Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T09:24:55.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Reactance to Leader Moral Hypocrisy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2023

McKenzie R. Rees ,
Isaac H. Smith  and
Andrew T. Soderberg
McKenzie R. Rees
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, USA
Isaac H. Smith
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, USA
Andrew T. Soderberg
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on early work on ethical leadership, we argue that when leaders engage in leader moral hypocrisy (i.e., ethical promotion without ethical demonstration), followers can experience psychological reactance—a negative response to a perceived restriction of freedom—which can have negative downstream consequences. In a survey of employee–manager dyads (study 1), we demonstrate that leader moral hypocrisy is positively associated with follower psychological reactance, which increases follower deviance. In two subsequent laboratory experiments, we find similar patterns of results (study 2) and explore potential alternative mechanisms (study 3). We demonstrate in a final experiment with working adults that the relationship between leader moral hypocrisy and psychological reactance is partly explained by increased perceptions of a leader’s use of power (study 4). We discuss the implications of our findings and advocate for further understanding of the risks associated with psychological reactance in response to leaders and other workplace situations.

Keywords

leader moral hypocrisypsychological reactanceethical leadershipworkplace deviance

Information

Type
Article
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 2024 , pp. 634 - 661
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. 2005. Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3): 315–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. A. 1993. Affect and organizational behavior: When and why feeling good (or bad) matters. In Murningham, J. K. (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research: 63–88. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. 2016. A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139: 517–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. 2000. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3): 349–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bierstedt, R. 1950. An analysis of social power. American Sociological Review, 15(6): 730–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brehm, S. S. 1981. Psychological reactance and the attractiveness of unobtainable objects: Sex differences in children’s responses to an elimination of freedom. Sex Roles, 7: 937–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. 2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6): 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, J. T., Welsh, D. T., Baer, M. D., & Waldman, D. 2021. Discouraging unethicality versus encouraging ethicality: Unraveling the differential effects of prevention- and promotion-focused ethical leadership. Personnel Psychology, 74(1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. 1977. Self-awareness, perception of threat, and the expression of reactance through attitude change. Journal of Personality, 45(4): 501–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. L., & Rothstein, H. R. 2006. The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67: 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Hartog, D. N. 2015. Ethical leadership. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2: 409–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. 2006. Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3): 622–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. R. 1994. Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20(3): 683–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. 2004. Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23(1): 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Piccolo, R. F. 2015. When leaders fail to “walk the talk”: Supervisor undermining and perceptions of leader hypocrisy. Journal of Management, 41(3): 929–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinote, A. 2017. How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68: 353–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. 2013. Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2): 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hong, S. M., & Faedda, S. 1996. Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1): 173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppner, J. J., & Vadakkepatt, G. G. 2019. Examining moral authority in the marketplace: A conceptualization and framework. Journal of Business Research, 95: 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A. W., Minson, J., & Gino, F. 2017. It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3): 430–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isserow, J., & Klein, C. 2017. Hyprocrisy and moral authority. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 12(2): 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., Kayser, D. N., Zanna, M., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Frey, D. 2009. Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a “universal” freedom? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5): 1068–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. 2011. Ethical Leadership at Work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 22(1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., & Galinsky, A. D. 2016. To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4): 498–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. 2003. Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., and Quinn, R. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: 241–61. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 351–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. 2012. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1): 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, A. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2006. Self-determination theory and public policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25(1): 104–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooijman, M., Van Dijk, W. W., Van Dijk, E., & Ellemers, N. 2019. Leader power, power stability, and interpersonal trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. 2013. Changes in perceived supervisor embeddedness: Effects on employees’ embeddedness, organizational trust, and voice behavior. Personnel Psychology, 66(3): 645–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. 2015. Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3): 948–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavey, L., Churchill, S., & Sparks, P. 2022. Proscriptive injunctions can elicit greater reactance and lower legitimacy perceptions than prescriptive injunctions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(5): 676–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennebaker, J. W., & Sanders, D. Y. 1976. American graffiti: Effects of authority and reactance arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2(3): 264–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. 2006. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. 2010. The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2/3): 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., Dimotakis, N., & Peng, A. C. 2012. Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5): 1053–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidler, S., Edinger-Schons, L. M., Spanjol, J., & Wieseke, J. 2019. Scrooge posing as Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 157: 339–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. 2006. A skeptical look at dispositional reactance. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6): 1291–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & McLean-Parks, J. 2007. Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among Black and non-Black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3): 650–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, T., Leroy, H., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. 2015. How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132: 831–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, T., Tomlinson, E., & Leroy, H. 2012. Research on behavioral integrity: A promising construct for positive organizational scholarship. In Cameron, K. S. and Spreitzer, G. M. (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 325–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Brown, M. E. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 69–81.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4): 128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. 2008. The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5): 1334–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6): 1063–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, F. A. 1996. Sources of influence in moral thought: The new Moral Authority Scale. Journal of Moral Education, 25(4): 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiium, N., Aarø, L. E., & Hetland, J. 2009. Psychological reactance and adolescents’ attitudes toward tobacco-control measures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7): 1718–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. 1971. Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(3): 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. 2015. The bad boss takes it all: How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadership Quarterly, 26(5): 763–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar