Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-9dm9z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T23:44:38.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does a Spin–Orbit Coupling Between the Sun and the Jovian Planets Govern the Solar Cycle?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

I. R. G. Wilson ,
B. D. Carter  and
I. A. Waite
I. R. G. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Education Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
B. D. Carter
Affiliation:
Centre for Astronomy, Solar Radiation and Climate, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
I. A. Waite
Affiliation:
Centre for Astronomy, Solar Radiation and Climate, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
*
C Corresponding author. Email: irgeo@ozemail.com.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We present evidence to show that changes in the Sun's equatorial rotation rate are synchronized with changes in its orbital motion about the barycentre of the Solar System. We propose that this synchronization is indicative of a spin–orbit coupling mechanism operating between the Jovian planets and the Sun. However, we are unable to suggest a plausible underlying physical cause for the coupling. Some researchers have proposed that it is the period of the meridional flow in the convective zone of the Sun that controls both the duration and strength of the Solar cycle. We postulate that the overall period of the meridional flow is set by the level of disruption to the flow that is caused by changes in Sun's equatorial rotation speed. Based on our claim that changes in the Sun's equatorial rotation rate are synchronized with changes in the Sun's orbital motion about the barycentre, we propose that the mean period for the Sun's meridional flow is set by a Synodic resonance between the flow period (∼22.3 yr), the overall 178.7-yr repetition period for the solar orbital motion, and the 19.86-yr synodic period of Jupiter and Saturn.

Keywords

sun: activitysun: sunspotssun: rotationstars: planetary systems

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 2008 , pp. 85 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2008

References

Chárvátova, I., 1990, BAICz, 41, 56 Google Scholar
Chárvátova, I., 2000, AnG, 18, 399 Google Scholar
Cox, A. N., 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th Edition; New York: AIP Press; Springer)Google Scholar
Fairbridge, R. W. & Shirley, J. H., 1987, SoPh, 110, 191 Google Scholar
Hale, G. E., 1908, ApJ, 28, 315 Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H., Nandy, D., Wilson, R. M. & Reichmann, E. J., 2003, ApJ, 589, 665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Hill, F., Komm, R. W., Larsen, R. M., Schou, J., Thompson, M. J. & Toomre, J., 2000, ApJ, 533, L163 Google Scholar
Javaraiah, J., 2003, SoPh, 212, 23 Google Scholar
Javaraiah, J. & Gokhale, M. H., 1995, SoPh, 158, 173 Google Scholar
Jose, P. D., 1965, AJ, 70, 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juckett, D., 2000, SoPh, 191, 201 Google Scholar
Landscheidt, T., 1981, J. Interdiscipl. Cycl. Res., 12, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landscheidt, T., 1999, SoPh, 189, 413 Google Scholar
Rogers, M. L., Richards, M. T. & Richards, D., 2006 (astro-ph/0606426)Google Scholar
Schwabe, H., 1843, AN, 20, 495 Google Scholar
Usoskin, I. G. & Mursula, K., 2003, SoPh, 218, 319 Google Scholar
Zaqarashvili, T., 1997, ApJ, 487, 930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar