Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:32:27.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for a threshold character in Drosophila I. An analysis of the phenotypic variance on the underlying scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. D. H. Latter
B. D. H. Latter
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The short-term response to artificial selection in a wild-type population for increased scutellar bristle number, has been interpreted in terms of two alternative threshold models. Both models have been shown to give a satisfactory transformation of the scale of measurement, in that the underlying variable shows an effectively linear response in terms of the accumulated selection differential, and the pheno-typic variance on the underlying scale remains virtually unchanged over a period of generations sufficient to increase the incidence of extra-bristles to almost 100%.

A genetic analysis based on the bivariate model, which to a large extent takes account of the location of the supernumerary bristles, has shown the phenotypic variance on the underlying scale to have the following composition: the additive genetic variance is 27·2 ± 0·9% of the total, and the developmental error or ‘chance’ variance accounts for a further 63·8 ± 2·6%, so that the remaining 9·0 ± 2·7% of the variance must be due to environmental differences among individuals and to non-additive genetic effects.

The relative magnitudes of these parameters are remarkably similar to those observed for two quasi-continuous variables in the same population, viz. abdominal and sternopleural hair number. In view of the ease with which scutellar bristles may be scored, the character can therefore serve as an extremely useful model character for quantitative genetic experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , July 1964 , pp. 198 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Clayton, G. A., Morris, J. A. & Robertson, A. (1957). An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. I. Short-term responses to selection. J. Genet. 55, 131–151.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1947). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1963). Genetic homeostasis and the theory of canalization. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (Hanson, W. D. & Robinson, H. F., eds.). National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council Pub. 982, 455–467.Google Scholar
Payne, F. (1918). An experiment to test the nature of the variation on which selection acts. Ind. Univ. Stud. 5, 1–45.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1931). Tables for Statisticians and Biometricians. Part II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plunkett, C. R. (1927). The interaction of genetic and environmental factors in development. J. exp. Zool. 46, 181–244.Google Scholar
Prout, T. (1962). The error variance of the heritability estimate obtained from selection response. Biometrics, 18, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. & Robertson, F. W. (1954). Studies in quantitative inheritance. VI. Sternite chaeta number in Drosophila; a metameric quantitative character. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre, 86, 269–288.Google Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. (1960). Some genetic tests on asymmetry of sternopleural chaeta number in Drosophila. Genet. Res. 1, 151–172.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. (1959). Canalization of the scute phenotype of Drosophila. Evolution, 13, 425–439.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. & Sheldon, B. L. (1960). Selection for canalization of the scute phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 13, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismanidis, A. (1942). Selection for an almost invariable character in Drosophila. J. Genet. 44, 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S. Y. & Weiler, H. (1960). Selection for two correlated traits by independent culling levels. J. Genet. 57, 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar