Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T11:58:42.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The gender divide in issue attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Laura Chaqués‐Bonafont  and
Camilo Cristancho
Laura Chaqués‐Bonafont
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Universitat de Barcelona‐Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals, Spain
Camilo Cristancho
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the conditions under which female members of parliament (MPs) are more likely than male MPs to participate in political debates relating to a range of issues. Building on descriptive representation theory and parliamentary behaviour studies, we examine how the effect of the number of women in parliament, and women's access to leadership positions, on MPs’ issue attention varies across policy areas and parliamentary venues. Looking at oral questions asked by male and female MPs in plenary sessions and parliamentary committees in Spain from 1982 to 2018, we found that numbers and leadership positions significantly affect female MPs’ attention to those parliamentary activities that aim to highlight the merits of government action and in venues that are less open to public scrutiny. Our results also illustrate that the presence of women in parliament and their access to leadership positions have a significant impact on female MPs’ attention to rights‐ and welfare‐related issues, but not issues traditionally linked to high‐profile political areas such as national security, macroeconomic policy, and government affairs. The presence of women in parliaments has increased globally, but inequalities in the gender distribution of issue attention persist, thereby reducing the capacity of female MPs to act on behalf of and stand up for women in political debates on most issues.

Keywords

Political representationagenda settinggenderparliamentary behaviour

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 3 - 20
Copyright
© 2021 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Annesley, C., Engeli, I. & Gains, F. (2015). The profile of gender equality issue attention in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 54(3): 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annesley, C., Beckwith, K. & Franceschet, S. (2019). Cabinets, ministers, and gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M.L. (2020). Gender and policy agendas in the post‐war house. Policy Studies Journal 48(1): 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M.L. & Windett, J.H. (2019). Gender stereotypes and the policy priorities of women in congress. Political Behavior  41(3): 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, H. & Debus, M. (2019). When do women speak? A comparative analysis of the role of gender in legislative debates. Political Studies  67(3): 576–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, F., Kostelka, F. & Zilovic, M. (2020). 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey trend file. Version 1.0. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Barnes, T.D. & O'Brien, D.Z. (2018). Defending the realm: The appointment of female defense ministers worldwide. American Journal of Political Science  62(2): 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., Breunig, C. and Grossman, E. (eds) (2019). Comparative policy agendas: Theory, tools, data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenau, J. (2019). The effects of female leadership on women's voice in political debate. British Journal of Political Science 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000334.Google Scholar
Bratton, K. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Politics and Gender 1: 97–125.Google Scholar
Burns, N. & Gallagher, K. (2010). Public opinion on gender issues: The politics of equity and roles. Annual Review of Political Science  13: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. & Childs, S. (2008). Introduction: The descriptive and substantive representation of women: New directions. Parliamentary Affairs  61(3): 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. (2012). On substantive representation, diversity, and responsiveness. Politics & Gender  8(4): 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K., Childs, S. & Curtin, J. (2016). Specialised parliamentary bodies and the quality of women's substantive representation: A comparative analysis of Belgium, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs 69(4): 812–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaqués Bonafont, L., Palau, A. & Baumgartner, F. (2015). Agenda dynamics in Spain. London, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaqués Bonafont, L. & Palau, A.M. (2011). Assessing the responsiveness of Spanish policymakers to the priorities of their citizens. West European Politics  34(4): 706–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, R. & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica  72(5): 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. (2004). New labour's women MPs: Women representing women. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.W. & McCubbins, M.D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. house of representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1998). On democracy. London, UK: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11: 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, D. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender  2(4): 511.Google Scholar
Damgaard, E. (1995). How parties control committee members. In Döring, H (ed), Parliaments and majority rule in western Europe. Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim, pp. 308–325.Google Scholar
Darcy, R. (1996). Women in the state legislative power structure: Committee chairs. Social Science Quarterly  77(4): 888–898.Google Scholar
Delgado, I. (ed) (2012). Alcanzando el equilibrio. El acceso y la presencia de las mujeres en los parlamentos. Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanc.Google Scholar
Dingler, S.C., Kroeber, C. & Fortin‐Rittberger, J. (2019). Do parliaments underrepresent women's policy preferences? Exploring gender equality in policy congruence in 21 European democracies. Journal of European Public Policy  26(2): 302–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Döring, H. (ed) (1995). Parliaments and majority rule in western Europe. Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Escobar‐Lemmon, M. & Taylor‐Robinson, M.M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly  62(4): 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J.M. (2008). Gender quotas and women's substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender  4(3): 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Y. (2007). Gender and political representation: Current empirical perspectives. International Political Science Review 28(5): 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Y., Clavero, S. & Calloni, M. (2008). Gender politics and democracy in post‐socialist Europe. Leverkusen Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2015). The temporary importance of role models for women's political representation. American Journal of Political Science  59(4): 957–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, S. (2002). Does size matter? Critical mass and new Zealand's women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs 55: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R.M., Schwindt‐Bayer, L.A. & Taylor‐Robinson, M.M. (2005). Women on the sidelines: Women's representation on committees in Latin American legislatures. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 420–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M.P. (1997). Legislator gender and legislator policy priorities in the argentine chamber of deputies and the United States house of representatives. Policy Studies Journal  25(4): 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, M.L. (2010). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, M.L. & O'Brien, D.Z. (2012). All the president's men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. The Journal of Politics  74(3): 840–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, E. & Meier, P. (2016). The symbolic representation of gender: A discursive approach. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, J. (2001). Women and politics: Minority representation or critical mass? Parliamentary Affairs 54(4): 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminizing politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J. & Norris, P. (2003). Westminster women: The politics of presence. Political Studies 51(1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, J., Krook, M.L. & Squires, J. (2006). Western Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand: Gender quotas in the context of citizenship models. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo Diaz, M. (2005). Representing women?. Essex, UK: ECPR press.Google Scholar
Mattson, I. & Strøm, K. (1995). Parliamentary committees. In Döring, H (ed), Parliaments and majority rule in western Europe. Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim, pp.249–307.Google Scholar
Matland, R. & Studlar, D.T. (1996). The contagion of women candidates in single‐member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. The Journal of Politics 58(3): 707–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, P. (2004). The mutual contagion effect of legal and party quotas: A Belgian perspective. Party Politics 10(5): 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. (2014). Quotas for men: reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review 108(3): 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, N.D. & Rickne, J. (2016). Gender quotas and women's political leadership. American Political Science Review 110(1): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, T. & Mendez, J.M. (2010). Speaking as women: Women and floor speeches in the Senate. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy  31(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P., Kunovich, S. & Hughes, M.M. (2007). Gender in politics. Annual Review of Sociology 33(1): 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence: Issues in democracy and group representation. In Phillips, A. (ed), Oxford political theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H.F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, F. & Wiberg, M. (2010). Parliamentary questioning in 17 European parliaments: Some steps towards comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16(2): 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint‐Germain, M. (1989). Does their difference make a difference? The impact of women on public policy in Arizona legislature. Social Science Quarterly 70: 956–968.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2008). Representation and democracy: Revisions and possibilities. Sociology Compass  2(3): 1000–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt‐Bayer, L.A. & Mishler, W. (2005). An integrated model of women's representation. Journal of Politics 67: 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studlar, D.T. & Moncrief, G.F. (1999). Women's work? The distribution and prestige of portfolios in the Canadian provinces. Governance  12(4): 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor‐Robinson, M.M. & Heath, R.M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? Women & Politics 24(4): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v24n04_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative policies. The Journal of Politics 4: 958–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verge, T. (2008). Cuotas voluntarias y legales en España. La paridad a examen. Revista española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 123: 123–150.Google Scholar
Verge, T. & de laFuente, M. (2014). Playing with different cards: Party politics, gender quotas and women's empowerment. International Political Science Review 35(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, C., Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology 1(3‐4): 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, G., Celis, K., Kantola, J. & Weldon, L. (eds) (2013). The Oxford handbook of gender and politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chaqués-Bonafont and Cristancho supplementary material

Chaqués-Bonafont and Cristancho supplementary material
Download Chaqués-Bonafont and Cristancho supplementary material(File)
File 828.2 KB