Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-23T12:08:26.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

APSIC revised guidelines for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI): a summary and position statement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2026

Moi Lin Ling Open the ORCID record for Moi Lin Ling [Opens in a new window] ,
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ,
Patricia Ching ,
Yee-Chun Chen ,
Glenys Harrington Open the ORCID record for Glenys Harrington [Opens in a new window] ,
Jin-Won Huh ,
Namita Jaggi Open the ORCID record for Namita Jaggi [Opens in a new window] ,
Keita Morikane Open the ORCID record for Keita Morikane [Opens in a new window]  and
Sahadol Poonyathawon Open the ORCID record for Sahadol Poonyathawon [Opens in a new window]
Moi Lin Ling*
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Anucha Apisarnthanarak
Affiliation:
Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand
Patricia Ching
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong School of Public Health, Hong Kong
Yee-Chun Chen
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
Glenys Harrington
Affiliation:
Infection Control Consultancy, Australia
Jin-Won Huh
Affiliation:
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
Namita Jaggi
Affiliation:
Artemis Hospitals, India
Keita Morikane
Affiliation:
Yamagata University Hospital, Japan
Sahadol Poonyathawon
Affiliation:
Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Thailand
*
Corresponding author: Moi Lin Ling; Email: ling.moi.lin@singhealth.com.sg

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the revised Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control (APSIC) Guidelines for Prevention of Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI) 2024.

Design:

The revised guidelines was developed by infection prevention and control experts and key opinion leaders from Asia Pacific.

Setting:

Emphasis on practical implementation of Central Line Insertion and Maintenance Bundles using quality improvement approach is recommended towards the goal of achieving zero CLABSI in any healthcare setting.

Patients or participants:

Any patients with a central line in a healthcare setting

Interventions:

Literature search was done for recent international updates in CLABSI prevention. Recommendations were evaluated for practical and feasible implementation in low resourced settings.

Results:

The key recommendations are listed in the APSIC CLABSI insertion and maintenance guidelines. Additional measures are recommended for use where CLABSI rates remain high despite implementation of all preventive strategies to achieve institutional goals.

Conclusions:

A surveillance program is recommended to monitor outcomes and compliance with bundles. Ongoing review of the performance data with appropriate interventions made should facilitate efforts towards zero CLABSI rate.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , 2026 , e39
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Use of central lines, or central vascular catheters (CVC) is common in both inpatient and outpatient settings (including long term care facilities and home care). Six studies done in Southeast Asian ICUs showed a high pooled incidence density of 4.7 per 1,000 catheter days (95% CI, 2.9–6.5; I2 = 83.8; χ2(5) = 30.9; P = .000) for central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI). Reference Ling, Apisarnthanarak and Madriaga1 Approximately half of all CLABSIs are considered preventable when evidence-based guidelines are implemented for the insertion and maintenance of CVCs. Reference Pronovost, Needham and Berenholtz2 Collaborative implementation of evidence-based interventions with stakeholder engagement, communication of opportunities for improvement and engaging local champions with feedback can reduce CLABSI.

APSIC convened experts in infection prevention and control as well as key opinion leaders from Asia Pacific region to review the APSIC Guidelines for Prevention of CLABSI published in 2015. The members of this workgroup are the authors of this paper.

The full revised APSIC Guidelines for Prevention of CLABSI is available at https://apsic-apac.org

Methods

The workgroup reviewed previously published relevant international guidelines and recommendations and performed literature searches using PubMed. The workgroup met twice as well as discussed via email correspondence to complete the revision of the guidelines. Criteria used for grading the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence are described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Categories for recommendation

The draft guideline was sent to an external reviewer, APSIC executive committee and national infection prevention and control societies who are member societies of APSIC in Asia Pacific for comments and feedback. A final draft was made following revision according to comments and feedback received. It was endorsed by the APSIC executive committee before upload at the APSIC website.

Results

CLABSI prevention bundles Reference Buetti, Mimoz and Mermel3–Reference Burke, Jakub and Kellar10

To prevent CLABSI, emphasis is placed on two aspects of central venous catheters: management: insertion and maintenance. CLABSI prevention bundles are created by combining proven evidence-based best practice interventions for patients with central venous catheters, both during insertion and maintenance. The central line insertion bundle comprises:

  1. i. Optimal site insertion

  2. ii. Hand hygiene

  3. iii. Alcohol-based chlorhexidine skin preparation

  4. iv. Maximal barrier precautions

  5. v. Chlorhexidine-containing dressings

Recommendations

  1. 1. Recommendations for central venous catheters

    1. a. Weigh the risk and benefits of placing a central venous device at a recommended site to reduce infectious complications against the risk for mechanical complications (eg, pneumothorax, subclavian artery puncture, subclavian vein laceration, subclavian vein stenosis, hemothorax, thrombosis, air embolism, and catheter misplacement). [IA]

    2. b. Avoid using the femoral vein for central venous access in adult patients when the catheter is placed under planned and controlled circumstances. [IA]

    3. c. In adult intensive care unit (ICU) setting, subclavian vein catheter insertion is preferred to reduce infectious complications [IA]

    4. d. In adult non-ICU settings, upper body insertion site is preferred to reduce infectious complications and thrombotic complications relative to a femoral insertion site [IIA]

    5. e. Use ultrasound guidance for internal jugular catheter insertion [IA]

    6. f. No recommendation can be made for a preferred site of insertion to minimize infection risk for a tunneled CVC. [Unresolved issue]

    7. g. Place catheters used for hemodialysis and pheresis in a jugular or femoral vein, rather than a subclavian vein, to avoid venous stenosis. [IA]

    8. h. Use of ultrasound guidance to place central venous catheters is recommended to improve first insertion-attempt success rates, reduce the number of cannulation attempts and insertion-related mechanical complications. [IB]

  2. 2. Perform hand hygiene procedures, either by washing hands with liquid soap and water or using alcohol-based hand rubs. Hand hygiene should be performed before and after palpating catheter insertion sites as well as before and after inserting, replacing, accessing, repairing, or dressing a central venous catheter. Palpation of the insertion site should not be performed after the application of antiseptic, unless aseptic technique is maintained. [IB]

  3. 3. Sterile gloves should be worn for the insertion of arterial, central, and midline catheters. [IA]

  4. 4. Use new sterile gloves before handling a new catheter when guidewire exchanges are performed. [IIA]

  5. 5. Prepare and clean the skin site with an alcoholic chlorhexidine solution containing a concentration of CHG greater than 0.5% or a 2% chlorhexidine-based preparation before central venous catheter insertion and during dressing changes. If there is a contraindication to chlorhexidine, tincture of iodine, an iodophor, or 70% alcohol can be used as alternatives. [IA]

  6. 6. Before accessing catheter hubs or injection ports, clean with an alcoholic chlorhexidine preparation or 70% alcohol to reduce contamination. [IIB]

  7. 7. Use Maximal Sterile Barrier precautions. [IB]

  8. 8. Use sterile chlorhexidine-containing dressings to cover catheter insertion site in patients over 2 months of age. [IA]

  9. 9. If moisture or oozing blood occurs at insertion site, apply sterile gauze/pad with transparent dressing until moisture or oozing blood are resolved and then apply sterile medication-impregnated semipermeable dressing (preferably chlorhexidine gluconate) as soon as possible. [IIB]

  10. 10. Healthcare facilities should have a procedure confirmation process (ie, CVC insertion checklist) documented during CVC insertion to ensure best practice and infection prevention process adherence. [IB]

CLABSI maintenance bundle components include

  1. i. Daily review of line necessity and removal or replacement (if clinically indicated)

  2. ii. Hand hygiene

  3. iii. Disinfection of hubs before accessing and/or changing access hubs/lumens/devices.

  4. iv. Aseptic dressing change technique.

  5. v. Change chlorhexidine impregnated dressing at least every 7 days.

  6. vi. Standardize administration sets changes.

Recommendations

  1. 1. Designated trained personnel who have demonstrated competence in insertion and maintenance of central venous catheters. [IA]

  2. 2. Promptly remove any central venous catheter that is no longer essential. [IA]

  3. 3. When adherence to aseptic technique cannot be ensured (ie, catheters inserted during a medical emergency), replace the catheter as soon as possible, that is within 48 hours. [IB]

  4. 4. Do not routinely replace CVCs, PICCs, hemodialysis catheters, or pulmonary artery catheters to prevent catheter-related infections. [IB]

  5. 5. Perform hand hygiene and wear either clean or sterile gloves when changing the dressing on central venous catheters. [IC]

  6. 6. If antiseptic barrier caps are used on needleless connectors, these must be changed after each access. [IIB]

  7. 7. Minimize contamination risk by scrubbing the access port/hubs with 70% alcohol or a chlorhexidine/alcohol preparation (≥0.5% CHG w/v in 70% alcohol) for at least 5 secs and accessing the port only with sterile devices. [IA]

  8. 8. Use either sterile gauze or sterile, transparent, semipermeable dressing to cover the catheter site. (IA)

  9. 9. Change chlorhexidine impregnated dressing at least every 7 days or according to the manufacturer’s instructions. [IA]

  10. 10. In patients not receiving blood, blood products or lipid formulations, replace administration sets that are continuously used, including secondary sets and add-on devices, up to but at least every 7 days. (IA)

  11. 11. Replace tubing used to administer propofol infusions every 6 or 12 hours, when the vial is changed, per the manufacturer’s recommendation. (IA)

  12. 12. Healthcare facility should use CVC maintenance checklist to document healthcare workers compliance with infection prevention best practices for patient safety and quality care. [IB]

Implementation

Checklists Reference MacKinnon, Seshadri, Mailman and Sy11

We encourage the use of checklists to help healthcare workers comply with the components in each bundle. Compliance is associated with better patient outcomes, reduced infection rates, as well as lowering related healthcare costs.

Culture Reference McCraw, Crutcher, Polancich and Jones12–Reference Saint, Kowalski, Banaszak-Holl, Forman, Damschroder and Krein16

A culture of targeting zero healthcare associated infections and zero tolerance for unsafe practices is characterized by the following:

  1. a. Setting the theoretical goal of elimination of CLABSI;

  2. b. An expectation that infection prevention and control (IPC) measures will be applied consistently by all healthcare workers, 100% of the time;

  3. c. A safe environment for healthcare workers to pursue 100% adherence, where they are empowered to hold each other accountable for infection prevention;

  4. d. Systems and administrative support that provide the foundation to successfully perform IPC measures;

  5. e. Transparency and continuous learning where mistakes and/or poor systems and processes can be openly discussed without fear of penalty;

  6. f. Prompt investigation of CLABSI of greatest concern to the organization and/or community; and

  7. g. Focus on providing real time data to frontline staff for the purpose of driving improvements.

Recommendations

  1. 1. Hospital leadership and policymakers are to continue providing support to build a culture of zero tolerance. [IIIB]

  2. 2. Lines of accountability need to be established to link everyone in a hospital—from the board to frontline staff—so that everyone has a shared understanding of the organizational goals, their role in meeting these, goals and receives feedback (such as dashboards) on how they are performing. [IIIB]

Education and training Reference Foka, Nicolaou and Kyprianou17–Reference Cooper, Frampton and Harris22

All healthcare personnel involved with the insertion and maintenance care of CVCs should receive educational programs that address knowledge, critical thinking, behavior and psychomotor skills, and attitudes and beliefs of CLABSI prevention. Educate healthcare personnel regarding the indications for central venous catheter use and appropriate infection control measures to prevent central venous catheter-related infections.

Recommendations

  1. 1. There should be focus on skill development and competency assessment in the organization. [IIIB]

  2. 2. The educational programs should be assessed for their content, relevance, staff knowledge, improvement and impact on work performance. [IIIB]

Cost-effectiveness analysis Reference Rice, Carr and Sobiesuo20–Reference Cooper, Frampton and Harris22

The core purpose of a cost evaluation for CLABSI is to provide a relative value to different healthcare interventions and to relate the value of the impact of these interventions to the value of specific health outcomes.

Recommendation

  1. 1. Cost effective analysis to justify investment of resources to the IPC program. [IIIB]

Common barriers and feasible solutions to successful implementation Reference Saint, Howell and Krein23

Common barriers to implement best practices to reduce CLABSI include barriers at the organizational level (eg, the lack of leadership support and commitment, lack of a safety culture, lack of available resources), barriers at the unit level (eg, nurse staffing variables, such as inadequate nurse-to-patient staffing rations and use of non-permanent staff), barriers at staff level (eg, education, training, experience, and competency of staff). All of which can affect patient safety in several ways. To successfully implement CLABSI prevention program, healthcare workers need to understand the barriers to successful implementation of CLABSI prevention program in their institutions and try to overcome those barriers.

Recommendation

  1. 1. Identifying and removing barriers to adherence to IPC practices is essential to successful implementation of best practices. [IIIB]

Additional strategies to reduce CLABSI Reference Afonso, Blot and Blot24–Reference Hemmelgarn, Moist and Lok31

Additional strategies to reduce CLABSI could be used in units within hospitals where CLABSI rates remain high despite implementation of all preventive strategies to achieve institutional goals. These include:

  1. a. Antiseptic daily bathing/wiping bath

  2. b. Antimicrobial and antiseptic impregnated catheters

  3. c. Antibiotic locks for long term central venous catheter usage

  4. d. Securement of central venous catheters

  5. e. Safety connectors and needleless system

  6. f. Antiseptic containing hub/connector cap/port protector

Recommendations

  1. 1. Antiseptic daily bathing or wiping bath has been shown to decrease CLABSI in the ICU patients >2 months of age. [IA]

  2. 2. Minocycline-rifampin or chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated catheters should be considered in adult patients whose catheter dwell time is expected to be >7 days in units where the CLABSI rate does not meet the set goal, and the prevention bundle of CLABSI has been implemented with a good compliance. [IA]

  3. 3. Patients using minocycline-rifampin or chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters should be monitored for side effects, such as anaphylaxis. [IIIB]

  4. 4. Prophylactic antimicrobial or antiseptic lock solution should be considered for the following:

    1. a. Patients with long-term hemodialysis catheters [IA]

    2. b. Patients with limited venous access and a history of recurrent CLABSI [IIB]

    3. c. Pediatric cancer patients with long-term catheters [IB]

  5. 5. Use a suture less securement device to reduce the risk of infection for central venous catheters. [IIC]

  6. 6. Use of a split septum valve is preferred over some mechanical valves due to increased risk of infection with the mechanical valves [IIB]

  7. 7. Scrubbing the access port of connectors with an appropriate antiseptic (chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, an iodophor, or 70% alcohol) and accessing the port only with sterile devices. [IA]

  8. 8. Ensure that all needleless components are compatible to reduce the risk of leaks and breaks in the system. [IIB]

  9. 9. Change needleless components at least as frequently as the administration set, that is up to every 7 days. [IIB]

  10. 10. Change the needleless connectors no more frequently than every 72 hours, or according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. [IIB]

  11. 11. Use a needleless system to access IV tubing. [IC]

  12. 12. Use an antiseptic-containing hub/connector cap/port protector to cover connectors (IIB).

  13. 13. Use povidone iodine antiseptic ointment or bacitracin/gramicidin/polymyxin B ointment at the hemodialysis catheter exit site after catheter insertion and at the end of each dialysis session only if this ointment does not interact with the material of the hemodialysis catheter per manufacturer’s recommendation. [IB]

  14. 14. Mupirocin ointment should not be applied to the catheter insertion site due to the risks of facilitating mupirocin resistance and potential damage to polyurethane catheters. [IB]

Discussion

CLABSI is a preventable healthcare association infection. We recommend hospitals in Asia Pacific to implement a CLABSI prevention program facility-wide.Reference Han, Wan and Cheng 32 A surveillance program is recommended to monitor outcomes and compliance with CLABSI prevention bundles. Ongoing review of the performance data with appropriate interventions made should facilitate efforts towards zero CLABSI rate.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support through an educational grant from Solventum. APSIC acknowledges the help of Steve Gordon, Chairman, Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA, in reviewing the revised guidelines, giving his valuable comments and feedback.

Author contribution

All authors are involved in the development of the revised APSIC CLABSI Prevention Guidelines. A/Prof Ling ML was responsible for the initial draft of this manuscript; the other authors gave input and comments; and A/Prof Ling ML revised the manuscript according to inputs received.

Competing interests

Nil.

References

Ling, ML, Apisarnthanarak, A, Madriaga, G. The burden of healthcare-associated infections in Southeast Asia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Clinic Infect Dis 2015;60:1690–1699.10.1093/cid/civ095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725–2732.10.1056/NEJMoa061115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buetti, N, Mimoz, O, Mermel, L, et al. Ultrasound guidance and risk for central venous catheter-related infections in the intensive care unit: a post hoc analysis of individual data of 3 multicenter randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73:e1054–e1061.10.1093/cid/ciaa1817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, MR, Chang, PJ, Hsu, PC, Lin, CS, Chiu, CH, Chen, CJ. Comparison of efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol and 10% povidone-iodine-alcohol against catheter-related bloodstream infections and bacterial colonization at central venous catheter insertion sites: a prospective, single-center, open-label, crossover study. J Clin Med 2022;11:2242.10.3390/jcm11082242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, D, Hada, S, Fujita, R, Matsunaga, N, Sakaki, H, Ohki, Y. Maximal sterile barrier precautions independently contribute to decreased central line-associated bloodstream infection in very low birth weight infants: a prospective multicenter observational study. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1365–1369.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puig-Asensio, M, Marra, AR, Childs, CA, Kukla, ME, Perencevich, EN, Schweizer, ML. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections: does one size fit all? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1388–1395.10.1017/ice.2020.356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, H, Hyun, A, Mihala, G, et al. The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous catheter-associated complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024;149:104620.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, Y, Yang, N, Zhang, L, Zhang, M, Pei, HH, Wang, H. Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1255–1262.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.02.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buetti, N, Marschall, J, Drees, M, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:553–569.10.1017/ice.2022.87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, C, Jakub, K, Kellar, I et al. Adherence to the central line bundle in intensive care: an integrative review. Am J Infect Control 2021;49:937–956.10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, KM, Seshadri, S, Mailman, JF, Sy, E. Impact of rounding checklists on the outcomes of patients admitted to ICUs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor 2024;6:e1140.Google ScholarPubMed
McCraw, B, Crutcher, J, Polancich, S, Jones, P. Preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit: application of high-reliability principles. J Healthc Qual 2018;40:392–397.10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warye, KL, Murphy, DM. Targeting zero health care-associated infections. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:683–684.10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, GL, Cheung, PY, Kerridge, IB. Infection control, ethics and accountability. Med J Aust 2009;190:696–698.10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02641.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apisarnthanarak, A, Greene, MT, Kennedy, EH, Khawcharoenporn, T, Krein, S, Saint, S. National survey of practices to prevent healthcare-associated infections in Thailand: the role of safety culture and collaboratives. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:711–717.10.1086/666330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint, S, Kowalski, CP, Banaszak-Holl, J, Forman, J, Damschroder, L, Krein, SL. The importance of leadership in preventing healthcare-associated infection: results of a multisite qualitative study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:901–907.10.1086/655459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foka, M, Nicolaou, E, Kyprianou, T, et al. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections through educational interventions in adult intensive care units: a systematic review. Cureus 2021;13:e17293.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, GC, Newman, LR, Schwartzstein, RM I, et al. Procedural competence in internal medicine residents: validity of a central venous catheter insertion assessment instrument. Acad Med 2009;84:1127–1134.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181acf491CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safdar, N, Abad, C. Educational interventions for prevention of healthcare-associated infection: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2008;36:933–940.10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165FAF3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, S, Carr, K, Sobiesuo, P, et al. Economic evaluation of interventions to prevent and control healthcare-associated infection: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2023;23:e228–e239.10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00877-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennert-May, E, Conly, J, Leal, J, Smith, S, Manns, B. Economic evaluations and their use in infection prevention and control: a narrative review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018;7:31.10.1186/s13756-018-0327-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, K, Frampton, G, Harris, P, et al. Are educational cost-effective. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:47–52.10.1016/j.jhin.2013.09.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint, S, Howell, JD, Krein, SL. Implementation science: how to jump-start infection prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:S14–S17.10.1086/655991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afonso, E, Blot, K, Blot, S. Prevention of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections through chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated washcloth bathing in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised crossover trials. Euro Surveill 2016;21:30400.10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.46.30400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zerr, DM, Milstone, AM, Dvorak, CC, et al. Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing in children with cancer or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial from the children’s oncology group. Cancer 2021;127:56–66.10.1002/cncr.33271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H, Tong, H, Liu, H, et al. Effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated central venous catheters for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections with the implementation of bundles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2018;8:71.10.1186/s13613-018-0416-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacharioudakis, IM, Zervou, FN, Arvanitis, M, Ziakas, PD, Mermel, LA, Mylonakis, E. Antimicrobial lock solutions as a method to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:1741–1749.10.1093/cid/ciu671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, H, Hyun, A, Mihala, G, et al. The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous catheter-associated complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024;149:104620.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, VD. Impact of needle-free connectors compared with 3-way stopcocks on catheter-related bloodstream infection rates: a meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:281–284.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, JM, Larsen, EN, Keogh, S, Ullman, AJ, Rickard, CM. Methods for microbial needleless connector decontamination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:956–962.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmelgarn, BR, Moist, LM, Lok, CE, et al. Prevention of dialysis catheter malfunction with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. N Engl J Med 2011;364:303–312.10.1056/NEJMoa1011376CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, J, Wan, J, Cheng, Y et al. A hospital-wide reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections through systematic quality improvement initiative and multidisciplinary teamwork. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1358–1364.10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Categories for recommendation