Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-l8wb7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-02T13:13:26.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural selection on reproductive timing varies by education in twentieth-century Estonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2025

Richard Meitern
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Peeter Hõrak*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
*
Corresponding author: Peeter Hõrak; Email: horak@ut.ee

Abstract

This register-based study investigates how natural selection acts on educational attainment and reproductive timing among Estonians born between 1925 and 1977. Women with primary education consistently achieved the highest reproductive success throughout the study period, whereas a positive educational gradient in reproduction emerged among men born since the 1950s, resulting in sexually antagonistic selection on educational attainment. Men with tertiary education had higher reproductive success than other men, despite initiating reproduction later. The lowest-educated women exhibited the strongest selection for early reproduction and the earliest start of reproduction throughout the study period. These women and the least-educated men also experienced the strongest selection for delayed reproductive cessation. Nonetheless, parents with primary education (particularly men) were typically the first to stop reproducing. Stabilizing selection for intermediate interbirth intervals also showed the strongest quadratic selection gradients among minimally educated parents of both sexes. At that, men with primary education had the fastest reproductive pace, whereas women in the same group had the slowest. Our study shows that selection on reproductive timing traits was consistently stronger among parents with lower educational attainment, and that variation in reproductive timing across educational strata does not consistently reflect the selective pressures acting on recent generations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Sample sizes for at least 15-year-old Estonians born between 1925 and 1977

Figure 1

Figure 1. Birth cohort averages with 95% CI for offspring number, ages of first and last birth (AFB and ALB) and average interbirth intervals (IBIs) in years by sex. Sample sizes in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1.

Figure 2

Table 2. Average offspring numbers by sex (M: male, F: female) and educational attainment for the whole study period (second column) and for the birth cohorts with maximum and minimum average offspring number for given sex/education category (third and fifth column)

Figure 3

Figure 2. Birth cohort averages for offspring number with 95% CI across sexes and educational attainment levels. Sample sizes in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1.

Figure 4

Table 3. Linear selection gradients (β) for educational attainment (all levels compared against individuals with primary education). Sample sizes for primary education: females 76,795; males 87,928

Figure 5

Figure 3. Birth cohort averages with 95% CI for offspring number, ages of first and last birth (AFB and ALB) and average interbirth intervals (IBIs) in years by educational attainment and sex. Sample sizes in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1. See Supplementary Figures S2–S4 for fine-scale data.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Quadradic selection curves with 95% CI for reproductive timing traits over the whole study period. ẞs are linear selection gradients (βQ) estimated from the quadratic regression model: rLRS = a + βQ(trait zscore) + 1/2 γ(trait zscore)2 + ε. See Supplementary Figure S5 for selection curves and gradients for unstandardized trait values and Table S2 for statistics.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Cohort average linear selection gradients (ẞ and 95% CI) on reproductive timing traits by sex and educational attainment levels. See Supplementary Figures S6–S8 for fine-scale data.

Supplementary material: File

Meitern and Hõrak supplementary material

Meitern and Hõrak supplementary material
Download Meitern and Hõrak supplementary material(File)
File 386.6 KB