Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T17:15:24.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Race and Policy History: A Dialogue about the G.I. Bill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2008

Ira Katznelson  and
Suzanne Mettler
Ira Katznelson
Affiliation:
Columbia University. E-mail: iik1@columbia.edu
Suzanne Mettler
Affiliation:
Cornell University E-mail: sbm24@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have independently analyzed the effects of the G.I. Bill's widely-utilized education and training benefits, and reached different conclusions. One of us argues that the implementation of these benefits, especially in the South, helped widen the income and wealth gaps between whites and blacks and further marginalized many African Americans; the other considers them to have been a rare example of a relatively inclusive policy, one that fostered equal citizenship. Because we are both historical institutionalists and we both share interests in matters of social policy, equality, and race, these dissimilar accounts require explanation. This dialogue first considers methodological issues, explaining our decisions about which forms of data to use and to emphasize, and how we made sense of contradictory findings. It next discusses interpretive matters, examining the processes through which we sometimes reached different conclusions even when we confronted the same evidence. Finally, the exchange considers some implications of our findings, probing the lessons they convey both about policy research and practice.

Information

Type
Dialogue
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 519 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atkins, James A. 1948. Negro educational institutions and the Veterans' Educational Facilities Program. Journal of Negro Education 17 (2): 141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolte, Charles G., and Harris, Louis. 1947. “Our Negro Veterans.” Public Affairs Pamphlet no. 128. New York: Public Affairs Committee.Google Scholar
Brodkin, Karen. 1998. How Jews Became White Folks and What That Says about Race in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael K. 1999. Race, Money, and the American Welfare State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lizabeth. 2003. A Consumer's Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Fass, Paula S. 1989. Outside In: Minorities and the Transformation of American Education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frydl, Kathleen Hill. 2000. “The G.I. Bill.” Ph.D. diss. University of Chicago, Department of History.Google Scholar
Gibson, Truman K. Jr. 1946. “Government Fails Negro Vets: Systematic Denial of Rights Under GI Bill Scored at Conference: New Techniques Needed to Get Results Under Government Program.” Pittsburgh Courier, April 13.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, Eli, and Bray, Douglas W.. 1953. The Uneducated. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2005. Bringing the welfare state back in: The promise (and perils) of the new social welfare history. Journal of Policy History 17 (1): 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Mettler, Suzanne, and Pinderhughes, Dianne. 2005. Inequality and public policy. In Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, ed. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Herbold, Hilary. 1994–1995. Never a level playing field: Blacks and the G.I. Bill. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 6: 104–8.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2005. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth Century America. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 1998. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Ann Chih. 2000. Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005a. Soldiers & Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005b. “The only good thing was the G.I. Bill”: Effects of the education and training provisions on African-American veterans' political participation. Studies in American Political Development 19 (1): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Herman P. 1966. Income Distribution in the United States: A 1960 Census Monograph. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1989. The politics of bureaucratic structure. In Can the Government Govern? ed. Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Olson, Keith W. 1974. The G.I. Bill, the Veterans, and the Colleges. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Onkst, David H. 1998. “First a Negro … incidentally a veteran”: Black World War Two veterans and the G.I. Bill of Rights in the Deep South, 1944–1948.” Journal of Social History 31 (3): 517–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Wildavsky, Aaron B.. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Page, Benjamin I., Verba, Sidney, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2005. Inequalities of political voice. In Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn, ed. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1991. Targeting within universalism: Politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In The Urban Underclass, ed. Christopher Jencks and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review 93 (2): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterner, Richard. 1943. The Negro's Share: A Study of Income, Consumption, Housing, and Public Assistance. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S.A., and others. 1949. The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Chas. H. 1946. The critical situation in Negro higher and professional education. Journal of Negro Higher Education 25: 579–84.Google Scholar
Turner, Sarah, and Bound, John. 2002. Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide: The Effects of the G.I. Bill and World War II on the Educational Outcomes of Black Americans. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper 9044).Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Committee on Veterans' Affairs. 1956a. “Readjustment Benefits: General Survey and Appraisal: A Report on Veterans' benefits in the United States by the Presidents' Commission on Veterans' Pensions.” Staff Report no. IX, part A. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Committee on Veterans' Affairs. 1956b. “Readjustment Benefits: Education and Training, and Employment and Unemployment.” Staff Report No. IX, Part B. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. President's Commission on Veterans' Pensions. 1956. Veterans' Benefits in the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Veterans' Administration. 1945. “Protecting Veterans from ‘Fake School.’” Occupations. December, 137–38.Google Scholar
U.S. Veterans' Administration, Office of Controller, Reports, and Statistics Service. 1980. National Survey of Veterans. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Veterans' Administration, Research Division, Coordination Services. 1950. “Benefits and Services Received by World War II Veterans Under the Major Veterans Administration Programs: Report of a Special Study.” Record Group 51, ser. 39.20a, box 9, National Archives, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Linda Faye. 2003. The Constraint of Race: Legacies of White Skin Privilege in America. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. 1999. The Bridge over the Racial Divide: Rising Inequality and Coalition Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar