Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T10:46:44.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A false aneurysm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

D Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
C Repanos*
Affiliation:
Department Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
W B Coman
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Costa Repanos, ENT Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Ports mouth, UK, P06 3LY E-mail: costa@repanos.com

Abstract

Objective:

We report a case of a remaining hemi-thyroid following laryngectomy, which was misinterpreted as a pseudoaneurysm.

Methods:

Case report and comment on this understandable error which is easily avoidable.

Results:

A 59-year-old man had undergone salvage laryngectomy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, which had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Three months after his laryngectomy, he presented with a sore neck and subcutaneous collections. Computed tomography revealed a unilateral mass with high signal contrast uptake anterior to the left common carotid artery, which was thought initially to be a carotid pseudoaneurysm. Further investigation, including ultrasonography and a review by the senior head and neck radiologist, demonstrated that this mass was actually the remnant hemi-thyroid preserved at laryngectomy (which is often misshapen compared with a normal hemi-thyroid). The collections were found to be recurrent tumour, and unnecessary further interventions were avoided.

Conclusion:

Ultrasonography easily distinguishes between a thyroid remnant and a pseudoaneurysm. Furthermore, the opinion of an experienced head and neck radiologist may be vital when interpreting complex post-surgical head and neck radiology.

Information

Type
Clinical Record
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable