Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-4jdj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T16:32:51.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory meatus performed to investigate audiovestibular symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2016

H M Htun ,
S L Mui ,
C Williams  and
P S Hans
H M Htun*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, UK
S L Mui
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, UK
C Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, UK
P S Hans
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Ms Hay Mar Htun, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Road, Blackpool FY3 8NR, UK E-mail: haymarhtun@doctors.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the frequency of incidental findings found on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the internal auditory meatus performed to investigate audiovestibular symptoms, and to determine how to best manage these when found.

Method:

A retrospective review was conducted of internal auditory meatus magnetic resonance imaging scans during a three-month period in the radiology department at a UK district general hospital.

Results:

A total of 109 scans were reviewed. Of these, 92.7 per cent showed no retrocochlear pathology, 0.9 per cent showed vestibular schwannoma, 6.4 per cent revealed vascular loops, and 2.8 per cent showed incidental findings that warranted further action and investigation. Of the scans, 40.4 per cent showed other incidental pathologies such as age-related ischaemic changes, and sinus disease that required no further intervention. Of the magnetic resonance imaging scans reviewed, 49.5 per cent were entirely normal.

Conclusion:

Almost half of the scans investigating audiovestibular symptoms showed incidental findings. Otolaryngologists should have an understanding of the significance of the most commonly encountered incidental findings, and should counsel patients appropriately and refer them onward when necessary.

Keywords

MRIInternal Auditory MeatusAudiovestibular SymptomsVestibular SchwannomaIncidental Findings

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 131 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 32 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presented orally at the North of England Otorhinolaryngological Society Meeting, 16 October 2015, Wakefield, and as a poster at the British Institute of Radiology Annual Trainee Events, 12–13 November 2015, Birmingham, UK.

References

1 Newton, JR, Shakeel, M, Flatman, S, Beattie, C, Ram, B. Magnetic resonance imaging screening in acoustic neuroma. Am J Otolaryngol 2010;31:217–20Google Scholar
2 Obholzer, RJ, Rea, PA, Harcourt, JP. Magnetic resonance imaging screening for vestibular schwannoma: analysis of published protocols. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:329–32Google Scholar
3 Dawes, PJ, Jeannon, JP. Audit of regional screening guidelines for vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:860–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Selesnick, SH, Jackler, RK, Pitts, LW. The changing clinical presentation of acoustic tumors in the MRI era. Laryngoscope 1993;103:431–6Google Scholar
5 Sidman, JD, Carrasco, VN, Whaley, RA, Pillsbury, HC. Gadolinium: the new gold standard for diagnosing cerebellopontine angle tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1244–7Google Scholar
6 Vandervelde, C, Connor, SE. Diagnostic yield of MRI for audiovestibular dysfunction using contemporary referral criteria: correlation with presenting symptoms and impact on clinical management. Clin Radiol 2009;64:156–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Papanikolaou, V, Khan, MH, Keogh, IJ. Incidental findings on MRI scans of patients presenting with audiovestibular symptoms. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2010;10:6 Google Scholar
8 Katzman, GL, Dagher, AP, Patronas, NJ. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 1999;282:36–9Google Scholar
9 Mirza, S, Malik, TH, Ahmed, A, Willatt, DJ, Hughes, DG. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging screening for cerebellopontine angle tumours. J Laryngol Otol 2006;114:750–4Google Scholar
10 Robson, AK, Leighton, SE, Anslow, P, Milford, CA. MRI as a single screening procedure for acoustic neuroma: a cost effective protocol. J R Soc Med 1993;86:455–7Google Scholar
11 Raber, E, Dort, JC, Sevick, R, Winkelaar, R. Asymmetric hearing loss: toward cost-effective diagnosis. J Otolaryngol 1997;26:88–91 Google Scholar
12 Gupta, R, Gupta, N, Gupta, S, Gupta, G, Kalsotra, P, Sharma, R. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with tinnitus. Indian J Otol 2015;21:41–6Google Scholar
13 Chadha, NK, Weiner, GM. Vascular loops causing otological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:5–11 Google Scholar
14 Møller, MB, Møller, AR, Jannetta, PJ, Jho, HD. Vascular decompression surgery for severe tinnitus: selection criteria and results. Laryngoscope 1993;103:421–7Google Scholar
15 Tash, RR, Kier, EL, Chyatte, D. Hemifacial spasm caused by a tortuous vertebral artery: MR demonstration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:492–4Google Scholar
16 O'Sullivan, M, Lythgoe, DJ, Pereira, AC, Summers, PE, Jarosz, JM, Williams, SC et al. Patterns of cerebral blood flow reduction in patients with ischemic leukoaraiosis. Neurology 2002;59:321–6Google Scholar
17 De Leeuw, FE, de Groot, JC, Achten, E, Oudkerk, M, Ramos, LM, Heijboer, R et al. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:9–14 Google Scholar
18 Debette, S, Markus, HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3666 Google Scholar
19 Moser, FG, Panush, D, Rubin, JS, Honigsberg, RM, Sprayregen, S, Eisig, SB. Incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities on MRI of the brain. Clin Radiol 1991;43:252–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Patel, K, Chavda, SV, Violaris, N, Pahor, AL. Incidental paranasal sinus inflammatory changes in a British population. J Laryngol Otol 2007;110:649–51Google Scholar
21 Tarp, B, Fiirgaard, B, Christensen, T, Jensen, JJ, Black, FT. The prevalence and significance of incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities on MRI. Rhinology 2000;38:33–8Google Scholar
22 Okuda, DT, Mowry, EM, Beheshtian, A, Waubant, E, Baranzini, SE, Goodin, DS et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 2009;72:800–5Google Scholar
23 Barkhof, F, Filippi, M, Miller, DH, Scheltens, P, Campi, A, Polman, CH et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997;120:2059–69Google Scholar
24 Royal College of Radiologists. Management of Incidental Findings Detected during Research Imaging. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 2011 Google Scholar
25 Cueva, RA. Auditory brainstem response versus magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1686–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Stachler, RJ, Chandrasekhar, SS, Archer, SM, Rosenfeld, RM, Schwartz, SR, Barrs, DM et al. Clinical practice guideline: sudden hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146(3 suppl):S1–35Google Scholar
27 Fortnum, H, O'Neill, C, Taylor, R, Lenthall, R, Nikolopoulos, T, Lightfoot, G et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of suspected acoustic neuroma: a systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness and natural history. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:1–154 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Reeves, D, Mason, L, Prosser, H, Kiernan, C. Direct Referral Systems for Hearing Aid Provision. London: HMSO, 1994 Google Scholar
29 Fishman, JM, Shoeb, M, Abramovich, S. Importance of imaging the central auditory pathways in cases of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:1–2 Google Scholar