Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T05:24:00.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glacial geology of Saalian relief around Midwolda, eastern Groningen, the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Sjoerd J. Kluiving*
Affiliation:
CLUE+/ Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, United Kingdom GEO-LOGICAL Earth Scientific Research & Consultancy, 2613 GN Delft, the Netherlands
Gerard Aalbersberg
Affiliation:
AGEA advies Archaeological and Earth Scientific research, 9968 AJ Pieterburen, the Netherlands / Terpencentrum, Groninger Instituut voor Archeologie, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Ronald T. van Balen
Affiliation:
Earth and Climate Cluster, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
Cornelis Kasse
Affiliation:
Earth and Climate Cluster, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: s.j.kluiving@vu.nl

Abstract

Due to canal-digging activities in 2011 and 2014, two small and one large temporary exposure, all ranging from 4 to 5 m in depth, were studied with respect to the sedimentology and structural geology, in the glacial ridge of Midwolda, Groningen, the Netherlands. The lowermost unit consists of clay of Elsterian age and is composed of glaciolacustrine and turbiditic deposits (Peelo Formation). These show synsedimentary deformations due to loading, as well as post-sedimentary Saalian glaciotectonic deformations, consisting of folding, and faulting structures. The overlying Saalian till sequence consists of two main units. The lower unit, with clear features of a subglacial deformation zone (e.g. lateral heterogeneity), has a local origin and strongly resembles the underlying Elsterian clay. Glacial tectonic and morphological observations indicate a primary NE–SW ice-flow direction. The second till layer has a sandy texture and high crystalline gravel content, while glacial-tectonic indicators point to a NW–SE ice-flow direction. The deformation of the till layers has caused a repetition and mixing of till layers, due to the last ice movement. The NW–SE ice movement is supported by the morphology as well as data from erratic gravel counts. Correlation with geological cross-sections strongly suggests regional subsurface control on ice-sheet behaviour.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Digital elevation map of the glacial landscape of eastern Groningen. The Midwolda ridge is located in the north, all other glacial ridges as red dashed lines. The map shows a dominant NE–SW orientation of the elongated relief next to irregular non-oriented relief forms in the NE and SW part of the map (www.ahn.nl/viewer).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) Simplified geological map of the NE Netherlands showing the main landscape units associated with the Saale glaciation. Red arrows indicate NNW–SSE orientation of Hondsrug ridges and Hunze valley (modified after De Mulder et al., 2003). (B) Geological map of the study area. The Midwolda ridge is marked with a black contour. (Source: DINOloket/De Mulder et al., 2003.)

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Map of study area showing the location of the 2011-1 (WP-1), 2011-3 (WP3) and 2014 trenches. The large 2014 trench is subdivided into ‘north 1’, ‘north 2’, ‘south 0’, ‘south 1’ and ‘south 2’ parts, of which the latter ‘south’ parts have been investigated in this study.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (A) Detail of glaciolacustrine clay in 2011 pit. The laminated clay is rotated (pushed) in vertical position. The individual layers show current ripples as well as discontinuities pointing to syn- or post-sedimentary deformation caused by rapid deposition and liquefaction of the sediment. Top of sequence is to the right. (B) Detail of section south 2 in the 2014 pit. Synclinal shape of glaciolacustrine deposits (units E) points to large-scale folding prior to till deposition (units D).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (A) 2011-3 exposure: grain-size, TGA and fine-gravel (2–4 mm fraction) analysis of samples MW 1.0–1.7 (from old to young). Subglacial till 1 has a higher quartz/crystalline ratio, than subglacial till 2 and intermediate layers. There is an increasing sand content going upwards from till 1 to till 2. Sample MW1.7 is a duplicate of MW1.5. Samples MW1.11–MW1.14 are duplicates (control samples) of samples MW1.2–1.5; all represented values are averages of the two samples. F/C = flint/crystalline ratio. (B) 2011-1 exposure: grain-size, TGA and fine-gravel analysis of samples MW2.1–2.3, 2.10-2–12, 2.14 in two separate sections. In both sections subglacial till 1 layer had a higher quartz/crystalline ratio than subglacial till 2. In both sections subglacial till layer 2 shows a (much) higher rest gravel content, higher F/C ratio and higher sand content than subglacial till layer 1. See (A) for legend.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (A) Lithostratigraphy of Elsterian (E), Saalian (S) and Weichselian (W) sediments of trench 2011-1. The Elsterian deposits (E1 and E3) have been pushed in almost vertical position. Subglacial tills 1 (S3 dark green) and 2 (S3 light green) are on top of each other, differing in a higher sand content of till 2 (S3 light green). (B) Lithostratigraphy of Elsterian (E), Saalian (S) and Weichselian (W) sediments of trench 2011-3. E1: clay; E2: slightly sandy clay. S6: vertical intrusion in a 3-D ball-shaped form (Fig. 10A); S1: lower till; S1a and S1b: intermediate deformed till layers (see Fig. 5A); S3: subglacial till layer 2 (with sandy sheath folds (S5)); W1b: discontinuous sand layers that are interpreted as Weichselian involutions. S3w: weathered upper part of the upper till.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (A) Lithostratigraphy and glaciotectonics of Elsterian sediments of trench 2014 south 2, detail 6. Synclinal structure with sandy clays (E1b) and sands (E1c) in the core of the structure. (B) Lithostratigraphy and glaciotectonics of Elsterian (units E) and sediments of trench 2014 south 2, detail 8: the layered units have a near-vertical attitude, caused by continuous compressional folding causing overprinted folding and attenuated layering.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (A) Glaciolacustrine clay with dark homogeneous clay layers (dark-coloured bands) showing a reverse fault in the centre of the photo, with fold axis orientation 130/64. (B) Glaciotectonic measurements in the glaciolacustrine clay as well as till layers plotted in rose diagrams: (i) strike-dip measurements on sedimentary bedding planes in the glaciolacustrine clay; (ii) strike-dip measurements on shear- and other fault planes in the glaciolacustrine clay and till layers; (iii) strike measurements on ice wedge structures; (iv) structural planes of the lower till; (v) fold axes of sheath folds of the upper till; (vi) strike measurements on ice wedge structures with diapirs.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. (A) Lithostratigraphy of trench 2011-1: Elsterian glaciolacustrine clay at the base with a ball shape of light-coloured silty clay that has been interpreted as an intrusion. The contact between the glaciolacustrine clay and the Saalian till is near the white bucket. Above the contact the lower ‘dark’ till is overlain by the upper iron-mottled ‘green’ till, that has been subdivided into multiple sublayers in this section.(B) Thin section of sample MS1 showing the boundary between the intrusion and the glaciolacustrine clay, showing a ‘zigzag’ geometry, implying faulting (Plane Light; for location see MS1 in Fig. 6B). (C) Thin section of sample S1-34 showing the boundary between the intrusion and glaciolacustrine clay (X POL Light). High birefringence (= difference in refractive index under microscope) is observed parallel to the faulted boundary intrusion, at right angles fitting in the ‘zigzag’ geometry, as well as in intermediate zones of low birefringence. Note also the corresponding rectangular pattern of micro-voids supporting the tectonic structure.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. (A) Sharp contact between lower till and (vertically) pushed glaciolacustrine clay below, showing folded nature of subglacial shear zone at the contact. (B) Thin section of sample MS-2 shows the shear zone between the lower till and the Elsterian displays (i) above a high birefringent matrix with sense of shear a continuous cleavage (s), cisaillement planes parallel to the shear zone boundary (c), and a spaced antithetic cleavage (c’) in a s–c–c’ shear zone (annotated, under crossed polarizers), and (ii) below image repeated without annotation (under crossed polarizers); see Figure 6A for sample location.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. (A) Medium-scale sheath fold structure within the upper till layer (2011-3 pit). Sheath fold structure has a sand lithology. (B) Detail of the characteristic ‘eye’ structure of fine-grained ‘loamy’ layering in the central part of the sheath fold structure (2011-3 pit). (C) Large-scale sheath fold structure in the upper till layer overprinted by a dark-grey type 2 intrusion in the lower left corner see also overview in (A). The centre bottom inset shows near-vertical layering in the ‘eye’ of the sheath fold; the right upper inset shows first phase of sheath folding of the sand in the upper till. (D) Schematic section showing upper till with large sheath fold (S5) consisting of sand lithology, overprinted by a younger intrusion (S6, 6a) that appears to originate from the basis of the sheath fold structure (2014 pit).

Figure 11

Table 1. Sequence of sedimentological and glacial events (n = 7) at the Midwolda glacial ridge as deduced from this study, showing event, (till) stratigraphy, gravel assemblage, stress type, main orientation of structures, and chronology. Till stratigraphy according to Rappol et al. (1991) and Zandstra (1983a,b).

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Overview of Regis II v2.2 cross-sections Finsterwolde–Winschoten (Fig 13A–C) and Hesemann countings of erratic boulders in the vicinity of the Midwolda ridge; X indicates location of exposure of the Oosterhout Formation.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. (A) D–D’ NE–SW cross-section shows ridge of Beerta with isolated plug of sandy Peelo Formation and Drente Formation (till) and the Westerlee–Heiligerlee ridge with thick isolated plug of sandy Peelo Formation. (B) A–A’ NE–SW cross-section shows Midwolda ridge with small isolated plug of sandy Peelo Formation covered with Drente Formation (till) sloping upwards to the SW. (C) G–G’ SE–NW cross-section shows Beerta and Midwolda ridges showing relatively steep slope on the SE part of the Peelo clay, as well as the shallow (5 m deep) basin between both ridges.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Structural and lithological map of Midwolda ridge showing lateral distribution of glacial tills as well as structural and lithological characteristics of Elsterian sand and clay.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Substrate-controlled glacial morphology reconstruction based on DEM and the results of this study. Zones with stiff and more competent layers in the subsurface show compressional pushed structures and are alternating with zones with an incompetent clay-rich substrate that show elongated isolated lineations all oriented towards a NE–SW ice-flow regime. The dashed lines represent the separation between the extensional and compressional zones. The short thick black arrows represent the direction of glaciotectonic shortening. The long black arrows represent elongated lineations like the Midwolda ridge. Superimposed, observed in the Midwolda ridge, are NW–SE lineations (red arrows) with associated till deposits that are classified as the Assen Group till (Rappol, 1987; Rappol et al., 1991) with an Eastern Baltic gravel assemblage.

Supplementary material: File

Kluiving et al. supplementary material

Kluiving et al. supplementary material

Download Kluiving et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.1 MB