Exit glacier

This is a small glacier (approx 5 km²) that drains the eastern side of the Harding Icefield, which is a large ice cap in the Kenai Fjords area (Fig. 1). The summit of the Harding Icefield is at 1700 m and Exit Glacier flows down the ice plateau at 900 m, down to 120 m in the valley. The bedrock beneath the glacier is flysch of the Chugach Terrane (Reference Connor and O’HaireConnor and O’Haire, 1988). The Holocene marginal fluctuations of this glacier have been studied by Reference Wiles and CalkinWiles and Calkin (1994), who recorded the Little Ice Age maximum moraine (age = AD 1825) approximately 2 km in front of the 1990 ice margin; and some ice-velocity measurements in the central part of the glacier were made by Reference RiceRice (1975), who recorded velocities of 51 cm d⁻¹.

The present-day glacier front stretches for approximately 1 km and consists of a senes of fresh non-vegetated moraines overlying an outwash plain. Local observers (personal communication from M. Tetreau) have recorded that the glacier has been re-advancing since 1989 (40 m between 1989 and 1991). The surface of the glacier is relatively steep with large crevasses but it is clean (Fig. 2a). There is also a sharp junction between the underlying sediments and the ice; the basal ice is debris-free and there is a saturated debris layer beneath This debris layer is about 40cm thick and is being currently extruded from beneath the ice. The median grain-size of this material is 1 mm. I suggest that this layer a the deforming layer and I shall provide further reasons for this assertion below.

Fig. 2.

Photographs of the glaciers (a) Exit Glaciers; (b) Childs Glacier; (c) Matanuska Glcier.

The resultant land forms at Exit Glacier can be divided into proglacial and subglacial features which I shall discuss in turn. The end moraines at the margin of this glacier must he push moraines because (a) there is no supraglacial source of debris and (b) material was observed being extruded from beneath the glacier to form the moraines (Fig. 3a and c). These moraines have a steep distal slope of 45° and a shallower proximal slope of 34°. The maximum height of the moraines is 5 m but they have built up into a moraine complex (see Fig. 3b), where a number of moraines are found. These may be annual pushes.

Fig. 3.

Exit Glacier, (a) Schematic diagram showing the proglacial and subglacial marginal arm; (b) Photograph of the push moraines; (c) Photograph of the deforming layer; (d) Photograph of the recently exposed subglacial surface; (e) Schematic diagram of the subglacial surface; (f) and (g) Photographs of flutes beneath the glacier; (h) Schematic diagram of the flutes; (i) Crevasse infills.

Where the ice has melted hack in 1994, the year of this study, subglacial surfaces have been preserved (Fig, 3d and e). One of these reveals a series of small parallel ridges (20 cm high by 30 cm wide) with a large clast within the intervening furrow. Another common feature beneath the ice are flutes (Fig, 3f and g). These consist of slightly higher and wider ridges (20-40 cm high by 30-60 cm wide), which run parallel with the ice flow and join the push moraines. Although only the distal parts of these flutes were exposed, it could be seen that they were composed of saturated till and were separated by ice tongues.

A final feature consisted of crevasse infilling on the glacier surface, which included circular, arcuate and linear ridges (Fig. 3i). These crevasses were filled with subglacial material.

Childs glacier

This is a larger glacier (approx. 100 km²; Reference FergusonFerguson, 1992) that flows down the eastern side of the western Chugach Mountains (Fig. 1). The local summit in the area is Mount Williams at 1967 m and Childs Glacier flows down from 1430 m to almost sea level in the Copper River valley. The glacier flows out into a piedrnost lobe in the valley and is unusual because the central part of the ice front is currently being undercut by the Copper River. This results in dramatic calving into the river and a steep ice front, 75-90 m high. The bedrock in this area is the early Cretaceous flysch of the Chugach Terrane (Reference Connor and O’HaireConnor and O’Haire, 1988).

The ice front investigated in this study was in the northern part, where the glacier terminates on land. This section stretches for approximately 1 km and also consists of a series of fresh non-vegetated moraines overlying an outwash plain and a series of older vegetated moraines. The surface of the glacier is at a relatively low angle but the surface is relatively clean and is cut by large crevasses (Fig. 2b).

Figure 4a shows a schematic cross-section of the marginal zone. Beneath the glacier there is a thin basal debris-rich frozen layer (10-30 cm thick) and a 10-50 cm thick saturated debris layer beneath. The debris-rich frozen layer has a sharp upper junction with clean ice but was thawing at its junction with the deforming layer (Fig. 4b). The concentration of the debris in this frozen layer is 92% by weight and the grain-size was 0.5 mm A till fabric was also taken in the frozen debris which yielded results of S1 = 0.697 and S3 = 0.036 (mean orientation 248°, dip 2°) (Fig. 4a). In places it can be seen that the debris-rich layer is being sheared up into the main body of the ice to form englacial debris bands (Fig. 4a and b).

Fig. 4.

Childs Glacier, (a) Schematic diagram of the proglacial and subglacial marginal area; (b) Photograph of the frozen top of the deforming layer beneath the glacier being sheared up into an englacial debris band; (c) Photograph showing the trees that have collapsed due to proglacial deformation.

The saturated debris layer is being extruded from the glacier in a way similar to that seen at Exit Glacier. This subglacial layer is composed of well-rounded clasts, whilst the majority of the supraglacial material is far more angular. It can be seen that the glacier is in fact overrunning a previous outwash surface and that accounts for the roundness of the clasts.

In front of the ice is a series of small push moraines. These are unconsolidated and consist of three main ridges. These moraines are very recent as they have overrun trees (Fig. 4c). Thus, I suggest these represent three annual advances and show a recent re-advance similar to that seen at Exit Glacier.

Matanuska glacier

This is the largest of the three glaciers studied (approx. area 320 km²; Reference FergusonFerguson, 1992) and it flows down the northern side of the western Chugach Mountains along a long valley (over 30 km long; Fig. 1). The glacier flows from close to the summit of Mount Marcus Baker (4016 m) down to 500 m in the valley. The glacier start on Chugach Terrane flysch sediments but flows on to Tertiary sediments (Chickaloon Formation of mudstones, sandstones and conglomerates; Reference Connor and O’HaireConnor and O’Haire, 1988) at its margin.

The ice margin is approximately 7 km across and mostly covered, particularly on the northern side, by supraglacial debris. The surface of the glacier is relatively flat with large crevasses (Fig. 2c). The area in front of the glacier consists of series of moraines and the ice front has been reported as being relatively stable over the last century. This glacier has been made famous by the work of Reference LawsonLawson (1979b, Reference Lawson1982) on the active proglacial sediment gravity flows and the debris-rich ice (BIL).

At the base of the glacier there is an 8 m thick unit of debris-rich ice (BIL). This has a very sharp upper boundary with clean ice, although the lower boundary was not exposed, but there was no evidence of any sediment being extruded from bcncath the glacier. At Matanuska Glacier, two sites were studied in detail which will discuss in turn.

Site 1. Figure 5 shows a schematic section of the site, a cross-section and ice log. Because this is at the margin of the glacier the ice is dipping at 40°. The cross-section consists of two small moraines about 0.5 m high in front of the steep ice margin. These moraines consist of faulted laminated sands, silts and clays and also fine-grained diamicton (Fig. 5f). The inner moraine is separated from the steep glacier margin by 1 m (Fig. 5d). Presumably, the inner moraine marks the last winter limit of the margin. During the summer, active melting has produced high quantities of water and debris from the BIL and the sediments. This has led to the development of debris flows discussed in detail by Reference LawsonLawson (1979b, Reference Lawson1982), which become trapped between the moraine and the ice. In this area there are also small lakes, marginal river and (dangerous!) pools of liquified mud (Fig. 5e). In places there is also a third, very small moraine (0.3 m high), which is found between the ice margin and last winter’s moraine.

Fig. 5.

Matanuska Glacier. Site 1: (a) Schematic section of the marginal area; (b) Ice-focies log taken at 35 m along the horizontal scale on Figure 6b; (c) Cross-section of the debris-rick ice (shaded), with the ice fabrics shown; the samples shown here were for grain-size and debris concentration; (d) Photograph of the ice front and the moraine; (e) Photograph of the sedimentation occurring at the ice margin, (f) Photograph of the deformed fine-grained materialin the moraine.

In order to investigate the origin of the moraines, a study of particle shape was undertaken At each site, 50 clasts were measured and both the lengths of the three axes and the overall roundness (angular, semi-angular, semi-rounded, round) recorded. The samples were taken from the supraglacial environment (Mat 1), the BIL (Mat 4), and the inner (Mat 2) and outer (Mat 3) moraine. The results are plotted on a triangular graph using the technique of Reference Sneed and FolkSneed and Folk (1958) and Reference Benn and BallantyneBenn and Ballantyne (1993) (Fig. 6) and the values for C₄₀ (percentage of clasts with c:aaxes ratio of less than or equal to 0.4) and RA (percentage of very angular and angular clasts) were calculated (Table 1).

Table 1.

Shape results from Matanuska Glacier compared with results from Slettmarkbreen, Norway (after Reference Benn and BallantyneBenn and Ballantyne, 1993)

Fig. 6.

Matanuska Glacier. Site 1: Parlicle-shape analysis. (a) Supraglacial debris; (b) Inner moraine; (c) Outer moraine; (d) Debris-rich ice.

The supraglacial material consisted mostly of a combination of oblate- and prolate-shaped clasts with a high C₄₀ value. In contrast, the debris-rich material was more spherical with the lowest C₄₀ value. The two morainic samples had both an intermediate shape and value, although closer to that of the debris-rich ice sample. Only the supraglacial sample had a non-zero value of RA.

The schematic ice diagram (Fig. 5c) shows that there are a number of open folds within the debris-rich ice, whilst the ice-facies log (Fig. 5b) shows the nature of the BIL. This is more complex at this site than site 2 because of the steep dip. The debris-rich ice consists of layers of (a) debris-poor ice; and (b) frozen debris, in differing amounts. At the base of the section there are thick bands of frozen debris (average 6 mm thick) separated by thin bands of debris-poor ice (average 1 mm thick), whilst at the top of the section there are thick bands of debris-poor ice(10 cm thick) with thin bands of frozen debris (1 cm thick). Two samples were taken to calculate the concentration of sediments at this sitD: one in the middle (sample 1a) and one at the top (sample 1b) (results are shown in Table 2). The middle sample (1a) was taken from the debris-poor ice and has a concentration of 3% by weight, the upper sample taken from the debris/ratio of 1/10 has a concentration of 13.2%. The median grain-sizes of these samples were as follows: sample 1a ≈ 0.011 mm; sample 1b = 009 mm. Fabrics were taken at the base, in the middle and at the top of the BIL. The results (shown in Figures 5c and 7; Table 3) show a general decrease in fabric strength upwards.

Table 2.

Debris concentration in the debris-rich ice at Matanuska Glacier

Site 2. Figure 8a shows the nature of site 2. Here the beds are horizontal because the river is actively eroding away the front of the glacier. There are many structures seen within the BIL, including folds (Fig. 8a) and faults (Fig. 8b).

Ice-fabric measurements were also taken in this area but at different locations: one at the base of the section and a second at the upper junction (Fig. 8c). The results (Fig. 7 and Table 3) indicate that the ice fabrics are both relatively weak.

Table 3.

Ice-fabric results at Matanuska Glacier

Fig. 7.

Matanuska Glacier. Ice-fabric results, compared with other fabric dala from Reference HartHart (1994) and Reference Dowdeswell and SharpDowdeswell and Sharp (1986). The dotted line marks the boundary between low fabric strength (above the line — typical of deforming-bed tills with a thick deforming layer) and high fabric strength (below the line — typical of lodgement tills and deforming-bed tills with a thin deforming layer).

Fig. 8.

Matanuska Glacier. Site 2. (a) Photograph of folding within the debris-rich ice; (b) Photograph of faulting within the debris-rich ice; (c) Schematic diagram to show the location and results of the ice fabrics; (d) Ice-facies log and location of the samples taken for grain-size and concentration analysis.

Figure 8d shows the ice facies at site 2. This shows a pattern to site 1. At the base of the section there are thick bands of frozen debris (6.5 mm) and thin bands of debris-poor ice (1 mm) (sample 2a). Further up, the frozen debris bands and debris-poor bands are of similar thickness (5 mm) (sample 2b), then towards the top there are thicker bands of frozen debris and debris-poor ice, although the layers of debris-poor ice are always thicker. A debris concentration of 59% was found for the lower unit and 18% for the upper unit. The median grain-size of the two samples is as follows: sample 2a = 0.077; sample 2b = 0.00115.

Ice facies

A number of researchers have devised their own systems for describing ice facies; these systems can be summarized as follows (Reference LawsonLawson, 1979b; Reference KnightKnight, 1987): (1) stratified (orlaminated) facies which are identified in both temperate and sub-polar glaciers (Reference Kamb and LaChapelleKamb and LaCha-pelle, 1964; Reference BoultonBoulton, 1970) and (2) dispersed(or clotted) facies more commonly reported from sub-polar glaciers (Reference LawsonLawson, 1979b; Reference SugdenSugden and others, 1987). At Matanuska Glacier, Reference LawsonLawson (1979b) described two basal zones, an upper dispersed facies 0.2-8 m thick and a lower stratified facies 3-15 m thick. Sediment concentrations in the two zones were 0.05-8% and 0.02-98%, respectively. He suggested that the stratified facies consisted of three sub-facies: (a) discontinuous —irregular aggregates of fine sediment; (b) suspended —dispersed fine debris particles and aggregates and comprising the relatively clear zone between the more debris-rich layers; and (c) solid — bands of debris with interstitial ice. It is not clear how Lawson’s dispersed facies is different from his discontinuous facies within the stratified facies, except he defined the former as containing no solid debris bands. However, Reference KnightKnight (1987) showed bands of debris within the dispersed (clotted) ice facies.

This is difficult to relate to the ice facies observed at Matanuska Glacier during this study. The BIL consisted of one distinct layer which was composed of a high debrish/ice ratio at the base and a low debris/ice ratio at the top. The individual debris couplets consisted of a debris-rich layer (equivalent to Lawson’s solid layer) and a debris-poor layer. This debris-poor ice layer was equivalent to Lawson’s suspended layer at the base but contained more debris particles towards the top (equivalent to Lawson’s discontinuousfacies).

Other researchers have noted the decrease in debris concentration upwards through the BIL, e.g Reference Boulton,, Morris, Armstrong and ThomasBoulton and others, (1979), Reference DrewryDrewry (1986), Reference Echelmeyer and ZhongxiangEchelmeyer and Zong-xiang (1987). Reference KnightKnight and others (1994) showed from four Greenland glaciers that the stratified and dispersed facies have similar mineral assemblage and particle shape but the dispersed facies is finer-grained and the clots within the dispersed facies decrease up ice. Reference KnightKnight (1987) has also suggested that dispersed facies (clotted ire) was found in areas of extending flow.

Debris entrainment

There have been a number of suggestions of how debris can be entrained within the BIL; this includes (Reference Hubbard and SharpHubbard and Sharp, 1989; Reference HubbardHubbard, 1991; Reference Tison, Petit, Barnola and MahaneyTison and others 1993): (a) pressure-melting regelation (Reference WeertmanWeertman, 1957, Reference Weertman1964) around obstacles at the ice bed which usually produces debris layers with low debris/ice ratios separated by layers of clean ice; (b) adfreezing due to the oscillation of the freezing front in and out of saturated sediment (Reference WeertmanWeertman, 1961). It has been suggested that the debris/ice couplets could represent a seasonal subglacial change in environment such as cold air entering the glacier (Reference Anderson, Hallet, Walder and AubreyAndersen and others, 1982) or the penetration of the cold wave through thin ice (Reference BoultonBoulton, 1977). Another possibility is a change in the nature of the subglacial sediment. Reference Gow, Epstein and SheehyGow and others (1979) suggested that the clean ice formed over debris-free areas and the debris-rich formed over areas of soft sediment. It has been suggested that this process will produce debris layers with high debris/ice ratios (Reference SugdenSugden and others, 1987; Reference Souchez, Lorrain, Tison and JouzelSouchez and others, 1988); (c) shearing-in of debris (Reference GoldthwaitGoldthwaite, 1951; Reference Dilabio, Shilts and SchlüchterDilabio and Shilts, 1979; Reference Echelmeyer and ZhongxiangEchelmeyer and Zhong-xiang, 1987; Reference Tison, Petit, Barnola and MahaneyTison and others, 1993) which results in thin alternating layers of debris-rich and clean ice, and Tison and others reported low debris/ice ratios.

Entrainment of the debris at the alaskan glaciers

At Childs Glacier, the deforming layer was incorporated into the ice by: (i) freezing-on by the migration of the freezing front passing down through saturated sediments and then (ii) shearing of this material into the glacier.

At Matanuska Glacier, the formation of the debris-rich layer is not so obvious. At this site, as at other debris-rich basal ice sites, the debris/ice ratio decreased upwards through the sequence; also the grain-size of the debris decreased upwards through the sequence. There is also evidence for deformation, including mylonization, and folding and faulting where there are local perturbations. The entrainment of the debris will be discussed in more detail below.

Formation of the BIL

Most researchers have then suggested that the stratified and dispersed facies have a different origin. Reference LawsonLawson (1979b) and Reference KnightKnight (1987, Reference Knight1994) have suggested that the stratified facies was formed due to the freezing of meltwater and subglacial sediments to the glacier, and Reference KnightKnight (1994) suggested that the banded facies may be a deformed version of the stratified facies. Furthermore, and Reference SugdenSugden and others (1987) have suggested that the dispersed facies is formed due to regelation sliding across a rough bed, whilst Reference KnightKnight (1987) suggested this facies is formed from debris-rich water being squeezed away from the bed into the adjacent vein network.

However, I suggest that all the facies within the BIL are formed in a similar manner and reflect different degrees of deformation. If sediment is initially entrained at the base of the ice due to adfreezing or regelation, as ice movement continues this will become both attenuated and moved upwards through the ice as more entrainment occurs beneath it. Thus, as deformation/ice movement continues, a thick debris band is attenuated into a thinner debris band, then into a clot and finally a debris particle. In this way, a debris-rich layer is transformed into a debris-poor layer as deformation increases upwards through the BIL. At the same time, debris may become finer, higher in the debris-rich layer, due to attrition between particles, during both the high deformation and longer duration in the ice. A similar model to this was also proposed by Reference LavrushinLavrushin (1970) and later discussed by Reference ShawShaw (1977). They described the stratified facies of the BIL as the poorly attenuated facies and the dispersed facies the highly attenuated facies.

If it is assumed that the BIL is formed due to deformational processes, then a number of tentative estimations can be made:

• (a) Changes in concentration of the debris-rich layers. Since many of the debris-rich layers at Matanuska Glacier were very thin, some of the debris-concentration measurements included both debris-rich and debris-poor bands. In order to calculate the debris concentrations of the debris-rich bands alone, the following calculation was undertaken. If it is assumed that the concentration of all the debris-poor ice is 2.7% (as this was the debris/ice ratio minimum — sample 1b) and where the debris/ice ratio is 6/1 then overall concentration was 59% (debris/ice maximum — sample 2b — 300 cm down from top) then the concentration of the debris-rich bands would be 68%. Using the same assumptions, at a depth of 150 cm where the debris/ice ratio is 5/5, the concentration of the debris would be 33%. Assuming that the debris at the base (which at this location was 400 cm) was formed from adfreezing, it would have a debris concentration of 92% (as found at Childs Glacier). If this theoretical change in concentration is plotted (Fig. 9), it can be seen that the concentration decreases linearly upwarda through the sequence (y = 13.6 + 4.2x).

• (b) Calculation of the amount of deformation (strain). If it assumed that the change in concentration is the result of deformation, then the strain at Matanuska Glacier can be estimated:

  

  Strain was calculated at Matanuska Glacier site 2a over the section using two techniques. First, strain was calculated on the basis of assuming the debris concentrations in the frozen debris layers were a constant 68% and in the debris-poor layers 2.7% (strain 1), and then more accurately using the results from Figure 10, whereby the debris concentration changed upwards through the sequence (strain 2). The results from this are shown in Table 4 and Figure Both techniques show a generally similar pattern of strain increasing towards the top; however, in the constant debris-concentration model (strain 1), the strain decreases in the top 60 cm. The amount of strain in the strain 2 model is an order of magnitude greater than in the strain 1 model. I would suggest that the strain 2 model is probably more representative since preliminary results suggested a decrease in debris concentration with height; however, until the absolute concentratiuns in the debris-rich ice layers are measured, this remains only a suggestion.

Because of the observed and proposed deformation at Glacier, it is difficult to say how the sediments were initially incorporated into the ice. It may have been by a similar process to that observed at Childs Glacier, that is initial freezing-on due to winter migration of the freezing front, followed by possible shearing-in. These annual adfreezing events may have accumulated at Matanuska Glacier (and not at Childs Glacier), because the former has a relatively stagnant margin at a high altitude (500 m a.m.s.l.) whilst the latter has a lower/warmer (0 m a.m.s.l.) advancing margin.

Fig. 9.

Concentration at site 2a.

Table 4.

Change in strain in the ice facies at Matanuska Glacier site 2

Fig. 10.

(a) Strain at Matanuska Glacier site 2 using the two different concentrations (details explained in the text); (b) A comparison of displacement over 10 d within two types of subglacial environments: (i) Saturated deforming layer at Breiòamerkurjökull, after Reference BoultonBoulton (1979); (ii) Frozen debris at Urumqi No. 1 Glacier, after Reference Echelmeyer and ZhongxiangEchelmeyer and Zhangxiong (1987); (c) A comparison of longitudinal strain within two types of subglaeial environment:(i) Saturated deforming layer at Great Blakenham, Suffolk, England, after Reference Hart and BoultonHart and Boulton (1991); (ii)Debris-rich ice layer at Matanuska Glacier (strain 2) site 2.

It can also be seen that at both sites at Matanuska Glacier the thicknesses of the debris-poor layers change in a similar manner (Figs 5b and 8d), i.e. they increase in thickness upwards. If it is assumed that each year a couplet of debris-rich and debris-poor ice is formed, this increase in thickness (of the debris-poor layer) must be due to one of the following reasons: (i) the upper units result from larger initial couplets or (ii) since debris-rich ice and debris-poor ice have different rheological properties, the edges of the debris-rich layers are being incorporated into the debris-poor layers during deformation, so that the latter become thicker. Thus, at the top of the sequence the debris bands’ ice will become completely incorporated (attenuated) into the debris-poor ice, except for particularly resistant layers. At site 2, there is a clast-rich lag at the top of the BIL. I suggest this latter explanation is more likely from the evidence at Matanuska Glacier but cannot be proved without comparisons with other sites.

If the latter explanation is true, then it is further field evidence that the debris-poor ice has a greater competence than debris-rich ice (see Reference Hubbard and SharpHubbard and Sharp (1989) for detailed discussion of this problem). It also implies that the number of original couplets (years?) cannot be calculated, because the upper couplets have been completely broken down (attenuated) to formdebris-poor the ice facies.

Comparisons between the Debris-rich layer and the deforming bed

The interpretations I have made from the study of these three glaciers suggest to me that there are similarities between the debris-rich layer and the deforming layer. These are summarizedin Table 5.

• (a) Longitudinal deformation styles within the deformation layer (DL) and the BIL are very similar; these include shear strain and extension up-glacier (flutes and subglacial deformation {DL}/attenuation {BIL}) and compression at the margin (push moraines {DL}/faulting and folding {BIL}).

• (b) It has been suggested that deformation increases up through the basal layer. Reference Echelmeyer and ZhongxiangEchelmeyer and Zhongxiang (1987) recorded displacement in a frozen drift layer below the glacier. Similarly, Reference BoultonBoulton (1979) recorded displacement in a deforming layer. The displacement over 10 d (taken from an average day multiplied by 10) is shown from these two sites in Figure 10b. It can be seen that the pattern of displacement is very similar but there is much faster movement in the deforming layer. Net longitudinal strain from the different subglacial environments can also be compared. It has been shown by Reference Hart and BoultonHart and Boulton (1991) that deformation increases upwards through the deforming layer and this is reflected in decreasing fabric strengths (Reference HartHart, 1994). It is very difficult to calculate strain in the subglacial deforming layer becausD: (a) there are few strain markers and (b) the thickness of the deforming layer changes as the glacier advances and retreats. One attempt has been made from a Quaternary site at Great Blakenham, England (Reference Hart and BoultonHart and Boulton, 1991). Figure 10c shows the results from the deforming layer compared with those from Matanuska Glacier, where fabric strengths also decreased upwards. It can be seen that the pattern of strain is very similar. It can also be argued that the style of deformation is similar; increases in strain within the deforming bed lead to the formation of a homogeneous diamicton (as all the components become mixed together); similarly, increases in strain in the BIL lead to the break-down of the debris-rich layers to form large units of debris-poor facies.

• (c) Sediment incorporation into the basal layers is also similar. In the deforming layer it has been shown that sediments are incorporated by being sheared and folded into the base of the deforming layer due to perturbations but that material also melts in from the base of the glacier (Reference Hart and BoultonHart and Boulton, 1991). In the BIL, material is brought in by a combination of adfreezing (often down into a deforming layer) and shearing and folding due to perturbations.

• (d) Measurements on the rate of subglacial sediment accumulations at the three glaciers showed that sedimentation at the two glaciers with a deforming bed was an order of magnitude higher than that with a debris-rich ice layer. It was also shown that Childs Glacier with its frozen top had a slightly lower sedimentation rate than Exit Glacier with full deforming-bed conditions even though this glacier was the smallest.

Thus, I suggest that the behaviour of the debris-rich ice layer is very similar to the deforming bed, except that the processes occur at a slower rate. Figure 11a shows a schematic diagram of the different types of deforming layers observed at the three sites, although unfortunately it is not known how far these marginal conditions extend up-glacier. The ideas presented in this paper can he combined to produce an “ideal” glacier with a deforming bed and/or debris-rich base (Fig. 11b). This results in a series of décollement layers within the sequence, at the base of the deforming layer, at the ice sheet-sediment interface and the top of the debris-rich ice. The notion of a deforming bed/debris-rich ice continuum is useful because the processes of incorporation and deformation are similar in both types of deforming layers. However, I would also suggest that only the deforming bed remains in the geological record; in contrast, on melting the majority of the deformed BIL simply flows away to produce the complex sediment gravity-flow deposits described by Reference LawsonLawson (1979b, Reference Lawson1982).

Table 5.

Comparison of the three Alaskan glaciers

Fig. 11.

(a) Schematic diagram to show die different types of deforming layers at the three sites; (b) Schematic diagram to show deforming bed debris-rich ice continuum.