Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T16:35:23.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of food intake, live weight, condition score and energy balance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

R. F. Veerkamp  and
E. P. C. Koenen
R. F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
E. P. C. Koenen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate genetic variation for traits that are part of the food utilization complex and to investigate the scope for future genetic improvement of traits possibly linked to metabolic stress: live weight (change), condition score (change) and energy balance. Many aspects of the food utilization complex appear to be heritable and are affected by genetic selection for yield. In general, genetic selection for yield increases intake and body tissue mobilization and energy balance is expected to decrease. However, unfavourable effects of genetic selection can be compensated for by measuring additional traits to be included in breeding programmes. Food intake, live weight (change) and condition score (change) are all potential options. Which traits should be measured, at what lactation stages and in which (nutritional) environment will merely depend on the coheritability with health and fertility, the genetic correlation with milk yield and the cost of measuring the trait effectively in a breeding programme.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arendonk, J. A. M. van, Nieuwhof, G. J., Vos, H. and Korver, S. 1991. Genetic aspects of food intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 29:263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammei, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Rowe, N. and Perrot, G. E. 1998. Energy metabolism in high yielding cows. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 13.Google Scholar
Berglund, B. and Danell, B. 1987. Live weight changes, feed consumption, milk yield and energy balance in dairy cattle during the first period of lactation. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 37:495–509.Google Scholar
Brotherstone, S. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between linear type traits and production traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Production 59:183–188.Google Scholar
Buckley, F., Dillon, P., Crosse, S., Flynn, F. and Rath, M. 1999. The performance of second lactation Holstein Friesian dairy cows on grass based systems of milk production. 2. The effects of cow genetic index. Livestock Production Science In press.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R., Everett, R. W. and Coppock, C. E. 1981. The relationships between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 53:742–748.Google Scholar
Dempfle, L. 1986. Increasing the efficiency of the dairy cow with regard to body size. Research bulletin no. 4, Livestock Improvement Co., New Zealand Dairy Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
DeRouen, S. M., Franke, D. E., Morrison, S. G., Wyatt, W. E., Coombs, D. F., White, T. W., Humes, P. E. and Greene, B. B. 1994. Prepartum body condition and weight influences on reproductive performance of first-calf beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 72:1119–1125.Google Scholar
Elzakker, P. J. M. van and Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1993. Feed intake, body weight and milk production: genetic analysis of different measurements in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 37:37–51.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1986. Efficiency and performance of genetically high and low milk-producing British Friesian and Jersey cattle. Animal Production 42:161–182.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Yan, T., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen. Animal Production 61:199–210.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Davey, A. W. F. and Holmes, C. W. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 1. Stall feeding and grazing experiments and performance during the whole lactation. Animal Production 40:379–388.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Holmes, C. W. and Moore, Y. F. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 2. Energy and nitrogen balance experiments with lactating and pregnant, non lactating cows. Animal Production 40:389–400.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1989. Economic values in cattle breeding. I. Influences of production circumstances in situations without output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 1–16.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. and Korver, S. 1990. Feed intake capacity of lactating cows. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 107: 389–396.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. O., Ford, S. P., Young, J. W., Conley, A. J. and Freeman, A. E. 1990. Increased milk production versus reproductive and energy status of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73:2749–2758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazel, L. N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28:476–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, C. W., Davey, A. W. F. and Grainger, C. 1981. The efficiency with which feed is utilised by the dairy cow. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 41:16–27.Google Scholar
Holter, J. B., Slotnick, M. J., Hayes, H. H., Bozak, C. K., Urban, W. E. and McGilliard, M. L. 1990. Effect of prepartum dietary energy on body condition score, posrparrum energy, nitrogen partition and lactation production response. Journal of Dairy Science 73:3502–3511.Google Scholar
Jensen, J., Hohenboken, W. D., Madsen, P. and Andersen, B. B. 1995. Sire X nutrition interactions and genetic parameters for energy intake, production and efficiency of nutrient utilization in young bulls, heifers and lactating cows. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 45: 81–91.Google Scholar
Koenen, E. P. C. and Veerkamp, R. F. 1997. Genotype by diet interactions for live weight and body condition score during lactation in heifers. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1997, p. 38.Google Scholar
Koenen, E. P. C. and Veerkamp, R. F. 1999. Genetic covariance functions for live weight, condition score and dry-matter intake measured at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers. Livestock Production Science 57: 67–77.Google Scholar
Kruip, T. A. M., Werf, J. H. J. van der and Wensing, T. 1996. Energy balance in early lactation of high producing dairy cows and its relation to reproduction, health and welfare. Proceedings of the Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands. European Association for Animal Production Publication no. 84, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
Laflamme, L. F. and Conner, M. L. 1992. Effect of postpartum nutrition and cow body condition at parturition on subsequent performance of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72:843–851.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J., Boichard, D. A., McAllister, A. J., Lin, Y. C., Nadarajah, T. R., Roy, G. L. and Vesely, J. A. 1992. Genetics of growth, feed intake and milk yield in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75:3145–3154.Google Scholar
Lin, C. Y., McAlister, A. J. and Lee, A. J. 1985. Multitrait estimation of relationships of first lactation yields to body weight changes in Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 68:2954–2663.Google Scholar
Lindberg, C. M., Swanson, G. J. T. and Mrode, R. A. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic trends in production traits in the UK dairy herd. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 191.Google Scholar
Luiting, P. 1991. The value of feed consumption data for breeding in laying hens. Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Madgwick, P. P., Beard, K. A. and Goddard, M. E. 1991. Possibilities for incorporating selection for feed efficiency into the national Dairy Herd Improvement Program. Proceedings of the ninth meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Australia, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
Oldenbroek, J. K., Galesloot, P. A. J., Pool, M. H. and Werf, J. H. J. van der. 1997. Effects of selection for milk yield on feed intake and metabolism of heifers in early lactation. Book of abstracts of the 48th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Vienna, 25-28 August 1997.Google Scholar
Persaud, P., Simm, G. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for yields, food intake and efficiency of dairy cows fed ad libitum. 1. Estimates for total lactation measures and their relationship with live-weight traits. Animal Production 52:435–444.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Nielsen, B. L., Veerkamp, R. F. and Simm, G. 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions, for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57:193–201.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. K. and Beever, D. E. 1995. Energy requirements and responses: a UK perspective. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J, Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 31–41. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19. Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1996. Nutrition and reproduction. Animal Reproduction Science 42:25–34.Google Scholar
Svendsen, M., Skipenes, P. and Mao, I. L. 1994. Genetic correlations in the feed conversion complex of primiparous cows at a recommended and a reduced plane of nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 72:1441–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, S., Luteijn, P. A. and Meijer, R. G. M. 1997. Changes in composition and energy content of liveweight loss in dairy cows with time after parturition. Livestock Production Science 52: 31–38.Google Scholar
Treacher, F. J., Reid, I. M. and Roberts, C. J. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 1–6.Google Scholar
Tveit, B., Svendsen, M. and Hove, K. 1991. Heritability of hypocalcemia at first parturition in Norwegian cattle: genetic correlations with yield and weight. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3561–3567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Raden, P. M. 1988. Economic value of body size in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 71: (suppl. 1) 238.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. 1998. Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 81:1109–1119.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. and Brotherstone, S. 1997. Genetic correlations between linear type traits, feed intake, live weight and condition score in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 64:385–392.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. and Emmans, G. C. 1995. Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency of dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 44:87–97.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39: 229–241.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interaction — experience from Langhill. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J, Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 59–66. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19. Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. and Thompson, R. 1999. Multi-trait covariance functions to estimate genetic correlations between milk yield, dry-matter intake and live weight during lactation. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 147–151. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Vermorel, M. and Coulon, J. B. 1998. Comparison of the national research council energy system for lactating cows with four European systems. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 846–855.Google Scholar
Villa-Godoy, A., Hughes, T. L., Emery, R. S., Stanisiewski, E. P. and Fogwell, R. L. 1990. Influence of energy balance and body condition on estrus and estrous cycles in Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 73:2579–2765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, P. M., Bowman, P. J. and Goddard, M. E. 1994. Breeding objectives for pasture based dairy production systems. Livestock Production Science 40:123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltner, S. S., McNamara, J. P. and Hillers, J. K. 1993. Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 76: 3410–3419.Google Scholar
Wildman, E. E., Jones, G. M., Wagner, P. E., Troutt, H. F. and Lesch, T. N. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65:495–501.Google Scholar
Zurek, E., Foxcroft, G. R. and Kennely, J. J. 1995. Metabolic status and interval to first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78:1909–1920.Google Scholar