Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T19:44:10.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material values past and present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Michael Vickers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The attitudes of the ancient Greeks towards their material culture—so far as we can discover from their writings—was rather different from that of most modern students of the remains of classical antiquity. The Greeks esteemed gold and silver vessels, while many archaeologists still believe that they preferred painted pottery. This reversal of classical values came about through the entry of Utopian ideals into the mainstream of classical scholarship in the 18th century. Laudable in themselves, these ideals have led to a serious misunderstanding of the role of ceramic in antiquity. Prices for painted pottery were extremely low and it can hardly have been the vehicle for what the Ancients would have considered to be ‘Art’. It is ironic that the classical tradition has been subverted by many of those charged with the scholarly interpretation of the classical past.

Information

Type
FOCUS—The Classical Heritage
Information
European Review , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 295 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Beazley, J. D. (1945) The Brygos Tomb at Capua. Am. J. Archaeology 49, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Conophagos, C. E. (1980) Le Laurium antique et la technique grecque de la production de l'argent Athens, 341–354.Google Scholar
3.Vickers, M. (1990) Golden Greece: relative values, minae and temple inventories. Am. J. Archaeology 94, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Vickers, M. (1992) The metrology of gold and silver plate in classical Greece. In The Economics of Cult in the Ancient Greek World, Boreas (Uppsala) 21 53–72.Google Scholar
5.Jones, A. H. M. (1957) Athenian Democracy Oxford, 79.Google Scholar
6.Green, T. (1985) The New World of Gold: The Inside Story of the Mines, the Markets, the Politics, the Investors, 2nd edn.London, 13.Google Scholar
7.Wolf, E. R. (1982) Europe and the People without History Berkeley and Los Angeles, 149–151, 333–336.Google Scholar
8.Mintz, S. W. (1985) Sweetness and Power: the Place Sugar in Modern History New York.Google Scholar
9.Spence, I. G. (1993) The Cavalry of Classical Greece: a Social and Military History Oxford, 180–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kurtz, D. C. (1988) Mistress and Maid. Annali del dipartimento di studi del mondo classico e del Mediterraneo antico del Istituto Universitario Orientate, Sezione di Archeologia e Storia Antica 10 (Naples) 146.Google Scholar
11. Information from David Gill.Google Scholar
12.Gill, D. W. J. (1991) Pots and Trade: Space-fillers or Objets d'art? J. Hellenic Studies 111, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Danov, C. and Ivanov, T. (1980) Antique Tombs in Bulgaria. Sophia, 35, 45, fig. 9.Google Scholar
14.Vickers, M., Allan, J. and Impey, O. (1986) From Silver to Ceramic Oxford, pl. 4.Google Scholar
15.Parker, R. (1983) Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford, 227.Google Scholar
16.Botticelli, S. (1482) Marriage Feast.Google Scholar
17.Brucker, G. A. (1983) Florence 1138–1737. London, 40.Google Scholar
18.Bloesch, H.-G. (1940) Formen attischer Schalen, von Exekias bis zum Ende des strengen Stils. Bern, passim.Google Scholar
19.Boardman, J. (1987) Silver is white. Revue Archéologique, 279–295.Google Scholar
20.Boardman, J. (1975) Athenian Red Figure Vases, the Archaic Period. London, 30.Google Scholar
21.Carter, P. A. (1977) The Creation of Tomorrow: Fifty Years of Magazine Science Fiction New York.Google Scholar
22.Heckscher, W. S. (1981) Pearls from a dung-heap: Andrea Alciati's ‘offensive’ emblem, ‘Adversus naturam peccantes’. In Art the Ape of Nature, H. W. Janson Festschrift, Marasch, M. and Sandler, C. F. (Eds) New York, 291–311.Google Scholar
23.Salter, S. (1982) The perils of being simple. New Scientist 25 February 495–497.Google Scholar
24. (1982) Coral Gables Junior Women's Club, The Children's Guide to Miami, 2nd edn.Coral Gables, Fla.Google Scholar
25.d'Hancarville, P. (1766 [1767]–76) Collection of Etruscan, Greek and Roman Antiquities from the Cabinet of the Hon. W. Hamilton, His Britannick Majesty's Envoy Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary at the Court of Naples (Naples).Google Scholar
26.Vickers, M. (1982) Value and simplicity: eighteenth century taste and the study of Greek vases. Past and Present 116, 98–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Gras, M. (1985) Trafics tyrrhéniens archaïques Rome514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. See the contributions in: (1994) Ceramics and Society: Making and Marketing Ancient Greek Pottery, Exhibition Catalogue, The Tampa Museum of Art, Russell, P. J. (Ed) Tampa, Fla.Google Scholar
29. Letter of 16 April 1986, deposited in the Beazley Archive at Oxford.Google Scholar