Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-d6ndz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T14:44:47.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eohellenic subduction and Alpine collision of the Preveli nappe (Uppermost Unit of Crete, Greece): constraints on the kinematics and age of deformation events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2026

Gernold Zulauf*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
Martin Kutzschbach
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
R. Albert
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
Chao Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
Axel Gerdes
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Isotope and Element Research Center (FIERCE), Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
Wolfgang Müller
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Germany
Jörg Pfänder
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Paraskevas Paris Xypolias
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Patras, Greece
*
Corresponding author: Gernold Zulauf; Email: g.zulauf@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Preveli nappe of Crete (Uppermost Unit) is derived from Permo-Triassic sediments and volcanics. Structural data, deformation microfabrics and petrological constraints suggest that subduction of the Preveli rocks was related to ESE-directed D2 shearing under epidote-blueschist-facies conditions (T = 360 ± 40°C and P > 1.0 GPa). New U-Pb ages of rutile from blueschist (132 ± 12 and 135 ± 10 Ma, 2σ) suggest that subduction and related HP-LT metamorphism occurred during the Early Cretaceous (Eohellenic phase). 39Ar-40Ar dating of ferri-winchite and Rb-Sr dating of phengite yielded 125 ± 10 Ma (1σ) and 131 ± 7 Ma (2σ), respectively, which also reflect the subduction stage. Further Rb-Sr dating of phengite and albite, coupled with trace element data (B, Li), revealed four growth stages, which are younger. They range from 120 to 90 Ma and are attributed to fluid-assisted shearing and reactivation of the main foliation at still deep structural levels (>1 GPa). Alpine emplacement of the Preveli nappe on top of the Pindos Unit was accommodated by brittle top-to-the west thrusting and west-vergent D3 folding. The age of this event has been constrained at 31 ± 9 Ma (2σ), by U-Pb dating of calcite. Despite the uncertainty, this age confirms that the Preveli nappe was emplaced after the deposition of the Paleogene Pindos flysch. The new data suggest that the Preveli nappe is derived from the Rhodope-Strandja or from the Sakarya Zone of Turkey. When travelling towards its recent position on Crete, the Preveli nappe should have passed the Cyclades, where similar rocks are exposed.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic sketch of the Cretan nappe stack and map of the Aegean region (modified from Chatzaras et al.2016) showing areas of the Attico-Cycladic Massif in dark grey. Exposures of Upper Unit of Cyclades (Dürr, 1985, 1986; Dürr et al. 1978; Reinecke et al. 1982; Altherr et al. 1994; Patzak et al. 1994; Langosch et al. 2000) and Uppermost Unit of Crete (Bonneau, 1972, 1984; Seidel et al. 1976, 1981; Krahl et al. 1982; Thorbecke, 1987) are depicted in red. BFZ, Bornova Flysch Zone; LN, Lycian Nappes; MM, Menderes Massif; SZ, Sakarya Zone; SMRM, Serbomacedonian and Rhodope Massifs.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of Crete showing the different geological units (after Zulauf et al. 2023a, and references therein). Exposures of rocks of Uppermost Unit are emphasized. Outline of map shown in Fig. 4 is indicated by black frame.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Panorama from Korifi mountain in the E to Plakias bay in the W. View is from the road 1.5 km SW of Drimiskos. Tectonic klippe of Korifi-Mourne blueschist on top of Preveli metasedimentary rocks is emphasized by dashed orange line. N-S striking subvertical competent layers within the Preveli rocks W of Korifi largely consist of metaconglomerates. Mountain peaks indicated further to the W consist of Preveli marble.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Geological map of study area with structural data and sample localities. (b–e) Equal-area lower-hemisphere stereo plots of structural data, (b) bedding and main foliation of Preveli rocks, (c) D2 stretching/mineral lineation of Preveli rocks, (d) D3 fold axes of Preveli rocks, and (e) fold axes and stretching/mineral lineation of basal black thrust breccia. Statistical analyses using the 1% area contouring method are indicated.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Deformation structures of rocks of the Preveli nappe. (a) East-west trending section through marble/calcareous phyllite interbedding; top-to-the E sense of shear is indicated by reverse kink bands (yellow lines) and imbrication of marble boudins (MB, lower part of figure). Sheep shelter SW of Lefkogia (N35°10′21.8″, E24°26′09.7′). (b) Metaconglomerate consisting of calcareous pebbles in calcareous-siliceous matrix. Apparent constrictional deformation is suggested by the nearly prolate shape of the pebbles as is obvious from sections perpendicular (b1) and parallel (b2) to the WNW-ESE trending stretching lineation. Top-to-the ESE sense of shear is indicated by displaced subvertical calcite veins (yellow arrows). Road cut 700 m SW of Lefkogia (sample 180922-4; N35°10′30.2″ E24°26′10.7″). (c) Upright N-S trending D3 folds and related subvertical S3 fracture cleavage in felsic metavolcanic rocks. Folded layering is S2. 600 m SW of Korifi summit (N35°09′24.5″, E24°29′16.3″). (d) Open to close fold in felsic metavolcanic rock with thin mafic interbeddings. Roadcut 1.8 km SW of Lefkogia (N35°09′59″, E24°25′45′). (e) Reddish metaradiolarite with interbeddings of metavolcanic rock (blueschist). Eastern slope of Meso Korifi (N35°09′38″, E24°28′01″).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Deformation structures of rocks of the Preveli nappe. (a) Alternating sequence of layers consisting of light pink metachert (C) and of dolomite marble (D). The dolomite marble shows a large number of fractures, whereas the metachert is almost free from fractures. Small cliff 100 m SW of Korifi summit (N35°09′32″, E24°29′35″). (b) West-vergent recumbent fold affecting boudinaged quartz veins in blueschist. Path cut 400 m SW of Korifi summit (N35° 09′28′, E24°29′26′) (c) Shape-preferred orientation of prolate clasts in mafic metavolcanic rock indicates constrictional deformation. Eastern slope of Meso Korifi (N35°09′38″, E24°28′01″). (d) West-vergent D3 fold in metaradiolarite. Note the quartz veins subperpendicular to bedding. Cliff SE of Korifi summit (N35°09′23.6′, E24°29′45.5′).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Deformation microfabrics of metaradiolarite of the Preveli Unit; road cut along southern coast of Crete, south of Korifi mountain (N35° 8′56.6′, E24°29′46.21′). (a) Low-strain domain of metaradiolarite is cut by at least three generations of veins filled with quartz (light) and calcite (dark); vein filled with weakly twinned calcite is indicated by arrow; plane polarizers. (b) Thin quartz veins in low-strain metaradiolarite are truncated by stylolite enriched with opaque phases; plane polarizers. (c) Veins filled with quartz (light) and calcite (dark) are cut by a stylolite, which is parallel to the main foliation in high-strain domain; foliation (horizontal in the microphotograph) is indicated by the elliptical shape of the radiolaria with the long axis of ellipses being largely horizontal, plane polarizers. (d) Veins filled with quartz and calcite in high-strain domain; most of the initial growth fabrics in veins are well preserved; calcite shows pervasive deformation twins, parts of which are bent; crossed polarizers.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Deformation microfabrics and spots of Laser-ICP-MS of rocks of the Preveli Unit. (a) Rutile in matrix of ferri-winchite (FW), actinolite and epidote; plane polarizers (SV Kor 5). (b) LA-ICP-MS spots in dark rutile-bearing domains of blueschist; plane polarizers (SV Lef 1). (c) Polyphase deformation in calcareous metaconglomerate. Oblique white mica S-fabric in calcite-rich domain (lower part of figure) indicates top-to-the ESE sense of shear; shear-band fabric in quartz-rich domain (upper part of figure) indicates top-to-the WNW sense of shear; crossed polarizers; (180922-4). (d) Shear-band fabric affecting older quartz fibres in calcite matrix indicates top-to-the ESE sense of shear; crossed polarizers; same rock and locality as in (c). (e) Asymmetric pressure shadows of quartz behind rigid plagioclase clast indicating top-to-the E sense of shear; shape-preferred orientation of white mica in recrystallized quartz matrix is affected by the clast; crossed polarizers; sample 180922 3-1; 1.8 km SW of Lefkogia (N35°10′17.1′, E 24°25′56.0′). (f) LA-ICP-MS spot locations in calcite of strain shadows and young foliation-parallel veins; plane polarizers, same rock type and locality as in (c).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Results of U-Pb dating plotted in Tera-Wasserburg diagrams. (a) Rutile of mafic metavolcanic rock (SV Lef 1). (b) Rutile of mafic metavolcanic rock (SV Kor 5). (c) Calcite of pressure shadows and veins in calcareous metaconglomerate (180922-4).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Age spectrum (a) and inverse isochron plot (b) of ferri-winchite of D2 shear zone in Triassic skarn (sample 180922_5a). Ages have been corrected for initial Ar using a 40Ar/36Ar of 903 ± 155 as deduced from the inverse isochron calculated from temperature steps 4–8. It is assumed that this value provides a reasonable estimate for the isotopic composition of the excess Ar component that was likely imprinted to the ferri-winchite during fluid-controlled growth in the subduction zone. Low-signal intensities during measurements owing to low K-contents cause comparatively large uncertainties.

Figure 10

Figure 11. LA-ICP-MS Rb-Sr isochron plots for (a) phengite (wm), albite (ab) and epidote (ep) from impure quartzite (sample Da2PDSP6); (b–d) phengite (three distinct populations) and albite from felsic metavolcanic rock (sample Lefkogia 1a); and (e, f) phengite (two distinct populations) and albite from siliciclastic metaconglomerate (sample 180922-1). Results from unanchored isochrones (mica only) are shown in the lower right corner of each plot. In panel (e), the single-spot age of analysis #62 is shown and was not assigned to either phengite population. Matrix-corrected Rb-Sr ages account for Rb/Sr elemental fractionation using natural mica (Phalaborwa biotite) as a matrix-matched reference material. Uncertainties on the Rb-Sr isochron ages are reported at the 2σ level and include all internal and external sources of error. Reported values are rounded to two significant digits. See text for details.

Figure 11

Figure 12. B, Li and tetrahedral Si contents versus age for the three phengite populations identified in sample Lefkogia 1a (left panels) and the two phengite populations as well as spot analysis #62 of sample 180922 (right panels). Uncertainties are reported as standard errors at the 1σ level.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Petrogenetic grid in the system CNMASH showing boundaries of very-low and low grade facies (after Willner et al. 2009, 2016, and references therein). Pressure-temperature data for deformation during subduction of Preveli rocks (blue box) are indicated (after Zulauf et al. 2023b). Si values of white mica, after Massonne and Schreyer (1987). Assumed PT path of the Preveli rocks is indicated by bold orange line.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Isotopic ages obtained from blueschists, felsic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the Preveli nappe. Apatite fission-track ages after Thomson (1999); ages of Pindos flysch after Richter and Müller (1992) and Wagreich et al. (1996).

Figure 14

Figure 15. Distinct rock types of Eastern Mediterranean, which are critical for the provenance of the Uppermost Unit of Crete: (1) Triassic volcanic rocks and granitoids (Korolay et al. 2001; Bröcker and Keasling 2006; Bröcker and Pidgeon 2007; Himmerkus et al. 2009; Bulle et al. 2010; Akal et al. 2011; Chatzaras et al. 2012; Liati et al. 2013; Zulauf et al. 2013; Bonev et al. 2019; this study); (2) Mesozoic ophiolites (Robertson 2002, and references therein; Liati et al. 2004; Smith 1993, and references therein; Koglin et al. 2009a; Robertson et al. 2012, and references therein); (3) Late Jurassic/early Cretaceous HP-LT metamorphic rocks of the Internal Hellenides (Seidel et al. 1976, 1977; Michard et al. 1994; Wawrzenitz and Mposkos 1997; Most et al. 2001; Most 2003; Kydonakis et al. 2015; Liati et al. 2016; Altherr et al. 2023); (4) Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous HP-LT metamorphic rocks of the CPS (Aygül et al. 2016, and references therein); (5) Late Cretaceous (arc-type) magmatic rocks (von Quadt et al. 2005, 2007, and references therein; Okay and Nikishin 2015, and references therein; Kneuker et al. 2015; Martha et al. 2016, 2017). (6) Permian igneous rocks (Reischmann 1998; Liati 2005; Koglin et al. 2009b; Tanatsiev et al. 2012; Okay and Nikishin 2015, and references therein; Antic et al. 2015, 2016; Bonev et al. 2019; Lazarova et al. 2021; Sałacińska et al. 2021). CPS = Central Pontides Supercomplex; DSFZ = Death Sea fault zone; EAFZ = East Anatolian fault zone; IPS = Intrapontine suture; IAES = Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan suture; NAFZ = North Anatolian fault zone; S = Samothraki ophiolite.

Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 1

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 12.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 2

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 187.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 3

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 331.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 4

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 371.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 5

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 244.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 6

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 215.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 7

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 299.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 8

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 8(File)
File 157.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 9

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 9(File)
File 289.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 10

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 10(File)
File 333.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 11

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 11(File)
File 287.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 12

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 12(File)
File 615 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 13

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 13(File)
File 677.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zulauf et al. supplementary material 14

Zulauf et al. supplementary material
Download Zulauf et al. supplementary material 14(File)
File 211.7 KB