Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T06:46:02.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2025

Kamrun Nahar Koly*
Affiliation:
Health System and Population Studies Division, ICDDR, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sanjida Sultana
Affiliation:
School of General Education, BRAC University , Dhaka, Bangladesh
Jobaida Saba
Affiliation:
Health System and Population Studies Division, ICDDR, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Maliha Khan Majlish
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Hospital Administration, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Md. Arif Billah
Affiliation:
Health System and Population Studies Division, ICDDR, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Juliet Watson
Affiliation:
Social Equity Research Centre, School of Global, Urban and Social Sciences, RMIT University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Barbara Barbosa Neves
Affiliation:
Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Kamrun Nahar Koly; Email: koly@icddrb.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) among women, research on its mental health consequences, particularly PTSD in slum settings, remains scarce. This study assessed PTSD prevalence and determinants among slum-dwelling women in Bangladesh who experienced IPV during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and October 2022 among 291 women from 5 urban slums in Dhaka, who reported IPV using the World Health Organisation questionnaire. Face-to-face interviews collected sociodemographic data, pandemic-related challenges, gender roles, health information and PTSD symptoms using the validated Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5. Logistic regression identified PTSD predictors. Most women were married before the age of 18 years (87.9%), unemployed (69.3%), had no formal schooling (38.6%) and lived in overcrowded households (38.6%). Over half of their husbands were daily wage earners (57.9%) and had a history of substance misuse (65.9%). PTSD prevalence was 21.16% and was higher among women with non-communicable diseases (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–6.7), concern about COVID-19 infection (AOR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.12–13.22) and increased marital arguments (AOR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.57–5.74). IPV in slum settings imposes a significant PTSD burden, highlighting the need for community-based mental health services to support marginalised women.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Participants characteristics

Figure 1

Figure 1. Prevalence of PTSD by IPV exposure status among women in urban slums. PTSD prevalence was 9.57% among women without IPV exposure, 21.16% among women exposed to any form of IPV and 25.74% among those exposed to all forms of IPV. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2

Table 2. Associated factors of PTSD among the women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) using the bivariate logistic regression

Figure 3

Table 3. Associated factors of PTSD among the women exposed to IPV using the multivariate logistic regression (n = 290)

Supplementary material: File

Koly et al. supplementary material

Koly et al. supplementary material
Download Koly et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.9 KB

Author comment: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R0/PR1

Comments

26 July 2025

Professor Dixon Chibanda, Professor Judy Bass

Co-Editors-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

RE: Submission of “Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and its associated factors among women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV): Experience from urban slums of Bangladesh”

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

I am pleased to submit an original research article entitled “Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and its associated factors among women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV): Experience from urban slums of Bangladesh” for consideration for publication in “Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

This study explores the prevalence and determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among women residing in urban slums of Bangladesh who experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight a significant mental health burden among marginalized women, emphasizing the urgent need for community-based mental health interventions in low-resource settings.

We believe this manuscript aligns with the journal’s focus on advancing global mental health, particularly in under-researched populations, and contributes valuable evidence to inform mental health policy and service delivery for vulnerable communities.

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration elsewhere, and we have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Thank you for considering our work. We look forward to your response.

Dr. Kamrun Nahar Koly

………………………………………………………

Kamrun Nahar Koly

Associate Scientist

Health System and Population Studies Division, icddr,b

MSc. Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Email: koly@icddrb.org

26 July 2025

Professor Dixon Chibanda, Professor Judy Bass

Co-Editors-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

RE: Submission of “Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and its associated factors among women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV): Experience from urban slums of Bangladesh”

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

I am pleased to submit an original research article entitled “Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and its associated factors among women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV): Experience from urban slums of Bangladesh” for consideration for publication in “Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

This study explores the prevalence and determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among women residing in urban slums of Bangladesh who experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight a significant mental health burden among marginalized women, emphasizing the urgent need for community-based mental health interventions in low-resource settings.

We believe this manuscript aligns with the journal’s focus on advancing global mental health, particularly in under-researched populations, and contributes valuable evidence to inform mental health policy and service delivery for vulnerable communities.

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration elsewhere, and we have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Thank you for considering our work. We look forward to your response.

Dr. Kamrun Nahar Koly

………………………………………………………

Kamrun Nahar Koly

Assistant Scientist

Health System and Population Studies Division, icddr,b

Email: koly@icddrb.org

Review: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Title: In title PTSD can be abbreviated.

Abstract: The Abstract is clear.

Introduction: The Introduction builds a solid background, but some modifications will make the novelty and rationale more prominent and directly link the study to an identifiable evidence gap. To strengthen the research gap related section, I recommend:

• Consider shortening background details to focus on the study gap and rationale.

• Moving this statement earlier in the final paragraph and expanding it to specify that prior Bangladeshi studies on IPV have focused mainly on prevalence, depression, or anxiety, with PTSD largely overlooked.

• Highlighting that there is no evidence on how COVID-19-related stressors interact with IPV to influence PTSD in urban slums, despite these being high-risk environments.

• Explicitly noting the absence of studies using validated PTSD assessment tools (e.g., PCL-5) in this population.

Methods: The methodology is described in detail. However, the explanation of the sample reduction from 405 to 290 IPV-exposed participants should be clarified. Please also clarify that the reported 71.6% IPV prevalence was observed in the recruited HDSS sample and is not a general prevalence estimate for all slum populations, to avoid misinterpretation of representativeness. In the Patient and Public Involvement section, please provide a formal citation to the WHO ethical and safety recommendations for research on violence against women consistent with the referencing style used elsewhere in the manuscript.

Issues with the explanatory variable section include:

• Mixed variable types without grouping – Sociodemographic variables (age, education, working status, early marriage, NCD status, husband’s age, etc.) are listed alongside COVID-19 stress variables, behavioural variables and women independence related, without clear grouping or subheadings, making it hard to see which are demographics, which are COVID-related, and which are IPV-related attitudes/behaviours.

• Inconsistent coding explanation – Some variables have coding explained (e.g., “0=No, 1=Yes”), others do not (e.g., “husband’s age”), and some reference categories are not explicitly stated.

• Crowding index definition placed mid-list – This disrupts flow; consider defining it separately or in the Measures section.

• Additionally, consider defining the Crowding Index separately for clarity. Additionally, please provide a brief justification or methodological reference for using p < 0.15 as the threshold for selecting variables from the bivariate to the multivariate analysis. This will enhance transparency and allow readers to better understand the rationale behind your modelling approach.

Results: The results are clearly presented, but –

• Tables 2 and 3 require consistent p-value formatting and explicit indication of reference categories. Figure 1 could be made more self-explanatory. Figure 1 labels could be made more self-explanatory for readers without referring to the text. Additionally, this figure should identify which part is for IPV-exposed and which part is non-exposed.

• Additionally, there is an inconsistency in how education is described. In the Data Analysis section, it is coded as ‘attended school (0=No, 1=Yes)’, while in Table 2 it is presented as ‘educated’ vs ‘non-educated’. Please ensure terminology is consistent and define the exact criteria used for categorisation.

• For Table 3, please explicitly state in the table legend or footnote which variables were included in the adjustment for the AORs. Currently, readers have to infer from the Methods that the model included age, education, husband’s substance use, and variables with p < 0.15 from the bivariate analysis; listing them directly in the table would improve clarity.

Discussion: The discussion appropriately interprets findings in the context of global literature, but some organisational pattern can be considered that is separating prevalence interpretation, determinants discussion, and policy implications into distinct paragraphs for better flow. Moreover, some sentences imply causality between IPV and PTSD despite the cross-sectional design The statement “Living with an abusive partner can exacerbate trauma, leading to PTSD” is supported by reference, but that study was also observational. As your own study is cross-sectional, it would be more accurate to frame this as “associated with PTSD” or “linked to higher PTSD symptoms,” and attribute the causal phrasing to prior research rather than implying causality from your findings.

Typographical corrections:

• Replace ‘at at’ with ‘at a’ in the Methods section.

• Correct ‘utlised’ to ‘utilised’ in the Study setting description.

• Change ‘husband that often quarrels’ to ‘husband who often quarrels’ for grammatical accuracy.

• Ensure consistent hyphenation for ‘non-exposed’.

• Standardise percentage formatting (e.g., ‘21.2% (n=40)’ rather than ‘21.2 % (n=40)’).

• In the discussion, “slumsFuture” should be corrected to “slums. Future”.

• Review reference formatting for consistency, ensuring all DOIs are preceded by ‘https://doi.org/’.

Review: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Dear Authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study makes a timely and important contribution by addressing a clear gap in global mental health research: the prevalence and determinants of PTSD among women experiencing intimate partner violence in Dhaka’s urban slums during the COVID-19 pandemic. The manuscript is well-organized, methodologically sound, and provides a comprehensive examination of a highly vulnerable population.

Major Strengths:

1. Relevance and originality – The focus on urban slum women in Bangladesh fills an important evidence gap. This is the first study of its kind in this context, and the findings have practical policy implications.

2. Methodological rigor – The use of a validated Bangla version of PCL-5 and WHO IPV questionnaire adds robustness. Clear inclusion/exclusion criteria and detailed description of ethical safeguards strengthen the credibility of the study.

3. Policy and practice implications – The discussion connects well with the broader literature and highlights how findings could inform community-based interventions and health system responses.

I believe the manuscript is suitable for publication after minor revisions. Below are my detailed comments and suggestions:

Suggestions for Minor Revision

1. Methods: The methods are solid overall. The authors use validated tools (WHO IPV questionnaire, Bangla PCL-5), and the ethical considerations are well thought out, which is critical for such a sensitive topic. The analysis is appropriate, but I’d like a bit more clarification on the sample size issue — they calculated for 405 participants but the analysis included 290 IPV survivors. This doesn’t undermine the study but should be discussed more explicitly as a limitation.

2. Presentation: The paper is generally well written and structured. That said, there are a few areas where clarity could be improved:

- PTSD prevalence is reported slightly differently in places (22.6% vs. 21.2% among survivors), so the numbers should be made consistent.

- Figure 1 is helpful but the labels are a bit confusing (“any form of IPV” vs. “all forms of IPV” could be explained more clearly).

- The discussion is thorough but at times leans heavily on global literature. I’d encourage the authors to balance this with more references from South Asia or LMICs to ground the findings in similar contexts.

- The limitations are covered well, but I’d suggest adding a note about possible reporting bias given the sensitive nature of IPV and PTSD.

- A light language edit would help tidy up some redundancies (e.g., repeated phrasing about “vulnerable populations” in discussion).

Recommendation: Overall, I think this is a strong paper that deserves publication. My recommendation is accept with minor revisions. The revisions are mostly about consistency in reporting, clarifying some details, and improving presentation, not about the core science, which is already solid.

Recommendation: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R1/PR6

Comments

Manuscript ID: GMH-2025-0223

Title: Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and its associated factors among women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV): Experience from urban slums of Bangladesh

Journal: Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Dear Editor,

We would like to sincerely thank the Academic Editor and Reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing valuable feedback that has significantly improved the quality and clarity of our paper. Below, we offer a detailed point-by-point response to each comment, with a description of the revisions made to all sections. We indicated all the modifications through “track changes” and “highlights”. In the rest of this letter, we have addressed each of the reviewer’s comments point by point. For convenience,

-The comments of each reviewer have been formatted into bold style

-The responses of authors have been formatted into a regular style

-Any direct phrase or statement quoted from the manuscript has been formatted into Italics.

We found the reviewers’ comments incredibly valuable and highly appreciate their feedback on our original manuscript. After addressing the comments, we believe the manuscript’s quality has improved compared to its previous state.

Regards,

Dr. Kamrun Nahar Koly

Corresponding author

Review: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

No

Comments

This research article is important to add in literature of mental health research.

Recommendation: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among women with an experience of intimate partner violence (IPV): Insights from urban slums of Bangladesh — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.