), and the maximum regressive surface as the correlative conformity (recorded in our sequences). Thus, individual T-R sequences are bound by maximum regressive surfaces (MRSs), not sequence boundaries of the traditional Exxon sequence stratigraphic model. This approach works well in more distal sections which lack a subaerial erosional unconformity. A single T-R sequence can be further divided into a fining-upward transgressive systems tract (TST) below, and a coarsening-upward regressive systems tract (RST) above, with the maximum flooding surface (MFS) being the mutual boundary. We have defined multiple T-R sequences in the Kapp Starostin Formation, each bound by an MRS that caps a succession of regressive sediments that coarsen upward as a result of decreasing accommodation space. The oldest of these in our sections is characterized by a ravinement surface – a transgressive surface of erosion generated by wave erosion near the base of the shoreface (see Section 5.a, below); several others are characterized by sediment starvation and the formation of firmgrounds. The T-R sequences in the Kapp Starostin Formation can be divided into their component systems tracts using conspicuous maximum flooding surfaces. These are distinctive surfaces of non-deposition, sediment starvation and condensation that tend to cap the finest grained sediments of the TSTs and precede the onset of coarsening-upward cycles (RSTs). Most of the MFSs seen in the Kapp Starostin Formation can be traced across the basin and correlated between the study sections.
We have identified seven T-R sequences (TR1–TR7) within the Kapp Starostin Formation (Figs 4, 5) of which all apart from the oldest sequence record complete trangressive and regressive systems tracts. The total duration of the Formation's depositional period was c. 30 Ma (latest Artinskian, at c. 283.5 Ma (Cohen et al. Reference Cohen, Finney, Gibbard and Fan2013, updated) to late Changhsingian, c. 252.5 Ma) and so the T-R sequences are probably third-order stratigraphic cycles with average durations of c. 4–5 Ma (e.g. Vail, Reference Vail, Einsele, Ricken and Seilacher1991; Coe et al. Reference Coe, Bosence, Church, Flint, Howell and Wilson2003). Although there seems to be a consensus that cycles in the Kapp Starostin Formation are the result of third-order eustatic cycles, opinion differs on the absolute number of cycles that are recorded (e.g. Ezaki, Kawamura & Nakamura, Reference Ezaki, Kawamura, Nakamura, Embry, Beauchamp and Glass1994; Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik, James and Clarke1997; Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001). However, our study is in agreement with Ehrenberg et al. (Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001), who identified seven sequences in the expanded Akseløya section; we have identified seven T-R cycles in the nearby expanded sections at Forkastningsdalen (F) and at Festningen (FN). The only discrepancy occurs in the interpretation of the basalmost cycles described below.
5.a. Sequence TR1
Sequence TR1 comprises most of the Vøringen Member of the Kapp Starostin Formation. The lower contact of the Vøringen Member with the underlying Gipshuken Formation marks the lowest base level recorded in the investigated strata. This contact is an unconformity that represents a hiatus of unknown duration within the Artinskian Stage (Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001; Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2011). The base of the Vøringen Member locally contains strongly reworked and bored carbonate extraclasts originating from the underlying Gipshuken Formation, which are interpreted as products of transgressive erosion. The initial flooding at the base of the Vøringen Member was rapid, and as a result the transgressive systems tract part of TR1 is absent, and this interval of time is recorded only by the ravinement surface. Consequently, we see only the RST portion of this sequence, as the newly available accommodation space was filled with coarsening-upward, largely inner shelf sediments (Figs 4, 5, 7).
Cross-section through Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet, showing interpreted facies/sequence correlations and basin morphology along the studied section sites. Blue lines = maximum regressive surfaces (MRS) that bound individual TR sequences. The MRS at the top of sequence TR4 is used as a tie-point because this is the uppermost MRS that is recorded in all seven sections. See Figure 1 for section locations and transect line; see Figure 4 for key to lithological symbols.
The complete regressive portion of the TR1 depositional sequence varies in thickness from c. 5 m (section TRN) to 20 m (section H in NE Spitsbergen; Figs 4, 5). The facies consist mainly of brachiopodal rudstones and grainstones (facies 1a; Table 1), with minor light cherts (facies 2a) and sandstones (facies 3a) in NE Svalbard. The northernmost sections (H and S) record a clear vertical facies shift from more offshore (e.g. middle shelf echinoderm- and bryozoan-dominated wackestones to grainstones, with minor floatstones and rudstones; facies 1d and 1e) to more nearshore (e.g. inner-shelf sandy brachiopod-dominated and bioclastic/peloidal grainstones and rudstones; facies 1a and 1b) consistent with a regressive systems tract. Thin, sandstone interbeds (facies 3a) also become more common upwards in several sections (e.g. at TRN, E, S, H; see Figs 4, 5).
5.b. Sequence TR2
Except at Festningen, the contact between TR1 and TR2 (i.e. the MRS that tops TR1) lies within the upper part of the Vøringen Member where a renewed deepening of the depositional area is manifest as a shift to echinoderm- and bryozoan-dominated wackestone and floatstones, with less common packstones, grainstones and rudstones (facies 1d and 1e) with intercalated light cherts (facies 2a, e.g. at section S), or as a gradual change from brachiopod-dominated rudstones and floatstones to finer-grained wackestones and packstones (e.g. at sections FN, TRN, KF, E, H). Only in section F is the MRS that caps sequence TR1 placed at the very top of the Vøringen Member because no intra-Vøringen facies change is observed (Fig. 7).
Sequence TR2 is the thickest complete transgressive–regressive sequence in the Kapp Starostin Formation, albeit with considerable lateral disparity. TR2 ranges from <50 m thick in Dickson Land (sections TRN and KF) and in NE Svalbard (sections E, H, S) to >100 m thick in western Spitsbergen (sections F and FN). The TST portion of TR2 saw a deepening that terminated carbonate deposition at the top of the Vøringen Member and led to the onset of chert deposition across the basin (Figs 4, 5, 7). The Vøringen Member is conformably overlain by a thin (up to several decimetres thick) dark shale horizon (facies 3c) in all sections that records deepening and transgression. This shale is succeeded by thick successions of dark, thin- to medium-bedded, spiculitic cherts (facies 2b; maximum thickness of 95 m in section FN) and silicified mudstones (facies 3b), marking the establishment of silica production in deeper, outer-shelf areas. Frequent shale intercalations and partings hint at parasequence-scale cycles.
At sections H and S in NE Svalbard, the dark cherts are less prominent (Fig. 5). Instead, the TST part of TR2 saw deposition of light, nodular cherts and two prominent metre-thick bryozoan-, echinoderm- and brachiopod-dominated floatstone and rudstone beds, suggesting generally shallower palaeowater depths and sedimentation above SWWB on the middle shelf within these areas. Dark cherts (facies 2b) occur at H towards the top of the TST, indicating that the prolonged deepening in sequence TR2 eventually resulted in the establishment of outer-shelf depositional conditions there. Note that Ehrenberg et al. (Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001) interpreted this package of sediment to be the highstand deposits of their first sequence, capped by an MRS. However, we consider the deep-water nature of this facies is inconsistent with a progradational systems tract and instead interpret this package to be a retrogradational systems tract capped by an MFS. Three to four repeated facies shifts are recorded within this TST at H (less obviously so at section S; Fig. 5) and these probably record either higher-order (e.g. fourth- or fifth-order) sequences that resulted from high-frequency sea-level fluctuations, or the influx of distal tempestites (Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013).
An MFS caps the thick successions of dark cherts and mudstones, above which the RST sees the sequence grade into a c. 20–25 m thick succession, firstly of lighter cherts (facies 2a) and then ruditic limestones, predominantly belonging to facies 1d and 1e (echinoderm- and bryozoan-dominated) in NE Svalbard (sections E, H, S; Fig. 5). These record a shift from outer to middle shelf environments in the NE. On Dickson Land (sections TRN and KF) the same change in shelf position is recorded by a thinner, more subtle coarsening upwards within darker (facies 2b) and lighter (facies 2a) cherts. Further west, middle shelf bryozoan-dominated floatstones and rudstones (facies 1e) are again developed at the top of this RST, especially at section F, where they reach 17 m in thickness.
Overall, the net effect of sequence TR2 is one of substantial deepening across the entire basin such that middle to outer shelf depositional environments became widely established across Svalbard (Fig. 7).
5.c. Sequence TR3
The TR2/TR3 boundary is marked by an MRS that records a renewed deepening in sedimentary facies, and a transition from inner to middle shelf limestone facies below (predominantly floatstones and rudstones but also packstones in the basin depocentre), to middle to outer shelf cherts above. At Festningen and Tålmodryggen (sections FN, TRN; Fig. 4), this level is marked by intensely bioturbated dark cherts (facies 2b) with abundant Thalassinoides and Skolithos burrows on their upper surfaces. These probably reflect condensation and sediment-starved conditions, and the formation of firmgrounds at the onset of the TST part of TR3.
In NE Svalbard, the MRS is marked by an abrupt transition from sandy rudstones and floatstones (facies 1d and 1e) to dark cherts (facies 2a). In all three NE Svalbard sections (E, H, S; Fig. 5) this level is notable for a level of intense glauconitization that extends downwards for a few metres (into the sandy limestones). We interpret this to be the product of sediment starvation in accommodation-starved nearshore (inner shelf) environments around the end of the RST and at the onset of transgression (e.g. Boreen & James, Reference Boreen and James1995; Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013).
The TST deposits in sequence TR3 have considerable lateral thickness variations (Fig. 7), and the MFS that terminates this systems tract has proved difficult to identify in some sections (particularly in outer shelf settings where it is characterized by a very subtle lithological change). Thus, in western Spitsbergen (sections F and FN) this portion of the sequence comprises nearly 40 m of predominantly dark and light chert (facies 2b and 2a). In Dickson Land, the MFS is characterized by a subtle shift from fining upward to coarsening upward within a package of dark cherts at section KF, whereas in the more condensed TRN section the TST consists of just a metre or so of dark, fine-grained chert. In NE Svalbard, the MFS succeeds a 5 and 10 m fining-upward sequence of dark cherts (facies 2b).
The RST part of sequence TR3 is recorded in a 20–25 m thick package of easily correlated, largely bryozoan-dominated floatstones and rudstones with minor packstones (facies 1e) at the most expanded F and FN sections (Fig. 4), where they are interbedded with thin carbonate mudstones and black shales respectively (probably the effects of higher-order cyclicity on the shelf). Packstones and grainstones (facies 1e) also develop in Dickson Land (sections TRN and KF) where they intercalate with, and cap, a coarsening-upward dark chert (facies 2b) sequence that is c. 12–22 m thick. In NE Svalbard, light cherts (facies 2a) coarsen upwards and are eventually succeeded by crinoid- and brachiopod-dominated floatstones and rudstones (facies 1d, 1c and 1a) of the middle to inner shelf respectively – the total packages being somewhat thinner at c. 3–11 m.
5.d. Sequence TR4
Sequence TR4 is lithologically similar to, but generally slightly thicker than, TR3. TR4 begins at an MRS that terminates the deposition of middle shelf limestone in central and western Spitsbergen, and inner to middle shelf limestone in NE Svalbard (Figs 5, 7). The initial flooding resulted in dark chert (facies 2b) deposition characteristic of outer shelf environments at all sections apart from section E, where middle-shelf light cherts were established. As with sequence TR3, the basal dark cherts of TR4 are intensely bioturbated and contain abundant Thalassinoides and Skolithos burrows on their upper surfaces. Again, these probably reflect sediment starvation and the formation of firmgrounds at the onset of transgression in TR4. The dark chert (facies 2b) package that characterizes the TST component of TR4 ranges in thickness from just a few metres in NE Svalbard to as much as 45 m in the most expanded sections in western Spitsbergen (Fig. 7).
The MFS that caps the TST part of sequence TR4 sees the onset of a coarsening-upward sequence of typically inner and middle shelf facies including brachiopod-dominated, mixed-bioclastic, echinoderm-dominated and bryozoan-dominated limestones (mainly packstones, grainstones, and sandy floatstones and rudstones; facies 1a, 1c, 1d and 1e, sections F, TRN, E, H and S; Fig. 6d). The coarsening-upward trend at Festningen (section FN) is more subtle, because after the initial shift from dark cherts to light chert (facies 2a), dark chert deposition resumed, before finally giving way to mixed-bioclastic floatstones and rudstones typical of inner shelf environments. At section KF, the MFS at the base of the TST is subtler still, and is recorded by a transition from a fining-upward to a coarsening-upward trend within the pile of dark cherts (facies 2b).
The sequence TR4 RST package shows distinctive higher-order cyclicity that manifests as conspicuous lithological changes in some sections. At TRN, a several metre thick package of thinly bedded, dark shales and siltstones (facies 3c and 3d; Fig. 6c) is followed by a c. 15 m thick succession of thin- to medium-bedded bryozoan and echinoderm packstones, grainstones, floatstones and rudstones, arranged into at least six stacked coarsening- and thickening-upward cycles (Fig. 4).
Brachiopodal limestones, though relatively sparse in central and western Spitsbergen (sections F, FN, TRN, KF) become increasingly common through sequence TR4 (Figs 4, 5), reflecting an overall gradual shallowing of the depositional area from outer and middle shelf to inner shelf environments upwards.
5.e. Sequence TR5
As with the TR2/TR3 sequence boundary, the basal contact of sequence TR5 is marked by intense glauconitization that was likely the result of sediment starvation in very shallow, nearshore environments around the end of the RST and at the onset of transgression (e.g. Boreen & James, Reference Boreen and James1995; Blomeier et al. Reference Blomeier, Dustira, Forke and Scheibner2013). In central and western Spitsbergen (sections F, FN, TRN, KF) the MRS at the base of this sequence is succeeded once again by a thick pile of dark cherts (facies 2b) that overlie the fossiliferous (brachiopods, echinoderms, bryozoans) sandy cherts and grainstones, floatstones and rudstones that characterize the top of the preceding RST (Fig. 4). In NE Svalbard, the TST part of sequence TR5 is very thin in sections E and S, comprising 1 m of black shale (facies 3c) that overlies abundantly fossiliferous inner-shelf rudstones and floatstones (Fig. 5). The abrupt facies change at the MRS that caps these fossiliferous rocks heralds a rapid deepening in the area that led to sediment-starved conditions. Sequence TR5 is not exposed in section H due to subaerial exposure and erosion during a later sea-level fall (Fig. 7).
The MFS that marks the onset of regression in sequence TR5 caps the black shales seen in NE Svalbard, and similar black shales that develop within the black chert in western Spitsbergen (sections F and FN). The overlying RST package records a coarsening-upward sequence through cherts into bioclastic wackestones to floatstones in all sections where this sequence is recorded. These limestones contain an abundant and diverse brachiopod fauna (around 27 individual genera and species; Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015) that disappears above this sequence in the basal decimetres of the overlying dark cherts of sequence TR6, a level that marks the Middle Permian (Capitanian) mass extinction.
5.f. Sequences TR6 and TR7
Sequences TR6 and TR7, comprising the transitional strata to the overlying latest Permian to Triassic Sassendalen Group, are exposed only in central and western Spitsbergen at Forkastningsdalen (F) and Festningen (FN). The MRS that tops the last brachiopod-bearing wackestones of sequence TR5 is succeeded by a c. 4–5 m succession of transgressive dark cherts (facies 2b) of sequence TR6 that records the intra-Capitanian Middle Permian mass extinction (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015) and is capped by an MFS (Fig. 4). Above this MFS, a sharp grain-size increase is recorded by the development of 12 m of sandy cherts at Festningen, and c. 20 m of sandstones at Forkastningsdalen, which comprise the RST package of TR6. These detrital grains consist of quartz and significant amounts of abraded heavy mineral grains (rutile, zircon and apatite) together with common grains of potassium feldspar, chlorite and biotite. This assemblage of grain types persists to the top of sequence TR6 and reappears during sedimentation of TR7. This sequence is characterized by a paucity of fossils, presumably as a result of the globally significant Middle Permian mass extinction that occurred near its base.
Sequence TR7 begins at the MRS that caps sandy cherts at Festningen and is overlain by c. 10 m of black shales interbedded with thin, sandy cherts that together comprise the TST portion of this sequence (Figs 4, 7). The equivalent sequence at Forkastningsdalen is marked by unexposed intervals in the section, which we assume are soft shales that often have poor exposure in the Svalbard outcrops. Like TR6, this sequence is largely lacking in fossils. However, several thin, condensed fossiliferous horizons (bryozoans, bivalves and brachiopods) provide evidence of a brief recovery following the Middle Permian (Capitanian) extinction (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015). The TST shales seen at Festningen are capped by an MFS that is overlain by sandy cherts that persist to the top of the Kapp Starostin Formation. At Forkastningsdalen, this RST is represented by sandstones. The topmost surface of the Formation in both sections is likely an MRS above which the sharp onset of mudstone deposition marks the base of the overlying latest Permian to Middle Triassic Sassendalen Group.
6. Basin development
6.a. Svalbard
A cross-section (Figs 1, 7) correlating all seven sections illustrates the basin morphology during deposition of the Kapp Starostin Formation along a SW–NE transect across Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet. The facies developments and thicknesses of the Formation are interpreted to reflect the palaeowater depth, which is a combination of the effects of local subsidence and sedimentation rate of the basin at each location (Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001) and eustatic variation. Accordingly, Festningen (section FN; Fig. 6e) represents the deepest part of the basin and its main depocentre. The basin shallows slightly to the southwest towards Forkastningsdalen (section F), and shallows significantly to the NE, where the basin assumes a shallow ramp characterized by a subdued relief (Fig. 7). Thickness trends in the basin fill appear to record an inherited structural control from Carboniferous rifting (Steel & Worsley, Reference Steel, Worsley and Spencer1984; Stemmerik & Worsley, Reference Stemmerik, Worsley and Collinson1989), despite previous suggestions that by the Middle to Late Permian these structures had already been filled in (Johannessen & Steel, Reference Johannessen and Steel1992; Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999).
The thicker brachiopod- and bryozoan-dominated floatstone and rudstone deposits of the Vøringen Member at Eremitten and Hódbreen in NE Spitsbergen, and at Selanderneset on Nordaustlandet (sections E, H and S) at the NE end of the transect (Fig. 7), indicate a minor local depocentre, probably related to remnants of the Lomfjorden Trough, a smaller graben east of the Lomfjorden–Agardhbukta Fault Zone (Fig. 1). The Tålmodryggen and Kapp Fleur de Lys sections (TRN and KF) on Dickson Land in central Spitsbergen are positioned on the Nordfjorden High where the reduced accommodation space accounts for the generally thinner sedimentary successions compared to the surrounding areas (Steel & Worsley, Reference Steel, Worsley and Spencer1984; Ehrenberg et al. Reference Ehrenberg, Pickard, Henriksen, Svana, Gutteridge and Macdonald2001).
Facies distributions and the general basin morphology provide an indication of proximal and distal areas. The sand-rich stratigraphy in the northeasternmost sections (S, H) suggests that a terrigenous source area was located in the vicinity of Nordaustlandet (Blomeier, Scheibner & Forke, Reference Blomeier, Scheibner and Forke2009). The common siltstone beds at Forkastningsdalen (section F; Figs 1, 7) suggest a second source of terrigenous sediment that was possibly related to erosion of the Sørkapp–Hornsund High that remained emergent until the end of the Permian (Dallmann, Reference Dallmann1999).
6.b. Regional comparison
Comparison of the Kapp Starostin Formation with time-equivalent strata elsewhere along the northern margin of Pangaea reveals a similar depositional history. In the Sverdrup Basin of Arctic Canada, Beauchamp et al. (Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009) recognized five complete T-R cycles in a continuous sequence of black cherts, shales and siltstones that formed in the basin centre between the Early Permian and the earliest Triassic. The Artinskian–Kungurian Trappers Cove Formation includes one part-sequence (an RST – the underlying TST lies within the Sakmarian Hare Fiord Formation) and one complete T-R sequence. The latter begins with a transgression atop an MRS that marks the Artinskian–Kungurian boundary, and is therefore correlative with the development of the Vøringen Member at the base of the Kapp Starostin Formation in Svalbard (our sequence TR1). Just as in our TR1 sequence, Beauchamp et al. (Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009) record a very thin TST in their basal Kungurian sequence, which soon gave way to a thicker overlying RST. The succeeding Kungurian to end-Capitanian van Hauen Formation of the Sverdrup Basin records two further complete T-R sequences. These probably correlate to our sequences TR2–TR5 and the basal part of TR6, based on the fact that the Middle Permian (intra-Capitanian) mass extinction in Svalbard manifests as the near-total loss of brachiopods near the base of that cycle. A middle-to-late Capitanian age for TR5 and TR6 in Svalbard is further supported by chemostratigraphy (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015). Thus, if Beauchamp et al.’s (Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009) age assignment for the van Hauen Formation is correct (based on a depauperate Mesogondolella conodont assemblage), four complete Kungurian to Capitanian T-R sequences occurred in Svalbard whilst only two occurred in the Sverdrup Basin during the same interval. Either local tectonics generated additional T-R sequences in Svalbard that are not recorded in the Sverdrup Basin, or the bounding surfaces are cryptic in the latter area and these sequences are unidentified. Above the van Hauen Formation, the Wuchiapingian–Changhsingian Black Stripe Formation and the latest Permian to Early Triassic Blind Fiord Formation record two further complete T-R sequences in the Sverdrup Basin; the same time interval in Svalbard also contains two comparable T-R sequences (TR6 and TR7) although we place at least part of the TST component of TR6 within the Capitanian for reasons given above. In Svalbard, the top of the Kapp Starostin Formation lies a few metres below the Permian–Triassic boundary and probably records an MRS at the top of an RST. In the Sverdrup Basin, this level is probably equivalent to the sequence boundary seen atop the Lindström Formation, in more proximal areas, whilst the unconformity passes into a correlative conformity within the Black Stripe Formation in distal areas (Beauchamp et al. Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009). The dark cherts of the uppermost Black Stripe are assigned to a TST, a unit that appears not to be represented in the Svalbard successions.
The sequence stratigraphic arrangement and sedimentary history is broadly similar between the two locations: five complete T-R sequences are recognized in the Sverdrup Basin from the base of the Kungurian to the Early Triassic; six complete sequences are seen during the same interval in Svalbard. Clearly, there is some discrepancy regarding the temporal placement of sequence boundaries that relates to the poor age control in both regions. Biostratigraphic correlation between the two areas is hampered by the paucity of conodonts. The dominance of the conodont Mesogondollela rosenkrantzi, and the absence of the Middle Permian forms M. phosphoriensis and M. bitteri, led Beauchamp et al. (Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009) to assign a Wuchiapingian age to the Black Stripe Formation. However, the most recent taxonomic assessment considers M. rosenkrantzi to be a typical Capitanian taxon (Legler & Schneider, Reference Legler and Schneider2008). If that is the case, the van Hauen / Black Stripe formational contact, assigned by Beauchamp et al. (Reference Beauchamp, Henderson, Grasby, Gates, Beatty, Utting and James2009) to the base of the Wuchiapingian, might actually be of an earlier Capitanian age. The first complete TST–RST package recorded by the Black Stripe Formation might be better placed within the Capitanian (rather than Wuchiapingian), in which case the early to middle Permian (Cisuralian–Guadalupian) sequence stratigraphic arrangement for the Sverdrup Basin matches that of Svalbard almost perfectly. However, this would create a discrepancy in the number of late Permian (Lopingian) cycles with either one or two T-R cycles recognized. Fully resolving the correlation of the T-R cycles on the Permian in the Svalbard and Canadian Arctic region awaits a breakthrough in either biostratigraphic or chemostratigraphic dating.
7. Permian climatic, environmental and biotic changes
The Late Palaeozoic saw dramatic climatic, environmental and palaeoceanographic changes, underpinned by a transition from a global icehouse in the Carboniferous to an extreme hothouse by the end of the Permian (e.g. Sun et al. Reference Sun, Joachimski, Wignall, Yan, Chen, Jiang, Wang and Lai2012). High-amplitude, high-frequency, glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations have been attributed to periodic Gondwanan glaciations during the Late Carboniferous (Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik, James and Clarke1997, Reference Stemmerik2000). The subsequent deglaciation began sometime between the Sakmarian (Veevers & Powell, Reference Veevers and Powell1987; Isbell et al. Reference Isbell, Miller, Wolfe, Lenaker, Chan and Archer2003) and the Kungurian (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Joachimski, Shen, Lambert, Lai, Wang, Chen and Yuan2013). A late Artinskian to Kungurian deglaciation phase would be consistent with the record of the Kapp Starostin Formation. Thus, melting ice caps and the associated major sea-level rise would account for the widespread flooding of the palaeo-land surface that resulted in the Vøringen Member (sequence TR1) being deposited unconformably above the Gipshuken Formation (following a hiatus of unknown duration; Fig. 2). This major, second-order sea-level rise continued through at least sequences TR2 and TR3. The transgressive–regressive depositional sequences identified within the Kapp Starostin Formation are probably of lower amplitude than the presumed glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations of the Carboniferous and Early Permian that are recorded by the Wordiekammen and Gipshuken Formations.
Middle to Late Permian cyclicity in Svalbard has been ascribed to eustasy (Stemmerik, Reference Stemmerik, James and Clarke1997; Rygel et al. Reference Rygel, Fielding, Frank and Birgenheier2008). However, whether the observed facies shifts on Svalbard and elsewhere in northwest Pangaea were the result of eustatic fluctuations and/or regional tectonic uplift or subsidence is difficult to untangle without better stratigraphic control. Comparison of our interpretation of relative sea-level for Svalbard with the global sea-level curve compiled by Haq & Schutter (Reference Haq and Schutter2008) reveals major discrepancies implying that the NW Pangaean record might be influenced by a tectonic signal. For example, the Haq & Schutter (Reference Haq and Schutter2008) curve shows no major Kungurian sea-level rise. Given that each shift in base level can be recognized across each of the sections in our study, local tectonic movements along the individual structural lineaments (e.g. Billefjorden Fault Zone, Lomfjorden Fault Zone, Raudfjorden Fault; Fig. 1) can be excluded as a controlling factor. Instead, the tectonic subsidence of extended parts of the entire shelf region might serve as possible explanation for the disparities between our regional sea-level history and the global curve.
The Middle Permian (Capitanian) mass extinction is recorded near the base of sequence TR6, when >80% of brachiopod species were wiped out in Spitsbergen. These losses have been attributed to localized anoxia and ocean acidification (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015) and to trace metal poisoning (Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall, Talavera, Galloway, Piepjohn, Reinhardt and Blomeier2015, Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall and Sanei2016). Thus, redox-sensitive trace metals such as U, Mo and V become greatly enriched in the extinction interval (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015; Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall, Talavera, Galloway, Piepjohn, Reinhardt and Blomeier2015), as does mercury, which sees a prolonged period of enrichment culminating in a large spike at the Permian–Triassic boundary (Grasby et al. Reference Grasby, Beauchamp, Bond, Wignall and Sanei2016). The absence of platform carbonates above TR5 in Spitsbergen and in age-equivalent strata across NW Pangaea is also consistent with a role for acidification (Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015).
Beauchamp & Grasby (Reference Beauchamp and Grasby2012) suggested that the entire Permian Chert Event might have resulted from gradual shoaling of the lysocline and the calcite compensation depth, in response to progressive build-up of atmospheric CO2 during the Permian, and amplified by upwelling along the NW margin of Pangaea. Ocean acidification is postulated to have eradicated carbonate in favour of more resilient silica factories. However, the periodic accumulation of abundant and diverse calcareous skeletal remains (brachiopods, echinoderms, bryozoans etc.) in sometimes quite thick limestone deposits in the Sverdrup Basin (Beauchamp & Grasby, Reference Beauchamp and Grasby2012) and also in Svalbard suggests that the ocean pH was not consistently inhospitably low for carbonate producers. Beauchamp & Grasby (Reference Beauchamp and Grasby2012) suggested that a ‘temperature shock’ (warming), particularly at the Permian–Triassic boundary, might have driven the lysocline deeper, allowing carbonates to resume accumulation in spite of low pH conditions. It is not clear how this can be reconciled with the Middle Permian extinction in which brachiopods (and all carbonates) disappear in Svalbard at a time of supposed warming – unless the magnitude of Middle Permian warming was not sufficient to drive the lysocline deep enough to counteract the enhanced input of atmospheric CO2 associated with contemporaneous large igneous province activity in China (e.g. Bond et al. Reference Bond, Wignall, Joachimski, Sun, Savov, Grasby, Beauchamp and Blomeier2015). In other words, did the deleterious effects of acidification (carbonate production crisis) outpace the counter-effects of warming (lysocline deepening) in this cool-water setting? Further testing is required to pinpoint the causal mechanisms involved in the Middle Permian mass extinction in Svalbard and beyond.
8. Conclusions
The mixed carbonate, siliceous and siliciclastic strata of the Kapp Starostin Formation (Artinskian–Changhsingian) were deposited in a cold to temperate, broad epicontinental shelf setting and display cyclicity of three different orders. Detailed facies analysis reveals seven third-order transgressive–regressive depositional sequences (TR1–TR7) that have been correlated across the depositional basin from western and central Spitsbergen to Nordaustlandet in the NE. These sequences, of c. 4–5 Ma average duration, are bound by prominent maximum regressive surfaces and are considered to be the result of relatively low-amplitude sea-level fluctuations superimposed on a second-order sea-level curve that controlled the overall stacking pattern. The basal Vøringen Member of the Kapp Starostin Formation saw deposition of bioclastic inner and middle shelf floatstones, rudstones and sandstones atop an extensive subaerial unconformity surface that provides evidence for widespread second-order flooding of vast karst, sabkha and peritidal platform areas. This major marine transgression is attributed either to the contemporaneous deglaciation of Gondwana or to regional tectonics (or a combination of both). In general, the older depositional sequences (TR1–TR3) record a net deepening across the basin (particularly noticeable in the shallower-water environments in NE Spitsbergen and Nordaustlandet) consistent with the overall second-order sea-level rise that continued into the Roadian. An overall thinning-upward and shallowing-upward stacking pattern characterizes sequences TR4–TR7, where sea-level rise decelerates and is finally outpaced by the filling of accommodation space within the depositional basin. Brachiopod losses associated with the Middle Permian mass extinction are observed in those sections where sequence TR6 is preserved, indicating basin-wide synchronicity of that event. The lack of carbonates in the post-TR5 strata is consistent with acidification as an extinction driver, and a decrease in the depth of the lysocline across Svalbard.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are given to Christian Scheibner, Michael Joachimski, Winfried Dallmann, Tatiana Grunt and the Organisation and Logistics Department of the Norwegian Polar Institute for support in the field. The technical staff at the universities of Amsterdam, Southampton, Oxford and Bremen are thanked for the preparation of numerous thin-sections for microfacies analysis. This work was supported by the Research Executive Agency (D. Bond, Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF-300455), and the Natural Environment Research Council (D. Bond, grant number NE/J01799X/1; P. Wignall, grant number NE/I015817/1). VU Amsterdam provided financial assistance towards fieldwork at Kapp Fleur de Lys, including travel costs for R. Groen, sample shipping, thin-sectioning and geochemical analyses. We thank Benoit Beauchamp and Sten-Andreas Grundvåg for helpful reviews of an earlier version of this work, and two anonymous reviewers for reviews of the manuscript.
Open access
