Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T05:31:58.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental capacity, diagnosis and insight in psychiatric in-patients: a cross-sectional study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2008

G. S. Owen ,
A. S. David ,
G. Richardson ,
G. Szmukler ,
P. Hayward  and
M. Hotopf
G. S. Owen*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
A. S. David
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
G. Richardson
Affiliation:
School of Law, King's College London, UK
G. Szmukler
Affiliation:
Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
P. Hayward
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
M. Hotopf
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr G. S. Owen, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Rd, London SE5 9RJ, UK. (Email: g.owen@iop.kcl.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Mental capacity is now a core part of UK mental health law and clinicians will increasingly be expected to assess it. Because it is a legal concept there is a need to clarify associations with variables that clinicians are more familiar with, especially insight.

Method

In this cross-sectional study we recruited consecutive psychiatric admissions to the Maudsley Hospital, London. We carried out structured assessments of decision making using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), resulting in a clinical judgement about capacity status. We analysed associations with a range of sociodemographic and clinical variables, including insight score on the Expanded Schedule for the Assessment of Insight (SAI-E). The same variables were compared in an analysis stratified according to diagnostic group: psychotic disorders/bipolar affective disorder (BPAD)/non-psychotic disorders.

Results

Psychotic disorders and manic episodes of BPAD are most strongly associated with incapacity. In such patients, insight is the best discriminator of capacity status. In patients with non-psychotic disorders, insight is less strongly associated with capacity; in this group depressed mood discriminates capacity status whereas it does not in psychotic disorders. Cognitive performance does not discriminate capacity status in patients with psychotic disorders.

Conclusions

Mental capacity has complex relationships with psychopathological variables, and these relationships are different according to diagnostic group. Insight is the best discriminator of capacity status in psychotic disorders and BPAD but not in non-psychotic disorders.

Keywords

Insightmedical ethicsmental capacitymental health law

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 39 , Issue 8 , August 2009 , pp. 1389 - 1398
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amador, X (2004). Insight and psychosis. In Insight and Psychosis, 2nd edn (ed. Amador, X. and David, A.), pp. 3–31. Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revision. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Applebaum, PS (2007). Assessment of patient's competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 1834–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck-Sandler, A (1998). Is insight meaningful? Journal of Mental Health 7, 25–34.Google Scholar
Bellhouse, J, Holland, AJ, Clare, ICH, Gunn, M, Watson, P (2003 a). Capacity-based mental health legislation and its impact on clinical practice: (1) admission to hospital. Journal of Mental Health Law (July), 9–23.Google Scholar
Bellhouse, J, Holland, AJ, Clare, ICH, Gunn, M, Watson, P (2003 b). Capacity-based mental health legislation and its impact on clinical practice: (2) treatment in hospital. Journal of Mental Health Law (July), 24–36.Google Scholar
Cairns, R, Maddock, C, David, AS, Hayward, P, Richardson, G, Szmukler, G, Hotopf, M (2005). Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, WT Jr., Gold, JM, Lahti, AC, Queern, CA, Conley, RR, Bartko, JJ, Kovnick, J, Appelbaum, PS (2000). Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Archives of General Psychiatry 57, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, A (1990). Insight and psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 161, 599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, AS (1998). Commentary on: ‘Is insight into psychosis meaningful?’. Journal of Mental Health 7, 579–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J, Szmukler, G (2006). Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. British Journal of Psychiatry 188, 504–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health (2008). Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983. The Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Diesfeld, K (2003). Insight on ‘insight’: the impact of extra-legislative factors on decisions to discharge detained patients. In Involuntary Detention and Therapeutic Jurisprudence (ed. Diesfeld, K. and Freckelton, I.), pp. 359–382. Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Etchells, E, Katz, MR, Shuchman, M, Wong, G, Workman, S, Choudhry, NK, Craven, J, Singer, PA (1997). Accuracy of clinical impressions and Mini-Mental State Exam scores for assessing capacity to consent to major medical treatment: comparison with criterion-standard psychiatric assessments. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry 38, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulford, KWM (2004). Insight and delusion: from Jaspers to Kraeplin and back again via Austin. In Insight and Psychosis, 2nd edn (ed. Amador, X. and David, A.), pp. 51–78. Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS, Hill-Fotouhi, C (1997). The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services 48, 1415–1419.Google ScholarPubMed
Kress, K (2004). Why lack of insight should have a central place in mental health law. In Insight and Psychosis, 2nd edn (ed. Amador, X. and David, A.), pp. 257–279. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Law Commission (1995). Mental Incapacity. The Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
McEvoy, JP, Appelbaum, PS, Apperson, LJ, Geller, JL, Freter, S (1989). Why must some schizophrenic patients be involuntarily committed? The role of insight. Comprehensive Psychiatry 30, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okai, D, Owen, G, McGuire, H, Singh, S, Churchill, R, Hotopf, M (2007). Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry 191, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, GS, Richardson, G, David, AS, Szmukler, G, Hayward, P, Hotopf, M (2008). Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: a cross sectional study. British Medical Journal 337, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, BW, Dunn, LB, Appelbaum, PS, Jeste, DV (2004). Correlates of treatment-related decision-making capacity among middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 61, 230–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, BW, Dunn, LB, Appelbaum, PS, Mudaliar, S, Thal, L, Henry, R, Golshan, S, Jeste, DV (2005). Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 726–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, BW, Jeste, DV (2006). Relationship of individual cognitive abilities to specific components of decisional capacity among middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PsychCorp (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence – Manual. PsychCorp: San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Raymont, V, Bingley, W, Buchanan, A, David, AS, Hayward, P, Wessely, S, Hotopf, M (2004). Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet 364, 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanz, M, Constable, G, Lopez-Ibor, I, Kemp, R, David, AS (1998). A comparative study of insight scales and their relationship to psychopathological and clinical variables. Psychological Medicine 28, 437–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, SP, Greenwood, N, White, S, Churchill, R (2007). Ethnicity and the Mental Health Act 1983. British Journal of Psychiatry 191, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stromberg, CD, Stone, AA (1983). A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harvard Journal on Legislation 20, 275–396.Google Scholar
Ventura, J, Green, MF, Shaner, A, Liberman, RP (1993). Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: ‘The drift buster’. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3, 221–244.Google Scholar
WHO (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
Wong, JG, Cheung, EP, Chen, EY (2005). Decision-making capacity of inpatients with schizophrenia in Hong Kong. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 193, 316–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wuensch, K (2007). Construct Confidence Interval for Cohen's d (http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/SPSS-Programs.htm).Google Scholar