Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T07:08:49.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staging Legality: How Legitimacy Budgeting Codifies Symbolic Governance in China’s Charity Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2025

Yujie Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, No. 174 Shazheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China.

Abstract

This article theorizes China’s Charity Law as a staged legal architecture that institutionalizes symbolic governance through sequenced design: from normative logic, to operational mechanism, to statutory codification. Based on comparative ethnographic fieldwork in Shanghai and Chongqing (2021–2023), this article develops a three-part model of interface legality. First, it conceptualizes legality as a symbolic infrastructure of legitimacy budgeting—the institutional logic through which symbolic control is organized without procedural closure. Second, it analyzes triadic discretion as the operational logic of this system, where codified law, bureaucratic modulation, and organizational alignment interact as a choreography of relational governance. Third, it traces how this discretionary system, developed in practice after the 2016 enactment, was codified into law as structured unfulfillability—embedding impossibility into legal form to sustain reputational suspense. These mechanisms are not pathologies of implementation but institutional features of symbolic governance. By connecting the Charity Law’s expressive design to its affective operations and strategic incompletion, this article contributes to sociolegal scholarship on staged legality by revealing how institutional logic, operational rhythm, and statutory design interlock to codify symbolic governance in contemporary lawmaking.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Amsler, Lisa Blomgren. “Collaborative Governance: Integrating Management, Politics, and Law.” Public Administration Review 76, no. 5 (2016): 700–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, Shahzad, Reinecke, Juliane, and Spaan, Amy. “How Are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation.” Organization Studies 35, no. 9 (2014): 1313–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnum, Timothy C., and Nagin, Daniel S.. “Ambiguity and Legal Compliance.” Criminology & Public Policy 20, no. 4 (2021): 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benney, Jonathan. “Weiwen at the Grassroots: China’s Stability Maintenance Apparatus as a Means of Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Contemporary China 25, no. 99 (2016): 389405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. 2016. “China’s Charity Law.” https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?MmM5MDlmZGQ2NzhiZjE3OTAxNjc4YmY4MDI4NjA4YzU%3D. Accessed December 10, 2023.Google Scholar
Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. 2024. “China’s Charity Law (Revised).” https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?ZmY4MDgxODE4ZDZhNDYzOTAxOGRmM2YxZmM3ZTEyMmQ%3D. Accessed March 2, 2025Google Scholar
Charbonneau, Étienne, Boisvert, Yves, and Bégin, Luc. “Rule Breaking, Bending, and Workarounds: Police Officers and Chiefs’ Coercion-Discretion of Enforcing State Executive Orders.” Public Performance & Management Review 46, no. 3 (2023): 536–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Victoria, and Braun, Virginia. “Thematic Analysis.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12, no. 3 (2017): 297–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Galia, and Cohen, Nissim. “Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Informal Collaboration: Evidence from Police Officers across the Jurisdictional Divide.” Public Management Review 25, no. 2 (2023): 224–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordery, Carolyn, and Deguchi, Masayuki. “Charity Registration and Reporting: A Cross-Jurisdictional and Theoretical Analysis of Regulatory Impact.” Public Management Review 20, no. 9 (2018): 1332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Can, and Wu, Jie. “Alternative to Civil Society Governance: Platform Control over the Third Sector in China.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 17, no. 3 (2024): 611–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Guosheng. “The Hidden Rules Governing China’s Unregistered NGOs: Management and Consequences.” China Review 10, no. 2 (2010): 183206.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (1983): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Sutton, John R.. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology 104, no. 2 (1998): 441–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farid, May, and Song, Chengcheng. “Public Trust as a Driver of State-Grassroots NGO Collaboration in China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 25, no. 4 (2020): 591613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, Ward, Guzior, Dustin F., and Malani, Anup. “Ambiguity about Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry into Legal Interpretation.” Journal of Legal Analysis 2, no. 1 (2010): 257300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Jiawei Sophia, and Yan, Shipeng. “How Do New Forms of Organizations Manage Institutional Voids? Social Enterprises’ Quest for Sociopolitical Legitimacy.” Business & Society **, no.* (2024): **–**Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law: Revised Edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gåsemyr, Hans Jørgen. “Navigation, Circumvention and Brokerage: The Tricks of the Trade of Developing NGOs in China.” The China Quarterly 229 (2017): 86106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L.. “Theoretical Sampling.” In Sociological Methods 105–115. Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gray, Garry C., and Silbey, Susan S.. “Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance.” American Journal of Sociology 120, no. 1 (2014): 96145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hachigian, Heather. “Ambiguity, Discretion and Ethics in Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund.” Business and Politics 17, no. 4 (2015): 603–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Heejin. “Legal Governance of NGOs in China under Xi Jinping: Reinforcing Divide and Rule.” Asian Journal of Political Science 26, no. 3 (2018): 390409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbig, Heike, and Lang, Bertram. “China’s Overseas NGO Law and the Future of International Civil Society.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 52, no. 4 (2022): 574601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Jude, K. R. Fisher, and X. Shang. “Accountability and Legitimacy of NGOs under Authoritarianism: The Case of China.” Third World Quarterly 41, no. 1 (2020): 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, Hui. “The Governance of Charities in China.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, no. 2 (2021): 356–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Ince, Irem, Maurice Yip, and Ruegg, Jean. “More-Than-Human Promise: Relationality, Materiality, and Performativity.” Legalities 4, no. 1 (2024): 6897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.Google Scholar
Luo, Wei, Zheng, Wenjuan, and Long, Yan. “Relational Work and Its Pitfalls: Nonprofits’ Participation in Government-Sponsored Voluntary Accreditation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 33, no. 1 (2023): 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luova, Outi. “Charity Paradigm Change in Contemporary China: From Anti-Socialist Activity to Civic Duty.” China Information 31, no. 2 (2017): 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Steve, and Hardy, Cynthia. “Organizing Processes and the Construction of Risk: A Discursive Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 56, no. 1 (2013): 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Susan K.Serving Society, Repurposing the State: Religious Charity and Resistance in China.” The China Journal 70, no. 1 (2013): 4872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messner, Claudius. “Living Law: Performative, Not Discursive.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law—Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (2012): 537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassar, Jessy, and Stel, Nora. “Lebanon’s Response to the Syrian Refugee Crisis–Institutional Ambiguity as a Governance Strategy.” Political Geography 70 (2019): 4454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ni, Na, and Zhan, Xueyong. “Embedded Government Control and Nonprofit Revenue Growth.” Public Administration Review 77, no. 5 (2017): 730–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Kathleen G., Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “Legal Accountability in the Service-based Welfare State: Lessons from Child Welfare Reform.” Law & Social Inquiry 34, no. 3 (2009): 523–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R.. External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. In Organizational Behavior, 355370. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto R. C.Beyond the Fear of Discretion: Flexibility, Performance, and Accountability in the Management of Regulatory Bureaucracies.” Regulation & Governance 5, no. 1 (2011): 4369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snape, Holly. “Beyond Contestation: Chinese Grassroots NGOs and the Role of the ‘Quiet Approach’ and Incrementalism in Evolving State-Society Relations in China.” The China Nonprofit Review 7, no. 2 (2015): 215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spires, Anthony J.Regulation as Political Control: China’s First Charity Law and Its Implications for Civil Society.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 49, no. 3 (2020): 571–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Talia Ye, and Jasper, Cynthia R.. “The Power Dynamics and Stakeholder Effects in the Legislative Process of Philanthropy Lawmaking in China.” China: An International Journal 20, no. 3 (2022): 97121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavory, Iddo, and Timmermans, Stefan. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teets, Jessica. “The Power of Policy Networks in Authoritarian Regimes: Changing Environmental Policy in China.” Governance 31, no. 1 (2018): 25141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Fengrui, and Chuang, Julia. “Depoliticizing China’s Grassroots NGOs: State and Civil Society as an Institutional Field of Power.” The China Quarterly 250 (2022): 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Lily L.Constructive Noncompliance.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 3 (2015): 253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Karen G., Feinerman, James V., and Kent Guy, R., eds. The Limits of the Rule of Law in China. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
der Kamp, Van, Sienli, Denise. “Governance by Uncertainty: Changing Patterns in China’s Environmental Enforcement.” Studies in Comparative International Development 59, no. 3 (2024): 409–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluis, Esther. “Even Rules, Uneven Practices: Opening the ‘Black Box’ of EU Law in Action.” West European Politics 30, no. 1 (2007): 5067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Keren. “Legal and Ritological Dynamics of Personalized ‘Pillars of Shame’ in Chinese Social Credit System Construction.” China Review 24, no. 3 (2024): 179206.Google Scholar
Wang, Qun. “Nonprofit Organizational Legitimacy and Government Grants Under Authoritarianism: Evidence from Chinese Foundations.” International Public Management Journal 26, no. 4 (2023): 489506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Scott. Tigers without Teeth: The Pursuit of Justice in Contemporary China. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yujie. “Governance in Layers: How Female Street-level Bureaucrats Reshape State Power through Emotional Labor.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 35, no. 3 (2025): 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zhibin, and Guo, Chao. “Nonprofit-Government Relations in Authoritarian China: A Review and Synthesis of the Chinese Literature.” Administration & Society 53, no. 1 (2021): 6496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Huiquan, and Le Han, Eileen. “Striving to Be Pure: Constructing the Idea of Grassroots Philanthropy in Chinese Cyberspace.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 30, no. 4 (2019): 709–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Han, and Jun, Lu. “The Crackdown on Rights-Advocacy NGOs in Xi’s China: Politicizing the Law and Legalizing the Repression.” Journal of Contemporary China 31, no. 136 (2022): 518–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xiao, Qiu, Taotao, and Liu, Dongshu. “Resisting Public Monitoring in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Local Environmental Litigation in China.” Governance 36, no. 2 (2023): 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Monica A., and Zeitz, Gerald J.. “Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy.” Academy of Management Review 27, no. 3 (2002): 414–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar