1949 Cape Felix patrol

The details of the discovery of the skeletal remains are contained in Henry Larsen’s 1949 Patrol Report, written in diary form, and in related RCMP correspondence held by Library and Archives Canada (Larsen, Reference Larsen1949). In early August 1949, a four-member team led by Larsen searched for evidence of the 1845 Franklin expedition along the northwest coast of King William Island between Collinson Inlet and Cape Felix, followed by searches on Adelaide Peninsula in the Richardson Point and Starvation Cove areas (Fig. 1). After establishing a base camp on 5 August near Cape Jane Franklin, Larsen and Constable John Biensch departed on foot on 6 August for Cape Felix (Fig. 2). The remaining two team members, Corporal Seaforth Burton and Special Constable William Cashin, remained behind to search the Collinson Inlet area.

Figure 1.

Map of King William Island, Nunavut, showing approximate area searched by Larsen in August 1949. Base map courtesy of the Department of Culture and Heritage, Government of Nunavut.

Figure 2.

RCMP Inspector Henry Larsen (l) and Constable John Biensch (r) on Cape Felix patrol, August 1949. Henry A. Larsen fonds, Library and Archives Canada, R1500.

Larsen and Biensch reached the Cape Felix area on 8 August. En route they searched for cairns reported by Schwatka in 1879 near Wall Bay and on the northwest side of Cape Felix. None were located, but about a mile inland from the west side of Cape Felix Larsen built a cairn in which he deposited a note in a small bottle. He deposited at least one other cairn record in the area (Wonders, Reference Wonders1968). Over a two-day period, an extensive search of Cape Felix and the surrounding area was conducted including several miles of the coastline stretching eastward toward Cape Sidney. No traces of the Franklin expedition were found, but Larsen reported seeing numerous old tent rings, hearths containing fused carbonised masses of burnt fat and bone, and surface scatters of old and cracked caribou and polar bear bones. The general character and condition of the sites led Larsen to speculate that many of them were of considerable antiquity.

Larsen’s search included the area at the tip of Cape Felix, but his report contains nothing to indicate that he visited the Franklin camp discovered there ninety years earlier by the McClintock search expedition (Hobson, Reference Hobson1859; Stenton, Reference Stenton2014). Had Larsen been at the site, the precise location of which was unknown until 2002 (Gross, Reference Gross2003), it is unlikely he could have overlooked the remains of the stone cairn and tent rings and the numerous Franklin expedition surface artefacts (e.g. canvas, rope, glass, clay pipe fragments, nails and screws) that were still present when the site was first identified more than half a century later. This suggests that the large stone cairn standing at the site in 1859 and which was still partially intact in 1879 (Schwatka, Reference Schwatka1879) had been further dismantled to the point where it was no longer a prominent feature of the landscape that would draw people to the location.

The discovery of the human skeletal remains was made on 8 August while Larsen and Biensch were walking north towards Cape Felix. The find was preceded by the discovery of a stone cache on a ridge described as situated half a mile inland from the beach near Cape Felix and at an estimated elevation of 200 feet (61 m) above sea level. Found in the cache were several Inuit artefacts including two whalebone harpoon heads, a whalebone knife handle and a bone or antler hook. Larsen’s level of familiarity with the material culture of prehistoric Arctic populations is unknown, but the style of the harpoon heads reinforced his belief that many of the sites he observed near Cape Felix dated from the distant past: “the harpoons found are similar to those found in or at Point Hope Alaska and must have belonged to the race of people who inhabited this coast prior to the Eskimos” (Larsen, Reference Larsen1949, p. 6).

Nearby, confusingly described in the patrol report as situated 50 yards from the artefact cache but apparently corrected in other correspondence as just 50 feet from it, Larsen found a human skull partially embedded in the ground between rocks and moss. He noted that the skull appeared to be very old but provided no other details about its discovery.

The artefacts and human remains found by Larsen at Cape Felix together with other artefacts found at Victory Point were collected and forwarded to RCMP Headquarters in Ottawa. On 22 October 1949, RCMP Commissioner S. T. Wood sent a confidential letter to Dr. R. M. Anderson to arrange a telephone call for the purpose of obtaining Anderson’s advice about who the RCMP might consult about the possible significance of the collections made by Larsen. Whether the telephone call was arranged and a recommendation was given by Anderson is unknown, but on 28 October, Wood asked Larsen to review a draft copy of a letter, dated 2 November 1949, inviting archaeologist Douglas Leechman at the National Museum of Canada to examine the collection (Leechman, Reference Leechman1949). The wording of the letter indicates that it formalised previous communication on the subject between Wood and Leechman.

Prior to being sent for examination by Leechman, the artefacts and the human remains were photographed by the RCMP Photographic Section on 1 November 1949 and shipped to Leechman via special messenger the following day (Fig. 3). In acknowledging receipt of the items, Leechman noted that he had previously seen them during a visit to Larsen’s office, and he submitted his report a month later on 6 December. Commissioner Wood replied on 25 January 1950 and invited Leechman to select from the collection any items in which he might have had an interest, an offer which Leechman declined with the recommendation that the collection be kept together in the Regina museum.

Figure 3.

Human skeletal remains found by Henry Larsen near Cape Felix, King William Island, August 1949: (a) fused parietals; (b) mandible; (c) temporal (?); (d) foramen magnum; (e) temporal; (f) frontal, zygomatics and maxilla; (g) occipital; (h) tibia; (i) unidentified; (j) unidentified (possible polar bear tooth?). Photo credit: RCMP, Henry A. Larsen fonds, Library and Archives Canada, R1500.

Leechman described the artefacts Larsen had found near the human remains as consisting of two adze handles, two whaling harpoon heads, a caribou antler hook and an unidentified bone fragment, all thought to date to the late Thule or early Inuit period. Their current location is unknown, and no photographs of them have been found that might allow evaluation of their relative age.

From his examination of the skeletal remains, Leechman reached the following conclusions:

Based on Leechman’s expert opinion and the geographical recovery context of the bones – southeast of where HMS Erebus and HMS Terror were beset and in the general vicinity of where a Franklin expedition a camp was known to exist – Larsen concluded that the remains could only have been those of a member of the Franklin expedition who had died prior to the April 1848 desertion of the ships near Victory Point:

Larsen correctly noted the fact that no graves attributable to the Franklin expedition had ever been found on King William Island between Victory Point and Cape Felix, but he suggested that fact did not preclude their existence given that the nature of the terrain, coupled with the likelihood of disturbance by Inuit, would make them difficult to identify. There is nothing controversial about Larsen’s assessment on these points, and in any case, his attribution of the remains to the 1845 Franklin expedition was based solely on Leechman’s analysis which was never questioned and as previously noted has been broadly accepted. A review of the details of the context of the discovery and of Leechman’s analysis of the skeletal remains introduces doubt, however, about its European ancestry and attribution to the Franklin expedition.

Recovery context

Site location

Beyond establishing that it was discovered about one-half mile inland while walking towards Cape Felix and was thus south of the cape, the few details in the report make it difficult to approximate where Larsen found the human remains. Its described location is also difficult to reconcile with the topography near Cape Felix where elevations up to a mile inland of the northwest coast of King William Island appear to be below 20 metres (65 feet) above sea level, far less than Larsen’s estimated 200 feet, suggesting either that the discovery site was much further inland or at a considerably lower elevation. An additional point regarding the discovery location is the described spatial association between the cache of Inuit artefacts and the human skull, a detail that appears not to have been a point of discussion with respect to the interpretation of its possible antiquity and ancestry. No temporal or cultural connection necessarily exists between the two discoveries simply because of the short distance separating them, but in light of other details, it is surprising that the possibility of such an association was not considered.

No in situ photographs of the finds were included in Larsen’s reports, but the Henry A. Larsen fonds at Library and Archives Canada does contain photographs taken during the 1949 Cape Felix patrol. A search identified several images that could be matched with details in the patrol report, including one image thought to be the human cranium (Fig. 4). There is no scale in the photograph, but it appears to show a piece of weathered bone exhibiting morphology which is consistent with the right lateral–posterior of an inverted human cranium. The depositional context matches Larsen’s description of finding the skull partly embedded in a matrix of moss and rocks, and the photograph shows what appears to be one or more bones deeply embedded in moss, several thick pieces of which had been removed prior to taking the photograph. The other bones Larsen recovered are not visible or easily identifiable, and the orientation of the presumed cranium as photographed makes it difficult to identify diagnostic morphological landmarks. However, one possible landmark is the junction of the lambdoid and sagittal sutures which join the occipital bone with the left and right parietal and temporal bones. The occipital bone is not seen in the photograph, but it was recovered. What appear to be these same sutures are seen in the 1949 RCMP photograph which supports the interpretation that the object in Figure 4 is the human cranium photographed by Larsen. It seems unlikely that Larsen would not have photographically documented the discovery, and a search of the 1949 Cape Felix patrol photographs in the Larsen fonds at Library and Archives Canada revealed no other possible images of the find. The visible portions of the calvaria appear bleached and weathered, whereas the base of the skull had a thick layer of moss adhering to it, suggesting that the cranium may have been moved for initial examination and was only approximately repositioned for the photograph.

Figure 4.

Photograph of presumed human skull found 8 August 1949 near Cape Felix, King William Island. Inset: comparison of junction of lambdoid and sagittal sutures as seen in RCMP photograph of cranium. Photo credit: Henry Larsen, Henry A. Larsen fonds, Library and Archives Canada, R1500.

Depositional and temporal contexts

In his report, Leechman did not comment on the appearance or condition of the bones as an indicator of their relative age or possible relevance with respect to their ancestry. Taking into account the many factors and processes affecting the preservation or degradation of exposed bone (Lyman, Reference Lyman1994), the observable characteristics of the human bones in the Cape Felix assemblage suggest they are of considerable antiquity, substantially pre-dating the mid-19th century. They exhibit significant bleaching and weathering, and extensive moss and lichen growth. Surface exfoliation, cracking and warping are also present, such as that seen on the lateral margin of the left eye orbit. The extent of tooth enamel loss is also noteworthy. All of the remaining teeth exhibit significant loss of enamel and exposure of dentine which also displays cracking and weathering indicative of exposure over a protracted period of time.

Because the specific effects of their environmental contexts are often not well understood, estimates of elapsed time based on assessments of weathering observed on archaeological bone specimens are inherently subjective. However, Franklin expedition skeletal remains recovered from surface contexts at sites elsewhere on King William Island offer a basis for general comparison with the Cape Felix assemblage. For example, hundreds of human bones found in the 1990s on the surface at site NgLj-2 located at Erebus Bay 90 km to the southwest of Cape Felix were bleached and weathered but substantially less than seen in the Cape Felix collection, and lichen growth was minimal (Fig. 5) (Keenleyside, Reference Keenleyside1994; Keenleyside, Bertulli, & Fricke, Reference Keenleyside, Bertulli and Fricke1997, p. 38). By contrast, the degree of post-mortem deterioration apparent in the Cape Felix collection is far more advanced and signifies a period of exposure to the elements over a much longer time period. This is supported by the fact that if the Cape Felix skeletal assemblage were that of a member of the 1845 Franklin expedition, it would essentially be the same age as the skeletal remains found at Erebus Bay. Site NgLj-2 dates to 1848 and the earliest possible date for the presence of any remains of Franklin expedition personnel anywhere on King William Island is September 1846. Thus, the possible timing of the deposition of the two assemblages differed by less than two years making it difficult to explain the obviously more advanced weathering and deterioration of the bones in the Cape Felix assemblage. Furthermore, when evaluating the condition of the bones in the two assemblages, it should be noted that when recovered in 1993, the NgLj-2 assemblage had been exposed for nearly half a century longer than Cape Felix assemblage.

Figure 5.

Composite image showing weathering of Cape Felix cranium and mandible (upper and lower left) compared with five crania and mandible from Franklin expedition sailors found at site NgLj-2, Erebus Bay. The good condition of the teeth in mandible NgLj-2:121 is representative of the condition of the teeth in all eight mandibles found at the site. When recovered in 1993, the Erebus Bay crania had been exposed to the elements for approximately 145 years. Photo credit: Cape Felix: RCMP, Henry A. Larsen fonds, Library and Archives Canada, R1500; NgLj-2: Anne Keenleyside.

Skeletal remains

Inventory

The Cape Felix assemblage appears not to have been formally inventoried or described in detail, but, based on the 1949 photograph, the total number of human bones and bone fragments recovered was nine (Table 1). On the assumption that the tibia and the cranium were from the same person, it was concluded that the assemblage represented a single individual. There is no obvious reason to question that conclusion and the possibility of more than one individual being represented could only be determined through DNA analysis. Leechman did note, however, the presence of a non-human bone in the assemblage: “Accompanying the skull was a little more than half of a molar tooth from a polar bear, presumably included by accident” (Leechman, Reference Leechman1949). Larsen’s report contains no mention of collecting human remains from any other location during the Cape Felix area search meaning that the polar bear tooth was presumably found commingled with the human bones. The presence of a broken polar bear tooth in the assemblage (Fig. 3) seems unusual, but no additional details about it, such as the possibility of it being worked (i.e. an artefact), were provided.

Table 1.

Inventory of skeletal remains collected by Larsen at Cape Felix, King William Island, Nunavut, 1949

Leechman did not comment on the human bones that comprised the assemblage, but the small number and type of elements suggest the possibility that it was formed as a result of animal activity. Photographs of the bones show no obvious evidence of animal-induced damage to the cranium (e.g. gnawing or puncture marks) although it might have been difficult to identify given its extremely weathered and fragile condition. However, there appears to be evidence of animal damage to the tibia, the only post-cranial bone found. The absence of the proximal and distal portions of the tibia is a form of bone modification consistent with damage caused by large carnivores (Haynes, Reference Haynes1980; Lyman, Reference Lyman1994).

Summary and conclusion

The preceding discussion draws into question the belief that the human skeletal remains found by Henry Larsen at Cape Felix in 1949 were those of a sailor from the 1845 Franklin expedition. New details about the location and depositional context in which the remains were found, photographic evidence and expert opinion all support the proposition that the skeletal remains found at Cape Felix have no connection with the 1845 Franklin expedition. It is important to emphasise that in questioning the 1949 conclusions, the intent is not to criticise Leechman or Larsen but instead to consider the possibility that the former had misinterpreted diagnostic anatomical attributes of the skeletal remains which resulted in the latter misattributing them to the 1845 Franklin Northwest Passage Expedition.

The ancestry of the Cape Felix skeleton could be determined definitively through successful extraction and sequencing of DNA, but attempts to acquire a sample from the RCMP Historical Collections Unit for genetic analysis have been unsuccessful. The information presented in this review suggests, however, that until such time as the ancestry and other attributes of the skeletal remains can be confirmed conclusively through re-examination by a physical anthropologist and genetic analysis, its attribution to the 1845 Franklin expedition and the interpretive implications that derive from that conclusion should be considered unproven. Unresolved questions about the ancestry of the Cape Felix skeletal remains might also be of interest to the Government of Nunavut which for many years has been compiling information about Inuit human remains in the collections of national and international heritage facilities for the purposes of future repatriation.