Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T06:03:51.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additive manufacturing of materials: Opportunities and challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2015

S.S. Babu
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; and Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, USA; sbabu@utk.edu
L. Love
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility and Energy and Transportation Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; lovelj@ornl.gov
R. Dehoff
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; dehoffrr@ornl.gov
W. Peter
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; peterwh@ornl.gov
T.R. Watkins
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA; watkinstr@ornl.gov
S. Pannala
Affiliation:
SABIC Americas, USA; spannala@sabic.com

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (also known as 3D printing) is considered a disruptive technology for producing components with topologically optimized complex geometries as well as functionalities that are not achievable by traditional methods. The realization of the full potential of 3D printing is stifled by a lack of computational design tools, generic material feedstocks, techniques for monitoring thermomechanical processes under in situ conditions, and especially methods for minimizing anisotropic static and dynamic properties brought about by microstructural heterogeneity. This article discusses the role of interdisciplinary research involving robotics and automation, process control, multiscale characterization of microstructure and properties, and high-performance computational tools to address each of these challenges. Emerging pathways to scale up additive manufacturing of structural materials to large sizes (>1 m) and higher productivities (5–20 kg/h) while maintaining mechanical performance and geometrical flexibility are also discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Development stages of big-area additive manufacturing (BAAM). (a) Gantry-style robotic automation system, without any heating environment, was developed and integrated with a single-screw extrusion nozzle. (b) Initial material trials led to extensive distortion with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) pellets, whereas use of pellets with ABS and carbon fiber (CF) reduced the distortion. (c) Aerial view of the industrial-scale BAAM system developed by Local Motors. (d) The industrial-scale system was verified by printing out a chassis of a small car, which was then integrated with an electric drive train. (e) The same technology was coupled with traditional manufacturing to produce a prototype similar to the Ford Shelby Cobra, which was also powered by an electric drive train. (f) The same technology has also been used to make molds for use in prototyping during traditional metal-forming processes. Reproduced with permission from Reference 10. © 2013 ASM International.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Example of in situ high-speed infrared imaging of electron beam melting using different values of the focus offset (FO = 3 and 15) on an overhang geometry. (a) Image from the first layer, showing the formation of bright spots indicative of porosity. Squares are one inch on a side. (b) Image from the third layer of the same region, showing the reduction of porosity. (c) Demonstration of crystallographic texture control to outline the letters “D,” “O,” and “E,” using a priori design of process control through modifications of electron-beam scans in regions 1 (inside “D” and “O”), 2 (letter bodies), and 3 (outside). (d) Electron backscatter diffraction image of the cross section of the sample processed according to the scan strategy in (c) showing the formation of highly aligned {001} crystal growth and a transition to equiaxed or misoriented growth in the locations outlining the letters. The inset shows the crystallographic color key for the image in (d). Reproduced with permission from Reference 24. © 2015 Maney Publishing.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Summary of a high-performance computational simulation of the thermal distribution during electron beam powder processing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy using standard electron-beam current and speed conditions with different scanning strategies at two sequential, arbitrary times. (a) Hilbert path: This ideal space-filling strategy leads to a more oval-shaped melt-pool shape. (b) Oxen path: This is the most common scanning strategy used by most AM machines and leads to elongated ellipsoidal-shaped melt pools similar to those encountered in welding. (c) Spiral path: As this path begins from the center, it results in a more oval-shaped melt pool that evolves into a complex shape with progress in time.56

Figure 3

Figure 4. Measurements of residual stresses in a sample made by electron beam melting (EBM) additive manufacturing of metal. (a) Locations of 5 × 10 × 20 mm3 rectangular prisms can be seen among “L”-shaped geometries that were produced using the EBM process. (b) Plot of substrate temperature as a function of time, confirming very slow cooling (>30 h) to room temperature from the processing temperature of approximately 900°C. (c) Measured variations of residual stress in the x, y, and z directions using force and momentum balance. Reproduced with permission from Reference 67. © 2015 Springer.

Babu supplementary material

Video 1

Download Babu supplementary material(Video)
Video 11 MB

Babu supplementary material

Video 2

Download Babu supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.1 MB

Babu supplementary material

Video 3

Download Babu supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.4 MB