Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T15:36:31.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Educational Value of Analytic Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2020

JANE GATLEY
JANE GATLEY*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM jane.gatley@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I outline three critiques of analytic philosophy; that it is (1) irrelevant to individuals and society; (2) unconstructive; and (3) excessively technical. These critiques are linked to skepticism about the educational value of analytic philosophy. In response, I suggest that if analytic philosophy provides constructive guidance about prominent and pressing questions, then it holds potential educational value. I identify a body of prominent and pressing questions that are addressed by analytic philosophy as a discipline. Because analytic philosophy is often concerned with the analysis of ordinary concepts, there is at least some potential educational value to analytic philosophy insofar as it provides guidance about the meaning of ordinary concepts that ground ordinary questions. Taking P. F. Strawson's paradigmatically analytic account of philosophy, I show that analytic philosophy can directly address ordinary questions in a constructive manner. Analytic philosophy is neither (1) irrelevant, (2) unconstructive, nor (3) excessively technical.

Keywords

analytic philosophyphilosophy of educationmetaphilosophyphilosophy for children

Information

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2021 , pp. 59 - 77
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Philosophical Association. (2020) ‘So You Want to Teach Precollege Philosophy’. https://www.apaonline.org/page/precollege (accessed February 25, 2020).Google Scholar
AQA Education. (2019) ‘Exam Results Statistics—June 2019 A-Level’. https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/over/stat_pdf/AQA-A-LEVEL-STATS-JUN-2019.PDF (accessed February 10, 2020).Google Scholar
Babich, Babette. (2003) ‘On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy: Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy’. In Prado, C. G. (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy (Amherst: Humanity Books), 63–103.Google Scholar
Biesta, Gert. (2002) ‘Bildung and Modernity: The Future of Bildung in a World of Difference’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callard, Agnes. (2019) ‘Is Public Philosophy Good?’ Point. February 13, 2019. https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/agnes-callard-is-public-philosophy-good/.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, Georges. (1953) ‘The Teaching of Philosophy in France’. In UNESCO (ed.), The Teaching of Philosophy: An International Inquiry of UNESCO (Paris: UNESCO), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. (1993) Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. (2008) What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guardian. (2018) ‘The Autocomplete Questions’. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/series/the-autocomplete-questions (accessed September 19, 2020).Google Scholar
Hand, Michael. (2018) ‘On the Distinctive Educational Value of Philosophy’. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, Michael, and Winstanley, Carrie. (2006) Philosophy in Schools. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. (2012) Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Neil. (2003) ‘Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences’. Metaphilosophy, 34, 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, Matthew, Sharp, Ann Margaret, and Oscanyan, Frederick S.. (1980) Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Donald. (1953) ‘The Teaching of Philosophy in the United Kingdom’. In UNESCO (ed.), The Teaching of Philosophy: An International Inquiry of UNESCO (Paris: UNESCO), 119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, Kate. (2018) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. (1980) Philosophy and the Young Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, Mary. (2018) What Is Philosophy For? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Midgley, Mary. (1992) ‘Philosophical Plumbing’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 33, 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Teachers of Religious Education. (2019) ‘Schools’ Failure to Meet Legal Requirement on RE Continues to Impact A-level Entries’. https://www.natre.org.uk/news/latest-news/schools-failure-to-meet-legal-requirements-on-re-continues-to-impact-a-level-entries/ (accessed 10 February 2020).Google Scholar
Pring, Richard. (1977) ‘Common Sense and Education’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 11, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. (1971) ‘Philosophical Arguments’. In Collected Essays 1929–1968, vol. 3 of Collected Papers (London: Hutchinson), 203–22.Google Scholar
Staiti, Andrea. (2013) ‘Philosophy: Wissenschaft or Weltanschauung? Towards a Prehistory of the Analytic/Continental Rift’. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39, 793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAPERE. (2020) ‘What is P4C?’ https://www.sapere.org.uk/about-us.aspx (accessed September 19, 2020).Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1992) Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. (1984) Teaching and Research in Philosophy: Africa. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2005) Item 15 of the Provisional Agenda of the Hundred and Seventy-First Session of the Executive Board: Creation of a World Philosophy Day. April 13, 2005. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000138818_eng.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2007) Philosophy: A School of Freedom. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2009) Teaching Philosophy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar