Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T12:06:34.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ACCI could be a poor prognostic indicator for the in-hospital mortality of patients with SFTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2023

Chen Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Xinjian Xiang
Affiliation:
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Baoyu Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Tingting Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Meng Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Shichun Shen*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Shenggang Ding*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
*
Corresponding authors: Shichun Shen and Shenggang Ding; Emails: shenshichun@outlook.com; juliolove@163.com
Corresponding authors: Shichun Shen and Shenggang Ding; Emails: shenshichun@outlook.com; juliolove@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the predictive role of age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) scores for in-hospital prognosis of severe fever in thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) patients. A total of 192 patients diagnosed with SFTS were selected as the study subjects. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of ACCI for the mortality of SFTS patients, and Cox regression models were used to assess the association between predictive factors and prognosis. The 192 SFTS patients were divided into two groups according to the clinical endpoints (survivors/non-survivors). The results showed that the mortality of the 192 hospitalized SFTS patients was 26.6%. The ACCI score of the survivor group was significantly lower than that of the non-survivor group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the increased ACCI score was a significant predictor of poor prognosis in SFTS. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that SFTS patients with an ACCI >2.5 had shorter mean survival times, indicating a poor prognosis. Our findings suggest that ACCI, as an easy-to-use clinical indicator, may offer a simple and feasible approach for clinicians to determine the severity of SFTS.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Participant clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors of SFTS

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of ACCI with score weights between survivors and non-survivors of SFTS

Figure 2

Table 3. Distinct Charlson comorbidity scores for survivors and non-survivors of SFTS

Figure 3

Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of distinct Charlson comorbidity scores for distinguishing survivors and non-survivors of SFTS; SFTS, Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

Figure 4

Figure 2. (A) Forest plots of HRs by multivariable Cox regression analysis; Red indicates HR > 1, Blue indicates HR < 1. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for overall survival in SFTS patients stratified according to the ACCI. (C) Comparison of fatality at different ACCI levels.

Supplementary material: File

Gong et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 16.9 KB