Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T08:20:15.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High and Low Trait Anger, Angry Thoughts, and the Recognition of Anger Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Raúl J. Alcázar-Olán Open the ORCID record for Raúl J. Alcázar-Olán [Opens in a new window] ,
Jerry L. Deffenbacher ,
Laura Hernández Guzmán  and
Samuel Jurado Cárdenas
Raúl J. Alcázar-Olán*
Affiliation:
Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla (México)
Jerry L. Deffenbacher
Affiliation:
Colorado State University (USA)
Laura Hernández Guzmán
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México)
Samuel Jurado Cárdenas
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Raúl J. Alcázar-Olán. Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla. Health Sciences. San Andrés Cholula, Puebla (México). E-mail: rulet7@gmail.com, raul.alcazar@iberopuebla.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research had two goals: (1) it tested hypotheses of the State-Trait Model of anger, and (2) it explored characteristics that may distinguish individuals with high trait anger who recognize problems with their anger from those who do not recognize anger problems. Regarding the first goal, findings supported three hypotheses tested. In particular, compared to those low in trait anger, individuals with high trait anger reported: (a) more intense anger (intensity hypothesis), p < .001, effect size (η2) = .109; (b) more thoughts involving pejorative labeling/denigration, p < .001, η2 = .280, thoughts of revenge, p < .001, η2 = .170, more outward, negative anger expression (anger-out), p < .001, η2 = .229, and more physically aggressive expression, p < .001, η2 = .046-.123, (aggression hypothesis); and (c) more anger suppression (anger-in), p < .001, η2 = .231, and fewer thoughts of self-control, p < .001, η2 = .088, and behavioral efforts to control angry feelings (anger control-in), p < .001, η2 = .116, and behavior (anger control-out), p < .001, η2 = .260 (reduced positive coping hypothesis). For the second goal we employed two types of individuals, both with high trait anger: those who identified anger as a personal problem and wanted help, and those who did not identify anger as a personal issue. As a result, compared to those who did not report anger problems, those who reported anger problems demonstrated a higher overall propensity to experience anger (i.e., higher trait anger), p < .01, η2 = .028, greater anger suppression and harboring grudges (anger-in), p < .001, η2 = .035, fewer thoughts of self-control, p < .05, η2 = .015, and attempts to control their angry feelings (anger-control-in), p < .05, η2 = .016, and behavior (anger-control-out), p < .001, η2 = .054. Gender was not associated with trait anger or anger problem recognition. Findings were discussed in terms of State-Trait Theory and implications for anger interventions.

Keywords

aggressionangercognition

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E84
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alcázar, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L., & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of the Anger Expression Inventory (ML-STAXI) in a Mexican sample. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 307–318.Google Scholar
Alcázar, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L., Hernández-Guzmán., , & Wilson, G. I. (2011). High and low trait anger, and the recognition of anger problems. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 851–858. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.32 Google Scholar
Alcázar-Olán, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L., Hernández-Guzmán., , & de la Chaussée Acuña, M. E. (2014). The angry thoughts scale: Initial development in a Mexican sample. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 7, 373–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2014.7.4.373 Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291 Google Scholar
Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Bartz, A. E., Blume, N. E., & Rose, J. (1996). Gender differences in self-report measures of anger: The role of social desirability and negative affect. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 241–253.Google Scholar
Chon, K. K. (2002). Cultural aspects of anger. In Hofsten, C. V. & Bäckman, L. (Eds.), Psychology at the turn of the millennium, (Vol. 2., pp. 323–346). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L. (1992). Trait anger: Theory, findings, and implications. In Spielberger, C. D., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9) (pp. 177–201). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L. (2009). Angry drivers: Characteristics and clinical interventions. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 26(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L., Filetti, L. B., Richards, T. L., Lynch, R. S., & Oetting, E. R. (2003). Characteristics of two groups of angry drivers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 123–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123 Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Filetti, L. B., Dahlen, E. R., & Oetting, E. R. (2003). Anger, aggression, risky behavior and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 333–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00014-1 Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L., & McKay, M. (2000). Overcoming situational and general anger: A protocol for the treatment of anger based on relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and coping skills training. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Thwaites, G. A., Lynch, R. S., Baker, D. A., Stark, R. S., … Eiswerth-Cox, L. (1996). State-trait anger theory and the utility of the trait anger scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 131–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.2.131 Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, J. L., Petrilli, R. T., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Swaim, R. C. (2003). The Driver’s Angry Thoughts Questionnaire: A measure of angry cognitions when driving. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 383–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025403712897 Google Scholar
DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2003). Anger treatment for adults: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 70–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.10.1.70 Google Scholar
Hazebroek, J. F., Howells, K., & Day, A. (2001). Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 31–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00007-6 Google Scholar
Kassinove, H., & Tafrate, R. C. (2006). Anger-related disorders: Basic issues, models, and diagnostic considerations. In Feindler, E. L. (Ed.), Anger-related disorders: A practitioner’s guide to comparative treatments (pp.1–27). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moscoso, M. S. (2000). Estructura factorial del Inventario Multicultural Latinoamericano de la Expresión de la Cólera y la Hostilidad [Factor structure of the Multicultural Latin American Anger Expression Inventory]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 32, 321–343.Google Scholar
Moscoso, M. S., & Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Evaluación de la experiencia, expresión y control de la cólera en Latinoamérica [Assessment of the experience, expression, and control of anger in Latin America]. Revista Psicología Contemporánea, 6, 4–13.Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2001). Stages of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 443–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.443 Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. O., & Prochaska, J. M. (1999). Why don’t continents move? Why don’t people change? Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 9, 83–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023210911909 Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., Crowson, J. J., Houston, B. K., Kurylo, M., & Poirier, J. (1997). Assessing hostile automatic thoughts: Development and validation of the HAT Scale. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 477–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021988511695 Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Stimmel, D. T., Rayburg, J., Waring, W., & Raffeld, P. M. (2005). The relation of internalized and trait anger to psychopathology. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 2, 112–123.Google Scholar
Tafrate, R. C., Kassinove, H., & Dundin, L. (2002). Anger episodes in high-and low-trait-anger community adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1573–1590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10076 Google Scholar
Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). Guarding against hostile thoughts: Trait anger and the recruitment of cognitive control. Emotion, 8, 578–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.578 Google Scholar