Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:24:10.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Bonding and Pseudogap in Zn- and Cd-based Compounds with Complex Hexagonal Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Y. Ishii
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chuo University, Kasuga, Tokyo 112–8551, Japan SORST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, (SORST-JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332–0012, Japan
K. Nozawa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chuo University, Kasuga, Tokyo 112–8551, Japan SORST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, (SORST-JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332–0012, Japan
T. Fujiwara
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113–8654, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Electronic structures of hexagonal Zn-Mg-Y and Cd58Y13 compounds are studied by first-principles calculations. Both of the systems show deep pseudogap in the electronic density of states near the Fermi level and considered to be stabilized electronically. To illustrate bonding nature of electronic wavefunctions, the crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) is calculated for neighboring pairs of atoms in the unit cell. It is found that the bonding nature is changed from bonding to anti-bonding almost exactly at the Fermi level for Zn-Zn and Cd-Cd bonds. On the contrary, for Zn/Cd-Y bonds, both of the states below and above the pseudogap behave as bonding ones. Possible effects of the p-d hybridization are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fujiwara, T., Physical Properties of Quasicrystals, edited by Stadnik, Z.M. (Springer, Berlin, 1999), p. 169.Google Scholar
2. Ishii, Y. and Fujiwara, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206408 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Tsai, A.P., Guo, J. Q., Abe, E., Takakura, H., and Sato, T. J., Nature (London) 408, 537 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Kaneko, Y., Arichika, Y. and Ishimasa, T., Philos. Mag. Lett. 81, 777 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Takakura, H., Sato, A., Yamamoto, A. and Tsai, A.P., Philos. Mag. Lett. 78, 263 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Bruzzone, G., Fornasini, M.L. and Merlo, F., J. Less-Common Met. 30, 361 (1973)Google Scholar
7. Andersen, O. K., Jepsen, O., and Glötzel, D., Highlight in Condensed Matter Theory, edited by Bassani, F., Fumi, F., and Tosi, M. P. (North-Holland, New York, 1985), p. 59.Google Scholar
8. Dronskowski, R. and Blöchl, P.E., J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993), 8617.Google Scholar
9. Ishii, Y. and Fujiwara, T., Proc. of 8th International Conference on Quasicrystals (Bangalore, 2002), to be published in J. Non-cryst. Solids.Google Scholar
10. Suchodolskis, A., Assums, W., Giovanelli, L., Larlsson, U.O., Karpus, V., Le Lay, G., Sterzel, R. and Uhrig, E., Phys. Rev. B 68, 054207 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Krajcí, M. and Hafner, J., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12, 5831 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Oshio, K. and Ishii, Y., J. Alloys Compounds 342, 402 (2002).Google Scholar