Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T12:37:50.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - The Indirect Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2025

Nicolas Treich
Affiliation:
Toulouse School of Economics and INRAE
Get access

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Albert, C, Luque, GM, Courchamp, F (2018) The twenty most charismatic species. PloS One, 13(7), e0199149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albrecht, K, Krämer, F, Szech, N (2017) Animal welfare and human ethics: A personality study, mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascione, FR (2005) Children and Animals: Exploring the Roots of Kindness and Cruelty. Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, IJ, Cole, M, Cooper, P et al. (2004) On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(1), 7193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batt, S (2009) Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: A multivariate approach. Bioscience Horizons, 2(2), 180190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollard, L (2023) A year of wins for farmed animals. Open Philanthropy farm animal welfare research newsletter.Google Scholar
Bordalo, P, Gennaioli, N, Shleifer, A (2022) Salience. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 521544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgi, M, Cirulli, F (2016) Pet face: Mechanisms underlying human-animal relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bursztyn, L, Jensen, R (2017) Social image and economic behavior in the field: Identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure. Annual Review of Economics, 9(1), 131153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burum, B, Nowak, MA, Hoffman, M (2020) An evolutionary explanation for ineffective altruism. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 12451257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, D, Haeder, S, Jenkins-Smith, H et al. (2019) Monetizing bowser: A contingent valuation of the statistical value of dog life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 11(1), 131149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, SM, Burgess, D, Hutchinson, WG (2006) The relative value of farm animal welfare. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B, Stewart, GB, Panzone, LA, Kyriazakis, I, Frewer, LJ (2017) Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy, 68, 112127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, JA, May, RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science, 297(5579), 191192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, C, Lewis, L, Lynham, J, Richardson, L (2023) The charisma premium: Iconic individuals and wildlife values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 122, 102872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courchamp, F, Jaric, I, Albert, C et al. (2018) The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals. PLoS Biology, 16(4), e2003997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dannenberg, A, Weingärtner, E (2023) The effects of observability and an information nudge on food choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 120, 102829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurobarometer (2023) Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2996.Google Scholar
Filippi, M, Riccitelli, G, Falini, A et al. (2010) The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. PloS One, 5(5), e10847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D (2010) Toward a synthesis of conservation and animal welfare science. Animal Welfare, 19, 121124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, UJ, Pirscher, F (2018) Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany. PloS One, 13(8), e0202193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, M, Yoeli, E (2022) Hidden Games: The Surprising Power of Game Theory to Explain Irrational Human Behaviour. Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Kontoleon, A, Swanson, T (2003) The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: Can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation? Land Economics, 79(4), 483499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladak, A, Anthis, JR (2022) Animals, Food, and Technology (AFT) Survey: 2021. www.sentienceinstitute.org/aft-survey-2021.Google Scholar
Lagerkvist, CJ, Hess, S (2011) A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38 (1), 5578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Y, Boaitey, A, Minegishi, K (2022) Behind the veil: Social desirability bias and animal welfare ballot initiatives. Food Policy, 106, 102184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, R (1999) Animal cruelty and violence against humans: Making the connection. Animal Law, 5, 81.Google Scholar
Loomis, JB (2011) What’s to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies? Journal of Economic Surveys, 25, 363370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, JB, White, DS (1996) Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 18(3), 197206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, JL, Norwood, FB (2012) Speciesism, altruism and the economics of animal welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 189212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechtenberg, L, Perino, G, Treich, N, Tyran, JR, Wang, S (2024) Self-signaling in voting. Journal of Public Economics, 231, 105070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrick, A, Weitzman, M. (1996) Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics, 71: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miralles, A, Raymond, M, Lecointre, G (2019) Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 19555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, FC, Stokes, A, Conte, MN, Dong, X (2022) Noah’s Ark in a warming world: climate change, biodiversity loss, and public adaptation costs in the United States. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(5), 9811015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwood, FB, Lusk, JL (2011) Compassion, by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, K (2000) Homo economicus and homo politicus: Interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(3), 305322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, K, Anderies, JM, Dannenberg, A et al. (2016) Social norms as solutions. Science, 354(6308), 4243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, ES (2000) Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked? Anthrozoös, 13, 194202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, AS, Lusk, JL, Norwood, FB, Tonsor, GT (2019) An experiment on the vote-buy gap with application to cage-free eggs. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 79, 102109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D (1993) Economic Values and the Natural World. Earthscan.Google Scholar
Phillips, C (2009) Empathy towards animals. In The Welfare of Animals, ed. Phillips, C. Animal Welfare, vol. 8, 4754. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M, Lee, NYP, Hötzel, MJ et al. (2022) International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 960379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M, Phillips, CJ (2017) The cross-cultural importance of animal protection and other world social issues. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30, 439455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, HR, Neumann, DL (2008) Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biological Psychology, 78(1), 6674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Amiot, CE, Bastian, B (2015) Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, B, Loughnan, S, Haslam, N, Radke, HJ (2012) Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AM (2014) The biology of the human–animal bond. Animal Frontiers, 4(3), 3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benningstad, NC, Kunst, JR (2020) Dissociating meat from its animal origins: A systematic literature review. Appetite, 147, 104554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilewicz, M, Imhoff, R, Drogosz, M (2011) The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 201209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratanova, B, Loughnan, S, Bastian, B (2011) The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(1), 193196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, ME, Hill, SE, Lord, CG (2012) Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 957960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caviola, L, Everett, JAC, Faber, NS (2019) The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 10111029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caviola, L, Kahane, G, Everett, JAC et al. (2021) Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(5), 10081039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dacey, M (2017) Anthropomorphism as cognitive bias. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 11521164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, FB (1999) Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: Consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27(1), 255280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhont, K, Hodson, G, Loughnan, S, Amiot, CE (2019) Rethinking human-animal relations: The critical role of social psychology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 769784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnthorsdottir, A (2001) Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 204215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, HA (2007) Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestermann, N, Le Yaouanq, Y, Treich, N (2017) Survey study on meat consumption and perceptions of animal welfare in France. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Ioannidou, M, Lesk, V, Stewart-Knox, B, Francis, KB (2023) Feeling morally troubled about meat, dairy, egg, and fish consumption: Dissonance reduction strategies among different dietary groups. Appetite, 190, 107024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaquet, F (2021) Speciesism and tribalism: Embarrassing origins. Philosophical Studies, 179, 933954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, M (2010) Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An Introduction to Carnism. Red Wheel.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F (2012) Critical anthropomorphism and animal ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 707720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, S, Piazza, J, Loughnan, S et al. (2022) Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds. Appetite, 171, 105935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, S, Sutton, R, Dhont, K, Douglas, K, Bergström, Z (2023) Are we smart enough to remember how smart animals are? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 10.1037/xge0001401.Google Scholar
Lobue, V, Bloom Pickard, M, Sherman, K, Axford, C, DeLoache, JS (2013) Young children’s interest in live animals. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 5769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loughnan, S, Haslam, N, Bastian, B (2010) The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55(1), 156159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morewedge, CK, Preston, J, Wegner, DM (2007) Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nozick, R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piazza, J, Ruby, MB, Loughnan, S et al. (2015) Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plous, S (1993) Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, H (2007) On the animal turn. Daedalus, 136(4), 118122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, J, Franks, B, Von Keyserlingk, MA (2018) “More than a feeling”: An empirical investigation of hedonistic accounts of animal welfare. PloS One, 13(3), e0193864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothgerber, H (2014) Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite, 79, 3241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothgerber, H (2020) Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schussler, EE, Olzak, LA (2008) It’s not easy being green: Student recall of plant and animal images. Journal of Biological Education, 42(3), 112119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serpell, JA, Paul, ES (1994) Pets and the development of positive attitudes to animals. In Animals and Human Society, eds. Manning, A and Paul, ES, 165182. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sevillano, V, Fiske, ST (2016) Warmth and competence in animals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(5), 276293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, F, Regolin, L, Bulf, H (2008) A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(2), 809813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P (1990) [1975] Animal Liberation: A New Ethics of Our Treatment of Animals. 2nd ed. Random House.Google Scholar
Stanton, RR (2021) The Disneyfication of Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, N, Signal, TD (2005) Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkenschuh, M, Hopwood, CJ, Dillard, C (2024) Personality aspects and attitudes about animal welfare legislation. Anthrozoös, 120.Google Scholar
Vezirian, K, Bègue, L, Bastian, B (2024) Mindless furry test-tubes: Categorizing animals as lab-subjects leads to their mind denial. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 114, 104629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, M, Caviola, L, Kahane, G, Bloom, P (2021) Children prioritize humans over animals less than adults do. Psychological Science, 32(1), 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bergstrom, T, Blume, L, Varian, H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T (1988) A simple model for merit good arguments. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 371383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, T (2006) Market failure for the treatment of animals. Society, 43(2), 3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, R, Treich, N (2023) Animal welfare as a public good. Ecological Economics, 216, 108025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leider, S, Möbius, MM, Rosenblat, T, Do, QA (2009) Directed altruism and enforced reciprocity in social networks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 18151851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, JL, Norwood, FB (2012) Speciesism, altruism and the economics of animal welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39, 189212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroyen, F (2005) An alternative way to model merit good arguments. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 957966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bénabou, R, Tirole, J (2002) Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperson, R, Gerster, A (2024) Willful ignorance and moral behavior, mimeo.Google Scholar
Hestermann, N, Le Yaouanq, Y, Treich, N (2020) An economic model of the meat paradox. European Economic Review, 129, 103569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Carlson, D, Haeder, S, Jenkins-Smith, H, Ripberger, J, Silva, C, Weimer, D (2019) Monetizing Bowser: A contingent valuation of the statistical value of dog life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 11(1), 131149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coate, S, Knight, B (2010) Pet overpopulation: An economic analysis. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1), Article 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, JB, Young, I, Lambert, K, Dysart, L, Nogueira Borden, L, Rajić, A (2014) A scoping review of published research on the relinquishment of companion animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17(3), 253273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einav, L, Finkelstein, A, Gupta, A (2017) Is American pet health care (also) uniquely inefficient? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endenburg, N, ‘t Hart, H, Bouw, J (1994) Motives for acquiring companion animals. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(1), 191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossin, J (1968) Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. Journal of Political Economy, 76(4, Part 1), 553568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, PM, Troyer, JL, Walker, JB (2007) Animal house: Economics of pets and the household. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimer, DL, Vining, AR (2024) Dog Economics: Perspectives on Our Canine Relationships. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anderson, E (1995) Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartling, B, Özdemir, Y (2023) The limits to moral erosion in markets: Social norms and the replacement excuse. Games and Economic Behavior, 138, 143160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T, Ghatak, M (2007) Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 16451663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, C (2019) Protecting Animals within and across Borders: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the Challenges of Globalization. Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, AL, Goulder, LH (2002) Environmental taxation and regulation. In Handbook of Public Economics, eds. Auerbach, AJ and Feldstein, M, Vol. 3, 14711545. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JM (1969) External diseconomies, corrective taxes, and market structure. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 174177.Google Scholar
Copeland, BR, Taylor, MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewatripont, M, Tirole, J (2024) The morality of markets. Journal of Political Economy, 132(8), 26552694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufwenberg, M, Heidhues, P, Kirchsteiger, G, Riedel, F, Sobel, J (2011) Other-regarding preferences in general equilibrium. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(2), 613639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, R, Treich, N (2023) Animal welfare as a public good. Ecological Economics, 216, 108025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A, Neuber, T, Szech, N (2020) Diffusion of being pivotal and immoral outcomes. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(5), 22052229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A, Szech, N (2013) Morals and markets. Science, 340(6133), 707711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, S, Wallenbeck, A, Agenäs, S, Hansson, H (2024) The impact of animal welfare regulations on pork trade: Evidence from European countries. Working Paper Series/Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics, (2024: 3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, J (Ed.) (2020) Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial. Sydney University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, CY., Lange, A, List, JA, Price, MK (2017) The business of business is business: Why (some) firms should provide public goods when they sell private goods (No. w23105). National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, RG, Lancaster, K (1956) The general theory of second best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, JL, Norwood, FB (2011) Animal welfare economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 33(4), 463483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T, Lusk, JL (2016) Putting the chicken before the egg price: An “ex post” analysis of California’s battery cage ban. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41(3), 518532.Google Scholar
McMullen, S (2015) Is capitalism to blame? Animal lives in the marketplace. Journal of Animal Ethics, 5(2), 126134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, S (2022) Competition, regulation, and the race to the bottom in animal agriculture. In Animals and Business Ethics, ed. Thomas, N, 113130. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, S, Peacock, J (2022) The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on animal welfare standards: Evidence from the cage-free egg industry. Available at SSRN 4219976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullally, C, Lusk, JL (2018) The impact of farm animal housing restrictions on egg prices, consumer welfare, and production in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(3), 649669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, SE, Vukina, T (2022) The price of cage‐free eggs: Social cost of Proposition 12 in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(4), 12931326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pi, L, Vukina, T (2025) Horizontal merger simulation in a Cournot oligopoly with competitive fringe: The US broiler industry case. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 107(3), 869887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponthiere, G, Stevens, N (2024) The morality of markets: A comment. Working paper.Google Scholar
Requate, T (2006) Environmental policy under imperfect competition. In The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, eds. Tietenberg, T and Folmer, H, 120207. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Sandel, MJ (2012) What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seibert, L, Norwood, FB (2011) Production costs and animal welfare for four stylized hog production systems. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14(1), 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, P, White, S (2015) The Impact of the World Trade Organisation Rules on Animal Welfare. Compassion in World Farming.Google Scholar
Xie, M (2023) Sales of cage-free eggs: The impact of proposition 12 on egg prices and consumer welfare in California. The Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research, 13(1), 11.Google Scholar
Ziegler, AG, Romagnoli, G, Offerman, T (2024) Morals in multi-unit markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(5), 22252260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Arpinon, T (2024) The social cost of adopting a plant-based diet. Ecological Economics, 224, 108283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, D (2006) Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 7695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beausoleil, NJ, Mellor, DJ, Baker, L et al. (2018) “Feelings and fitness” not “feelings or fitness” – the raison d’être of conservation welfare, which aligns conservation and animal welfare objectives. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belot, M, Berlin, N, James, J, Skafida, V (2018) The formation and malleability of dietary habits: A field experiment with low income families. Journal of Political Economy: Microeconomics, 2(4), 707746.Google Scholar
Bollard, L (2023a) A year of wins for farmed animals. Open Philanthropy farm animal welfare research newsletter.Google Scholar
Bollard, L (2023b) What could AI mean for animals? Open Philanthropy farm animal welfare research newsletter.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C, Bouamra-Mechemache, Z, Réquillart, V, Treich, N (2020) Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy, 97, 101847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briefer, EF, Sypherd, CCR, Linhart, P et al. (2022) Classification of pig calls produced from birth to slaughter according to their emotional valence and context of production. Scientific Reports, 12, 3409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camilleri, AR, Larrick, RP, Hossain, S, Patino-Echeverri, D (2019) Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 5358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaillé, C, Chen, DL, Van der Straeten, K (2024) Who cares? Measuring differences in preference intensity. Political Science Research and Methods, 13(2). 117.Google Scholar
Cowen, T (2003) Policing nature. Environmental Ethics, 25(2), 169182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, A, Fabre, A, Kruse, T et al. (2024) Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies. American Economic Review, 115(4), 12581300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delon, N, Purves, D (2018) Wild animal suffering is intractable. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31, 239260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F (2016) Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Epperson, R, Gerster, A (2024) Willful ignorance and moral behavior, mimeo.Google Scholar
Espinosa, R, Borau, S, Treich, N (2024) Impact of NGOs’ undercover videos on citizens’ emotions and pro-social behaviors. Scientific Reports, 14, 20584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinosa, R, Treich, N (2021) Moderate versus radical NGOs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(4), 14781501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, R, Treich, N (2024) Economics of animal law and welfare: Social objective and strategies. In Oxford Handbook of Global Animal Law, eds. Peters, Anne, Stilt, Kristen and Stucki, Saskia. Oxford University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M, Kramer, LA, Lacetera, N (2021) A tough nudge to crack: An experimental study on behavioral cues to reduce animal-based food consumption, mimeo.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R, Rodrik, D (1991) Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 11461155.Google Scholar
Frieden, J, Silve, A (2023) The political reception of innovations. Economics & Politics, 35(2), 595628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funke, F, Mattauch, L, Bijgaart, IVD et al. (2022) Toward optimal meat pricing: Is it time to tax meat consumption? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 16(2), 219240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagendorff, T, Bossert, LN, Tse, YF, Singer, P (2023) Speciesist bias in AI: How AI applications perpetuate discrimination and unfair outcomes against animals. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 717734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, ER, Gillogly, M, Bradford, BE (2021) Children are unsuspecting meat eaters: An opportunity to address climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haile, M, Jalil, A, Tasoff, J, Vargas Bustamante, A (2021) Changing hearts and plates: The effect of animal-advocacy pamphlets on meat consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 668674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, D, Hubbard, C (2013) Reconsidering the political economy of farm animal welfare: An anatomy of market failure. Food Policy, 38, 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, B, Thoni, C, Gachter, S (2008) Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 13621367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, PD, Dacey, A (2008) Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 579596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, K (2020) Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesternich, I, Siflinger, B, Smith, JP, Winter, JK (2015) Individual behaviour as a pathway between early-life shocks and adult health: Evidence from hunger episodes in post-war Germany. The Economic Journal, 125(588), F372F393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenert, D, Funke, F, Cai, M (2023) Meat taxes in Europe can be designed to avoid overburdening low-income consumers. Nature Food, 4(10), 894901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kortleve, AJ, Mogollón, JM, Harwatt, H, Behrens, P (2024) Over 80% of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy supports emissions-intensive animal products. Nature Food, 5(4), 288292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunst, JR, Haugestad, CAP (2018) The effects of dissociation on willingness to eat meat are moderated by exposure to unprocessed meat: A cross-cultural demonstration. Appetite, 120, 356366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, Y, Boaitey, A, Minegishi, K (2022) Behind the veil: Social desirability bias and animal welfare ballot initiatives. Food Policy, 106, 102184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Yaouanq, Y (2023) A model of voting with motivated beliefs. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 213, 394408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, BNJ, Vivalt, E (2018) Effective strategies for overcoming the naturalistic heuristic: Experimental evidence on consumer acceptance of “clean” meat, mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, KL, Roxburgh, S (2019) “If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me:” Anticipating vegan stigma as a barrier to plant-based diets. Appetite, 135, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matějka, F, Tabellini, G (2021) Electoral competition with rationally inattentive voters. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(3), 18991935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, MB, Peacock, J, Reichling, DB et al. (2021) Interventions to reduce meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: Meta-analysis and evidence-based recommendations. Appetite, 164, 105277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMullen, S (2022) Competition, regulation, and the race to the bottom in animal agriculture. In Animals and Business Ethics, ed. Thomas, N 113130. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechtenberg, L, Perino, G, Treich, N, Tyran, JR, Wang, S (2024) Self-signaling in voting. Journal of Public Economics, 231, 105070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, G, Schumacher, I (2020) The importance of considering optimal government policy when social norms matter for the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22(3), 630655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, JA, Monin, B (2012) Do-gooder derogation: Disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 200207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neethirajan, S (2021) The use of artificial intelligence in assessing affective states in livestock. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 715261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 15601563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyborg, K, Anderies, JM, Dannenberg, A et al. (2016) Social norms as solutions. Science, 354(6308), 4243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perino, G, Schwickert, H (2023) Animal welfare is a stronger determinant of public support for meat taxation than climate change mitigation in Germany. Nature Food, 4(2), 160169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinovitch, A, Myślińska-Szarek, K, Cantarero, K, Byrka, K (2024) Eating pigs, not Peppa Pig: The effect of identifiability on children’s propensity to humanize, befriend, and consume edible animals. Appetite, 200, 107505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramp, D, Bekoff, M (2015) Compassion as a practical and evolved ethic for conservation. BioScience, 65, 323327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randers, L, Thøgersen, J (2023) Meat, myself, and I: The role of multiple identities in meat consumption. Appetite, 180, 106319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, JA, Franks, B, Weary, DM, Von Keyserlingk, MA (2016) Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations. Food Policy, 61, 121125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, GO, Savulescu, J (2014) The ethics of producing in vitro meat. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31(2), 188202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwardmann, P, Van der Weele, J (2019) Deception and self-deception. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 10551061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekar, N, Shiller, D (2020) Engage with animal welfare in conservation. Science, 369, 629630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegrist, B, Sutterlin, B, Hartmann, C (2018) Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. Meat Science, 139, 213219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmonds, P, Vallgård, S (2021) “It’s not as simple as something like sugar”: Values and conflict in the UK meat tax debate. International Journal of Health Governance, 26(3), 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, DR (2013) Meatonomics: How the Rigged Economics of Meat and Dairy Make You Consume Too Much–and How To Eat Better, Live Longer, and Spend Smarter. Conari Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P, Tse, YF (2023) AI ethics: The case for including animals. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 539551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solda, A, Ke, C, Page, L, Von Hippel, W (2020) Strategically delusional. Experimental Economics, 23, 604631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeber, J, Dhont, K, Salmen, A (2024) Individual differences in effective animal advocacy: Moderating effects of gender identity and speciesism. Anthrozoös, 37(3), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treich, N (2021) Cultured meat: Promises and challenges. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79(1), 3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treich, N (2022) The Dasgupta Review and the problem of anthropocentrism. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(4), 973997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loo, EJ, Caputo, V, Lusk, JL (2020) Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? Food Policy, 95, 101931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loo, EJ, Caputo, V, Nayga, RM, Verbeke, W (2014) Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, D (2020) The ‘embarrassing’ endangered species act: Beyond collective rights for species. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 45, 1.Google Scholar
Weiler, AM, Zavitz, T (2024) Nothing to hide: How governments justify the adoption of ag‐gag laws. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 62(1), 7598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinrich, R, Strack, M, Neugebauer, F (2020) Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Germany. Meat Science, 162, 107924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynes, S, Nicholas, KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), 074024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaraska, M (2016) Meathooked: The History and Science of Our 2.5-million-year Obsession with Meat. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Indirect Approach
  • Nicolas Treich, Toulouse School of Economics and INRAE
  • Book: Animal Economics
  • Online publication: 18 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009699334.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Indirect Approach
  • Nicolas Treich, Toulouse School of Economics and INRAE
  • Book: Animal Economics
  • Online publication: 18 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009699334.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Indirect Approach
  • Nicolas Treich, Toulouse School of Economics and INRAE
  • Book: Animal Economics
  • Online publication: 18 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009699334.014
Available formats
×