Sunday schools in a mobilising Church

It was the Low Church segment within the national Church that first advanced the idea of Sunday schools in Sweden during the first half of the nineteenth century. The inspiration came mostly from like-minded groups in Britain, but when compared to Britain the advent of Sunday schools in Sweden was faltering and late.Footnote ¹¹ At first they were established to provide basic education for the poor; it was only in the latter half of the nineteenth century that they gained their exclusively religious connotations. Such activities were in general sponsored by independent groups of believers, forming self-governing ‘mission societies’. In some localities they were aided by a benevolent local clergyman.Footnote ¹²

However, Sunday schools were far from welcomed by every representative of the national Church. First and foremost, a majority of the clergy saw them as unnecessary. The Compulsory School Act of 1842 (folkskolestadgan) aimed at creating a parish-based schooling system for younger children (up to the age of twelve). These schools were firmly integrated into the national ecclesiastical system. Local school boards were organised as committees under the parish council with the minister acting as the statutory chairman. Until the 1920s instruction in the Lutheran creed formed a central part of the curriculum. Therefore, it was not far-fetched to claim that these decentralised educational institutions actually provided fundamental Christian instruction, administered by a trained and committed teacher, to every baptised child. With such provision, the need for additional teaching activities did not seem like a pressing concern. In addition, Sunday schools also suffered by their association with schismatic Evangelical revivalism. From the 1850s onwards large sections of the Low Church phalanx were beginning to look with unease at their continued association with the national Church. Despite official antagonism, they started to form independent groups of believers and worked strenuously for the religious uplift of the populace at large. Sunday schools were a device in their activist toolkit. Many of those who espoused such autonomous religious sentiments and thus provoked the ire of stalwart churchmen formed a separate religious body, the Swedish Covenant Church (Svenska missionsförbundet), in 1878.Footnote ¹³ In such a situation, Sunday schools organised by the Evangelical Free Churches seemed like ‘proselyte schools for the sect system’, to borrow the words of one early twentieth-century bishop.Footnote ¹⁴ It goes without saying that local Sunday school enthusiasts could not count on the endorsement of the ecclesiastical leadership.

This hostile position began to change around the turn of the twentieth century. Traditional visions of the parish as a unified religious community were by now merely a mirage. Urbanisation and signs of declining parental religious socialisation, the growing political strength of the Evangelical Free Churches and the rise of anticlerical Socialism led many loyal supporters of the established Church to fear for the future. Save the staunchest reactionaries, there was a growing sense among leading ecclesiastics that something new was needed to meet the threat that seemed to be mounting. Activities that had hitherto been frowned upon, such as Sunday schools, were now being seriously contemplated among a broader segment of church people, clergy and laity alike.Footnote ¹⁵ Their vision was mostly rooted in a resolute political conservatism, now forced into action. Sweden as a nation was in danger; what was needed was a rejuvenated and vigorous Church. In a much-read pamphlet from 1909, Manfred Björkquist (1884–1985), a future bishop of Stockholm, declared that ‘The Church wants to gather all of the people (folk) of Sweden. Not that they shall be only a one-church people, but that all shall become part of God's fold through Jesus Christ. By its very existence, Sweden's church dares to believe that the Swedish nation can become a people of God.’Footnote ¹⁶

As civil servants, the clergy were bound by oath to adhere to the ordinances of the Church Law (passed by the absolute monarch Karl xi in 1686) and the Municipal Act of 1862. These pieces of legislation, together with detailed instructions issued by the Swedish government and by the diocesan chapters, structured the religious duties of the local clergy and by extension every parish within the realm. In these statutes one could find (often detailed) instructions for conducting the religious life that revolved around the parish church. If previous generations viewed these ordinances as sufficient for maintaining the spiritual vigour of the nation, the generation that rose to maturity towards the end of the nineteenth century began to see them as just the first steps towards the building of an ecclesiastical edifice fit for its present-day task. Clerical opinion began to talk about the need for ‘non-compulsory work’ (frivilligarbete). In this context ‘non-compulsory work’ refers to religious activities that were not prescribed by the then existing religious legislation. Ideally, it was to be performed by small teams consisting of both clergy and lay members of the parish. In the first number of the recently launched church magazine Församlingsbladet (Parish Gazette) that appeared in 1902, the editor expressed a need to ‘enliven and strengthen a concern for the tasks that not only fall on the church and her representatives, but on every Christian as a member of this body’.Footnote ¹⁷ In order to preserve the integrity of the national ecclesiastical fabric (much had been learnt from the rift of 1878), the clergy were placed at the centre of these activities. Without their participation and leadership, all advances in parochial life could be understood as but the first step to dissent. No autonomous societies, in which people applied for membership, were to be created. Instead, loosely organised groups of volunteer workers were formed around the local minster. They were, using the terminology of the time, his ‘helpers’.

The evolution of ‘non-compulsory work’ in Church of Sweden parishes was greatly aided by the advancement of a new understanding of the role of Christian laity. With inspiration from reform-minded German Lutherans, one of the leading champions of renewed parish life, Professor Olov Holmström (1854–1921), filled the sixteenth-century concept of the priesthood of all believers with new and activist content. Pastors who had hitherto toiled on their own in populous parishes (which was how Holmström described it) should from now on be aided by groups of committed parishioners. Together they should be able to make the local church better suited to the many needs of the present age.Footnote ¹⁸

Several influential clerical groupings gave vigorous support to the idea of local parishes as hubs of activity. The most important of these was the National Union of Swedish Clergy (Allmänna svenska prästföreningen), formed in 1903. This association, which enjoyed widespread support, was above all intended to advocate for the formation of church youth clubs led by the local clergy (the preferred Swedish term was ‘youth circle’ [ungdomskrets]). A separate Board of Youth Care was organised in 1904 with Holmström as chairman. The board also published a monthly, at first heavily nationalistic and royalistic, church youth magazine, Sveriges ungdom (Sweden's Youth).Footnote ¹⁹

At this time ‘non-compulsory work’ had begun to grow rapidly within the national Church, above all in the central parts of Sweden. After some considerable manoeuvring in the National Synod, it was decided in 1910 that a national body supporting these activities should be formed. The objective of this new institution within the state Church apparatus was to strengthen the novel expressions of parish activity that now were springing to life.Footnote ²⁰ In other words, after having gained government approval, the Church of Sweden's Diaconal Board (Svenska kyrkans diakonistyrelse) organised itself as a kind of state department for a mobilising Church. Young and energetic clergy, fired by the vision of a rejuvenated national Church, immersed themselves in the work of this agency.Footnote ²¹ From its onset the Diaconal Board engaged in vigorous publishing activities which produced a range of church magazines and instructional manuals aimed at various kinds of volunteers.Footnote ²² Regular instruction courses were arranged to equip groups of committed parishioners for new tasks. These courses, together with separate youth conferences (ungdomskurser), toured the country during the 1910s and 1920s.Footnote ²³ To provide further support to the new kind of lay workers that emerged during the first decades of the twentieth century, the Diaconal Board set up a Church of Sweden layman's school (Svenska kyrkans lekmannaskola), located in Sigtuna on the outskirts of Stockholm in 1922. More substantial courses, lasting for up to two months, for Sunday school teachers and youth group leaders were a priority. Young women, above all, flocked to these courses.Footnote ²⁴ In response to the secularisation of the Swedish primary school system (primary schools were removed from the responsibility of the parish council in 1930), the layman's school offered hugely popular teacher training courses between 1930 and 1956. All of these were intended to offer further instruction in the Lutheran creed, but also served to prepare lay individuals for service in Church of Sweden Sunday schools.Footnote ²⁵ Primary school teachers, many of whom received training at the layman's school, were to become key figures in local ‘non-compulsory’ church teaching activities.

Starting in the 1920s, additional bodies were organised with the aim of supporting the ‘non-compulsory work’ of the church. These took the form of regional Diocesan Councils (stiftsråd) headed by a bishop and composed of interested clergy and lay parish representatives. In the Växjö diocese such a body was formed in 1923.Footnote ²⁶ Gradually, these regional organs assumed responsibility for the educational activities previously organised by the Diaconal Board. The Växjö Diocesan Council organised its first course for Sunday school teachers in January 1925.Footnote ²⁷ These courses were to become staple parts of diocesan life for many years. During the 1940s there was a further decentralisation of educational management for Sunday school volunteers. With the rapid increase in the number of parish Sunday schools, there was now a solid base for organising shorter instruction courses at the deanery level. For those unable to attend these, the Diocesan Council recommended the formation of local study circles. It was even possible to take a correspondence course, designed by the Sunday School Committee of the Diaconal Board,Footnote ²⁸ that promised to provide the essentials for a prospective, but untrained, Sunday school teacher.

The rise and fall of parish Sunday schools

It is impossible to tell when and where the new kind of manifestly church-oriented Sunday school emerged within the Växjö diocese. Autonomous groups of believers had already organised Sunday schools during the first decades of the nineteenth century.Footnote ²⁹ Some of these groups were steadfast in their loyalty to the national Church; others drifted towards secession. By the early twentieth century there were still only a handful of parish Sunday schools within the old diocese of Kalmar.Footnote ³⁰ Largely owing to the disinclination of its backwards-looking bishop, N. J. O. H. Lindström (1842–1916), no such figures exist for the diocese of Växjö for this period. With the arrival of Ludvig Lindberg (1860–1928), first bishop of the now merged diocese, however, the clergy had gained a superior who was a fervent believer in the need for a forward movement in parish life, including the organisation of Sunday schools in as many parishes as possible. At first, however, the results were meagre. Figures presented in 1921, communicated during the first clergy conference of Lindberg's episcopate, reveal that church-oriented Sunday schools were to be found in only twenty-three out of a total of 255 parishes. Examining these statistics more closely, it is evident that some of these schools were considerable enterprises. In one rural parish 125 children were enrolled in the Sunday school, and in Jönköping, the largest town in the diocese, 375 children went to class before Sunday morning worship began.Footnote ³¹

The statistics further demonstrate that there was a rapid expansion of Sunday school provision during the next couple of decades. In 1927, Sunday schools were organised in sixty-seven parishes. Seven years later that figure had risen to 103 parishes.Footnote ³² By 1944 it was estimated that Sunday schools were organised in more than 75 per cent of the parishes in the diocese.Footnote ³³ In other words, in a little more than twenty years the number of parishes in Växjö diocese with a Sunday school had multiplied more than eight times. By the 1950s, the existence of a Sunday school seems to have been taken for granted in most Church of Sweden parishes. Save a few minuscule parishes, some of which consisted of less than a hundred parishioners, Sunday schools were a universal phenomenon within the diocese of Växjö. Statistics gathered for the 1955 clergy conference are as exact as they are impressive: 15,403 children were enrolled in parish Sunday schools. This translated to an average of sixty children per parish, but, in reality, size varied greatly.Footnote ³⁴ On a national level, the church Sunday schools peaked in Sweden, unlike in Britain,Footnote ³⁵ during the late 1950s. National statistics reveal that a total number of 134,963 children aged between four and fourteen attended a Church of Sweden Sunday school in 1954 (11.2 per cent of the total number of Swedish children aged between four and fourteen); five years later that figure had risen marginally to 135,963 (11.6 per cent). Statistics which include figures from the Swedish Protestant Free Churches reveal that no less than 35 per cent of all Swedish children attended a Sunday school in 1959. At this time Sunday schools run by the Church of Sweden far outnumbered those organised by all the Free Churches put together.Footnote ³⁶

However, just as the advocates of the Sunday schools were beginning to celebrate the successes of recent years, the first signs of decay set in. In spite of the introduction of an age-based class system and various efforts to renew and ‘modernise’ its gatherings, contemporaries began to complain that it was primarily younger children who were attending. Pre-teenagers were no longer so easy to attract. Postwar youth culture was beginning to find the kindly teaching offered in Sunday schools rather suffocating, and parents were less and less likely to force their young people to attend.Footnote ³⁷ As one of the ministers in Växjö phrased it in the mid-1960s: ‘It is not cool to be in Sunday school when you are twelve or thirteen years old.’Footnote ³⁸ A similar pattern is discernible in other Church of Sweden dioceses.Footnote ³⁹ In order to meet the needs of pre-teen youths, there was a push for weekday ‘junior clubs’ (most of which were organised as Scout clubs) designed to offer Christian instruction to those who had abandoned Sunday school. In 1965, these junior clubs had about 2,500 members in the Växjö diocese.Footnote ⁴⁰ Membership figures remained stable throughout the period covered in this article.Footnote ⁴¹

Starting in the 1960s, Sunday school numbers dropped slowly but steadily. In 1959, for example, there had been 371 Sunday schools (organised in 649 classes) within Växjö diocese with a total of 13,950 children enrolled.Footnote ⁴² Twelve years later that figure had dropped marginally to 10,350 children.Footnote ⁴³ After that a period of rapid decline set in. Between 1971 and 1977 the numbers of children attending Sunday schools fell by almost half.Footnote ⁴⁴ In 1983, only 2,666 children attended Sunday schools within the diocese.Footnote ⁴⁵

By the 1970s, the evidence was irrefutable. With every year that passed parents were less and less inclined to send even their younger offspring to Sunday schools. To those with children in the 1960s and 1970s, Sunday schools increasingly seemed obsolete, a remnant from a less affluent, leisured and mobile past. Family and vacation patterns started to change. In 1963 the government instituted a fourth week of statutory vacation, the five-day work week was gradually introduced in the latter half of the 1960s and in 1968 teaching on Saturdays was abandoned in all Swedish schools. Swedish post-war prosperity had made the family car a reality even for working-class families. With the car came new opportunities for weekend travel and social activities away from home. For the modestly prosperous, a countryside cottage became a hallowed retreat filled with idyllic dreams of cross-generational summer vacations and male DIY work. In such a scenario, when weekends became a time of relaxation as well as an opportunity to escape the tedious routines of work and school, it was only too easy to leave Sunday schools behind. The vision of Sunday as a day apart drifted away. There was more than one parent in Sweden at this time who would have agreed with the man cited by Hugh McLeod who declared that church activities just tend to ‘bugger up Sundays’.Footnote ⁴⁶ This did not, however, mean that parents were averse to church activities as such, or that church-sponsored religious socialisation declined altogether.

That church-based teaching classes still enjoyed a considerable popularity, especially in expanding suburban areas, is demonstrated by the manner in which mothers with pre-school children immersed themselves in the weekday activities that now were organised as an evolution of the Sunday school model. For a brief interval, from the late 1960s until the early 1980s, ‘children's church hour’ (kyrkans barntimmar) achieved an enormous popularity. ‘Children's church hour’ was a teaching concept that emerged ‘from below’, originating in the diocese of Härnösand in the late 1950s.Footnote ⁴⁷ It spread gradually over the country in response to changing demands and declining Sunday observance. It should be noted that this teaching concept had a much freer form than the Sunday schools (which had a syllabus decided by the national board of bishops [biskopsmötet]), allowing for experimentation and local adjustments. In the diocese of Växjö it was estimated that 4,900 children aged four to five took part in these activities in 1971.Footnote ⁴⁸ Seven years later there were 420 ‘Children's church hour’ groups within the diocese. Similar figures were presented for other Church of Sweden dioceses.Footnote ⁴⁹ The total number of participants was at this time not even counted. A cautious estimate of fifteen children per group would give a total of about 6,300 attendees in the Växjö diocese. If added to the existing Sunday school figures, a total of no less than about 11,700 children were involved in church teaching activities in Växjö in the late 1970s. But these were far from the only activities on offer at this time. In bustling church community centres, a majority of which were erected in suburban areas during the 1960s and 1970s, children could also be found in other new kinds of age-based initiatives.Footnote ⁵⁰

These numerical tabulations of Sunday school participation may actually be more important than might be at first assumed. Sunday school statistics are regularly counted among the so-called ‘indices of religion’, readily used by present-day scholars to demonstrate shifting religious trends during the twentieth century. It is easy to forget that Sunday schools were not the only children's activity on offer and that there was considerable creativity among the Churches (not only in Sweden) in adjusting to contemporary demands. Without paying close attention to the ways in which the Churches responded to the decline of Sunday schools – by forming alternative groups which were in turn highly popular – we may miss the finer points of the religious history of north-western Europe. The statistics presented above could be used to call recent claims about an accelerating mass exodus from church activities during the ‘long 1960s’ into question,Footnote ⁵¹ at least if looking at Sweden.

However, the ‘Children's church hour’ and the successes of the 1970s did not last for long. These decades saw the far-reaching expansion of the Swedish welfare state. In order for the social adjustments that this required to take place, an expansion of the female workforce was a prerequisite. By the 1980s it was more or less taken for granted that women with children were expected to work, at least part time, outside the home. Domesticity had at last come to an end in Sweden. This change was eased by the tax reforms implemented in the first half of the 1970s and by the swift development of a modestly-priced childcare system. In this context, the Church's efforts at social provision, manifesting itself in the ‘Children's church hour’, became rapidly obsolete. It vanished almost as quickly as it had once appeared. No popular alternative was ever able to take its place.

Sunday school teachers, c. 1920–90

As an expanding venture, Sunday schools were in constant need of more people willing to assume teaching responsibilities. Long before the peak years in the late 1950s, contemporaries frequently complained about the lack of volunteers. In Kyrka och Hem (Church and Home), the Växjö diocesan magazine, the, at the time, influential area dean Arvid Karlsson (1880–1945) expressed the feelings of many by alluding to Matthew ix.37–8: ‘The church waits and prays to God for many more faithful and persistent labourers in the plentiful harvest. This is not the time to delay, or to resign in hopelessness before the superficial advances of dark powers.’Footnote ⁵² In spite of such fears, even in a thinly populated diocese, there were many who gathered to take care of the ‘plentiful harvest’.

Who were these volunteer teachers? How many were involved in this line of church activity? What can be said about their social characteristics? Given the informal and semi-organised nature of local ‘non-compulsory work’ few manuscript sources (minutes, lists of participants etc) exist that could offer a clearer view of the men and women who were involved in these activities. Not even records of those who attended the diocesan Sunday school instruction courses have survived to any great extent. However, at irregular intervals the Diaconal Board and the Diocesan Council gathered some rudimentary figures for the teaching workforce. A close and contextualised reading of these documents allows a partial answer to these questions.

In general terms, the number of teachers seems to have grown as the number of Sunday schools increased. It should be noted that the figures for the period from 1930 to 1960 include clergy actively involved as Sunday school teachers. During the relatively early phase of the late 1920s, a statistical survey conducted by the Diocesan Council reveals that in Växjö there were 310 Sunday school teachers active within the diocese.Footnote ⁵³ In 1948, that figure had risen significantly to 791.Footnote ⁵⁴ Eight years later available statistics indicate a further rise. A total of 888 Sunday school teachers were active in 1956 (indicating an approximate average ratio of seventeen children per teacher).Footnote ⁵⁵ According to the comprehensive survey of the ‘non-compulsory work’ conducted by the Diaconal Board in 1959, the Sunday schools in Växjö diocese were served by no less than 983 teachers.Footnote ⁵⁶ To a considerable extent, these people also served as leaders in the emerging junior clubs. As may be expected, a consequence of the years of slow demise in the 1970s was that this group of Sunday school teachers also diminished in size. Yet the decline was not as fast or as sizeable as may have been expected. Even when Växjö's Sunday schools were but a shadow of their former glory, there were still large numbers of people involved as teachers in the diocese. For the 2,666 children that still went to Sunday school in 1983, there were no less than 480 teachers (about five children per teacher).Footnote ⁵⁷ Ultimately, a core group of Sunday school teachers was loyal right to the bitter end.

It is hardly surprising that throughout the period covered in this article there were considerably more women than men involved in Sunday school teaching. Save the clergy, there are only a handful of men to be found on Växjö's rosters. The statistics for 1948, for example, reveal that only 5 per cent (forty-one out of 791) of Sunday school teachers were non-ordained men. All of these men were active as primary school teachers.Footnote ⁵⁸ Throughout the 1950s the proportion of non-ordained men appears to have remained the same.Footnote ⁵⁹ These figures should of course be related to the gender regime of the era according to which the care and education of children primarily was seen as a woman's task. An essentialist assumption about the caring nature of women was taken for granted in largely conservative-minded church circles. Women seemed naturally inclined, and by nature well equipped, for the formation of young minds. Such widely-held beliefs added to the ‘feminising’ drift of much of modern church life.Footnote ⁶⁰ The constant stream of complaints that men were missing from the ranks focused on the disciplinary authority which Sunday school teaching lacked as a result. Men were needed to keep track of unruly boys. As one clerical observer remarked in the 1950s, male teachers were desperately needed ‘for the boys who are difficult to retain’.Footnote ⁶¹

Such effusions should not distract us from the fact that men did feature within Sunday school circles. At least until the 1960s, a large segment of the (at this time all male) clergy formed part of the committed core of teachers. Statistics from Växjö in the late 1940s indicate that a total of 217 ministers (about 70 per cent of the active diocesan clergy) were active as Sunday school teachers.Footnote ⁶² Somewhat surprisingly, as early as the 1950s the clergy started to excuse themselves from taking an active part in Sunday schools. Statistics from 1959 reveal that out of a total of 358 active clergy only 197 were directly involved as Sunday school teachers (55 per cent).Footnote ⁶³ In quasi-normative documents produced around this time, the clergy were being attributed with a monitoring and organising function. Ideally, it was the laity who should act as teachers.Footnote ⁶⁴ The reason for this change in attitude remains unclear, but it is probable that the 1950s increase in the number of active laity paved the way for this shift in roles. This trend continued, and became even more visible, during the following decade. By the 1970s, very few of the clergy were directly involved in the day-to-day business of Sunday schools. Clergy had receded into the background and had become merely their supporters and well-wishers.

It had never been the clergy who were the central figures in Church of Sweden Sunday schools. It was in fact their wives. For the maintenance and assurance of adequate teaching quality, clergy wives were of inestimable importance. In the statistical summaries of Sunday school workers they are not counted as a separate group. Yet everybody knew that they were ubiquitously present. Bishop Lindberg stated what was obvious to everyone at the clergy conference of 1921: ‘A clergyman has a good, yes one may say the best, co-worker in his wife. This is as it should be. United, their labour produces manifold blessings.’Footnote ⁶⁵ Until the 1970s it was taken for granted that involvement in Sunday schools was one of the duties of a clergyman's wife. However, that is when conditions started to change for them. Younger generations of often well-educated clergy wives were not unaffected by changing attitudes vis-à-vis an expansion of the married female workforce.Footnote ⁶⁶ On top of that, new groups of paid parish functionaries were now increasingly put in charge of managing a whole range of parish activities. Suddenly, the unpaid services offered by clergy wives were not in such high demand as they had once been. Oral history enables a glimpse of a shift that was expressed with not a few notes of bitterness by an older generation. One informant, born in 1926, remembers how, after moving with her husband to a new (urban) benefice in the 1970s, she was suddenly deprived of most of her former areas of responsibility. The parish community centre seemed to be filled with salaried staff ‘who did the things I had done without pay, but with a more limited scope’.Footnote ⁶⁷ At least for an older generation of clergy wives, Sunday schools were something like a last bastion. They remained at their posts even when the crowds of children had vanished.Footnote ⁶⁸ Together with likeminded sisters, their continued presence accounts for the fact that there was still a large group of Sunday school teachers in Växjö during the waning years of the 1980s.Footnote ⁶⁹

Statistical figures reveal that another clearly defined group of women should be counted as amongst the pillars of the Sunday schools. It is possible to identify a group of male primary school teachers in the statistics, but these individuals were by far outnumbered by their female colleagues. In 1945 no less than 56 per cent of all lay Sunday school teachers within the diocese of Växjö were in fact trained primary school teachers (304 of a total of 546). 65 per cent of these (197) were women.Footnote ⁷⁰ This illustrates the strong connection between church and school that still existed during the 1940s. The separation of church and primary school was a protracted affair. The disappearance of the Lutheran catechism from the curriculum in 1919 did not stop teachers (above all female) loyal to the national Church from believing that a catechetical function was at the heart of their professional identity. That the primary schools from the 1930s and onwards were run by the (secular) municipalities had, at first, little impact on such ideals. In fact, before the construction of church community centres, Sunday schools often gathered at the rectory or at the teacher's ‘home arena’ – the local school building. Only gradually did teachers begin to see their calling in a new, and less religious, light. Clergy and teaching staff drifted apart. And just as the clergy started to fade away from active participation in Sunday schools during the 1950s, so too did the teachers. From the 1950s onwards, statistical surveys indicate that it was not as easy to enrol younger generations of female professional teachers in Sunday school work as it once had been. However, since older generations of teachers remained loyal, there was still a significant proportion of primary school teachers active in Sunday schools during the final years of the 1950s. In Växjö diocese, 14 per cent of all Sunday school teachers belonged to the teaching staff of a local school in 1959.Footnote ⁷¹ After that point in time teachers were no longer singled out as a separate category in statistical summaries of Sunday school staff, a clear indication that their former numerical strength had gone.

In spite of the fact that a typical Sunday school teacher was likely to be a middle-aged woman, young people (aged fifteen to twenty) frequently became involved in Sunday school work. This was particularly the case before the 1960s. To be a Sunday school ‘helper’ was listed among the activities suitable, not only for children of the clergy, but also for the committed church youth club member and for young students at teacher training colleges. Their numbers appear never to have been significant, and, for natural reasons, they may have served in this capacity for only limited periods of time. The comprehensive statistics gathered by the Diaconal Board in 1959 indicate that about 10 per cent of Sunday school teachers in Växjö diocese were below the age of twenty.Footnote ⁷² During the following decade the young seem to have been less and less motivated to do volunteer work in Sunday schools. In 1974 the Växjö Diocesan Council stated as a well-known fact that young ‘helpers’ had abandoned Sunday schools.Footnote ⁷³ However, this should not be taken as a sign that young people had stopped volunteering for church activities altogether. It was in fact the Sunday school itself, an institution that by now had acquired a certain degree of ‘stodginess’, that failed to attract a younger generation. As volunteers they instead joined other church-sponsored children's activities or immersed themselves in a still vibrant church youth movement.Footnote ⁷⁴

A bird's eye view of the statistics indicates that new categories of women must have committed themselves to Sunday school work during the 1950s. The gradual withdrawal of the professional clergy and female schoolteachers led to a ‘democratisation’ of the teaching staff. This fed into the overall strategy of the postwar national Church. In order to maintain its position within the population at large, there needed to be a far-reaching mobilisation of the laity to serve alongside the clergy in all kinds of parish activities – study groups, youth and children's clubs and, above all, in Sunday schools.Footnote ⁷⁵

Regrettably, little is known about the women who now became involved in Sunday school teaching activities. Fragmentary evidence implies that they were, as might be expected, housewives with younger children.Footnote ⁷⁶ Over the coming decades, however, these women were less and less likely to volunteer as Sunday school teachers. Instead, they started to contribute to the by-now immensely popular weekday teaching activities such as the ‘Children's church hour’. In most cases they had first attended these groups with their own children. After their offspring had reached school age, some of them remained to volunteer, performing duties that to them still seemed fulfilling. There is no contemporary estimate of how many volunteers were involved in these instructional activities. Official documents recommended that each group should be served not only by an organising member of the parish staff (or equivalent), but also by a volunteer who could be a parent or a parish trainee.Footnote ⁷⁷ Even though this ideal was unattainable in many parishes, it suggests that somewhere between five and six hundred women acted as volunteer leaders in Växjö diocese during the peak years of the late 1970s.

At this point it becomes evident that the postwar mobilisation strategy was beginning to produce some unexpected results. At a time when employment levels among married women was rising, and when parish finances were solid, it seemed only natural that women, instead of working as volunteers, should receive some monetary remuneration for their services. What had once been a volunteer activity was transformed into a part-time ‘job’, paid for by the church taxes that parishes had the right to levy on the local population until the turn of the twenty-first century. Furthermore, the new instructional activities, such as the ‘Children's church hour’, needed an organisational backbone. This was provided then, not by the clergy or their wives, but by this new group of part-time, salaried, predominantly female, teaching staff who step-by-step became the nexus of many parish community centres. Between 1973 and 1983 the total number of employed teachers in Church of Sweden parishes (many of them working on a part-time basis) rose by 47 per cent (from 2,329 to 3,419 people).Footnote ⁷⁸ In Växjö diocese alone there were sixty people in full-time employment performing such duties in the final years of the 1970s.Footnote ⁷⁹ When the century was drawing to a close their numbers had risen to 194.Footnote ⁸⁰

This article demonstrates how the Church of Sweden during the latter half of the twentieth century was able to adjust its teaching activities to changing circumstances in several successive stages. First, when Sunday schools were declining in popularity due to changing trends in society, parishes were able to both conceptualise and organise alternative instructional activities. This led to an overall rise in children's religious participation throughout the 1960s and 1970s (a period now associated with a decline in religious practices in the West). By implication, this suggests that the standard indices of religion should be used with some caution. If figures for alternative and newly-established church activities are not included, these sets of statistics may be misleading. They may seem to signal a decline in participation when in fact the opposite was true, and that growth was taking place, only elsewhere. Second, when participation in Sunday schools was declining on the part of both the clergy and primary school teaching staff, new groups of women were recruited to fill the vacated positions. To some extent this indicates that the postwar strategy of the Swedish national Church was successful. New lay groups were willing to engage in volunteer work. An expansion of the church workforce was a precondition for the church's achievements in the 1960s and 1970s. Thirdly, the extension of its salaried female workforce during the 1970s forced the Church of Sweden to make additional adjustments. With the intention of recruiting a new generation of working women, parishes were now forced to turn the tasks that had been seen as volunteer work into regular jobs. To a considerable extent this evolution still characterises the Church of Sweden and sets it apart from Protestant Churches with a similar pedigree in, for example, Britain, Germany and the other Nordic countries. This demonstrates the need to infuse a gender perspective into institutional history if we are to understand the postwar activities of Churches and other Christian groups. A focus on the behaviour of women may be essential for our understanding of the demise of religion in north-western Europe,Footnote ⁸¹ but to an equal extent for our reconsideration of postwar religious mobilisation in the Western world. While the modifications the Church of Sweden introduced around teaching the young may not have stemmed the rising tide of secularisation, it may have, for some time at least, slowed the rate of its flow.