Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T18:33:29.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the early Palaeozoic appinite-granite complex in the Western Kunlun Orogenic Belt, NW China: implications for Palaeozoic tectonic evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

JIE ZHU
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
QIUGEN LI*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
XU CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, US
HAOSHU TANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550008, China
ZONGQI WANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
YANJING CHEN
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
SHUWEN LIU
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
BING XIAO
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
JUNLU CHEN
Affiliation:
Xi'an Institute of Geology and Mineral Resource, Xi'an 710054, China
*
Author for correspondence: qgli@pku.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Datong pluton, the largest early Palaeozoic granitoid in the Western Kunlun Orogenic Belt (WKOB) in NW China, is a typical appinite-granite complex. It consists of diorites, quartz diorites, monzodiorites, quartz monzodiorites, monzonites, quartz monzonites, syenites, granodiorites and monzogranites. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) zircon U–Pb dating yielded crystallization ages of 459 ± 3 Ma for the quartz monzonites and 452 ± 5 Ma for the monzogranites (Late Ordovician). The rocks possess a wide range of SiO2 (56.0–73.4 wt %), MgO (0.17–4.55 wt %) and Mg no. (25–60), with high K2O (2.83–5.29 wt %) contents, exhibiting high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic traits. They are characterized by enrichments in large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and light rare Earth elements (LREEs), as well as depletions in high-field-strength elements (HFSEs). The rocks have initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7086–0.7185, negative εNd(t) values of –3.72 to –1.79 and εHf(t) values vary from –1.6 to +4.7. These features are modelled to show that they were most likely derived from an enriched lithospheric mantle source and that fractional crystallization with minor crustal contamination was involved in their petrogenetic process. Considering the distribution and chronology of the Palaeozoic intrusions – such as Kegang, Bulong, Qiukesu, Yierba, North Kudi, Dongbake, Buya, Ayilixi and Warengzilafu granitoid plutons with ages of c. 420–530 Ma – in conjunction with the Palaeozoic metamorphic overprinting in the WKOB, we propose a divergent double-subduction model to explain the destruction of the Proto-Tethys Ocean and suggest that the Datong pluton was likely emplaced in a post-collisional setting following the termination of subduction in response to slab break-off.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Schematic tectonic map of China, showing the major cratons and orogenic belts in mainland China (modified after Li et al.2007; Zhao & Cawood, 2012). The location of the Western Kunlun Orogenic Belt (Fig. 1b) is shown by the rectangle. (b) Geological sketch map showing tectonic division of the Western Kunlun Orogenic Belt and distribution of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic granitoids in the NW and SW Kunlun Terrane (modified after Li, Ji & Yang, 2008; Pan, 1996). Location of the Datong pluton (Fig. 2) is shown by the rectangle. NWKT – NW Kunlun Terrane; SWKT – SW Kunlun Terrane; TT – Tianshuihai Terrane; KKT – Karakoram Terrane. 1, Oytag-Kegang Fault (OKF); 2, Kudi Fault (KF); 3, Mazar-Kangxiwar Fault (MKF); 4, Longmucuo-Shuanghu Fault (LSF); 5, Karakoram Fault (KKF).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the Datong pluton and sampling locations.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Photographs of typical exposures of the Datong pluton. (a) Mafic microgranular enclaves and hybrids in the granitoid; and (b) enclave as a convex lobe with cuspate margins in the host intrusions.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Photomicrographs of samples in the Datong pluton. (a) Euhedral hornblende in the intermediate rock (13TSK04-3); (b) euhedral titanites scattered throughout the rock-forming minerals indicate the hybrid nature of sample 13TSK04-4; (c, d) titanite-rich texture and poikilitic texture, respectively, showing the hybrid characteristics in the enclave sample 13TSK04-1; (e) a euhedral phenocryst of K-feldspar with concentrically more altered inclusions of plagioclase in the intermediate sample 13TSK04-5; and (f) cumulative mafic minerals (e.g. Hbl, Bt, Ep) and epidotization of hornblende in the felsic monzogranite 12TS8-3. Mineral abbreviations are after Whitney & Evans (2010).

Figure 4

Table 1. Major (wt %) and trace (ppm) element analyses of the Datong pluton.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Total alkalis v. silica diagram (TAS, after Middlemost, 1994) showing petrochemical classification of the Datong pluton. Symbols for these samples are indicated within the inset. Solid symbols represent data from Jiang et al. (2002), Liao et al. (2010) and Gao et al. (2013).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Geochemical characteristics for the major compositions. (a).K2O v. SiO2 classification diagram, after Peccerillo & Taylor (1976); (b) FeO*/(FeO* + MgO) v. SiO2 diagram, after Frost et al. (2001); (c) Mg no. v. SiO2 diagram (Mg no. = molar MgO/(MgO + 0.85×FeO*)); the fields of pure crustal partial melts have been determined in experimental studies by dehydration melting of low-K basaltic rocks at 8–16 kbar and 1000–1050 °C (Rapp & Watson, 1995), pelitic rocks at 7–13 kbar and 825–950 °C (Douce & Johnston, 1991), and moderately hydrous (1.7–2.3 wt % H2O) medium- to high-K basaltic rocks at 7 kbar and 825–950 °C (Sisson et al.2005); and (d) A/NK (molar Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O)) v. A/CNK (molar Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O)) diagram, after Maniar & Piccoli (1989). Symbols as for Figure 5.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized spider diagrams for (a, b) monzonites; (c, d) quartz monzonites; and (e, f) monzogranites of the Datong pluton. Chondrite values are after Taylor & McLennan (1985); primitive mantle values are after Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 8

Table 2. Results of LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon dating for sample 13TSK04-5 and 12TS8-2 from the Datong pluton.

Figure 9

Figure 8. (a, c) CL images of representative zircon grains showing internal structures and analytical locations. Dashed circles are the analytical locations for Hf isotopic analyses; solid circles are the analytical locations for U–Pb dating. (b, d) U–Pb concordia diagrams and weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages for samples 13TSK04-5 and 12TS8-2. Dashed circles represent the younger 206Pb/238U age population. Solid circles represent the older 206Pb/238U age population. The bold dashed circle in (d) represents the age data excluded from the calculation.

Figure 10

Table 3. Lu-Hf isotopic data of zircons from the samples 12TS8-2 and 13TSK04-5 of the Datong pluton.

Figure 11

Table 4. Sr–Nd isotopic ratios for samples from the Datong pluton.

Figure 12

Figure 9. εNd(t) v. (87Sr/86Sr)i plot for the Datong pluton, after Kaygusuz & Öztürk (2015) and Zindler & Hart (1986). Lithospheric mantle array from Davies & Von Blanckenburg (1995). Symbols for these samples are indicated within the inset. Solid symbols represent data from Liao et al. (2010).

Figure 13

Figure 10. εNd(t) v. SiO2 diagram.

Figure 14

Figure 11. Harker diagrams for major-element oxide data. Symbols as for Figure 5.

Figure 15

Figure 12. Fractionation vectors modelled for crystallization of individual mineral phases. (a) Y v. SiO2, showing a negative correlation that suggests amphibole-related fractionation, after Boztuğ et al. (2007). (b) Clear correlations of Sm with P2O5 suggest the fractionation of apatite, after Fowler et al. (2001). (c) Ba v. SiO2 diagram revealing feldspar and biotite fractionation, after Boztuğ et al. (2007). (d) Sr v. Ba revealing dominant biotite fractionation, after Fowler et al. (2008). Mineral abbreviations are after Whitney & Evans (2010). Symbols as for Figure 5.

Figure 16

Figure 13. Simplified geodynamic and petrogenetic models showing the tectonic evolution of a divergent double-subduction system in the WKOB. See text for explanation.