Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T17:38:29.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal networks and psychological attributes: Exploring individual differences in personality and sense of community and their relationship to the structure of personal networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

Isidro Maya-Jariego Open the ORCID record for Isidro Maya-Jariego [Opens in a new window] ,
Srebrenka Letina  and
Elena González Tinoco
Isidro Maya-Jariego*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
Srebrenka Letina
Affiliation:
The Institute for Analytical Sociology, Linköping University, Sweden and Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary (e-mail: sreb.letina@gmail.com)
Elena González Tinoco
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain (e-mail: elenagonzaleztinoco@gmail.com)
*
*Corresponding author. Email: isidromj@us.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper explores the relationship between personality characteristics, sense of community and the structure of personal networks. We collected personal network data from 100 adults, consisting of the information about their 45 alters and ties among them. In addition to the typically used bivariate correlations to analyze the relationship between individual psychological differences and network structure, we propose first the use of typologies of networks and personality and second modified versions of the triadic census in ego-networks. The results show that different personality types tend to occupy a different kind of networks and that newly introduced triadic measures show a relatively higher association with examined psychological attributes than global network measures. Overall, the Psychological Sense of Community showed higher associations with network measures than Big Five personality traits. The former was positively correlated with measures of closed triads among alters, but also with alters embedded in triads with weak ties. Regarding personality traits, Emotional Stability was positively correlated with strong closed triads and with the overall indicator of density. The elaboration of typologies and the census of triads are shown to be effective strategies for the description of personal networks, as well as for the analysis of individual psychological differences.

Keywords

Stanley Wassermanpersonality traitsBig Fivepersonal networkstypologytriadsindividual differencespsychological predispositions

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue Ego Networks , June 2020 , pp. 168 - 188
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R., & McNulty, J. K. (2011). Self-compassion and relationship maintenance: the moderating roles of conscientiousness and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 853–873. doi: 10.1037/a0021884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battistoni, E., & Fronzetti Colladon, A. F. (2014). Personality correlates of key roles in informal advice networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 63–69.10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729.Google ScholarPubMed
Bidart, C., & Lavenu, D. (2005). Evolutions of personal networks and life events. Social Networks, 27(4), 359–376.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidart, C., Degenne, A., & Grossetti, M. (2018). Personal networks typologies: A structural approach. Social Networks, 54, 1–11.10.1016/j.socnet.2017.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Bouchard, P., & Maya-Jariego, I. (2019). Estilos de apego, redes personales y satisfacción con la carrera profesional en el personal directivo de Quebec (Canadá). Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Jannota, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20, 63–87.10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00005-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., Brissette, I., Skoner, D., & Doyle, W. (2000). Social integration and health: The case of the common cold. Journal of Social Structure, 1(3), 1–7.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 73–87.10.1002/per.448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, M., & Weitekamp, L. A. (2007). I am so happy ’cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(2), 181–211.Google Scholar
Dickens, W. J., & Perlman, D. (1981). Friendship over the life-cycle. Personal Relationships, 2, 91–122.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeven-Eggens, L., De Fruyt, F., Hendriks, A. J., Bosker, R. J., & Van der Werf, M. P. (2008). Personality and personal network type. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 689–693.Google Scholar
Emery, C. (2012). Uncovering the role of emotional abilities in leadership emergence. A longitudinal analysis of leadership networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 429–437.10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, C., Calvard, T. S., & Pierce, M. E. (2013). Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality and leadership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 28–45.10.1177/1368430212461835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M.H., Shaw, M.D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiler, D. C., & Kleinbaum, A. M. (2015). Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias. Psychological Science, 26, 593–603.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferrand, A. (1989). Connaissances passagères et vieux amis. Les durées de vie des relations interpersonnelles. Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 2, 431–439.Google Scholar
Furukawa, T., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1998). Social support and adjustment to a novel social environment. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 44(1), 56–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Giannella, E., & Fischer, C. S. (2016). An inductive typology of egocentric networks. Social Networks, 47, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, Jr., , W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.Google Scholar
Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1976). Local structure in social networks. Sociological Methodology, 7, 1–45.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1977). A dynamic model for social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
Jason, L. A., Stevens, E., & Ram, D. (2015). Development of a three-factor psychological sense of community scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(8), 973–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalish, Y. (2008). Bridging in social networks: Who are the people in structural holes and why are they there? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 53–66.Google Scholar
Kalish, Y., & Robins, G. (2006). Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure. Social Networks, 28(1), 56–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J., Lim, B. C., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In Andrews, S. B., & Knoke, D. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 16: Networks in and around organizations (pp. 183–210). Stamford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Krause, J., James, R., & Croft, D. P. (2010). Personality in the context of social networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1560), 4099–4106.Google ScholarPubMed
Landis, B. (2016). Personality and social networks in organizations: A review and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S107–S121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., & Ipe, M. (2010). How do they become nodes? Revisiting team member network centrality. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louch, H. (2000). Personal network integration: Transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22(1), 45–64.Google Scholar
Lozares, C., Mart, J., Molina, J. L., & Garca-Macas, A. (2013). La cohesión-integración versus la fragmentación social desde un perspectiva relacional. Metodologa de Encuestas, 15, 57–75.Google Scholar
Lubbers, M.J., Molina, J.L., & McCarty, C. (2007). Personal networks and ethnic identifications: The case of migrants in Spain. International Sociology, 22(6), 721–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maya-Jariego, I. (2002). Tipos de redes personales de los inmigrantes y adaptación psicológica. REDES. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 1(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.30 Retrieved from https://revistes.uab.es/redes/article/view/v1-n1-mayaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maya-Jariego, I. (2003). A general typology of the personal networks of immigrants with less than 10 years living in Spain. Paper presented at the XXIII Sunbelt Conference, Cancún, Mexico.Google Scholar
Maya-Jariego, I. (2004). Sentido de comunidad y potenciación comunitaria. Apuntes de Psicologa, 22(2), 187–211.Google Scholar
Maya-Jariego, I. (2018). Why name generators with a fixed number of alters may be a pragmatic option for personal network analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 62(1–2), 233–238. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maya-Jariego, I., & Holgado, D. (2015). Living in the metropolitan area. Correlation of interurban mobility with the structural cohesion of personal networks and the originative sense of community. Psychosocial Intervention, 24(3), 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, C. (2002). Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3, 1.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.Google ScholarPubMed
McMillan, B., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298, 824–827.Google ScholarPubMed
Molina, J. L., Maya-Jariego, I., & McCarty, C. (2014). Giving meaning to social networks: Methodology for conducting and analyzing interviews based on personal network visualizations. In Dominguez, S., & Hollstein, B. (Eds.). Mixed methods social networks research. Designs and applications (pp. 305–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. L., Neal, M. B., & Carder, P. (1997). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Z. P., & Neal, J. W. (2017), Network analysis in community psychology: Looking back, looking forward. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60, 279–295. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regts, G., & Molleman, E. (2016). The moderating influence of personality on individual outcomes of social networks. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(3), 656–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renau, V., Oberst, U., Gosling, S. D., Rusiñol, J., & Lusar, A. C. (2013). Translation and validation of the ten-item-personality inventory into Spanish and Catalan. Aloma. Revista de psicologia, ciències de l’educació i de l’esport Blanquerna, 31(2), 85–97.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. G., Wilson, R., Fedurek, P., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 954–964.Google Scholar
Russell, D. W., Booth, B., Reed, D., & Laughlin, P. R. (1997). Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality, 65, 649–692.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Selden, M., & Goodie, A. S. (2018). Review of the effects of Five Factor model personality traits on network structures and perceptions of structure. Social Networks, 52, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., Van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siltaloppi, J., & Vargo, S.L. (2017). Triads: A review and analytical framework. Marketing Theory, 17(4), 395–414.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiano, J., Pianesi, F., Lepri, B., Sebe, N., Aharony, N., & Pentland, A. (2012). Friends don’t lie. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing – UbiComp’12, Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
Stokman, F. N., & Doreian, P. (1997). Evolution of social networks: Processes and principles. In Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (Eds.), Evolution of social networks (pp. 233–250). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Gordon and Breach Publishers.Google Scholar
Swickert, R. J., Rosentreter, C. J., Hittner, J. B., & Mushrush, J. E. (2002). Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(5), 877–891.Google Scholar
Totterdell, P., Holman, D., & Hukin, A. (2008). Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others. Social Networks, 30(4), 283–296.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Technical Report (No. 61-97), Lackland Airforce Base, TX: US Air Force.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinacke, W. E., & Arkoff, A. (1957). An experimental study of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 22(4), 406–414.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., & Trautwein, U. (2014). Who belongs to me? Social relationship and personality characteristics in the transition to young adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 586–603.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1983). Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory, 1, 155–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, K. H. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., Zimmermann, J., Mund, M., & Neyer, F. J. (2017). Friendships in young and middle adulthood: Normative patterns and personality differences. In Hojjat, M., & Moyer, A. (Eds.), Psychology of friendship (pp. 21–38). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xia, L., Yuan, Y. C., & Gay, G. (2009). Exploring negative group dynamics: Adversarial network, personality, and performance in project groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., Woo, S. E., Porter, C., & Brzezinski, M. (2013). Pathways to happiness: From personality to social networks and perceived support. Social Networks, 35(3), 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Maya-Jariego et al. supplementary material

Maya-Jariego et al. supplementary material

Download Maya-Jariego et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB