Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T17:53:13.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chap. 10 - BACTEREMIA, SEPSIS, SEPTIC SHOCK, AND TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Geeta Patel
Affiliation:
Montgomery Regional Hospital
Ryan Hawley
Affiliation:
Samaritan Medical Center
Noah Scheinfeld
Affiliation:
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
Ronni Wolf
Affiliation:
Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
Batya B. Davidovici
Affiliation:
Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
Jennifer L. Parish
Affiliation:
Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Lawrence Charles Parish
Affiliation:
Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Get access

Summary

IN THE EMERGENCY department, intensive care unit, and primary care setting, dermatological conditions rank as one of the most common disease presentations. It is often a challenge for physicians to differentiate routine skin ailments from more serious, life-threatening conditions that require immediate intervention. This chapter highlights some dermatologic emergencies that plague physicians daily and initially may present with cutaneous manifestations. Septic shock and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) are potentially fatal medical emergencies that manifest with dermatologic signs, making a good understanding of dermatology a crucial step in rapid and early diagnosis of these two emergencies. As part of a clinical continuum, the terms bacteremia, sepsis, and septic shock have for many years been confused due to the inaccurate usage of terminology associated with such infections. In 1991, the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a Consensus Conference to standardize terminology and provide a framework for physicians to accurately identify the body's systemic response to infection. These quantifiable definitions work on a clinical continuum established by clinical and laboratory findings. Unfortunately, to date there is no single definitive census for the standard of care and defined illness; the 1992 consensus is commonly accepted and reputable for defining disease for this topic and will be used as a guideline for this chapter (Table 10.1).

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×